Bacterial contamination of autologous bone marrow during processing
We were interested to read the report by Smith et al. bacteriological monitoring of 14 bone marrow harvests. They found a 36% bacterial contamination rate before cryopreservation, which rose to 45% at the thawing stage. We also monitor bone marrow harvests, and 34 (39.5%) of the 86 harvests cultured...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of hospital infection 1996-11, Vol.34 (3), p.230-233 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 233 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 230 |
container_title | The Journal of hospital infection |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Farrington, M. Matthews, I. Jestice, H.K. Scott, M.A. Marcus, R.E. Hunt, C. Foreman, J. |
description | We were interested to read the report by Smith et al. bacteriological monitoring of 14 bone marrow harvests. They found a 36% bacterial contamination rate before cryopreservation, which rose to 45% at the thawing stage. We also monitor bone marrow harvests, and 34 (39.5%) of the 86 harvests cultured between January 1995 and April 1996 were positive with a comparable (although broader) range of isolates to those reported by Smith et al. To the microbiologist's eye, there are many similarities between the processes of bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) harvest, and our recently published experience of monitoring 128 PBSC harvests from 64 patients has interesting analogies and contrasts with the results from University College. We cultured at the same stages as Smith et al., but in duplicate, and found 18.0% PBSC harvests to be contaminated, two (1.6%) of these with the same bacteria in both duplicate post-cryopreservation cultures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0195-6701(96)90072-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78554073</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0195670196900729</els_id><sourcerecordid>16020813</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-c2c83ca52436a790f8572a217c104a5bcce968ec77242e8c334d05bbe466ac7b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1v2zAMhoViQ5t1_QkBfBrWg1dKsiTrVHRBtxUosEO7syDTdKHCsTLJXtF_P-cDueZEgnzJl3wYW3L4xoHrmyfgVpXaAP9q9bUFMKK0Z2zBlRSlsNJ-YIuj5IJ9yvkVAOa6OmfntRVS1LBgq-8eR0rB9wXGYfTrMPgxxKGIXeGnMfbxJU65aOJAxdqnFN-KdkpheCk2KSLlPKef2cfO95muDvGS_flx_7z6VT7-_vmwunssUVo-liiwluiVqKT2xkJXKyO84AY5VF41iGR1TWiMqATVKGXVgmoaqrT2aBp5yb7s987WfyfKo1uHjNT3fqD5SGdqpSow8qSQaxBQ861Q7YWYYs6JOrdJYX7z3XFwW8puR9ltETqr3Y6ys_Pc8mAwNWtqj1MHrHP_dt-nGce_QMllDDQgtSERjq6N4YTDfyt_jGc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16020813</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bacterial contamination of autologous bone marrow during processing</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Farrington, M. ; Matthews, I. ; Jestice, H.K. ; Scott, M.A. ; Marcus, R.E. ; Hunt, C. ; Foreman, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Farrington, M. ; Matthews, I. ; Jestice, H.K. ; Scott, M.A. ; Marcus, R.E. ; Hunt, C. ; Foreman, J.</creatorcontrib><description>We were interested to read the report by Smith et al. bacteriological monitoring of 14 bone marrow harvests. They found a 36% bacterial contamination rate before cryopreservation, which rose to 45% at the thawing stage. We also monitor bone marrow harvests, and 34 (39.5%) of the 86 harvests cultured between January 1995 and April 1996 were positive with a comparable (although broader) range of isolates to those reported by Smith et al. To the microbiologist's eye, there are many similarities between the processes of bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) harvest, and our recently published experience of monitoring 128 PBSC harvests from 64 patients has interesting analogies and contrasts with the results from University College. We cultured at the same stages as Smith et al., but in duplicate, and found 18.0% PBSC harvests to be contaminated, two (1.6%) of these with the same bacteria in both duplicate post-cryopreservation cultures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0195-6701(96)90072-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8923280</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bacterial Infections - prevention & control ; Bacterial Infections - transmission ; Bone Marrow - microbiology ; Bone Marrow Transplantation ; Humans ; Infection Control - methods</subject><ispartof>The Journal of hospital infection, 1996-11, Vol.34 (3), p.230-233</ispartof><rights>1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-c2c83ca52436a790f8572a217c104a5bcce968ec77242e8c334d05bbe466ac7b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-c2c83ca52436a790f8572a217c104a5bcce968ec77242e8c334d05bbe466ac7b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6701(96)90072-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8923280$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Farrington, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jestice, H.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcus, R.