Improvements in Ovarian Stimulation for in Vitro Fertilization

What are the major improvements in stimulation over recent years? The stimulated cycle has completely superseded the natural cycle since this is the only method of obtaining several embryos. In conventional stimulation, despite an enormous body of literature, no single treatment modality has emerged...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1988-10, Vol.541 (1), p.30-36
Hauptverfasser: FRYDMAN, R., FORMAN, R.G., BELAISCH-ALLART, J., HAZOUT, A., RAINHORN, J.D., FRIES, N., TESTARTb, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 36
container_issue 1
container_start_page 30
container_title Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
container_volume 541
creator FRYDMAN, R.
FORMAN, R.G.
BELAISCH-ALLART, J.
HAZOUT, A.
RAINHORN, J.D.
FRIES, N.
TESTARTb, J.
description What are the major improvements in stimulation over recent years? The stimulated cycle has completely superseded the natural cycle since this is the only method of obtaining several embryos. In conventional stimulation, despite an enormous body of literature, no single treatment modality has emerged as superior to other forms of therapy. Undoubtedly it is the experience and habits of individual IVF teams that determine the success of one or another method. Therefore programmed stimulation is an improvement in that it introduces the factors of convenience and simplicity while retaining the clinical efficacy of stimulation by conventional treatment. The analogues of LHRH are still in an early phase of development, but they appear to be associated with a low cancellation rate even in previous poor-responders. Furthermore, preliminary results seem to indicate that this is the first development since the widespread adoption of follicular stimulation, which is associated with an increased pregnancy rate. We are currently involved in trying to associate programmed stimulation and analogue treatment in a bid to combine the advantages of both therapies. Finally, embryo cryopreservation must be mentioned. There is no point in refining our stimulation protocols to obtain many embryos if those surplus to immediate requirement are disposed of. Cryopreservation offers the means of maximizing the pregnancy potential of a single IVF cycle while reducing the possibility of multiple pregnancy.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb22239.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78555042</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78555042</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3220-1eb65d7b0bf87d3c43db5ac64717f891bfdb6765cd5bca8924a631046ca3d0523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE1Lw0AQhhdRtFZ_ghA8eEvcj-xu4qFQRKtQW7Ba0cuym2xgaz50N9XWX29iQu_OZQ7vzDPDA8A5ggFq6nIVIB7GPmMEByiOoqBWGGMSB5s9MNhF-2AAIed-FGNyBI6dW0GIcBTyQ3BIUExjFA7A6L74sNWXLnRZO8-U3vxLWiNLb1GbYp3L2lSll1W2jZamtpV3q21tcvPzF52Ag0zmTp_2fQieb2-eru_86Xxyfz2e-gnBGPpIK0ZTrqDKIp6SJCSpojJhIUc8i2KkslQxzmiSUpXI5uFQMoJgyBJJUkgxGYKLjts8-7nWrhaFcYnOc1nqau0EjyilMGwHr7rBxFbOWZ2JD2sKabcCQdHKEyvRGhKtIdHKE708sWmWz_ora1XodLfa22ryUZd_m1xv_0EWs9fxgsAG4HcA42q92QGkfReME07Fy2wipg8T-giXRLyRX1XojsI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78555042</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improvements in Ovarian Stimulation for in Vitro Fertilization</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>FRYDMAN, R. ; FORMAN, R.G. ; BELAISCH-ALLART, J. ; HAZOUT, A. ; RAINHORN, J.D. ; FRIES, N. ; TESTARTb, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>FRYDMAN, R. ; FORMAN, R.G. ; BELAISCH-ALLART, J. ; HAZOUT, A. ; RAINHORN, J.D. ; FRIES, N. ; TESTARTb, J.</creatorcontrib><description>What are the major improvements in stimulation over recent years? The stimulated cycle has completely superseded the natural cycle since this is the only method of obtaining several embryos. In conventional stimulation, despite an enormous body of literature, no single treatment modality has emerged as superior to other forms of therapy. Undoubtedly it is the experience and habits of individual IVF teams that determine the success of one or another method. Therefore programmed stimulation is an improvement in that it introduces the factors of convenience and simplicity while retaining the clinical efficacy of stimulation by conventional treatment. The analogues of LHRH are still in an early phase of development, but they appear to be associated with a low cancellation rate even in previous poor-responders. Furthermore, preliminary results seem to indicate that this is the first development since the widespread adoption of follicular stimulation, which is associated with an increased pregnancy rate. We are currently involved in trying to associate programmed stimulation and analogue treatment in a bid to combine the advantages of both therapies. Finally, embryo cryopreservation must be mentioned. There is no point in refining our stimulation protocols to obtain many embryos if those surplus to immediate requirement are disposed of. Cryopreservation offers the means of maximizing the pregnancy potential of a single IVF cycle while reducing the possibility of multiple pregnancy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0077-8923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1749-6632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb22239.