MR lesion detection in a breast cancer population
Implementation of MR imaging of the breast as an extension of the existing imaging modalities in the diagnosis of breast cancer was evaluated in a university cancer center. MR imaging of the breast was performed in 54 patients, in whom the MR results were compared with the triple test (the combinati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 1996-11, Vol.6 (6), p.849-854 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 854 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 849 |
container_title | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Obdeijn, Inge-Marie A. Kuijpers, Theodore J. A. van Dijk, Pieter Wiggers, Theodore Oudkerk, Matthijs |
description | Implementation of MR imaging of the breast as an extension of the existing imaging modalities in the diagnosis of breast cancer was evaluated in a university cancer center. MR imaging of the breast was performed in 54 patients, in whom the MR results were compared with the triple test (the combination of clinical examination, mammographic evaluation, and cytology) and the final histological diagnosis. MR imaging of the breast depicted 30 of the 33 malignancies (sensitivity, 91%). In two of the malignancies, the carcinoma was clinically and mammographically occult. For the three patients with a false‐negative MRI diagnosis, the conventional mammography showed suspicious clustered microcalcifications as a sign of in situ carcinoma. For seven patients, MR imaging of the breast incorrectly suggested the presence of a malignant lesion (specificity, 67%). To improve MR specificity, we perform MR‐guided ultrasonographic fine‐needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). Although MR imaging of the breast is a highly sensitive examination, conventional x‐ray mammography remains the most efficient imaging modality in the diagnosis of breast cancer. In our patient population, MR imaging of the breast had additional value for women with mammographically dense breast tissue and especially for patients with clinical evidence of breast carcinoma that could not be detected with conventional diagnostic methods. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jmri.1880060602 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78613965</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78613965</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3822-27a64f9e9ac3c1efb3e80e51c49394aa9faf6fa31d8bfe60f8a364748cbc8b113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9LwzAUx4Moc07PnoSevHVLmjZN8KTDzek2YSoeQ5q9QGfX1qRF99_b0jHxJO_wHnx_8PggdEnwkGAcjDZbmw4J5xizZoIj1CdREPhBxNlxc-OI-oTj-BSdObfBGAsRRj3U4yJiJIj7iCxWXgYuLXJvDRXoqr3S3FNeYkG5ytMq12C9sijrTLXqOToxKnNwsd8D9Da5fx0_-PPn6Wx8O_c15e0HsWKhESCUppqASShwDBHRoaAiVEoYZZhRlKx5YoBhwxVlYRxynWieEEIH6LrrLW3xWYOr5DZ1GrJM5VDUTsacESpY1BhHnVHbwjkLRpY23Sq7kwTLFpJsIclfSE3ial9dJ1tYH_x7Ko1-0-lfaQa7_-rk42I1-9Pud-nUVfB9SCv7IVlM40i-L6cST54m4mU5kXf0B9BHgvs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78613965</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MR lesion detection in a breast cancer population</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Obdeijn, Inge-Marie A. ; Kuijpers, Theodore J. A. ; van Dijk, Pieter ; Wiggers, Theodore ; Oudkerk, Matthijs</creator><creatorcontrib>Obdeijn, Inge-Marie A. ; Kuijpers, Theodore J. A. ; van Dijk, Pieter ; Wiggers, Theodore ; Oudkerk, Matthijs</creatorcontrib><description>Implementation of MR imaging of the breast as an extension of the existing imaging modalities in the diagnosis of breast cancer was evaluated in a university cancer center. MR imaging of the breast was performed in 54 patients, in whom the MR results were compared with the triple test (the combination of clinical examination, mammographic evaluation, and cytology) and the final histological diagnosis. MR imaging of the breast depicted 30 of the 33 malignancies (sensitivity, 91%). In two of the malignancies, the carcinoma was clinically and mammographically occult. For the three patients with a false‐negative MRI diagnosis, the conventional mammography showed suspicious clustered microcalcifications as a sign of in situ carcinoma. For seven patients, MR imaging of the breast incorrectly suggested the presence of a malignant lesion (specificity, 67%). To improve MR specificity, we perform MR‐guided ultrasonographic fine‐needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). Although MR imaging of the breast is a highly sensitive examination, conventional x‐ray mammography remains the most efficient imaging modality in the diagnosis of breast cancer. In our patient population, MR imaging of the breast had additional value for women with mammographically dense breast tissue and especially for patients with clinical evidence of breast carcinoma that could not be detected with conventional diagnostic methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-1807</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880060602</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8956127</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis ; Biopsy, Needle ; Breast - pathology ; Breast carcinoma ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Carcinoma in Situ - diagnosis ; Contrast Media ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Female ; Gadolinium ; Gadolinium DTPA ; Humans ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Mammography ; MR imaging of the breast ; MRI-guided ultrasonography ; Occult breast carcinoma ; Organometallic Compounds ; Pentetic Acid - analogs & derivatives ; Prospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Triple test ; Ultrasonography, Mammary</subject><ispartof>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 1996-11, Vol.6 (6), p.849-854</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1996 Wiley‐Liss, Inc., A Wiley Company</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3822-27a64f9e9ac3c1efb3e80e51c49394aa9faf6fa31d8bfe60f8a364748cbc8b113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3822-27a64f9e9ac3c1efb3e80e51c49394aa9faf6fa31d8bfe60f8a364748cbc8b113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjmri.1880060602$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjmri.1880060602$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8956127$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Obdeijn, Inge-Marie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuijpers, Theodore J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Dijk, Pieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiggers, Theodore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oudkerk, Matthijs</creatorcontrib><title>MR lesion detection in a breast cancer population</title><title>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</title><addtitle>J. Magn. Reson. Imaging</addtitle><description>Implementation of MR imaging of the breast as an extension of the existing imaging modalities in the diagnosis of breast cancer was evaluated in a university cancer center. MR imaging of the breast was performed in 54 patients, in whom the MR results were compared with the triple test (the combination of clinical examination, mammographic evaluation, and cytology) and the final histological diagnosis. MR imaging of the breast depicted 30 of the 33 malignancies (sensitivity, 91%). In two of the malignancies, the carcinoma was clinically and mammographically occult. For the three patients with a false‐negative MRI diagnosis, the conventional mammography showed suspicious clustered microcalcifications as a sign of in situ carcinoma. For seven patients, MR imaging of the breast incorrectly suggested the presence of a malignant lesion (specificity, 67%). To improve MR specificity, we perform MR‐guided ultrasonographic fine‐needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). Although MR imaging of the breast is a highly sensitive examination, conventional x‐ray mammography remains the most efficient imaging modality in the diagnosis of breast cancer. In our patient population, MR imaging of the breast had additional value for women with mammographically dense breast tissue and especially for patients with clinical evidence of breast carcinoma that could not be detected with conventional diagnostic methods.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Biopsy, Needle</subject><subject>Breast - pathology</subject><subject>Breast carcinoma</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carcinoma in Situ - diagnosis</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gadolinium</subject><subject>Gadolinium DTPA</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>MR imaging of the breast</subject><subject>MRI-guided ultrasonography</subject><subject>Occult breast carcinoma</subject><subject>Organometallic Compounds</subject><subject>Pentetic Acid - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Triple test</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Mammary</subject><issn>1053-1807</issn><issn>1522-2586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM9LwzAUx4Moc07PnoSevHVLmjZN8KTDzek2YSoeQ5q9QGfX1qRF99_b0jHxJO_wHnx_8PggdEnwkGAcjDZbmw4J5xizZoIj1CdREPhBxNlxc-OI-oTj-BSdObfBGAsRRj3U4yJiJIj7iCxWXgYuLXJvDRXoqr3S3FNeYkG5ytMq12C9sijrTLXqOToxKnNwsd8D9Da5fx0_-PPn6Wx8O_c15e0HsWKhESCUppqASShwDBHRoaAiVEoYZZhRlKx5YoBhwxVlYRxynWieEEIH6LrrLW3xWYOr5DZ1GrJM5VDUTsacESpY1BhHnVHbwjkLRpY23Sq7kwTLFpJsIclfSE3ial9dJ1tYH_x7Ko1-0-lfaQa7_-rk42I1-9Pud-nUVfB9SCv7IVlM40i-L6cST54m4mU5kXf0B9BHgvs</recordid><startdate>199611</startdate><enddate>199611</enddate><creator>Obdeijn, Inge-Marie A.</creator><creator>Kuijpers, Theodore J. A.