MR lesion detection in a breast cancer population

Implementation of MR imaging of the breast as an extension of the existing imaging modalities in the diagnosis of breast cancer was evaluated in a university cancer center. MR imaging of the breast was performed in 54 patients, in whom the MR results were compared with the triple test (the combinati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 1996-11, Vol.6 (6), p.849-854
Hauptverfasser: Obdeijn, Inge-Marie A., Kuijpers, Theodore J. A., van Dijk, Pieter, Wiggers, Theodore, Oudkerk, Matthijs
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 854
container_issue 6
container_start_page 849
container_title Journal of magnetic resonance imaging
container_volume 6
creator Obdeijn, Inge-Marie A.
Kuijpers, Theodore J. A.
van Dijk, Pieter
Wiggers, Theodore
Oudkerk, Matthijs
description Implementation of MR imaging of the breast as an extension of the existing imaging modalities in the diagnosis of breast cancer was evaluated in a university cancer center. MR imaging of the breast was performed in 54 patients, in whom the MR results were compared with the triple test (the combination of clinical examination, mammographic evaluation, and cytology) and the final histological diagnosis. MR imaging of the breast depicted 30 of the 33 malignancies (sensitivity, 91%). In two of the malignancies, the carcinoma was clinically and mammographically occult. For the three patients with a false‐negative MRI diagnosis, the conventional mammography showed suspicious clustered microcalcifications as a sign of in situ carcinoma. For seven patients, MR imaging of the breast incorrectly suggested the presence of a malignant lesion (specificity, 67%). To improve MR specificity, we perform MR‐guided ultrasonographic fine‐needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). Although MR imaging of the breast is a highly sensitive examination, conventional x‐ray mammography remains the most efficient imaging modality in the diagnosis of breast cancer. In our patient population, MR imaging of the breast had additional value for women with mammographically dense breast tissue and especially for patients with clinical evidence of breast carcinoma that could not be detected with conventional diagnostic methods.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jmri.1880060602
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78613965</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78613965</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3822-27a64f9e9ac3c1efb3e80e51c49394aa9faf6fa31d8bfe60f8a364748cbc8b113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9LwzAUx4Moc07PnoSevHVLmjZN8KTDzek2YSoeQ5q9QGfX1qRF99_b0jHxJO_wHnx_8PggdEnwkGAcjDZbmw4J5xizZoIj1CdREPhBxNlxc-OI-oTj-BSdObfBGAsRRj3U4yJiJIj7iCxWXgYuLXJvDRXoqr3S3FNeYkG5ytMq12C9sijrTLXqOToxKnNwsd8D9Da5fx0_-PPn6Wx8O_c15e0HsWKhESCUppqASShwDBHRoaAiVEoYZZhRlKx5YoBhwxVlYRxynWieEEIH6LrrLW3xWYOr5DZ1GrJM5VDUTsacESpY1BhHnVHbwjkLRpY23Sq7kwTLFpJsIclfSE3ial9dJ1tYH_x7Ko1-0-lfaQa7_-rk42I1-9Pud-nUVfB9SCv7IVlM40i-L6cST54m4mU5kXf0B9BHgvs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78613965</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MR lesion detection in a breast cancer population</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Obdeijn, Inge-Marie A. ; Kuijpers, Theodore J. A. ; van Dijk, Pieter ; Wiggers, Theodore ; Oudkerk, Matthijs</creator><creatorcontrib>Obdeijn, Inge-Marie A. ; Kuijpers, Theodore J. A. ; van Dijk, Pieter ; Wiggers, Theodore ; Oudkerk, Matthijs</creatorcontrib><description>Implementation of MR imaging of the breast as an extension of the existing imaging modalities in the diagnosis of breast cancer was evaluated in a university cancer center. MR imaging of the breast was performed in 54 patients, in whom the MR results were compared with the triple test (the combination of clinical examination, mammographic evaluation, and cytology) and the final histological diagnosis. MR imaging of the breast depicted 30 of the 33 malignancies (sensitivity, 91%). In two of the malignancies, the carcinoma was clinically and mammographically occult. For the three patients with a false‐negative MRI diagnosis, the conventional mammography showed suspicious clustered microcalcifications as a sign of in situ carcinoma. For seven patients, MR imaging of the breast incorrectly suggested the presence of a malignant lesion (specificity, 67%). To improve MR specificity, we perform MR‐guided ultrasonographic fine‐needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). Although MR imaging of the breast is a highly sensitive examination, conventional x‐ray mammography remains the most efficient imaging modality in the diagnosis of breast cancer. In our patient population, MR imaging of the breast had additional value for women with mammographically dense breast tissue and especially for patients with clinical evidence of breast carcinoma that could not be detected with conventional diagnostic methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-1807</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880060602</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8956127</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis ; Biopsy, Needle ; Breast - pathology ; Breast carcinoma ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Carcinoma in Situ - diagnosis ; Contrast Media ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Female ; Gadolinium ; Gadolinium DTPA ; Humans ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Mammography ; MR imaging of the breast ; MRI-guided ultrasonography ; Occult breast carcinoma ; Organometallic Compounds ; Pentetic Acid - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Prospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Triple test ; Ultrasonography, Mammary</subject><ispartof>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 1996-11, Vol.6 (6), p.849-854</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1996 Wiley‐Liss, Inc., A Wiley Company</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3822-27a64f9e9ac3c1efb3e80e51c49394aa9faf6fa31d8bfe60f8a364748cbc8b113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3822-27a64f9e9ac3c1efb3e80e51c49394aa9faf6fa31d8bfe60f8a364748cbc8b113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjmri.1880060602$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjmri.1880060602$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8956127$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Obdeijn, Inge-Marie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuijpers, Theodore J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Dijk, Pieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiggers, Theodore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oudkerk, Matthijs</creatorcontrib><title>MR lesion detection in a breast cancer population</title><title>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</title><addtitle>J. Magn. Reson. Imaging</addtitle><description>Implementation of MR imaging of the breast as an extension of the existing imaging modalities in the diagnosis of breast cancer was evaluated in a university cancer center. MR imaging of the breast was performed in 54 patients, in whom the MR results were compared with the triple test (the combination of clinical examination, mammographic evaluation, and cytology) and the final histological diagnosis. MR imaging of the breast depicted 30 of the 33 malignancies (sensitivity, 91%). In two of the malignancies, the carcinoma was clinically and mammographically occult. For the three patients with a false‐negative MRI diagnosis, the conventional mammography showed suspicious clustered microcalcifications as a sign of in situ carcinoma. For seven patients, MR imaging of the breast incorrectly suggested the presence of a malignant lesion (specificity, 67%). To improve MR specificity, we perform MR‐guided ultrasonographic fine‐needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). Although MR imaging of the breast is a highly sensitive examination, conventional x‐ray mammography remains the most efficient imaging modality in the diagnosis of breast cancer. In our patient population, MR imaging of the breast had additional value for women with mammographically dense breast tissue and especially for patients with clinical evidence of breast carcinoma that could not be detected with conventional diagnostic methods.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Biopsy, Needle</subject><subject>Breast - pathology</subject><subject>Breast carcinoma</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carcinoma in Situ - diagnosis</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gadolinium</subject><subject>Gadolinium DTPA</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>MR imaging of the breast</subject><subject>MRI-guided ultrasonography</subject><subject>Occult breast carcinoma</subject><subject>Organometallic Compounds</subject><subject>Pentetic Acid - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Triple test</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Mammary</subject><issn>1053-1807</issn><issn>1522-2586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM9LwzAUx4Moc07PnoSevHVLmjZN8KTDzek2YSoeQ5q9QGfX1qRF99_b0jHxJO_wHnx_8PggdEnwkGAcjDZbmw4J5xizZoIj1CdREPhBxNlxc-OI-oTj-BSdObfBGAsRRj3U4yJiJIj7iCxWXgYuLXJvDRXoqr3S3FNeYkG5ytMq12C9sijrTLXqOToxKnNwsd8D9Da5fx0_-PPn6Wx8O_c15e0HsWKhESCUppqASShwDBHRoaAiVEoYZZhRlKx5YoBhwxVlYRxynWieEEIH6LrrLW3xWYOr5DZ1GrJM5VDUTsacESpY1BhHnVHbwjkLRpY23Sq7kwTLFpJsIclfSE3ial9dJ1tYH_x7Ko1-0-lfaQa7_-rk42I1-9Pud-nUVfB9SCv7IVlM40i-L6cST54m4mU5kXf0B9BHgvs</recordid><startdate>199611</startdate><enddate>199611</enddate><creator>Obdeijn, Inge-Marie A.</creator><creator>Kuijpers, Theodore J. A.