Is an outpatient appointment required for patients referred for a minor operation under local anaesthetic?
The necessity of an outpatient (OP) consultation for patients referred for minor surgery under local anaesthetic (LA) was examined. Two separate prospective studies were performed. The first comprised 107 patients referred for minor surgery, who were assessed in the outpatient department (OPD), befo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 1996-09, Vol.78 (5 Suppl), p.223-225 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 225 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 Suppl |
container_start_page | 223 |
container_title | Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England |
container_volume | 78 |
creator | Johnson, R C Pullan, R D Hedges, A R Stamatakis, J D |
description | The necessity of an outpatient (OP) consultation for patients referred for minor surgery under local anaesthetic (LA) was examined. Two separate prospective studies were performed. The first comprised 107 patients referred for minor surgery, who were assessed in the outpatient department (OPD), before being booked for minor operations. The second study comprised 106 patients whose names were placed directly on a minor operations list on the basis of the GP referral letter alone. In the first study, 97 (91 per cent) patients went on to undergo minor surgery. Five were not suitable for LA and in five an operation was considered unnecessary. Patients not suitable for LA included children, neck swellings, pre-auricular swellings and swellings described as lymph nodes. In the second study, the GP referral letters were screened to exclude the above and of 106 referrals 93 (88 per cent) underwent a minor operation. The benefit of the second study was twofold. First, 106 OP slots were available for other referrals and secondly, patients avoided the OP waiting list and did not lose time from work as a result of the OP visit. There were no adverse effects demonstrated during the second study. We believe the OP consultation can be avoided if the referral letters are carefully screened. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78574157</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78574157</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p121t-92e1f15487a762aec544e8bf289796d3bd836eed7b28521684743a3d52e9bdcc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kE1LxDAYhHNQ1nX1Jwg5eSs0X01yEln8WFjYi55L2rzFLG2STdKD_96K9TTD8DADc4W2dc1EpRRnN-g253NdEy0V2aCN0pxzXW_R-ZCx8TjMJZriwBdsYgzOl-nXJ7jMLoHFQ0h4BfKSDpD-U4Mn5xcNEdICBI9nbyHhMfRmXKoN5PIFxfVPd-h6MGOG-1V36PP15WP_Xh1Pb4f987GKhJJSaQpkIIIraWRDDfSCc1DdQJWWurGss4o1AFZ2VAlKGsUlZ4ZZQUF3tu_ZDj3-9cYULvMy304u9zCOxkOYcyuVkJwIuYAPKzh3E9g2JjeZ9N2u57AfyxhheQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78574157</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is an outpatient appointment required for patients referred for a minor operation under local anaesthetic?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Johnson, R C ; Pullan, R D ; Hedges, A R ; Stamatakis, J D</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, R C ; Pullan, R D ; Hedges, A R ; Stamatakis, J D</creatorcontrib><description>The necessity of an outpatient (OP) consultation for patients referred for minor surgery under local anaesthetic (LA) was examined. Two separate prospective studies were performed. The first comprised 107 patients referred for minor surgery, who were assessed in the outpatient department (OPD), before being booked for minor operations. The second study comprised 106 patients whose names were placed directly on a minor operations list on the basis of the GP referral letter alone. In the first study, 97 (91 per cent) patients went on to undergo minor surgery. Five were not suitable for LA and in five an operation was considered unnecessary. Patients not suitable for LA included children, neck swellings, pre-auricular swellings and swellings described as lymph nodes. In the second study, the GP referral letters were screened to exclude the above and of 106 referrals 93 (88 per cent) underwent a minor operation. The benefit of the second study was twofold. First, 106 OP slots were available for other referrals and secondly, patients avoided the OP waiting list and did not lose time from work as a result of the OP visit. There were no adverse effects demonstrated during the second study. We believe the OP consultation can be avoided if the referral letters are carefully screened.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0035-8843</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8944490</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures ; Anesthesia, Local ; Appointments and Schedules ; Correspondence as Topic ; General Surgery - organization & administration ; Humans ; Outpatient Clinics, Hospital - organization & administration ; Prospective Studies ; Referral and Consultation ; Wales</subject><ispartof>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 1996-09, Vol.78 (5 Suppl), p.223-225</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8944490$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, R C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pullan, R D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hedges, A R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stamatakis, J D</creatorcontrib><title>Is an outpatient appointment required for patients referred for a minor operation under local anaesthetic?