</creator><creator>van Dijk, Pieter</creator><creator>Wiggers, Theodore</creator><creator>Oudkerk, Matthijs</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199611</creationdate><title>MR lesion detection in a breast cancer population</title><author>Obdeijn, Inge-Marie A. ; Kuijpers, Theodore J. A. ; van Dijk, Pieter ; Wiggers, Theodore ; Oudkerk, Matthijs</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3822-27a64f9e9ac3c1efb3e80e51c49394aa9faf6fa31d8bfe60f8a364748cbc8b113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Biopsy, Needle</topic><topic>Breast - pathology</topic><topic>Breast carcinoma</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carcinoma in Situ - diagnosis</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gadolinium</topic><topic>Gadolinium DTPA</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>MR imaging of the breast</topic><topic>MRI-guided ultrasonography</topic><topic>Occult breast carcinoma</topic><topic>Organometallic Compounds</topic><topic>Pentetic Acid - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Triple test</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Mammary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Obdeijn, Inge-Marie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuijpers, Theodore J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Dijk, Pieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiggers, Theodore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oudkerk, Matthijs</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Obdeijn, Inge-Marie A.</au><au>Kuijpers, Theodore J. A.</au><au>van Dijk, Pieter</au><au>Wiggers, Theodore</au><au>Oudkerk, Matthijs</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MR lesion detection in a breast cancer population</atitle><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle><addtitle>J. Magn. Reson. Imaging</addtitle><date>1996-11</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>849</spage><epage>854</epage><pages>849-854</pages><issn>1053-1807</issn><eissn>1522-2586</eissn><abstract>Implementation of MR imaging of the breast as an extension of the existing imaging modalities in the diagnosis of breast cancer was evaluated in a university cancer center. MR imaging of the breast was performed in 54 patients, in whom the MR results were compared with the triple test (the combination of clinical examination, mammographic evaluation, and cytology) and the final histological diagnosis. MR imaging of the breast depicted 30 of the 33 malignancies (sensitivity, 91%). In two of the malignancies, the carcinoma was clinically and mammographically occult. For the three patients with a false‐negative MRI diagnosis, the conventional mammography showed suspicious clustered microcalcifications as a sign of in situ carcinoma. For seven patients, MR imaging of the breast incorrectly suggested the presence of a malignant lesion (specificity, 67%). To improve MR specificity, we perform MR‐guided ultrasonographic fine‐needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). Although MR imaging of the breast is a highly sensitive examination, conventional x‐ray mammography remains the most efficient imaging modality in the diagnosis of breast cancer. In our patient population, MR imaging of the breast had additional value for women with mammographically dense breast tissue and especially for patients with clinical evidence of breast carcinoma that could not be detected with conventional diagnostic methods.</abstract><cop>Baltimore</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>8956127</pmid><doi>10.1002/jmri.1880060602</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-1807 |
ispartof | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 1996-11, Vol.6 (6), p.849-854 |
issn | 1053-1807 1522-2586 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78613965 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis Biopsy, Needle Breast - pathology Breast carcinoma Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis Carcinoma in Situ - diagnosis Contrast Media Evaluation Studies as Topic Female Gadolinium Gadolinium DTPA Humans Lymphatic Metastasis Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Mammography MR imaging of the breast MRI-guided ultrasonography Occult breast carcinoma Organometallic Compounds Pentetic Acid - analogs & derivatives Prospective Studies Sensitivity and Specificity Triple test Ultrasonography, Mammary |
title | MR lesion detection in a breast cancer population |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T21%3A52%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MR%20lesion%20detection%20in%20a%20breast%20cancer%20population&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.au=Obdeijn,%20Inge-Marie%20A.&rft.date=1996-11&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=849&rft.epage=854&rft.pages=849-854&rft.issn=1053-1807&rft.eissn=1522-2586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jmri.1880060602&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78613965%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78613965&rft_id=info:pmid/8956127&rfr_iscdi=true |