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3195914</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Embryo, Mammalian - physiology ; Estradiol - blood ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro ; Humans ; Luteinizing Hormone - metabolism ; Menstrual Cycle ; Ovary - physiology ; Ovulation Induction ; Tissue Preservation</subject><ispartof>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1988-10, Vol.541 (1), p.30-36</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3220-1eb65d7b0bf87d3c43db5ac64717f891bfdb6765cd5bca8924a631046ca3d0523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3220-1eb65d7b0bf87d3c43db5ac64717f891bfdb6765cd5bca8924a631046ca3d0523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1749-6632.1988.tb22239.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1749-6632.1988.tb22239.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3195914$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>FRYDMAN, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FORMAN, R.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BELAISCH-ALLART, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAZOUT, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAINHORN, J.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRIES, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TESTARTb, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Improvements in Ovarian Stimulation for in Vitro Fertilization</title><title>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</title><addtitle>Ann N Y Acad Sci</addtitle><description>What are the major improvements in stimulation over recent years? The stimulated cycle has completely superseded the natural cycle since this is the only method of obtaining several embryos. In conventional stimulation, despite an enormous body of literature, no single treatment modality has emerged as superior to other forms of therapy. Undoubtedly it is the experience and habits of individual IVF teams that determine the success of one or another method. Therefore programmed stimulation is an improvement in that it introduces the factors of convenience and simplicity while retaining the clinical efficacy of stimulation by conventional treatment. The analogues of LHRH are still in an early phase of development, but they appear to be associated with a low cancellation rate even in previous poor-responders. Furthermore, preliminary results seem to indicate that this is the first development since the widespread adoption of follicular stimulation, which is associated with an increased pregnancy rate. We are currently involved in trying to associate programmed stimulation and analogue treatment in a bid to combine the advantages of both therapies. Finally, embryo cryopreservation must be mentioned. There is no point in refining our stimulation protocols to obtain many embryos if those surplus to immediate requirement are disposed of. Cryopreservation offers the means of maximizing the pregnancy potential of a single IVF cycle while reducing the possibility of multiple pregnancy.</description><subject>Embryo, Mammalian - physiology</subject><subject>Estradiol - blood</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Luteinizing Hormone - metabolism</subject><subject>Menstrual Cycle</subject><subject>Ovary - physiology</subject><subject>Ovulation Induction</subject><subject>Tissue Preservation</subject><issn>0077-8923</issn><issn>1749-6632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkE1Lw0AQhhdRtFZ_ghA8eEvcj-xu4qFQRKtQW7Ba0cuym2xgaz50N9XWX29iQu_OZQ7vzDPDA8A5ggFq6nIVIB7GPmMEByiOoqBWGGMSB5s9MNhF-2AAIed-FGNyBI6dW0GIcBTyQ3BIUExjFA7A6L74sNWXLnRZO8-U3vxLWiNLb1GbYp3L2lSll1W2jZamtpV3q21tcvPzF52Ag0zmTp_2fQieb2-eru_86Xxyfz2e-gnBGPpIK0ZTrqDKIp6SJCSpojJhIUc8i2KkslQxzmiSUpXI5uFQMoJgyBJJUkgxGYKLjts8-7nWrhaFcYnOc1nqau0EjyilMGwHr7rBxFbOWZ2JD2sKabcCQdHKEyvRGhKtIdHKE708sWmWz_ora1XodLfa22ryUZd_m1xv_0EWs9fxgsAG4HcA42q92QGkfReME07Fy2wipg8T-giXRLyRX1XojsI</recordid><startdate>198810</startdate><enddate>198810</enddate><creator>FRYDMAN, R.</creator><creator>FORMAN, R.G.</creator><creator>BELAISCH-ALLART, J.