Magnetic resonance imaging and contrast CT of the lumbar spine: comparison of diagnostic methods and correlation with surgical findings
Thirty-two patients with suspected lumbar disc herniation were studied with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast computed tomography (CT). One hundred disc levels were evaluated. Twenty-five patients underwent surgery on 31 discs, allowing anatomic confirmation of the diagnosis. Surgical fi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Pa. 1976), 1988-09, Vol.13 (9), p.1049-1054 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1054 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1049 |
container_title | Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | FORRISTALL, R. M MARSH, H. O PAY, N. T |
description | Thirty-two patients with suspected lumbar disc herniation were studied with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast computed tomography (CT). One hundred disc levels were evaluated. Twenty-five patients underwent surgery on 31 discs, allowing anatomic confirmation of the diagnosis. Surgical findings supported the MRI diagnosis at 28 of 31 levels (90.3% accuracy), whereas the CT diagnosis correctly reflected only 24 of 31 levels (77.4% accuracy). Discrepancy between MRI and CT interpretation occurred at ten levels that were surgically explored. Computed tomography (CT) was incorrect at seven levels, and MRI was in error at three levels. The sensitivity of MRI was 91.7%, compared with 83.3% for CT, and the MRI specificity of 100% was superior to 71.4% for CT. This study demonstrates the clinical superiority of surface coil MRI over contrast CT in the evaluation of lumbar disc herniation. Surface coil MRI can be used as the initial diagnostic procedure for a suspected herniated lumbar disc, using invasive contrast studies and CT, if required, to clarify an equivocal MRI finding. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00007632-198809000-00013 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78598918</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78598918</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-57dc4ece9a13d7b0886036add73059741fda93ecefc9244348f651ab3f0ec8183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kclKBDEQhoMoOi6PIOQg3lqz9JJ4k8ENRrzouclkmYl0p8dUGvEJfG0z2k4ghKK--ov8P0KYkitKZHNN8mlqzgoqhSAyV0W-lO-hGa2YKCit5D6aEV6zgpW8PkLHAO8ZqTmVh-iQM1IzKWfo-1mtgk1e42hhCCpoi32vVj6ssAoG6yGkqCDh-SseHE5ri7uxX6qIYeODvclAv1HR59lt3_gsN8BWr7dpPRiYVGK0nUo-U58-rTGMceW16rDzweRdcIoOnOrAnk3vCXq7v3udPxaLl4en-e2i0EyUqagao0urrVSUm2ZJhKjzH5UxDSeVbErqjJI8A05LVpa8FK6uqFpyR6wWVPATdPmnu4nDx2ghtb0HbbtOBTuM0DaikkL-guIP1HEAiNa1m5iNiV8tJe02g_Y_g3aXQfubQR49n3aMy96a3eBkeu5fTH0F2QMXs-sedljDRF0xwn8AsYmRKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78598918</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Magnetic resonance imaging and contrast CT of the lumbar spine: comparison of diagnostic methods and correlation with surgical findings</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>FORRISTALL, R. M ; MARSH, H. O ; PAY, N. T</creator><creatorcontrib>FORRISTALL, R. M ; MARSH, H. O ; PAY, N. T</creatorcontrib><description>Thirty-two patients with suspected lumbar disc herniation were studied with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast computed tomography (CT). One hundred disc levels were evaluated. Twenty-five patients underwent surgery on 31 discs, allowing anatomic confirmation of the diagnosis. Surgical findings supported the MRI diagnosis at 28 of 31 levels (90.3% accuracy), whereas the CT diagnosis correctly reflected only 24 of 31 levels (77.4% accuracy). Discrepancy between MRI and CT interpretation occurred at ten levels that were surgically explored. Computed tomography (CT) was incorrect at seven levels, and MRI was in error at three levels. The sensitivity of MRI was 91.7%, compared with 83.3% for CT, and the MRI specificity of 100% was superior to 71.4% for CT. This study demonstrates the clinical superiority of surface coil MRI over contrast CT in the evaluation of lumbar disc herniation. Surface coil MRI can be used as the initial diagnostic procedure for a suspected herniated lumbar disc, using invasive contrast studies and CT, if required, to clarify an equivocal MRI finding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-2436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198809000-00013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3206299</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SPINDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Diseases of the spine ; False Negative Reactions ; False Positive Reactions ; Female ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement - diagnosis ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement - diagnostic imaging ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Spine - diagnostic imaging ; Spine - pathology ; Spine - surgery ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 1988-09, Vol.13 (9), p.1049-1054</ispartof><rights>1989 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=7286520$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3206299$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>FORRISTALL, R. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARSH, H. O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAY, N. T</creatorcontrib><title>Magnetic resonance imaging and contrast CT of the lumbar spine: comparison of diagnostic methods and correlation with surgical findings</title><title>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</title><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><description>Thirty-two patients with suspected lumbar disc herniation were studied with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast computed tomography (CT). One hundred disc levels were evaluated. Twenty-five patients underwent surgery on 31 discs, allowing anatomic confirmation of the diagnosis. Surgical findings supported the MRI diagnosis at 28 of 31 levels (90.3% accuracy), whereas the CT diagnosis correctly reflected only 24 of 31 levels (77.4% accuracy). Discrepancy between MRI and CT interpretation occurred at ten levels that were surgically explored. Computed tomography (CT) was incorrect at seven levels, and MRI was in error at three levels. The sensitivity of MRI was 91.7%, compared with 83.3% for CT, and the MRI specificity of 100% was superior to 71.4% for CT. This study demonstrates the clinical superiority of surface coil MRI over contrast CT in the evaluation of lumbar disc herniation. Surface coil MRI can be used as the initial diagnostic procedure for a suspected herniated lumbar disc, using invasive contrast studies and CT, if required, to clarify an equivocal MRI finding.