</title><title>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</title><addtitle>Ann R Coll Surg Engl</addtitle><description>The necessity of an outpatient (OP) consultation for patients referred for minor surgery under local anaesthetic (LA) was examined. Two separate prospective studies were performed. The first comprised 107 patients referred for minor surgery, who were assessed in the outpatient department (OPD), before being booked for minor operations. The second study comprised 106 patients whose names were placed directly on a minor operations list on the basis of the GP referral letter alone. In the first study, 97 (91 per cent) patients went on to undergo minor surgery. Five were not suitable for LA and in five an operation was considered unnecessary. Patients not suitable for LA included children, neck swellings, pre-auricular swellings and swellings described as lymph nodes. In the second study, the GP referral letters were screened to exclude the above and of 106 referrals 93 (88 per cent) underwent a minor operation. The benefit of the second study was twofold. First, 106 OP slots were available for other referrals and secondly, patients avoided the OP waiting list and did not lose time from work as a result of the OP visit. There were no adverse effects demonstrated during the second study. We believe the OP consultation can be avoided if the referral letters are carefully screened.</description><subject>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Local</subject><subject>Appointments and Schedules</subject><subject>Correspondence as Topic</subject><subject>General Surgery - organization & administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Outpatient Clinics, Hospital - organization & administration</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>Wales</subject><issn>0035-8843</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kE1LxDAYhHNQ1nX1Jwg5eSs0X01yEln8WFjYi55L2rzFLG2STdKD_96K9TTD8DADc4W2dc1EpRRnN-g253NdEy0V2aCN0pxzXW_R-ZCx8TjMJZriwBdsYgzOl-nXJ7jMLoHFQ0h4BfKSDpD-U4Mn5xcNEdICBI9nbyHhMfRmXKoN5PIFxfVPd-h6MGOG-1V36PP15WP_Xh1Pb4f987GKhJJSaQpkIIIraWRDDfSCc1DdQJWWurGss4o1AFZ2VAlKGsUlZ4ZZQUF3tu_ZDj3-9cYULvMy304u9zCOxkOYcyuVkJwIuYAPKzh3E9g2JjeZ9N2u57AfyxhheQ</recordid><startdate>199609</startdate><enddate>199609</enddate><creator>Johnson, R C</creator><creator>Pullan, R D</creator><creator>Hedges, A R</creator><creator>Stamatakis, J D</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199609</creationdate><title>Is an outpatient appointment required for patients referred for a minor operation under local anaesthetic?</title><author>Johnson, R C ; Pullan, R D ; Hedges, A R ; Stamatakis, J D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p121t-92e1f15487a762aec544e8bf289796d3bd836eed7b28521684743a3d52e9bdcc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Local</topic><topic>Appointments and Schedules</topic><topic>Correspondence as Topic</topic><topic>General Surgery - organization & administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Outpatient Clinics, Hospital - organization & administration</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>Wales</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, R C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pullan, R D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hedges, A R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stamatakis, J D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, R C</au><au>Pullan, R D</au><au>Hedges, A R</au><au>Stamatakis, J D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is an outpatient appointment required for patients referred for a minor operation under local anaesthetic?</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England</jtitle><addtitle>Ann R Coll Surg Engl</addtitle><date>1996-09</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>5 Suppl</issue><spage>223</spage><epage>225</epage><pages>223-225</pages><issn>0035-8843</issn><abstract>The necessity of an outpatient (OP) consultation for patients referred for minor surgery under local anaesthetic (LA) was examined. Two separate prospective studies were performed. The first comprised 107 patients referred for minor surgery, who were assessed in the outpatient department (OPD), before being booked for minor operations. The second study comprised 106 patients whose names were placed directly on a minor operations list on the basis of the GP referral letter alone. In the first study, 97 (91 per cent) patients went on to undergo minor surgery. Five were not suitable for LA and in five an operation was considered unnecessary. Patients not suitable for LA included children, neck swellings, pre-auricular swellings and swellings described as lymph nodes. In the second study, the GP referral letters were screened to exclude the above and of 106 referrals 93 (88 per cent) underwent a minor operation. The benefit of the second study was twofold. First, 106 OP slots were available for other referrals and secondly, patients avoided the OP waiting list and did not lose time from work as a result of the OP visit. There were no adverse effects demonstrated during the second study. We believe the OP consultation can be avoided if the referral letters are carefully screened.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>8944490</pmid><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0035-8843 |
ispartof | Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 1996-09, Vol.78 (5 Suppl), p.223-225 |
issn | 0035-8843 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78574157 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Ambulatory Surgical Procedures Anesthesia, Local Appointments and Schedules Correspondence as Topic General Surgery - organization & administration Humans Outpatient Clinics, Hospital - organization & administration Prospective Studies Referral and Consultation Wales |
title | Is an outpatient appointment required for patients referred for a minor operation under local anaesthetic? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T20%3A41%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20an%20outpatient%20appointment%20required%20for%20patients%20referred%20for%20a%20minor%20operation%20under%20local%20anaesthetic?&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20Royal%20College%20of%20Surgeons%20of%20England&rft.au=Johnson,%20R%20C&rft.date=1996-09&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=5%20Suppl&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=225&rft.pages=223-225&rft.issn=0035-8843&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E78574157%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78574157&rft_id=info:pmid/8944490&rfr_iscdi=true |