Detection of acute inflammation with 111In-Labeled nonspecific polyclonal IgG

The detection of focal sites of inflammation is an integral part of the clinical evaluation of the febrile patient. When anatomically distinct abscesses are present, lesion detection can be accomplished by standard radiographic techniques, particularly in patients with normal anatomy. At the phlegmo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Seminars in nuclear medicine 1988-10, Vol.18 (4), p.335-344
Hauptverfasser: Fischman, Alan J., Rubin, Robert H., Khaw, Ban An, Callahan, Ronald J., Wilkinson, Robert, Keech, Frances, Nedelman, Mark, Dragotakes, Stephen, Kramer, Peter B., LaMuraglia, Glenn M., Lind, Stuart, Strauss, H. William
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 344
container_issue 4
container_start_page 335
container_title Seminars in nuclear medicine
container_volume 18
creator Fischman, Alan J.
Rubin, Robert H.
Khaw, Ban An
Callahan, Ronald J.
Wilkinson, Robert
Keech, Frances
Nedelman, Mark
Dragotakes, Stephen
Kramer, Peter B.
LaMuraglia, Glenn M.
Lind, Stuart
Strauss, H. William
description The detection of focal sites of inflammation is an integral part of the clinical evaluation of the febrile patient. When anatomically distinct abscesses are present, lesion detection can be accomplished by standard radiographic techniques, particularly in patients with normal anatomy. At the phlegmon stage, however, and in patients who have undergone surgery, these techniques are considerably less effective. While radionculide methods, such as Gallium-67 ( 87Ga)-citrate and Indium-111 ( 111In)-labeled WBCs have been relatively successful for the detection of early inflammation, neither approach is ideal. In the course of studies addressing the use of specific organism-directed antibodies for imaging experimental infections in animals, we observed that non-specific polyclonal immunoglobulin G (IgG) localized as well as specific antibodies. Preliminary experiments suggested that the Fc portion of IgG is necessary for effective inflammation localization. Since polyclonal IgG in gram quantities has been safely used for therapy in patients with immune deficiency states, we decided to test whether milligram quantities of radiolabeled IgG could image focal sites of inflammation in humans. Thus far, we have studied a series of 84 patients with suspected lesions in the abdomen, pelvis, vascular grafts, lungs, or bones/joints. In 48 of 52 patients with focal lesions detected by surgery, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or ultrasound (US), the IgG scan correctly localized the site, while 31 patients without focal inflammation had no abnormal focal localization of the radiopharmaceutical. Four patients had false negative scans and one patient had a false positive scan. For this small series, the overall sensitivity and specificity were 92% and 95%, respectively. In this report, we review our experience with this exciting new agent.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0001-2998(88)80042-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78611396</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0001299888800424</els_id><sourcerecordid>78611396</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2079-87d808b80596f77a86c60052a1ca2b07c3075b583c8d08aac1a851f6a42539413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkNFLwzAQxoMoc07_hEGfRB-ql7RJkyeRqXMw8UF9DmmaaiRNZtMq--_t3NircHBw33f3cT-EphiuMGB2_QIAOCVC8AvOLzlATtL8AI0xpTzNGckO0XhvOUYnMX4CEEoFHaFRRjDJmRijpzvTGd3Z4JNQJ0r3nUmsr51qGvU3_bHdR4IxXvh0qUrjTJX44OPKaFtbnayCW2sXvHLJ4n1-io5q5aI52_UJenu4f509psvn-WJ2u0w1gUKkvKg48JIDFawuCsWZZgCUKKwVKaHQGRS0pDzTvAKulMaKU1wzlROaiRxnE3S-vbtqw1dvYicbG7VxTnkT-igLzjDOBBuMdGvUbYixNbVctbZR7VpikBuM8g-j3DCSfKgNRpkPe9NdQF82ptpv7bgN-s1WN8OX39a0MmprvDaVbQecsgr2n4Rf7aCAAQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78611396</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detection of acute inflammation with 111In-Labeled nonspecific polyclonal IgG</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Fischman, Alan J. ; Rubin, Robert H. ; Khaw, Ban An ; Callahan, Ronald J. ; Wilkinson, Robert ; Keech, Frances ; Nedelman, Mark ; Dragotakes, Stephen ; Kramer, Peter B. ; LaMuraglia, Glenn M. ; Lind, Stuart ; Strauss, H. William</creator><creatorcontrib>Fischman, Alan J. ; Rubin, Robert H. ; Khaw, Ban An ; Callahan, Ronald J. ; Wilkinson, Robert ; Keech, Frances ; Nedelman, Mark ; Dragotakes, Stephen ; Kramer, Peter B. ; LaMuraglia, Glenn M. ; Lind, Stuart ; Strauss, H. William</creatorcontrib><description>The detection of focal sites of inflammation is an integral part of the clinical evaluation of the febrile patient. When anatomically distinct abscesses are present, lesion detection can be accomplished by standard radiographic techniques, particularly in patients with normal anatomy. At the phlegmon stage, however, and in patients who have undergone surgery, these techniques are considerably less effective. While radionculide methods, such as Gallium-67 ( 87Ga)-citrate and Indium-111 ( 111In)-labeled WBCs have been relatively successful for the detection of early inflammation, neither approach is ideal. In the course of studies addressing the use of specific organism-directed antibodies for imaging experimental infections in animals, we observed that non-specific polyclonal immunoglobulin G (IgG) localized as well as specific antibodies. Preliminary experiments suggested that the Fc portion of IgG is necessary for effective inflammation localization. Since polyclonal IgG in gram quantities has been safely used for therapy in patients with immune deficiency states, we decided to test whether milligram quantities