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Diseases of the spine</subject><subject>False Negative Reactions</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - diagnosis</subject><subject>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Spine - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Spine - pathology</subject><subject>Spine - surgery</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>0362-2436</issn><issn>1528-1159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kclKBDEQhoMoOi6PIOQg3lqz9JJ4k8ENRrzouclkmYl0p8dUGvEJfG0z2k4ghKK--ov8P0KYkitKZHNN8mlqzgoqhSAyV0W-lO-hGa2YKCit5D6aEV6zgpW8PkLHAO8ZqTmVh-iQM1IzKWfo-1mtgk1e42hhCCpoi32vVj6ssAoG6yGkqCDh-SseHE5ri7uxX6qIYeODvclAv1HR59lt3_gsN8BWr7dpPRiYVGK0nUo-U58-rTGMceW16rDzweRdcIoOnOrAnk3vCXq7v3udPxaLl4en-e2i0EyUqagao0urrVSUm2ZJhKjzH5UxDSeVbErqjJI8A05LVpa8FK6uqFpyR6wWVPATdPmnu4nDx2ghtb0HbbtOBTuM0DaikkL-guIP1HEAiNa1m5iNiV8tJe02g_Y_g3aXQfubQR49n3aMy96a3eBkeu5fTH0F2QMXs-sedljDRF0xwn8AsYmRKA</recordid><startdate>19880901</startdate><enddate>19880901</enddate><creator>FORRISTALL, R. M</creator><creator>MARSH, H. O</creator><creator>PAY, N. T</creator><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19880901</creationdate><title>Magnetic resonance imaging and contrast CT of the lumbar spine: comparison of diagnostic methods and correlation with surgical findings</title><author>FORRISTALL, R. M ; MARSH, H. O ; PAY, N. T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-57dc4ece9a13d7b0886036add73059741fda93ecefc9244348f651ab3f0ec8183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Diseases of the spine</topic><topic>False Negative Reactions</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - diagnosis</topic><topic>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Spine - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Spine - pathology</topic><topic>Spine - surgery</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FORRISTALL, R. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARSH, H. O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAY, N. T</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FORRISTALL, R. M</au><au>MARSH, H. O</au><au>PAY, N. T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Magnetic resonance imaging and contrast CT of the lumbar spine: comparison of diagnostic methods and correlation with surgical findings</atitle><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><date>1988-09-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1049</spage><epage>1054</epage><pages>1049-1054</pages><issn>0362-2436</issn><eissn>1528-1159</eissn><coden>SPINDD</coden><abstract>Thirty-two patients with suspected lumbar disc herniation were studied with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast computed tomography (CT). One hundred disc levels were evaluated. Twenty-five patients underwent surgery on 31 discs, allowing anatomic confirmation of the diagnosis. Surgical findings supported the MRI diagnosis at 28 of 31 levels (90.3% accuracy), whereas the CT diagnosis correctly reflected only 24 of 31 levels (77.4% accuracy). Discrepancy between MRI and CT interpretation occurred at ten levels that were surgically explored. Computed tomography (CT) was incorrect at seven levels, and MRI was in error at three levels. The sensitivity of MRI was 91.7%, compared with 83.3% for CT, and the MRI specificity of 100% was superior to 71.4% for CT. This study demonstrates the clinical superiority of surface coil MRI over contrast CT in the evaluation of lumbar disc herniation. Surface coil MRI can be used as the initial diagnostic procedure for a suspected herniated lumbar disc, using invasive contrast studies and CT, if required, to clarify an equivocal MRI finding.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott</pub><pmid>3206299</pmid><doi>10.1097/00007632-198809000-00013</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0362-2436 |
ispartof | Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 1988-09, Vol.13 (9), p.1049-1054 |
issn | 0362-2436 1528-1159 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78598918 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload |
subjects | Adult Aged Biological and medical sciences Diseases of the osteoarticular system Diseases of the spine False Negative Reactions False Positive Reactions Female Humans Intervertebral Disc Displacement - diagnosis Intervertebral Disc Displacement - diagnostic imaging Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Spine - diagnostic imaging Spine - pathology Spine - surgery Tomography, X-Ray Computed |
title | Magnetic resonance imaging and contrast CT of the lumbar spine: comparison of diagnostic methods and correlation with surgical findings |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T07%3A53%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20and%20contrast%20CT%20of%20the%20lumbar%20spine:%20comparison%20of%20diagnostic%20methods%20and%20correlation%20with%20surgical%20findings&rft.jtitle=Spine%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.%201976)&rft.au=FORRISTALL,%20R.%20M&rft.date=1988-09-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1049&rft.epage=1054&rft.pages=1049-1054&rft.issn=0362-2436&rft.eissn=1528-1159&rft.coden=SPINDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00007632-198809000-00013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78598918%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78598918&rft_id=info:pmid/3206299&rfr_iscdi=true |