Influence of prenatal and postnatal fraternity size on reproduction in swine

Hypotheses of a negative association between fraternity size (size of litter in which an individual develops prior to birth or is reared following birth) and ovulation rate or litter size were tested by examining reproduction of females born or reared in varying prenatal and postnatal fraternities....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 1988-10, Vol.66 (10), p.2530-2537
Hauptverfasser: Kirkpatrick, B.W, Rutledge, J.J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2537
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2530
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 66
creator Kirkpatrick, B.W
Rutledge, J.J
description Hypotheses of a negative association between fraternity size (size of litter in which an individual develops prior to birth or is reared following birth) and ovulation rate or litter size were tested by examining reproduction of females born or reared in varying prenatal and postnatal fraternities. Gifts were randomly assigned to develop prenatally and be reared postnatal in small or large fraternities. Dams of experimental animals were randomly assigned to one of two prenatal fraternity size treatments, either unilateral oviductal ligation (to bear a small prenatal litter) or no ligation (to bear a normal prenatal litter). Whereas this did result in differences (P less than .01) in litter size at birth (small = 6.2 +/- .4 vs large = 9.6 +/- .9), there was considerable overlap in observed litter sizes between ligated and nonligated dams. Consequently, effects of prenatal fraternity size were examined by regression. Distinct differences in postnatal fraternity size were created by randomly assigning piglets to small (5 piglets) or large (10 piglets) postnatal fraternities within 24 h of birth. Differences in postnatal fraternity size were maintained through weaning at 3 wk (small = 4.9 +/- .1 vs large = 9.4 +/- .2). Weights at birth (regression of birth weight on prenatal fraternity size = -.07 +/- .02, P less than .01) and weaning (small = 6.09 +/- .15 vs large = 5.46 +/- .17 kg, P less than .01) were heavier for gilts from small prenatal and postnatal fraternities, respectively, compared with gilts from large fraternities. Effects of prenatal and postnatal size on BW did not persist following weaning (P greater than .20).
doi_str_mv 10.2527/jas1988.66102530x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78562154</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78562154</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-7a6e0210997062735be21d9c3b44d96331f6f36c627dea215654ebda0c3d618f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF1LwzAYhYMoc05_gILQK73qzEeTtpcy_BgMvNBdh7R9s0XadCYtc_56M1p29XI4zzm8HIRuCZ5TTtOnb-VJnmVzIQimnOHfMzQlnPKYEcHO0RRjSuIsI_QSXXn_jTGhPOcTNGEhxhmfotXS6roHW0LU6mjnwKpO1ZGyVbRrfTco7VQHzpruEHnzF0gbOdi5turLzgRhbOT3xsI1utCq9nAz3hlav758Ld7j1cfbcvG8ikuW4y5OlYDwGM7zFAuaMl4AJVVesiJJqlwwRrTQTJTBq0BRwgVPoKgULlklSKbZDD0MveGHnx58JxvjS6hrZaHtvUwzLkIsCSAZwNK13jvQcudMo9xBEiyPC8pxQXlaMGTux_K-aKA6JcbJgv84-Fuz2e6NA-kbVdeBJsc2IYZuhgN5N5BatVJtnPFy_ZllgvMEs38xK4JH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78562154</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of prenatal and postnatal fraternity size on reproduction in swine</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kirkpatrick, B.W ; Rutledge, J.J</creator><creatorcontrib>Kirkpatrick, B.W ; Rutledge, J.J</creatorcontrib><description>Hypotheses of a negative association between fraternity size (size of litter in which an individual develops prior to birth or is reared following birth) and ovulation rate or litter size were tested by examining reproduction of females born or reared in varying prenatal and postnatal fraternities. Gifts were randomly assigned to develop prenatally and be reared postnatal in small or large fraternities. Dams of experimental animals were randomly assigned to one of two prenatal fraternity size treatments, either unilateral oviductal ligation (to bear a small prenatal litter) or no ligation (to bear a normal prenatal litter). Whereas this did result in differences (P less than .01) in litter size at birth (small = 6.2 +/- .4 vs large = 9.6 +/- .9), there was considerable overlap in observed litter sizes between ligated and nonligated dams. Consequently, effects of prenatal fraternity size were examined by regression. Distinct differences in postnatal fraternity size were created by randomly assigning piglets to small (5 piglets) or large (10 piglets) postnatal fraternities within 24 h of birth. Differences in postnatal fraternity size were maintained through weaning at 3 wk (small = 4.9 +/- .1 vs large = 9.4 +/- .2). Weights at birth (regression of birth weight on prenatal fraternity size = -.07 +/- .02, P less than .01) and weaning (small = 6.09 +/- .15 vs large = 5.46 +/- .17 kg, P less than .01) were heavier for gilts from small prenatal and postnatal fraternities, respectively, compared with gilts from large fraternities. Effects of prenatal and postnatal size on BW did not persist following weaning (P greater than .20).