Influence of prenatal and postnatal fraternity size on reproduction in swine
Hypotheses of a negative association between fraternity size (size of litter in which an individual develops prior to birth or is reared following birth) and ovulation rate or litter size were tested by examining reproduction of females born or reared in varying prenatal and postnatal fraternities....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 1988-10, Vol.66 (10), p.2530-2537 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2537 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 2530 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Kirkpatrick, B.W Rutledge, J.J |
description | Hypotheses of a negative association between fraternity size (size of litter in which an individual develops prior to birth or is reared following birth) and ovulation rate or litter size were tested by examining reproduction of females born or reared in varying prenatal and postnatal fraternities. Gifts were randomly assigned to develop prenatally and be reared postnatal in small or large fraternities. Dams of experimental animals were randomly assigned to one of two prenatal fraternity size treatments, either unilateral oviductal ligation (to bear a small prenatal litter) or no ligation (to bear a normal prenatal litter). Whereas this did result in differences (P less than .01) in litter size at birth (small = 6.2 +/- .4 vs large = 9.6 +/- .9), there was considerable overlap in observed litter sizes between ligated and nonligated dams. Consequently, effects of prenatal fraternity size were examined by regression. Distinct differences in postnatal fraternity size were created by randomly assigning piglets to small (5 piglets) or large (10 piglets) postnatal fraternities within 24 h of birth. Differences in postnatal fraternity size were maintained through weaning at 3 wk (small = 4.9 +/- .1 vs large = 9.4 +/- .2). Weights at birth (regression of birth weight on prenatal fraternity size = -.07 +/- .02, P less than .01) and weaning (small = 6.09 +/- .15 vs large = 5.46 +/- .17 kg, P less than .01) were heavier for gilts from small prenatal and postnatal fraternities, respectively, compared with gilts from large fraternities. Effects of prenatal and postnatal size on BW did not persist following weaning (P greater than .20). |
doi_str_mv | 10.2527/jas1988.66102530x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78562154</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78562154</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-7a6e0210997062735be21d9c3b44d96331f6f36c627dea215654ebda0c3d618f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF1LwzAYhYMoc05_gILQK73qzEeTtpcy_BgMvNBdh7R9s0XadCYtc_56M1p29XI4zzm8HIRuCZ5TTtOnb-VJnmVzIQimnOHfMzQlnPKYEcHO0RRjSuIsI_QSXXn_jTGhPOcTNGEhxhmfotXS6roHW0LU6mjnwKpO1ZGyVbRrfTco7VQHzpruEHnzF0gbOdi5turLzgRhbOT3xsI1utCq9nAz3hlav758Ld7j1cfbcvG8ikuW4y5OlYDwGM7zFAuaMl4AJVVesiJJqlwwRrTQTJTBq0BRwgVPoKgULlklSKbZDD0MveGHnx58JxvjS6hrZaHtvUwzLkIsCSAZwNK13jvQcudMo9xBEiyPC8pxQXlaMGTux_K-aKA6JcbJgv84-Fuz2e6NA-kbVdeBJsc2IYZuhgN5N5BatVJtnPFy_ZllgvMEs38xK4JH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78562154</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of prenatal and postnatal fraternity size on reproduction in swine</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kirkpatrick, B.W ; Rutledge, J.J</creator><creatorcontrib>Kirkpatrick, B.W ; Rutledge, J.J</creatorcontrib><description>Hypotheses of a negative association between fraternity size (size of litter in which an individual develops prior to birth or is reared following birth) and ovulation rate or litter size were tested by examining reproduction of females born or reared in varying prenatal and postnatal fraternities. Gifts were randomly assigned to develop prenatally and be reared postnatal in small or large fraternities. Dams of experimental animals were randomly assigned to one of two prenatal fraternity size treatments, either unilateral oviductal ligation (to bear a small prenatal litter) or no ligation (to bear a normal prenatal litter). Whereas this did result in differences (P less than .01) in litter size at birth (small = 6.2 +/- .4 vs large = 9.6 +/- .9), there was considerable overlap in observed litter sizes between ligated and nonligated dams. Consequently, effects of prenatal fraternity size were examined by regression. Distinct differences in postnatal fraternity size were created by randomly assigning piglets to small (5 piglets) or large (10 piglets) postnatal fraternities within 24 h of birth. Differences in postnatal fraternity size were maintained through weaning at 3 wk (small = 4.9 +/- .1 vs large = 9.4 +/- .2). Weights at birth (regression of birth weight on prenatal fraternity size = -.07 +/- .02, P less than .01) and weaning (small = 6.09 +/- .15 vs large = 5.46 +/- .17 kg, P less than .01) were heavier for gilts from small prenatal and postnatal fraternities, respectively, compared with gilts from large fraternities. Effects of prenatal and postnatal size on BW did not persist following weaning (P greater than .20).