of radiolabeled IgG could image focal sites of inflammation in humans. Thus far, we have studied a series of 84 patients with suspected lesions in the abdomen, pelvis, vascular grafts, lungs, or bones/joints. In 48 of 52 patients with focal lesions detected by surgery, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or ultrasound (US), the IgG scan correctly localized the site, while 31 patients without focal inflammation had no abnormal focal localization of the radiopharmaceutical. Four patients had false negative scans and one patient had a false positive scan. For this small series, the overall sensitivity and specificity were 92% and 95%, respectively. In this report, we review our experience with this exciting new agent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-2998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-4623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0001-2998(88)80042-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3212469</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acute Disease ; Animals ; Female ; Humans ; Immunoglobulin G - immunology ; Indium Radioisotopes ; Inflammation - diagnostic imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Radionuclide Imaging ; Rats ; Rats, Inbred Strains</subject><ispartof>Seminars in nuclear medicine, 1988-10, Vol.18 (4), p.335-344</ispartof><rights>1988 Grune &amp; Stratton, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2079-87d808b80596f77a86c60052a1ca2b07c3075b583c8d08aac1a851f6a42539413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2079-87d808b80596f77a86c60052a1ca2b07c3075b583c8d08aac1a851f6a42539413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0001-2998(88)80042-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3212469$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fischman, Alan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubin, Robert H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khaw, Ban An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callahan, Ronald J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keech, Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nedelman, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dragotakes, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, Peter B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaMuraglia, Glenn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lind, Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strauss, H. William</creatorcontrib><title>Detection of acute inflammation with 111In-Labeled nonspecific polyclonal IgG</title><title>Seminars in nuclear medicine</title><addtitle>Semin Nucl Med</addtitle><description>The detection of focal sites of inflammation is an integral part of the clinical evaluation of the febrile patient. When anatomically distinct abscesses are present, lesion detection can be accomplished by standard radiographic techniques, particularly in patients with normal anatomy. At the phlegmon stage, however, and in patients who have undergone surgery, these techniques are considerably less effective. While radionculide methods, such as Gallium-67 ( 87Ga)-citrate and Indium-111 ( 111In)-labeled WBCs have been relatively successful for the detection of early inflammation, neither approach is ideal. In the course of studies addressing the use of specific organism-directed antibodies for imaging experimental infections in animals, we observed that non-specific polyclonal immunoglobulin G (IgG) localized as well as specific antibodies. Preliminary experiments suggested that the Fc portion of IgG is necessary for effective inflammation localization. Since polyclonal IgG in gram quantities has been safely used for therapy in patients with immune deficiency states, we decided to test whether milligram quantities of radiolabeled IgG could image focal sites of inflammation in humans. Thus far, we have studied a series of 84 patients with suspected lesions in the abdomen, pelvis, vascular grafts, lungs, or bones/joints. In 48 of 52 patients with focal lesions detected by surgery, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or ultrasound (US), the IgG scan correctly localized the site, while 31 patients without focal inflammation had no abnormal focal localization of the radiopharmaceutical. Four patients had false negative scans and one patient had a false positive scan. For this small series, the overall sensitivity and specificity were 92% and 95%, respectively. In this report, we review our experience with this exciting new agent.</description><subject>Acute Disease</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G - immunology</subject><subject>Indium Radioisotopes</subject><subject>Inflammation - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Inbred Strains</subject><issn>0001-2998</issn><issn>1558-4623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkNFLwzAQxoMoc07_hEGfRB-ql7RJkyeRqXMw8UF9DmmaaiRNZtMq--_t3NircHBw33f3cT-EphiuMGB2_QIAOCVC8AvOLzlATtL8AI0xpTzNGckO0XhvOUYnMX4CEEoFHaFRRjDJmRijpzvTGd3Z4JNQJ0r3nUmsr51qGvU3_bHdR4IxXvh0qUrjTJX44OPKaFtbnayCW2sXvHLJ4n1-io5q5aI52_UJenu4f509psvn-WJ2u0w1gUKkvKg48JIDFawuCsWZZgCUKKwVKaHQGRS0pDzTvAKulMaKU1wzlROaiRxnE3S-vbtqw1dvYicbG7VxTnkT-igLzjDOBBuMdGvUbYixNbVctbZR7VpikBuM8g-j3DCSfKgNRpkPe9NdQF82ptpv7bgN-s1WN8OX39a0MmprvDaVbQecsgr2n4Rf7aCAAQ</recordid><startdate>198810</startdate><enddate>198810</enddate><creator>Fischman, Alan J.</creator><creator>Rubin, Robert H.</creator><creator>Khaw, Ban An</creator><creator>Callahan, Ronald J.</creator><creator>Wilkinson, Robert</creator><creator>Keech, Frances</creator><creator>Nedelman, Mark</creator><creator>Dragotakes, Stephen</creator><creator>Kramer, Peter B.</creator><creator>LaMuraglia, Glenn M.