Hummingbird hovering performance in hyperoxic heliox: effects of body mass and sex
Owing to their small size and hovering locomotion, hummingbirds are the most aerobically active vertebrate endotherms. Can hyperoxia enhance the flight performance of this highly oxygen-dependent group? Hovering performance of ruby-throated hummingbirds (Archilochus colubris) was manipulated non-inv...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental biology 1996-12, Vol.199 (Pt 12), p.2745-2755 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2755 |
---|---|
container_issue | Pt 12 |
container_start_page | 2745 |
container_title | Journal of experimental biology |
container_volume | 199 |
creator | Chai, P Harrykissoon, R Dudley, R |
description | Owing to their small size and hovering locomotion, hummingbirds are the most aerobically active vertebrate endotherms. Can hyperoxia enhance the flight performance of this highly oxygen-dependent group? Hovering performance of ruby-throated hummingbirds (Archilochus colubris) was manipulated non-invasively using hyperoxic but hypodense gas mixtures of sea-level air combined with heliox containing 35% O2. This manipulation sheds light on the interplay among metabolic power input, mechanical power output and aerodynamic force production in limiting flight performance. No significant differences in flight mechanics and oxygen consumption were identified between hyperoxic and normoxic conditions. Thus, at least in the present experimental context, hyperoxia did not change the major metabolic and mechanical parameters; O2 diffusive capacities of the respiratory system were probably not limiting to a significant extent. Compared with hummingbirds in our previous studies, the present experimental birds were heavier, had resultant shorter hover-feeding durations and experienced aerodynamic failure at higher air densities. Because hummingbirds have relatively stable wingbeat frequencies, modulation of power output was attained primarily through variation in stroke amplitude up to near 180 degrees. This result indicates that maximum hovering performance was constrained geometrically and that heavier birds with greater fat loads had less margin for enhancement of power production. Sexual dimorphism in flight adaptation also played a role, with males showing more limited hovering capacities, presumably as a trade-off for increased maneuverability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1242/jeb.199.12.2745 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78632232</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78632232</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-fed1ddc82de820d261d0dc3542a1ca937fa64a71d6b5333be9e81e0ed185ed073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMotVbPnoTgwdu2-drNxpsUtUJBED2HbDJrt-xuatKV9t8bafHgXIZ3eGYYHoSuKZlSJthsDdWUKpXClEmRn6AxFVJmior8FI0JYSwjSqhzdBHjmqQqcjFCI0UpUbkco7fF0HVN_1k1weGV_4aQAt5AqH3oTG8BNz1e7dPA7xqLV9A2fnePoa7BbiP2Na682-POxIhN73CE3SU6q00b4erYJ-jj6fF9vsiWr88v84dlZgXj26wGR52zJXNQMuJYQR1xlueCGWqN4rI2hTCSuqLKOecVKCgpkLRV5uCI5BN0d7i7Cf5rgLjVXRMttK3pwQ9Ry7LgjHGWwNt_4NoPoU-_acYJZ0QWPEGzA2SDjzFArTeh6UzYa0r0r2qdVOukOgX9qzpt3BzPDlUH7o8_uuU_hOx6UQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230320763</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hummingbird hovering performance in hyperoxic heliox: effects of body mass and sex</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Company of Biologists</source><creator>Chai, P ; Harrykissoon, R ; Dudley, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Chai, P ; Harrykissoon, R ; Dudley, R</creatorcontrib><description>Owing to their small size and hovering locomotion, hummingbirds are the most aerobically active vertebrate endotherms. Can hyperoxia enhance the flight performance of this highly oxygen-dependent group? Hovering performance of ruby-throated hummingbirds (Archilochus colubris) was manipulated non-invasively using hyperoxic but hypodense gas mixtures of sea-level air combined with heliox containing 35% O2. This manipulation sheds light on the interplay among metabolic power input, mechanical power output and aerodynamic force production in limiting flight performance. No significant differences in flight mechanics and oxygen consumption were identified between hyperoxic and normoxic conditions. Thus, at least in the present experimental context, hyperoxia did not change the major metabolic and mechanical parameters; O2 diffusive capacities of the respiratory system were probably not limiting to a significant extent. Compared with hummingbirds in our previous studies, the present experimental birds were heavier, had resultant shorter hover-feeding