</creator><creator>van Dijk, Pieter</creator><creator>Wiggers, Theodore</creator><creator>Oudkerk, Matthijs</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199611</creationdate><title>MR lesion detection in a breast cancer population</title><author>Obdeijn, Inge-Marie A. ; Kuijpers, Theodore J. A. ; van Dijk, Pieter ; Wiggers, Theodore ; Oudkerk, Matthijs</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3822-27a64f9e9ac3c1efb3e80e51c49394aa9faf6fa31d8bfe60f8a364748cbc8b113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Biopsy, Needle</topic><topic>Breast - pathology</topic><topic>Breast carcinoma</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carcinoma in Situ - diagnosis</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gadolinium</topic><topic>Gadolinium DTPA</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>MR imaging of the breast</topic><topic>MRI-guided ultrasonography</topic><topic>Occult breast carcinoma</topic><topic>Organometallic Compounds</topic><topic>Pentetic Acid - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Triple test</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Mammary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Obdeijn, Inge-Marie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuijpers, Theodore J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Dijk, Pieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiggers, Theodore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oudkerk, Matthijs</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Obdeijn, Inge-Marie A.</au><au>Kuijpers, Theodore J. A.</au><au>van Dijk, Pieter</au><au>Wiggers, Theodore</au><au>Oudkerk, Matthijs</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MR lesion detection in a breast cancer population</atitle><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle><addtitle>J. Magn. Reson. Imaging</addtitle><date>1996-11</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>849</spage><epage>854</epage><pages>849-854</pages><issn>1053-1807</issn><eissn>1522-2586</eissn><abstract>Implementation of MR imaging of the breast as an extension of the existing imaging modalities in the diagnosis of breast cancer was evaluated in a university cancer center. MR imaging of the breast was performed in 54 patients, in whom the MR results were compared with the triple test (the combination of clinical examination, mammographic evaluation, and cytology) and the final histological diagnosis. MR imaging of the breast depicted 30 of the 33 malignancies (sensitivity, 91%). In two of the malignancies, the carcinoma was clinically and mammographically occult. For the three patients with a false‐negative MRI diagnosis, the conventional mammography showed suspicious clustered microcalcifications as a sign of in situ carcinoma. For seven patients, MR imaging of the breast incorrectly suggested the presence of a malignant lesion (specificity, 67%). To improve MR specificity, we perform MR‐guided ultrasonographic fine‐needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). Although MR imaging of the breast is a highly sensitive examination, conventional x‐ray mammography remains the most efficient imaging modality in the diagnosis of breast cancer. In our patient population, MR imaging of the breast had additional value for women with mammographically dense breast tissue and especially for patients with clinical evidence of breast carcinoma that could not be detected with conventional diagnostic methods.</abstract><cop>Baltimore</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>8956127</pmid><doi>10.1002/jmri.1880060602</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-1807
ispartof Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 1996-11, Vol.6 (6), p.849-854
issn 1053-1807
1522-2586
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78613965
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library
subjects Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis
Biopsy, Needle
Breast - pathology
Breast carcinoma
Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
Carcinoma in Situ - diagnosis
Contrast Media
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Female
Gadolinium
Gadolinium DTPA
Humans
Lymphatic Metastasis
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Mammography
MR imaging of the breast
MRI-guided ultrasonography
Occult breast carcinoma
Organometallic Compounds
Pentetic Acid - analogs & derivatives
Prospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Triple test
Ultrasonography, Mammary
title MR lesion detection in a breast cancer population
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T21%3A52%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MR%20lesion%20detection%20in%20a%20breast%20cancer%20population&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.au=Obdeijn,%20Inge-Marie%20A.&rft.date=1996-11&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=849&rft.epage=854&rft.pages=849-854&rft.issn=1053-1807&rft.eissn=1522-2586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jmri.1880060602&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78613965%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78613965&rft_id=info:pmid/8956127&rfr_iscdi=true