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jas1988.66102530x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3198535</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Am Soc Animal Sci</publisher><subject>Animals ; CERDO ; Female ; GESTACION ; GESTATION ; GESTATION MULTIPLE ; Litter Size ; MULTIPLE BIRTHS ; OVULACION ; OVULATION ; PARTOS MULTIPLES ; PORCIN ; PREGNANCY ; Pregnancy, Animal - physiology ; PUERPERIO ; PUERPERIUM ; SWINE ; Swine - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 1988-10, Vol.66 (10), p.2530-2537</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-7a6e0210997062735be21d9c3b44d96331f6f36c627dea215654ebda0c3d618f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3198535$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kirkpatrick, B.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutledge, J.J</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of prenatal and postnatal fraternity size on reproduction in swine</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description>Hypotheses of a negative association between fraternity size (size of litter in which an individual develops prior to birth or is reared following birth) and ovulation rate or litter size were tested by examining reproduction of females born or reared in varying prenatal and postnatal fraternities. Gifts were randomly assigned to develop prenatally and be reared postnatal in small or large fraternities. Dams of experimental animals were randomly assigned to one of two prenatal fraternity size treatments, either unilateral oviductal ligation (to bear a small prenatal litter) or no ligation (to bear a normal prenatal litter). Whereas this did result in differences (P less than .01) in litter size at birth (small = 6.2 +/- .4 vs large = 9.6 +/- .9), there was considerable overlap in observed litter sizes between ligated and nonligated dams. Consequently, effects of prenatal fraternity size were examined by regression. Distinct differences in postnatal fraternity size were created by randomly assigning piglets to small (5 piglets) or large (10 piglets) postnatal fraternities within 24 h of birth. Differences in postnatal fraternity size were maintained through weaning at 3 wk (small = 4.9 +/- .1 vs large = 9.4 +/- .2). Weights at birth (regression of birth weight on prenatal fraternity size = -.07 +/- .02, P less than .01) and weaning (small = 6.09 +/- .15 vs large = 5.46 +/- .17 kg, P less than .01) were heavier for gilts from small prenatal and postnatal fraternities, respectively, compared with gilts from large fraternities. Effects of prenatal and postnatal size on BW did not persist following weaning (P greater than .20).</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>CERDO</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>GESTACION</subject><subject>GESTATION</subject><subject>GESTATION MULTIPLE</subject><subject>Litter Size</subject><subject>MULTIPLE BIRTHS</subject><subject>OVULACION</subject><subject>OVULATION</subject><subject>PARTOS MULTIPLES</subject><subject>PORCIN</subject><subject>PREGNANCY</subject><subject>Pregnancy, Animal - physiology</subject><subject>PUERPERIO</subject><subject>PUERPERIUM</subject><subject>SWINE</subject><subject>Swine - physiology</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><issn>0021-8812</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kF1LwzAYhYMoc05_gILQK73qzEeTtpcy_BgMvNBdh7R9s0XadCYtc_56M1p29XI4zzm8HIRuCZ5TTtOnb-VJnmVzIQimnOHfMzQlnPKYEcHO0RRjSuIsI_QSXXn_jTGhPOcTNGEhxhmfotXS6roHW0LU6mjnwKpO1ZGyVbRrfTco7VQHzpruEHnzF0gbOdi5turLzgRhbOT3xsI1utCq9nAz3hlav758Ld7j1cfbcvG8ikuW4y5OlYDwGM7zFAuaMl4AJVVesiJJqlwwRrTQTJTBq0BRwgVPoKgULlklSKbZDD0MveGHnx58JxvjS6hrZaHtvUwzLkIsCSAZwNK13jvQcudMo9xBEiyPC8pxQXlaMGTux_K-aKA6JcbJgv84-Fuz2e6NA-kbVdeBJsc2IYZuhgN5N5BatVJtnPFy_ZllgvMEs38xK4JH</recordid><startdate>19881001</startdate><enddate>19881001</enddate><creator>Kirkpatrick, B.W</creator><creator>Rutledge, J.J</creator><general>Am