</creator><creator>HAZOUT, A.</creator><creator>RAINHORN, J.D.</creator><creator>FRIES, N.</creator><creator>TESTARTb, J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198810</creationdate><title>Improvements in Ovarian Stimulation for in Vitro Fertilization</title><author>FRYDMAN, R. ; FORMAN, R.G. ; BELAISCH-ALLART, J. ; HAZOUT, A. ; RAINHORN, J.D. ; FRIES, N. ; TESTARTb, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3220-1eb65d7b0bf87d3c43db5ac64717f891bfdb6765cd5bca8924a631046ca3d0523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Embryo, Mammalian - physiology</topic><topic>Estradiol - blood</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Luteinizing Hormone - metabolism</topic><topic>Menstrual Cycle</topic><topic>Ovary - physiology</topic><topic>Ovulation Induction</topic><topic>Tissue Preservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FRYDMAN, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FORMAN, R.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BELAISCH-ALLART, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAZOUT, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAINHORN, J.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRIES, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TESTARTb, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FRYDMAN, R.</au><au>FORMAN, R.G.</au><au>BELAISCH-ALLART, J.</au><au>HAZOUT, A.</au><au>RAINHORN, J.D.</au><au>FRIES, N.</au><au>TESTARTb, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improvements in Ovarian Stimulation for in Vitro Fertilization</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Ann N Y Acad Sci</addtitle><date>1988-10</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>541</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>30</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>30-36</pages><issn>0077-8923</issn><eissn>1749-6632</eissn><abstract>What are the major improvements in stimulation over recent years? The stimulated cycle has completely superseded the natural cycle since this is the only method of obtaining several embryos. In conventional stimulation, despite an enormous body of literature, no single treatment modality has emerged as superior to other forms of therapy. Undoubtedly it is the experience and habits of individual IVF teams that determine the success of one or another method. Therefore programmed stimulation is an improvement in that it introduces the factors of convenience and simplicity while retaining the clinical efficacy of stimulation by conventional treatment. The analogues of LHRH are still in an early phase of development, but they appear to be associated with a low cancellation rate even in previous poor-responders. Furthermore, preliminary results seem to indicate that this is the first development since the widespread adoption of follicular stimulation, which is associated with an increased pregnancy rate. We are currently involved in trying to associate programmed stimulation and analogue treatment in a bid to combine the advantages of both therapies. Finally, embryo cryopreservation must be mentioned. There is no point in refining our stimulation protocols to obtain many embryos if those surplus to immediate requirement are disposed of. Cryopreservation offers the means of maximizing the pregnancy potential of a single IVF cycle while reducing the possibility of multiple pregnancy.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>3195914</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb22239.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0077-8923
ispartof Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1988-10, Vol.541 (1), p.30-36
issn 0077-8923
1749-6632
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78555042
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Embryo, Mammalian - physiology
Estradiol - blood
Female
Fertilization in Vitro
Humans
Luteinizing Hormone - metabolism
Menstrual Cycle
Ovary - physiology
Ovulation Induction
Tissue Preservation
title Improvements in Ovarian Stimulation for in Vitro Fertilization
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T18%3A38%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improvements%20in%20Ovarian%20Stimulation%20for%20in%20Vitro%20Fertilization&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20New%20York%20Academy%20of%20Sciences&rft.au=FRYDMAN,%20R.&rft.date=1988-10&rft.volume=541&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=30-36&rft.issn=0077-8923&rft.eissn=1749-6632&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb22239.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78555042%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78555042&rft_id=info:pmid/3195914&rfr_iscdi=true