Bacterial contamination of autologous bone marrow during processing

We were interested to read the report by Smith et al. bacteriological monitoring of 14 bone marrow harvests. They found a 36% bacterial contamination rate before cryopreservation, which rose to 45% at the thawing stage. We also monitor bone marrow harvests, and 34 (39.5%) of the 86 harvests cultured...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of hospital infection 1996-11, Vol.34 (3), p.230-233
Hauptverfasser: Farrington, M., Matthews, I., Jestice, H.K., Scott, M.A., Marcus, R.E., Hunt, C., Foreman, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 233
container_issue 3
container_start_page 230
container_title The Journal of hospital infection
container_volume 34
creator Farrington, M.
Matthews, I.
Jestice, H.K.
Scott, M.A.
Marcus, R.E.
Hunt, C.
Foreman, J.
description We were interested to read the report by Smith et al. bacteriological monitoring of 14 bone marrow harvests. They found a 36% bacterial contamination rate before cryopreservation, which rose to 45% at the thawing stage. We also monitor bone marrow harvests, and 34 (39.5%) of the 86 harvests cultured between January 1995 and April 1996 were positive with a comparable (although broader) range of isolates to those reported by Smith et al. To the microbiologist's eye, there are many similarities between the processes of bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) harvest, and our recently published experience of monitoring 128 PBSC harvests from 64 patients has interesting analogies and contrasts with the results from University College. We cultured at the same stages as Smith et al., but in duplicate, and found 18.0% PBSC harvests to be contaminated, two (1.6%) of these with the same bacteria in both duplicate post-cryopreservation cultures.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0195-6701(96)90072-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78554073</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0195670196900729</els_id><sourcerecordid>16020813</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-c2c83ca52436a790f8572a217c104a5bcce968ec77242e8c334d05bbe466ac7b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1v2zAMhoViQ5t1_QkBfBrWg1dKsiTrVHRBtxUosEO7syDTdKHCsTLJXtF_P-cDueZEgnzJl3wYW3L4xoHrmyfgVpXaAP9q9bUFMKK0Z2zBlRSlsNJ-YIuj5IJ9yvkVAOa6OmfntRVS1LBgq-8eR0rB9wXGYfTrMPgxxKGIXeGnMfbxJU65aOJAxdqnFN-KdkpheCk2KSLlPKef2cfO95muDvGS_flx_7z6VT7-_vmwunssUVo-liiwluiVqKT2xkJXKyO84AY5VF41iGR1TWiMqATVKGXVgmoaqrT2aBp5yb7s987WfyfKo1uHjNT3fqD5SGdqpSow8qSQaxBQ861Q7YWYYs6JOrdJYX7z3XFwW8puR9ltETqr3Y6ys_Pc8mAwNWtqj1MHrHP_dt-nGce_QMllDDQgtSERjq6N4YTDfyt_jGc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16020813</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bacterial contamination of autologous bone marrow during processing</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Farrington, M. ; Matthews, I. ; Jestice, H.K. ; Scott, M.A. ; Marcus, R.E. ; Hunt, C. ; Foreman, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Farrington, M. ; Matthews, I. ; Jestice, H.K. ; Scott, M.A. ; Marcus, R.E. ; Hunt, C. ; Foreman, J.</creatorcontrib><description>We were interested to read the report by Smith et al. bacteriological monitoring of 14 bone marrow harvests. They found a 36% bacterial contamination rate before cryopreservation, which rose to 45% at the thawing stage. We also monitor bone marrow harvests, and 34 (39.5%) of the 86 harvests cultured between January 1995 and April 1996 were positive with a comparable (although broader) range of isolates to those reported by Smith et al. To the microbiologist's eye, there are many similarities between the processes of bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) harvest, and our recently published experience of monitoring 128 PBSC harvests from 64 patients has interesting analogies and contrasts with the results from University College. We cultured at the same stages as Smith et al., but in duplicate, and found 18.0% PBSC harvests to be contaminated, two (1.6%) of these with the same bacteria in both duplicate post-cryopreservation cultures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0195-6701(96)90072-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8923280</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bacterial Infections - prevention &amp; control ; Bacterial Infections - transmission ; Bone Marrow - microbiology ; Bone Marrow Transplantation ; Humans ; Infection Control - methods</subject><ispartof>The Journal of hospital infection, 1996-11, Vol.34 (3), p.230-233</ispartof><rights>1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-c2c83ca52436a790f8572a217c104a5bcce968ec77242e8c334d05bbe466ac7b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-c2c83ca52436a790f8572a217c104a5bcce968ec77242e8c334d05bbe466ac7b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6701(96)90072-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8923280$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Farrington, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jestice, H.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcus, R.