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foreman, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Bacterial contamination of autologous bone marrow during processing</title><title>The Journal of hospital infection</title><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><description>We were interested to read the report by Smith et al. bacteriological monitoring of 14 bone marrow harvests. They found a 36% bacterial contamination rate before cryopreservation, which rose to 45% at the thawing stage. We also monitor bone marrow harvests, and 34 (39.5%) of the 86 harvests cultured between January 1995 and April 1996 were positive with a comparable (although broader) range of isolates to those reported by Smith et al. To the microbiologist's eye, there are many similarities between the processes of bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) harvest, and our recently published experience of monitoring 128 PBSC harvests from 64 patients has interesting analogies and contrasts with the results from University College. We cultured at the same stages as Smith et al., but in duplicate, and found 18.0% PBSC harvests to be contaminated, two (1.6%) of these with the same bacteria in both duplicate post-cryopreservation cultures.</description><subject>Bacterial Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - transmission</subject><subject>Bone Marrow - microbiology</subject><subject>Bone Marrow Transplantation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection Control - methods</subject><issn>0195-6701</issn><issn>1532-2939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1v2zAMhoViQ5t1_QkBfBrWg1dKsiTrVHRBtxUosEO7syDTdKHCsTLJXtF_P-cDueZEgnzJl3wYW3L4xoHrmyfgVpXaAP9q9bUFMKK0Z2zBlRSlsNJ-YIuj5IJ9yvkVAOa6OmfntRVS1LBgq-8eR0rB9wXGYfTrMPgxxKGIXeGnMfbxJU65aOJAxdqnFN-KdkpheCk2KSLlPKef2cfO95muDvGS_flx_7z6VT7-_vmwunssUVo-liiwluiVqKT2xkJXKyO84AY5VF41iGR1TWiMqATVKGXVgmoaqrT2aBp5yb7s987WfyfKo1uHjNT3fqD5SGdqpSow8qSQaxBQ861Q7YWYYs6JOrdJYX7z3XFwW8puR9ltETqr3Y6ys_Pc8mAwNWtqj1MHrHP_dt-nGce_QMllDDQgtSERjq6N4YTDfyt_jGc</recordid><startdate>19961101</startdate><enddate>19961101</enddate><creator>Farrington, M.</creator><creator>Matthews, I.</creator><creator>Jestice, H.K.</creator><creator>Scott, M.A.</creator><creator>Marcus, R.E.</creator><creator>Hunt, C.</creator><creator>Foreman, J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19961101</creationdate><title>Bacterial contamination of autologous bone marrow during processing</title><author>Farrington, M. ; Matthews, I. ; Jestice, H.K. ; Scott, M.A. ; Marcus, R.E. ; Hunt, C. ; Foreman, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-c2c83ca52436a790f8572a217c104a5bcce968ec77242e8c334d05bbe466ac7b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Bacterial Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - transmission</topic><topic>Bone Marrow - microbiology</topic><topic>Bone Marrow Transplantation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection Control - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Farrington, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jestice, H.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcus, R.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foreman, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Farrington, M.</au><au>Matthews, I.</au><au>Jestice, H.K.</au><au>Scott, M.A.</au><au>Marcus, R.E.</au><au>Hunt, C.</au><au>Foreman, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bacterial contamination of autologous bone marrow during processing</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><date>1996-11-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>230</spage><epage>233</epage><pages>230-233</pages><issn>0195-6701</issn><eissn>1532-2939</eissn><abstract>We were interested to read the report by Smith et al. bacteriological monitoring of 14 bone marrow harvests. They found a 36% bacterial contamination rate before cryopreservation, which rose to 45% at the thawing stage. We also monitor bone marrow harvests, and 34 (39.5%) of the 86 harvests cultured between January 1995 and April 1996 were positive with a comparable (although broader) range of isolates to those reported by Smith et al. To the microbiologist's eye, there are many similarities between the processes of bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) harvest, and our recently published experience of monitoring 128 PBSC harvests from 64 patients has interesting analogies and contrasts with the results from University College. We cultured at the same stages as Smith et al., but in duplicate, and found 18.0% PBSC harvests to be contaminated, two (1.6%) of these with the same bacteria in both duplicate post-cryopreservation cultures.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>8923280</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0195-6701(96)90072-9</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0195-6701 |
ispartof | The Journal of hospital infection, 1996-11, Vol.34 (3), p.230-233 |
issn | 0195-6701 1532-2939 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78554073 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Bacterial Infections - prevention & control Bacterial Infections - transmission Bone Marrow - microbiology Bone Marrow Transplantation Humans Infection Control - methods |
title | Bacterial contamination of autologous bone marrow during processing |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T06%3A06%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bacterial%20contamination%20of%20autologous%20bone%20marrow%20during%20processing&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20hospital%20infection&rft.au=Farrington,%20M.&rft.date=1996-11-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=230&rft.epage=233&rft.pages=230-233&rft.issn=0195-6701&rft.eissn=1532-2939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0195-6701(96)90072-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16020813%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16020813&rft_id=info:pmid/8923280&rft_els_id=S0195670196900729&rfr_iscdi=true |