Splinting in the Management of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Flexion Contracture
Proximal interphalangeal (PIP) flexion contracture is a common complication following hand injuries and conditions. This study investigated the treatment outcome of 20 subjects with PIP flexion contracture who followed a dynamic splinting program using either a Capener or low-profile outrigger. The...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of hand therapy 1996-10, Vol.9 (4), p.378-386 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 386 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 378 |
container_title | Journal of hand therapy |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Prosser, Rosemary |
description | Proximal interphalangeal (PIP) flexion contracture is a common complication following hand injuries and conditions. This study investigated the treatment outcome of 20 subjects with PIP flexion contracture who followed a dynamic splinting program using either a Capener or low-profile outrigger. The splint applied a 250-g force to the distal end of the middle phalanx. Each patient was instructed to wear the splint for 8 to 12 hours per 24 hours for 8 weeks followed by a 2- to 3-week weaning period. Passive extension was evaluated objectively using torque range-of-motion measurement. The average pretreatment flexion contracture was 39°. Final extension deficit averaged 21°, an improvement of 18°. There was no statistically significant effect on final results based on joint stiffness (as expressed by the slopes of the torque angle curves). Total end-range time (TERT) averaged 10 hours per 24 hours, for an average period of 4.3 months. Statistical analysis showed that splinting time was the only statistically significant factor affecting outcome. The correlation coefficients showed that the longer the contracture was present, the stiffer the joint and the less the contracture resolved. Dynamic splinting was an effective form of treatment for PIP flexion contracture. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0894-1130(96)80045-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78657829</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0894113096800457</els_id><sourcerecordid>78657829</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-9d155f827135b3398c7f989bc2bf464b56b38c286ac157f2ed51ea9f4e34cb193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMlOwzAQhi0EgrI8QqWcEBwCdhwn9gmhilUgQIDEzXKcSWuU2sV2Ebw97qJeOc2M5v9n-RAaEnxGMKnOXzEXZU4IxSeiOuUYlyyvt9CAsJSk6mMbDTaSPbQfwifGhBW43kW7XIgSk3KAXl5nvbHR2HFmbBYnkD0qq8YwBRsz12XP3v2YqeqzOxvBzyaqV3YMqb53yZZd9_BjnM1GzkavdJx7OEQ7neoDHK3jAXq_vnob3eYPTzd3o8uHXFNBYy5awljHi5pQ1lAquK47wUWji6Yrq7JhVUO5LnilNGF1V0DLCCjRlUBL3RBBD9Dxau7Mu685hCinJmjo04Hg5kHWvGI1LxZCthJq70Lw0MmZTy_5X0mwXKCUS5RywUmKSi5Ryjr5husF82YK7ca1Zpf6F6s-pC-_DXgZtAGroTUedJStM_9s-AOe9IOv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78657829</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Splinting in the Management of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Flexion Contracture</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Prosser, Rosemary</creator><creatorcontrib>Prosser, Rosemary</creatorcontrib><description>Proximal interphalangeal (PIP) flexion contracture is a common complication following hand injuries and conditions. This study investigated the treatment outcome of 20 subjects with PIP flexion contracture who followed a dynamic splinting program using either a Capener or low-profile outrigger. The splint applied a 250-g force to the distal end of the middle phalanx. Each patient was instructed to wear the splint for 8 to 12 hours per 24 hours for 8 weeks followed by a 2- to 3-week weaning period. Passive extension was evaluated objectively using torque range-of-motion measurement. The average pretreatment flexion contracture was 39°. Final extension deficit averaged 21°, an improvement of 18°. There was no statistically significant effect on final results based on joint stiffness (as expressed by the slopes of the torque angle curves). Total end-range time (TERT) averaged 10 hours per 24 hours, for an average period of 4.3 months. Statistical analysis showed that splinting time was the only statistically significant factor affecting outcome. The correlation coefficients showed that the longer the contracture was present, the stiffer the joint and the less the contracture resolved. Dynamic splinting was an effective form of treatment for PIP flexion contracture.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-1130</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-004X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0894-1130(96)80045-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8994014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Contracture - rehabilitation ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Metacarpophalangeal Joint - injuries ; Multivariate Analysis ; Patient Compliance ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Splints ; Tendon Injuries - rehabilitation ; Tendons ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of hand therapy, 1996-10, Vol.9 (4), p.378-386</ispartof><rights>1996 Hanley & Belfus, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-9d155f827135b3398c7f989bc2bf464b56b38c286ac157f2ed51ea9f4e34cb193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-9d155f827135b3398c7f989bc2bf464b56b38c286ac157f2ed51ea9f4e34cb193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0894113096800457$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8994014$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prosser, Rosemary</creatorcontrib><title>Splinting in the Management of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Flexion Contracture</title><title>Journal of hand therapy</title><addtitle>J Hand Ther</addtitle><description>Proximal interphalangeal (PIP) flexion contracture is a common complication following hand injuries and conditions. This study investigated the treatment outcome of 20 subjects with PIP flexion contracture who followed a dynamic splinting program using either a Capener or low-profile outrigger. The