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foreman, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Bacterial contamination of autologous bone marrow during processing</title><title>The Journal of hospital infection</title><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><description>We were interested to read the report by Smith et al. bacteriological monitoring of 14 bone marrow harvests. They found a 36% bacterial contamination rate before cryopreservation, which rose to 45% at the thawing stage. We also monitor bone marrow harvests, and 34 (39.5%) of the 86 harvests cultured between January 1995 and April 1996 were positive with a comparable (although broader) range of isolates to those reported by Smith et al. To the microbiologist's eye, there are many similarities between the processes of bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) harvest, and our recently published experience of monitoring 128 PBSC harvests from 64 patients has interesting analogies and contrasts with the results from University College. We cultured at the same stages as Smith et al., but in duplicate, and found 18.0% PBSC harvests to be contaminated, two (1.6%) of these with the same bacteria in both duplicate post-cryopreservation cultures.</description><subject>Bacterial Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - transmission</subject><subject>Bone Marrow - microbiology</subject><subject>Bone Marrow Transplantation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection Control - methods</subject><issn>0195-6701</issn><issn>1532-2939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1v2zAMhoViQ5t1_QkBfBrWg1dKsiTrVHRBtxUosEO7syDTdKHCsTLJXtF_P-cDueZEgnzJl3wYW3L4xoHrmyfgVpXaAP9q9bUFMKK0Z2zBlRSlsNJ-YIuj5IJ9yvkVAOa6OmfntRVS1LBgq-8eR0rB9wXGYfTrMPgxxKGIXeGnMfbxJU65aOJAxdqnFN-KdkpheCk2KSLlPKef2cfO95muDvGS_flx_7z6VT7-_vmwunssUVo-liiwluiVqKT2xkJXKyO84AY5VF41iGR1TWiMqATVKGXVgmoaqrT2aBp5yb7s987WfyfKo1uHjNT3fqD5SGdqpSow8qSQaxBQ861Q7YWYYs6JOrdJYX7z3XFwW8puR9ltETqr3Y6ys_Pc8mAwNWtqj1MHrHP_dt-nGce_QMllDDQgtSERjq6N4YTDfyt_jGc</recordid><startdate>19961101</startdate><enddate>19961101</enddate><creator>Farrington, M.</creator><creator>Matthews, I.</creator><creator>Jestice, H.K.</creator><creator>Scott, M.A.</creator><creator>Marcus, R.E.</creator><creator>Hunt, C.</creator><creator>Foreman, J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19961101</creationdate><title>Bacterial contamination of autologous bone marrow during processing</title><author>Farrington, M. ; Matthews, I. ; Jestice, H.K. ; Scott, M.A. ; Marcus, R.E. ; Hunt, C. ; Foreman, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-c2c83ca52436a790f8572a217c104a5bcce968ec77242e8c334d05bbe466ac7b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Bacterial Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - transmission</topic><topic>Bone Marrow - microbiology</topic><topic>Bone Marrow Transplantation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection Control - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Farrington, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jestice, H.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcus, R.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foreman, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Farrington, M.</au><au>Matthews, I.</au><au>Jestice, H.K.</au><au>Scott, M.A.</au><au>Marcus, R.E.</au><au>Hunt, C.</au><au>Foreman, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bacterial contamination of autologous bone marrow during processing</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><date>1996-11-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>230</spage><epage>233</epage><pages>230-233</pages><issn>0195-6701</issn><eissn>1532-2939</eissn><abstract>We were interested to read the report by Smith et al. bacteriological monitoring of 14 bone marrow harvests. They found a 36% bacterial contamination rate before cryopreservation, which rose to 45% at the thawing stage. We also monitor bone marrow harvests, and 34 (39.5%) of the 86 harvests cultured between January 1995 and April 1996 were positive with a comparable (although broader) range of isolates to those reported by Smith et al. To the microbiologist's eye, there are many similarities between the processes of bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) harvest, and our recently published experience of monitoring 128 PBSC harvests from 64 patients has interesting analogies and contrasts with the results from University College. We cultured at the same stages as Smith et al., but in duplicate, and found 18.0% PBSC harvests to be contaminated, two (1.6%) of these with the same bacteria in both duplicate post-cryopreservation cultures.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>8923280</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0195-6701(96)90072-9</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-6701
ispartof The Journal of hospital infection, 1996-11, Vol.34 (3), p.230-233
issn 0195-6701
1532-2939
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78554073
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Bacterial Infections - prevention & control
Bacterial Infections - transmission
Bone Marrow - microbiology
Bone Marrow Transplantation
Humans
Infection Control - methods
title Bacterial contamination of autologous bone marrow during processing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T06%3A06%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bacterial%20contamination%20of%20autologous%20bone%20marrow%20during%20processing&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20hospital%20infection&rft.au=Farrington,%20M.&rft.date=1996-11-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=230&rft.epage=233&rft.pages=230-233&rft.issn=0195-6701&rft.eissn=1532-2939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0195-6701(96)90072-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16020813%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16020813&rft_id=info:pmid/8923280&rft_els_id=S0195670196900729&rfr_iscdi=true