</creator><creator>Lind, Stuart</creator><creator>Strauss, H. William</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198810</creationdate><title>Detection of acute inflammation with 111In-Labeled nonspecific polyclonal IgG</title><author>Fischman, Alan J. ; Rubin, Robert H. ; Khaw, Ban An ; Callahan, Ronald J. ; Wilkinson, Robert ; Keech, Frances ; Nedelman, Mark ; Dragotakes, Stephen ; Kramer, Peter B. ; LaMuraglia, Glenn M. ; Lind, Stuart ; Strauss, H. William</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2079-87d808b80596f77a86c60052a1ca2b07c3075b583c8d08aac1a851f6a42539413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Acute Disease</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G - immunology</topic><topic>Indium Radioisotopes</topic><topic>Inflammation - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Inbred Strains</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fischman, Alan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubin, Robert H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khaw, Ban An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callahan, Ronald J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keech, Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nedelman, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dragotakes, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, Peter B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaMuraglia, Glenn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lind, Stuart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strauss, H. William</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Seminars in nuclear medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fischman, Alan J.</au><au>Rubin, Robert H.</au><au>Khaw, Ban An</au><au>Callahan, Ronald J.</au><au>Wilkinson, Robert</au><au>Keech, Frances</au><au>Nedelman, Mark</au><au>Dragotakes, Stephen</au><au>Kramer, Peter B.</au><au>LaMuraglia, Glenn M.</au><au>Lind, Stuart</au><au>Strauss, H. William</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detection of acute inflammation with 111In-Labeled nonspecific polyclonal IgG</atitle><jtitle>Seminars in nuclear medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Semin Nucl Med</addtitle><date>1988-10</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>335</spage><epage>344</epage><pages>335-344</pages><issn>0001-2998</issn><eissn>1558-4623</eissn><abstract>The detection of focal sites of inflammation is an integral part of the clinical evaluation of the febrile patient. When anatomically distinct abscesses are present, lesion detection can be accomplished by standard radiographic techniques, particularly in patients with normal anatomy. At the phlegmon stage, however, and in patients who have undergone surgery, these techniques are considerably less effective. While radionculide methods, such as Gallium-67 ( 87Ga)-citrate and Indium-111 ( 111In)-labeled WBCs have been relatively successful for the detection of early inflammation, neither approach is ideal. In the course of studies addressing the use of specific organism-directed antibodies for imaging experimental infections in animals, we observed that non-specific polyclonal immunoglobulin G (IgG) localized as well as specific antibodies. Preliminary experiments suggested that the Fc portion of IgG is necessary for effective inflammation localization. Since polyclonal IgG in gram quantities has been safely used for therapy in patients with immune deficiency states, we decided to test whether milligram quantities of radiolabeled IgG could image focal sites of inflammation in humans. Thus far, we have studied a series of 84 patients with suspected lesions in the abdomen, pelvis, vascular grafts, lungs, or bones/joints. In 48 of 52 patients with focal lesions detected by surgery, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or ultrasound (US), the IgG scan correctly localized the site, while 31 patients without focal inflammation had no abnormal focal localization of the radiopharmaceutical. Four patients had false negative scans and one patient had a false positive scan. For this small series, the overall sensitivity and specificity were 92% and 95%, respectively. In this report, we review our experience with this exciting new agent.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>3212469</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0001-2998(88)80042-4</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-2998
ispartof Seminars in nuclear medicine, 1988-10, Vol.18 (4), p.335-344
issn 0001-2998
1558-4623
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78611396
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Acute Disease
Animals
Female
Humans
Immunoglobulin G - immunology
Indium Radioisotopes
Inflammation - diagnostic imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Radionuclide Imaging
Rats
Rats, Inbred Strains
title Detection of acute inflammation with 111In-Labeled nonspecific polyclonal IgG
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T13%3A44%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detection%20of%20acute%20inflammation%20with%20111In-Labeled%20nonspecific%20polyclonal%20IgG&rft.jtitle=Seminars%20in%20nuclear%20medicine&rft.au=Fischman,%20Alan%20J.&rft.date=1988-10&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=335&rft.epage=344&rft.pages=335-344&rft.issn=0001-2998&rft.eissn=1558-4623&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0001-2998(88)80042-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78611396%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78611396&rft_id=info:pmid/3212469&rft_els_id=S0001299888800424&rfr_iscdi=true