Bone marrow biopsy during induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia identifies only 50% of patients with resistant disease

A study was carried out to determine whether bone marrow biopsy performed on day 6 of induction therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) can identify those patients with resistant disease who would need an intensification of the first course of induction. Bone marrow biopsies were performed on day...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Leukemia research 1988, Vol.12 (10), p.817-821
Hauptverfasser: Roberts, Marion M., Juttner, Christopher A., To, L.Bik, Kimber, Richard J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 821
container_issue 10
container_start_page 817
container_title Leukemia research
container_volume 12
creator Roberts, Marion M.
Juttner, Christopher A.
To, L.Bik
Kimber, Richard J.
description A study was carried out to determine whether bone marrow biopsy performed on day 6 of induction therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) can identify those patients with resistant disease who would need an intensification of the first course of induction. Bone marrow biopsies were performed on day 6 of induction chemotherapy in 44 patients with AML treated with daunorubicin, cytosine arabinoside and thioguanine. Biopsies were assessed for blast count, trephine cellularity and leukaemic index. Discrimination between patients who went on to achieve remission and those with resistant disease was best achieved using the reduction in bone marrow cellularity from pretreatment marrow to day-6 marrow. However, this discriminator identified only 50% of the patients with resistant disease and included 13% of patients who achieved remission with the first course of chemotherapy. The other parameters of response were even less effective at discriminating between chemotherapy-resistant and chemotherapy-responsive disease.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0145-2126(88)90035-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78575950</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0145212688900355</els_id><sourcerecordid>78575950</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-a0e28d9ae020a5ef7fb27fc2f7a5e90c8e00c8d22ca9e2b2dff4c2ced964efd13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM2OFCEURonRjD2jb6AJC53oohSoogo2JjrxL5nEja4JDRf7alXRAuWk1r64tN3ppRsI-c53czmEPOHsFWe8f814JxvBRf9CqZeasVY28h7ZcDW0jVStvE82Z-Qhucz5B2NMaq4vyEXLtVYd35A_7-IMdLIpxTu6xbjPK_VLwvk7xdkvrmCcqdvBFMsOkt2vNMRErVtKba0wRvR0hOWnhQktRQ9zwYCQaZzHlUr2nMZA97ZgDTK9w7KjCTLmYudCPWawGR6RB8GOGR6f7ivy7cP7rzefmtsvHz_fvL1tXMt4aSwDoby2wASzEsIQtmIIToShvjRzClg9vBDOahBb4UPonHDgdd9B8Ly9ItfHufsUfy2Qi5kwOxhHO0NcshmUHKSWrILdEXQp5pwgmH3C6mg1nJmDe3MQaw5ijVLmn3sja-3paf6yncCfSyfZNX92ym12dgzJzg7zGRtYr4XoK_bmiEF18RshmeyqvvoRTOCK8RH_v8dfUeejww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78575950</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bone marrow biopsy during induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia identifies only 50% of patients with resistant disease</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Roberts, Marion M. ; Juttner, Christopher A. ; To, L.Bik ; Kimber, Richard J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Marion M. ; Juttner, Christopher A. ; To, L.Bik ; Kimber, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><description>A study was carried out to determine whether bone marrow biopsy performed on day 6 of induction therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) can identify those patients with resistant disease who would need an intensification of the first course of induction. Bone marrow biopsies were performed on day 6 of induction chemotherapy in 44 patients with AML treated with daunorubicin, cytosine arabinoside and thioguanine. Biopsies were assessed for blast count, trephine cellularity and leukaemic index. Discrimination between patients who went on to achieve remission and those with resistant disease was best achieved using the reduction in bone marrow cellularity from pretreatment marrow to day-6 marrow. However, this discriminator identified only 50% of the patients with resistant disease and included 13% of patients who achieved remission with the first course of chemotherapy. The other parameters of response were even less effective at discriminating between chemotherapy-resistant and chemotherapy-responsive disease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0145-2126</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5835</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0145-2126(88)90035-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3199841</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LEREDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acute myeloid leukaemia ; Antineoplastic agents ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy ; Bone Marrow - pathology ; Bone Marrow Examination ; Chemotherapy ; Cytarabine - administration &amp; dosage ; Daunorubicin - administration &amp; dosage ; day-6 bone marrow biopsy ; Drug Resistance ; Humans ; induction ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - drug therapy ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - pathology ; Medical sciences ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Remission Induction ; Thioguanine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><ispartof>Leukemia research, 1988, Vol.12 (10), p.817-821</ispartof><rights>1988</rights><rights>1989 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-a0e28d9ae020a5ef7fb27fc2f7a5e90c8e00c8d22ca9e2b2dff4c2ced964efd13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-a0e28d9ae020a5ef7fb27fc2f7a5e90c8e00c8d22ca9e2b2dff4c2ced964efd13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0145212688900355$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27900,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7069226$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3199841$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Marion M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juttner, Christopher A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>To, L.Bik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimber, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><title>Bone marrow biopsy during induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia identifies only 50% of patients with resistant disease</title><title>Leukemia research</title><addtitle>Leuk Res</addtitle><description>A study was carried out to determine whether bone marrow biopsy performed on day 6 of induction therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) can identify those patients with resistant disease who would need an intensification of the first course of induction. Bone marrow biopsies were performed on day 6 of induction chemotherapy in 44 patients with AML treated with daunorubicin, cytosine arabinoside and thioguanine. Biopsies were assessed for blast count, trephine cellularity and leukaemic index. Discrimination between patients who went on to achieve remission and those with resistant disease was best achieved using the reduction in bone marrow cellularity from pretreatment marrow to day-6 marrow. However, this discriminator identified only 50% of the patients with resistant disease and included 13% of patients who achieved remission with the first course of chemotherapy. The other parameters of response were even less effective at discriminating between chemotherapy-resistant and chemotherapy-responsive disease.