durations and experienced aerodynamic failure at higher air densities. Because hummingbirds have relatively stable wingbeat frequencies, modulation of power output was attained primarily through variation in stroke amplitude up to near 180 degrees. This result indicates that maximum hovering performance was constrained geometrically and that heavier birds with greater fat loads had less margin for enhancement of power production. Sexual dimorphism in flight adaptation also played a role, with males showing more limited hovering capacities, presumably as a trade-off for increased maneuverability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0949</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-9145</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1242/jeb.199.12.2745</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9110957</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEBIAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Company of Biologists Ltd</publisher><subject>Adipose Tissue ; Animals ; Birds ; Birds - physiology ; Body Composition ; Body Weight ; Female ; Flight, Animal - physiology ; Helium ; Kinetics ; Male ; Muscles ; Oxygen - administration & dosage ; Sex Characteristics</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental biology, 1996-12, Vol.199 (Pt 12), p.2745-2755</ispartof><rights>Copyright Company of Biologists Limited, Department of Zoology Dec 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-fed1ddc82de820d261d0dc3542a1ca937fa64a71d6b5333be9e81e0ed185ed073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-fed1ddc82de820d261d0dc3542a1ca937fa64a71d6b5333be9e81e0ed185ed073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3678,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9110957$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chai, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrykissoon, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dudley, R</creatorcontrib><title>Hummingbird hovering performance in hyperoxic heliox: effects of body mass and sex</title><title>Journal of experimental biology</title><addtitle>J Exp Biol</addtitle><description>Owing to their small size and hovering locomotion, hummingbirds are the most aerobically active vertebrate endotherms. Can hyperoxia enhance the flight performance of this highly oxygen-dependent group? Hovering performance of ruby-throated hummingbirds (Archilochus colubris) was manipulated non-invasively using hyperoxic but hypodense gas mixtures of sea-level air combined with heliox containing 35% O2. This manipulation sheds light on the interplay among metabolic power input, mechanical power output and aerodynamic force production in limiting flight performance. No significant differences in flight mechanics and oxygen consumption were identified between hyperoxic and normoxic conditions. Thus, at least in the present experimental context, hyperoxia did not change the major metabolic and mechanical parameters; O2 diffusive capacities of the respiratory system were probably not limiting to a significant extent. Compared with hummingbirds in our previous studies, the present experimental birds were heavier, had resultant shorter hover-feeding durations and experienced aerodynamic failure at higher air densities. Because hummingbirds have relatively stable wingbeat frequencies, modulation of power output was attained primarily through variation in stroke amplitude up to near 180 degrees. This result indicates that maximum hovering performance was constrained geometrically and that heavier birds with greater fat loads had less margin for enhancement of power production. Sexual dimorphism in flight adaptation also played a role, with males showing more limited hovering capacities, presumably as a trade-off for increased maneuverability.</description><subject>Adipose Tissue</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Birds - physiology</subject><subject>Body Composition</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Flight, Animal - physiology</subject><subject>Helium</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Oxygen - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><issn>0022-0949</issn><issn>1477-9145</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMotVbPnoTgwdu2-drNxpsUtUJBED2HbDJrt-xuatKV9t8bafHgXIZ3eGYYHoSuKZlSJthsDdWUKpXClEmRn6AxFVJmior8FI0JYSwjSqhzdBHjmqQqcjFCI0UpUbkco7fF0HVN_1k1weGV_4aQAt5AqH3oTG8BNz1e7dPA7xqLV9A2fnePoa7BbiP2Na682-POxIhN73CE3SU6q00b4erYJ-jj6fF9vsiWr88v84dlZgXj26wGR52zJXNQMuJYQR1xlueCGWqN4rI2hTCSuqLKOecVKCgpkLRV5uCI5BN0d7i7Cf5rgLjVXRMttK3pwQ9Ry7LgjHGWwNt_4NoPoU-_acYJZ0QWPEGzA2SDjzFArTeh6UzYa0r0r2qdVOukOgX9qzpt3BzPDlUH7o8_uuU_hOx6UQ</recordid><startdate>19961201</startdate><enddate>19961201</enddate><creator>Chai, P</creator><creator>Harrykissoon, R</creator><creator>Dudley, R</creator><general>The