splint applied a 250-g force to the distal end of the middle phalanx. Each patient was instructed to wear the splint for 8 to 12 hours per 24 hours for 8 weeks followed by a 2- to 3-week weaning period. Passive extension was evaluated objectively using torque range-of-motion measurement. The average pretreatment flexion contracture was 39°. Final extension deficit averaged 21°, an improvement of 18°. There was no statistically significant effect on final results based on joint stiffness (as expressed by the slopes of the torque angle curves). Total end-range time (TERT) averaged 10 hours per 24 hours, for an average period of 4.3 months. Statistical analysis showed that splinting time was the only statistically significant factor affecting outcome. The correlation coefficients showed that the longer the contracture was present, the stiffer the joint and the less the contracture resolved. Dynamic splinting was an effective form of treatment for PIP flexion contracture.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Contracture - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metacarpophalangeal Joint - injuries</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Patient Compliance</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Splints</subject><subject>Tendon Injuries - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Tendons</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0894-1130</issn><issn>1545-004X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMlOwzAQhi0EgrI8QqWcEBwCdhwn9gmhilUgQIDEzXKcSWuU2sV2Ebw97qJeOc2M5v9n-RAaEnxGMKnOXzEXZU4IxSeiOuUYlyyvt9CAsJSk6mMbDTaSPbQfwifGhBW43kW7XIgSk3KAXl5nvbHR2HFmbBYnkD0qq8YwBRsz12XP3v2YqeqzOxvBzyaqV3YMqb53yZZd9_BjnM1GzkavdJx7OEQ7neoDHK3jAXq_vnob3eYPTzd3o8uHXFNBYy5awljHi5pQ1lAquK47wUWji6Yrq7JhVUO5LnilNGF1V0DLCCjRlUBL3RBBD9Dxau7Mu685hCinJmjo04Hg5kHWvGI1LxZCthJq70Lw0MmZTy_5X0mwXKCUS5RywUmKSi5Ryjr5husF82YK7ca1Zpf6F6s-pC-_DXgZtAGroTUedJStM_9s-AOe9IOv</recordid><startdate>199610</startdate><enddate>199610</enddate><creator>Prosser, Rosemary</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199610</creationdate><title>Splinting in the Management of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Flexion Contracture</title><author>Prosser, Rosemary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-9d155f827135b3398c7f989bc2bf464b56b38c286ac157f2ed51ea9f4e34cb193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Contracture - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metacarpophalangeal Joint - injuries</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Patient Compliance</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Splints</topic><topic>Tendon Injuries - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Tendons</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prosser, Rosemary</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of hand therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prosser, Rosemary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Splinting in the Management of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Flexion Contracture</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hand therapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Hand Ther</addtitle><date>1996-10</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>378</spage><epage>386</epage><pages>378-386</pages><issn>0894-1130</issn><eissn>1545-004X</eissn><abstract>Proximal interphalangeal (PIP) flexion contracture is a common complication following hand injuries and conditions. This study investigated the treatment outcome of 20 subjects with PIP flexion contracture who followed a dynamic splinting program using either a Capener or low-profile outrigger. The splint applied a 250-g force to the distal end of the middle phalanx. Each patient was instructed to wear the splint for 8 to 12 hours per 24 hours for 8 weeks followed by a 2- to 3-week weaning period. Passive extension was evaluated objectively using torque range-of-motion measurement. The average pretreatment flexion contracture was 39°. Final extension deficit averaged 21°, an improvement of 18°. There was no statistically significant effect on final results based on joint stiffness (as expressed by the slopes of the torque angle curves). Total end-range time (TERT) averaged 10 hours per 24 hours, for an average period of 4.3 months. Statistical analysis showed that splinting time was the only statistically significant factor affecting outcome. The correlation coefficients showed that the longer the contracture was present, the stiffer the joint and the less the contracture resolved. Dynamic splinting was an effective form of treatment for PIP flexion contracture.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>8994014</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0894-1130(96)80045-7</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0894-1130 |
ispartof | Journal of hand therapy, 1996-10, Vol.9 (4), p.378-386 |
issn | 0894-1130 1545-004X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78657829 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Biomechanical Phenomena Contracture - rehabilitation Female Humans Male Metacarpophalangeal Joint - injuries Multivariate Analysis Patient Compliance Range of Motion, Articular Splints Tendon Injuries - rehabilitation Tendons Time Factors |
title | Splinting in the Management of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Flexion Contracture |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T00%3A45%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Splinting%20in%20the%20Management%20of%20Proximal%20Interphalangeal%20Joint%20Flexion%20Contracture&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hand%20therapy&rft.au=Prosser,%20Rosemary&rft.date=1996-10&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=378&rft.epage=386&rft.pages=378-386&rft.issn=0894-1130&rft.eissn=1545-004X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0894-1130(96)80045-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78657829%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78657829&rft_id=info:pmid/8994014&rft_els_id=S0894113096800457&rfr_iscdi=true |