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jas1988.66102530x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3198535</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Am Soc Animal Sci</publisher><subject>Animals ; CERDO ; Female ; GESTACION ; GESTATION ; GESTATION MULTIPLE ; Litter Size ; MULTIPLE BIRTHS ; OVULACION ; OVULATION ; PARTOS MULTIPLES ; PORCIN ; PREGNANCY ; Pregnancy, Animal - physiology ; PUERPERIO ; PUERPERIUM ; SWINE ; Swine - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 1988-10, Vol.66 (10), p.2530-2537</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-7a6e0210997062735be21d9c3b44d96331f6f36c627dea215654ebda0c3d618f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3198535$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kirkpatrick, B.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutledge, J.J</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of prenatal and postnatal fraternity size on reproduction in swine</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description>Hypotheses of a negative association between fraternity size (size of litter in which an individual develops prior to birth or is reared following birth) and ovulation rate or litter size were tested by examining reproduction of females born or reared in varying prenatal and postnatal fraternities. Gifts were randomly assigned to develop prenatally and be reared postnatal in small or large fraternities. Dams of experimental animals were randomly assigned to one of two prenatal fraternity size treatments, either unilateral oviductal ligation (to bear a small prenatal litter) or no ligation (to bear a normal prenatal litter). Whereas this did result in differences (P less than .01) in litter size at birth (small = 6.2 +/- .4 vs large = 9.6 +/- .9), there was considerable overlap in observed litter sizes between ligated and nonligated dams. Consequently, effects of prenatal fraternity size were examined by regression. Distinct differences in postnatal fraternity size were created by randomly assigning piglets to small (5 piglets) or large (10 piglets) postnatal fraternities within 24 h of birth. Differences in postnatal fraternity size were maintained through weaning at 3 wk (small = 4.9 +/- .1 vs large = 9.4 +/- .2). Weights at birth (regression of birth weight on prenatal fraternity size = -.07 +/- .02, P less than .01) and weaning (small = 6.09 +/- .15 vs large = 5.46 +/- .17 kg, P less than .01) were heavier for gilts from small prenatal and postnatal fraternities, respectively, compared with gilts from large fraternities. Effects of prenatal and postnatal size on BW did not persist following weaning (P greater than .20).</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>CERDO</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>GESTACION</subject><subject>GESTATION</subject><subject>GESTATION MULTIPLE</subject><subject>Litter Size</subject><subject>MULTIPLE BIRTHS</subject><subject>OVULACION</subject><subject>OVULATION</subject><subject>PARTOS MULTIPLES</subject><subject>PORCIN</subject><subject>PREGNANCY</subject><subject>Pregnancy, Animal - physiology</subject><subject>PUERPERIO</subject><subject>PUERPERIUM</subject><subject>SWINE</subject><subject>Swine - physiology</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><issn>0021-8812</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kF1LwzAYhYMoc05_gILQK73qzEeTtpcy_BgMvNBdh7R9s0XadCYtc_56M1p29XI4zzm8HIRuCZ5TTtOnb-VJnmVzIQimnOHfMzQlnPKYEcHO0RRjSuIsI_QSXXn_jTGhPOcTNGEhxhmfotXS6roHW0LU6mjnwKpO1ZGyVbRrfTco7VQHzpruEHnzF0gbOdi5turLzgRhbOT3xsI1utCq9nAz3hlav758Ld7j1cfbcvG8ikuW4y5OlYDwGM7zFAuaMl4AJVVesiJJqlwwRrTQTJTBq0BRwgVPoKgULlklSKbZDD0MveGHnx58JxvjS6hrZaHtvUwzLkIsCSAZwNK13jvQcudMo9xBEiyPC8pxQXlaMGTux_K-aKA6JcbJgv84-Fuz2e6NA-kbVdeBJsc2IYZuhgN5N5BatVJtnPFy_ZllgvMEs38xK4JH</recordid><startdate>19881001</startdate><enddate>19881001</enddate><creator>Kirkpatrick, B.W</creator><creator>Rutledge, J.J</creator><general>Am