</description><subject>Acute myeloid leukaemia</subject><subject>Antineoplastic agents</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Bone Marrow - pathology</subject><subject>Bone Marrow Examination</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Cytarabine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Daunorubicin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>day-6 bone marrow biopsy</subject><subject>Drug Resistance</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>induction</subject><subject>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - drug therapy</subject><subject>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - pathology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Remission Induction</subject><subject>Thioguanine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><issn>0145-2126</issn><issn>1873-5835</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM2OFCEURonRjD2jb6AJC53oohSoogo2JjrxL5nEja4JDRf7alXRAuWk1r64tN3ppRsI-c53czmEPOHsFWe8f814JxvBRf9CqZeasVY28h7ZcDW0jVStvE82Z-Qhucz5B2NMaq4vyEXLtVYd35A_7-IMdLIpxTu6xbjPK_VLwvk7xdkvrmCcqdvBFMsOkt2vNMRErVtKba0wRvR0hOWnhQktRQ9zwYCQaZzHlUr2nMZA97ZgDTK9w7KjCTLmYudCPWawGR6RB8GOGR6f7ivy7cP7rzefmtsvHz_fvL1tXMt4aSwDoby2wASzEsIQtmIIToShvjRzClg9vBDOahBb4UPonHDgdd9B8Ly9ItfHufsUfy2Qi5kwOxhHO0NcshmUHKSWrILdEXQp5pwgmH3C6mg1nJmDe3MQaw5ijVLmn3sja-3paf6yncCfSyfZNX92ym12dgzJzg7zGRtYr4XoK_bmiEF18RshmeyqvvoRTOCK8RH_v8dfUeejww</recordid><startdate>1988</startdate><enddate>1988</enddate><creator>Roberts, Marion M.</creator><creator>Juttner, Christopher A.</creator><creator>To, L.Bik</creator><creator>Kimber, Richard J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1988</creationdate><title>Bone marrow biopsy during induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia identifies only 50% of patients with resistant disease</title><author>Roberts, Marion M. ; Juttner, Christopher A. ; To, L.Bik ; Kimber, Richard J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-a0e28d9ae020a5ef7fb27fc2f7a5e90c8e00c8d22ca9e2b2dff4c2ced964efd13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Acute myeloid leukaemia</topic><topic>Antineoplastic agents</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Bone Marrow - pathology</topic><topic>Bone Marrow Examination</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Cytarabine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Daunorubicin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>day-6 bone marrow biopsy</topic><topic>Drug Resistance</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>induction</topic><topic>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - drug therapy</topic><topic>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - pathology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Remission Induction</topic><topic>Thioguanine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Marion M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juttner, Christopher A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>To, L.Bik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimber, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Leukemia research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roberts, Marion M.</au><au>Juttner, Christopher A.</au><au>To, L.Bik</au><au>Kimber, Richard J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bone marrow biopsy during induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia identifies only 50% of patients with resistant disease</atitle><jtitle>Leukemia research</jtitle><addtitle>Leuk Res</addtitle><date>1988</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>817</spage><epage>821</epage><pages>817-821</pages><issn>0145-2126</issn><eissn>1873-5835</eissn><coden>LEREDD</coden><abstract>A study was carried out to determine whether bone marrow biopsy performed on day 6 of induction therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) can identify those patients with resistant disease who would need an intensification of the first course of induction. Bone marrow biopsies were performed on day 6 of induction chemotherapy in 44 patients with AML treated with daunorubicin, cytosine arabinoside and thioguanine. Biopsies were assessed for blast count, trephine cellularity and leukaemic index. Discrimination between patients who went on to achieve remission and those with resistant disease was best achieved using the reduction in bone marrow cellularity from pretreatment marrow to day-6 marrow. However, this discriminator identified only 50% of the patients with resistant disease and included 13% of patients who achieved remission with the first course of chemotherapy. The other parameters of response were even less effective at discriminating between chemotherapy-resistant and chemotherapy-responsive disease.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>3199841</pmid><doi>10.1016/0145-2126(88)90035-5</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0145-2126
ispartof Leukemia research, 1988, Vol.12 (10), p.817-821
issn 0145-2126
1873-5835
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78575950
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Acute myeloid leukaemia
Antineoplastic agents
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
Biopsy
Bone Marrow - pathology
Bone Marrow Examination
Chemotherapy
Cytarabine - administration & dosage
Daunorubicin - administration & dosage
day-6 bone marrow biopsy
Drug Resistance
Humans
induction
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - drug therapy
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - pathology
Medical sciences
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Remission Induction
Thioguanine - administration & dosage
title Bone marrow biopsy during induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia identifies only 50% of patients with resistant disease
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T14%3A28%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bone%20marrow%20biopsy%20during%20induction%20chemotherapy%20for%20acute%20myeloid%20leukaemia%20identifies%20only%2050%25%20of%20patients%20with%20resistant%20disease&rft.jtitle=Leukemia%20research&rft.au=Roberts,%20Marion%20M.&rft.date=1988&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=817&rft.epage=821&rft.pages=817-821&rft.issn=0145-2126&rft.eissn=1873-5835&rft.coden=LEREDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0145-2126(88)90035-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78575950%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78575950&rft_id=info:pmid/3199841&rft_els_id=0145212688900355&rfr_iscdi=true