Soc Animal Sci</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19881001</creationdate><title>Influence of prenatal and postnatal fraternity size on reproduction in swine</title><author>Kirkpatrick, B.W ; Rutledge, J.J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-7a6e0210997062735be21d9c3b44d96331f6f36c627dea215654ebda0c3d618f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>CERDO</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>GESTACION</topic><topic>GESTATION</topic><topic>GESTATION MULTIPLE</topic><topic>Litter Size</topic><topic>MULTIPLE BIRTHS</topic><topic>OVULACION</topic><topic>OVULATION</topic><topic>PARTOS MULTIPLES</topic><topic>PORCIN</topic><topic>PREGNANCY</topic><topic>Pregnancy, Animal - physiology</topic><topic>PUERPERIO</topic><topic>PUERPERIUM</topic><topic>SWINE</topic><topic>Swine - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kirkpatrick, B.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutledge, J.J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kirkpatrick, B.W</au><au>Rutledge, J.J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of prenatal and postnatal fraternity size on reproduction in swine</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>1988-10-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2530</spage><epage>2537</epage><pages>2530-2537</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><eissn>0021-8812</eissn><abstract>Hypotheses of a negative association between fraternity size (size of litter in which an individual develops prior to birth or is reared following birth) and ovulation rate or litter size were tested by examining reproduction of females born or reared in varying prenatal and postnatal fraternities. Gifts were randomly assigned to develop prenatally and be reared postnatal in small or large fraternities. Dams of experimental animals were randomly assigned to one of two prenatal fraternity size treatments, either unilateral oviductal ligation (to bear a small prenatal litter) or no ligation (to bear a normal prenatal litter). Whereas this did result in differences (P less than .01) in litter size at birth (small = 6.2 +/- .4 vs large = 9.6 +/- .9), there was considerable overlap in observed litter sizes between ligated and nonligated dams. Consequently, effects of prenatal fraternity size were examined by regression. Distinct differences in postnatal fraternity size were created by randomly assigning piglets to small (5 piglets) or large (10 piglets) postnatal fraternities within 24 h of birth. Differences in postnatal fraternity size were maintained through weaning at 3 wk (small = 4.9 +/- .1 vs large = 9.4 +/- .2). Weights at birth (regression of birth weight on prenatal fraternity size = -.07 +/- .02, P less than .01) and weaning (small = 6.09 +/- .15 vs large = 5.46 +/- .17 kg, P less than .01) were heavier for gilts from small prenatal and postnatal fraternities, respectively, compared with gilts from large fraternities. Effects of prenatal and postnatal size on BW did not persist following weaning (P greater than .20).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Am Soc Animal Sci</pub><pmid>3198535</pmid><doi>10.2527/jas1988.66102530x</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 1988-10, Vol.66 (10), p.2530-2537
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
0021-8812
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78562154
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animals
CERDO
Female
GESTACION
GESTATION
GESTATION MULTIPLE
Litter Size
MULTIPLE BIRTHS
OVULACION
OVULATION
PARTOS MULTIPLES
PORCIN
PREGNANCY
Pregnancy, Animal - physiology
PUERPERIO
PUERPERIUM
SWINE
Swine - physiology
title Influence of prenatal and postnatal fraternity size on reproduction in swine
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A52%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20prenatal%20and%20postnatal%20fraternity%20size%20on%20reproduction%20in%20swine&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Kirkpatrick,%20B.W&rft.date=1988-10-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2530&rft.epage=2537&rft.pages=2530-2537&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jas1988.66102530x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78562154%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78562154&rft_id=info:pmid/3198535&rfr_iscdi=true