Soc Animal Sci</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19881001</creationdate><title>Influence of prenatal and postnatal fraternity size on reproduction in swine</title><author>Kirkpatrick, B.W ; Rutledge, J.J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-7a6e0210997062735be21d9c3b44d96331f6f36c627dea215654ebda0c3d618f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>CERDO</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>GESTACION</topic><topic>GESTATION</topic><topic>GESTATION MULTIPLE</topic><topic>Litter Size</topic><topic>MULTIPLE BIRTHS</topic><topic>OVULACION</topic><topic>OVULATION</topic><topic>PARTOS MULTIPLES</topic><topic>PORCIN</topic><topic>PREGNANCY</topic><topic>Pregnancy, Animal - physiology</topic><topic>PUERPERIO</topic><topic>PUERPERIUM</topic><topic>SWINE</topic><topic>Swine - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kirkpatrick, B.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutledge, J.J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kirkpatrick, B.W</au><au>Rutledge, J.J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of prenatal and postnatal fraternity size on reproduction in swine</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>1988-10-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2530</spage><epage>2537</epage><pages>2530-2537</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><eissn>0021-8812</eissn><abstract>Hypotheses of a negative association between fraternity size (size of litter in which an individual develops prior to birth or is reared following birth) and ovulation rate or litter size were tested by examining reproduction of females born or reared in varying prenatal and postnatal fraternities. Gifts were randomly assigned to develop prenatally and be reared postnatal in small or large fraternities. Dams of experimental animals were randomly assigned to one of two prenatal fraternity size treatments, either unilateral oviductal ligation (to bear a small prenatal litter) or no ligation (to bear a normal prenatal litter). Whereas this did result in differences (P less than .01) in litter size at birth (small = 6.2 +/- .4 vs large = 9.6 +/- .9), there was considerable overlap in observed litter sizes between ligated and nonligated dams. Consequently, effects of prenatal fraternity size were examined by regression. Distinct differences in postnatal fraternity size were created by randomly assigning piglets to small (5 piglets) or large (10 piglets) postnatal fraternities within 24 h of birth. Differences in postnatal fraternity size were maintained through weaning at 3 wk (small = 4.9 +/- .1 vs large = 9.4 +/- .2). Weights at birth (regression of birth weight on prenatal fraternity size = -.07 +/- .02, P less than .01) and weaning (small = 6.09 +/- .15 vs large = 5.46 +/- .17 kg, P less than .01) were heavier for gilts from small prenatal and postnatal fraternities, respectively, compared with gilts from large fraternities. Effects of prenatal and postnatal size on BW did not persist following weaning (P greater than .20).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Am Soc Animal Sci</pub><pmid>3198535</pmid><doi>10.2527/jas1988.66102530x</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 1988-10, Vol.66 (10), p.2530-2537 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 0021-8812 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78562154 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Animals CERDO Female GESTACION GESTATION GESTATION MULTIPLE Litter Size MULTIPLE BIRTHS OVULACION OVULATION PARTOS MULTIPLES PORCIN PREGNANCY Pregnancy, Animal - physiology PUERPERIO PUERPERIUM SWINE Swine - physiology |
title | Influence of prenatal and postnatal fraternity size on reproduction in swine |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A52%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20prenatal%20and%20postnatal%20fraternity%20size%20on%20reproduction%20in%20swine&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Kirkpatrick,%20B.W&rft.date=1988-10-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2530&rft.epage=2537&rft.pages=2530-2537&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jas1988.66102530x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78562154%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78562154&rft_id=info:pmid/3198535&rfr_iscdi=true |