Company of Biologists Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19961201</creationdate><title>Hummingbird hovering performance in hyperoxic heliox: effects of body mass and sex</title><author>Chai, P ; Harrykissoon, R ; Dudley, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-fed1ddc82de820d261d0dc3542a1ca937fa64a71d6b5333be9e81e0ed185ed073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adipose Tissue</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Birds - physiology</topic><topic>Body Composition</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Flight, Animal - physiology</topic><topic>Helium</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Oxygen - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chai, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrykissoon, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dudley, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chai, P</au><au>Harrykissoon, R</au><au>Dudley, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hummingbird hovering performance in hyperoxic heliox: effects of body mass and sex</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Biol</addtitle><date>1996-12-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>199</volume><issue>Pt 12</issue><spage>2745</spage><epage>2755</epage><pages>2745-2755</pages><issn>0022-0949</issn><eissn>1477-9145</eissn><coden>JEBIAM</coden><abstract>Owing to their small size and hovering locomotion, hummingbirds are the most aerobically active vertebrate endotherms. Can hyperoxia enhance the flight performance of this highly oxygen-dependent group? Hovering performance of ruby-throated hummingbirds (Archilochus colubris) was manipulated non-invasively using hyperoxic but hypodense gas mixtures of sea-level air combined with heliox containing 35% O2. This manipulation sheds light on the interplay among metabolic power input, mechanical power output and aerodynamic force production in limiting flight performance. No significant differences in flight mechanics and oxygen consumption were identified between hyperoxic and normoxic conditions. Thus, at least in the present experimental context, hyperoxia did not change the major metabolic and mechanical parameters; O2 diffusive capacities of the respiratory system were probably not limiting to a significant extent. Compared with hummingbirds in our previous studies, the present experimental birds were heavier, had resultant shorter hover-feeding durations and experienced aerodynamic failure at higher air densities. Because hummingbirds have relatively stable wingbeat frequencies, modulation of power output was attained primarily through variation in stroke amplitude up to near 180 degrees. This result indicates that maximum hovering performance was constrained geometrically and that heavier birds with greater fat loads had less margin for enhancement of power production. Sexual dimorphism in flight adaptation also played a role, with males showing more limited hovering capacities, presumably as a trade-off for increased maneuverability.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Company of Biologists Ltd</pub><pmid>9110957</pmid><doi>10.1242/jeb.199.12.2745</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0949 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental biology, 1996-12, Vol.199 (Pt 12), p.2745-2755 |
issn | 0022-0949 1477-9145 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78632232 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Company of Biologists |
subjects | Adipose Tissue Animals Birds Birds - physiology Body Composition Body Weight Female Flight, Animal - physiology Helium Kinetics Male Muscles Oxygen - administration & dosage Sex Characteristics |
title | Hummingbird hovering performance in hyperoxic heliox: effects of body mass and sex |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T17%3A52%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hummingbird%20hovering%20performance%20in%20hyperoxic%20heliox:%20effects%20of%20body%20mass%20and%20sex&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20biology&rft.au=Chai,%20P&rft.date=1996-12-01&rft.volume=199&rft.issue=Pt%2012&rft.spage=2745&rft.epage=2755&rft.pages=2745-2755&rft.issn=0022-0949&rft.eissn=1477-9145&rft.coden=JEBIAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1242/jeb.199.12.2745&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78632232%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230320763&rft_id=info:pmid/9110957&rfr_iscdi=true |