Biomechanical considerations in the surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Based on a review of previous studies and our opinion, biomechanical considerations suggest the following guidelines for the surgical management of CSM. It is not recommended that the dura mater, the pia mater, and the dentate ligaments be transected in the surgical treatment of CSM. Anterior decomp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Pa. 1976), 1988-07, Vol.13 (7), p.856-860
Hauptverfasser: White, 3rd, A A, Panjabi, M M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 860
container_issue 7
container_start_page 856
container_title Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)
container_volume 13
creator White, 3rd, A A
Panjabi, M M
description Based on a review of previous studies and our opinion, biomechanical considerations suggest the following guidelines for the surgical management of CSM. It is not recommended that the dura mater, the pia mater, and the dentate ligaments be transected in the surgical treatment of CSM. Anterior decompression and fusion, preferably with the Smith-Robinson technique, is recommended for patients with anterior impingement of the spinal cord at one or two levels in the absence of a narrow spinal canal. This procedure is also advantageous when there is significant radiculopathy associated with the level(s) of pathology. Posterior decompression is recommended when there are three or more levels involved, and particularly when there is developmental stenosis of the canal, ie, a DAD below 13 mm and a SAD below 11 mm. Laminectomy and laminoplasty for CSM may not be any different as regards surgical outcome. One well-controlled study showed only one difference, a decrease in the ability of the laminoplasty patients to extend the neck. If there is evidence of instability or a potential for it, posterior decompression procedures should be accompanied by a facet fusion, or in the case of laminoplasty, some fusion modification such as that described by Itoh and Tsuji. There may also be circumstances in which significant multilevel anterior spur formation and compression in association with a stenotic canal should be treated with anterior and posterior surgery with appropriate attention to maintaining adequate stability. The advantages and disadvantages of these various surgical procedures and their relative appropriateness in various clinical situations will be gradually clarified through well-designed and executed laboratory and clinical investigations.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00007632-198807000-00029
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78547148</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78547148</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-21ab60b32e0151cc601c877e6984682487ff59da03ca9746bdbec4737c0de62e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kDlPwzAUgD2ASin8BCRPbAFftZ0RKi6pEgssLJbjvLRGSVzsBCn_HlNKn_TuS_oQwpTcUFKqW5JFSc4KWmpNVM6KrKw8QXPCJSuY4PIMnaf0mcuS03KGZtkKVco5-rj3oQO3tb13tsUu9MnXEO3gc4R9j4ct4DTGzb7d2d5uoIN-wKHBDuL3vpx2oa-nNgze4W6CNuzssJ0u0Glj2wSXB79A748Pb6vnYv369LK6WxeOKzkUjNpKkoozIHRJnZOEOq0UyFILqZnQqmmWZW0Jd7ZUQlZ1BU4orhypQTLgC3T9d3cXw9cIaTCdTw7a1vYQxmSUXgpFhc6D-m_QxZBShMbsou9snAwl5hel-UdpjijNHmVevTr8GKsO6uPigSP_AcDYcok</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78547148</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biomechanical considerations in the surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>White, 3rd, A A ; Panjabi, M M</creator><creatorcontrib>White, 3rd, A A ; Panjabi, M M</creatorcontrib><description>Based on a review of previous studies and our opinion, biomechanical considerations suggest the following guidelines for the surgical management of CSM. It is not recommended that the dura mater, the pia mater, and the dentate ligaments be transected in the surgical treatment of CSM. Anterior decompression and fusion, preferably with the Smith-Robinson technique, is recommended for patients with anterior impingement of the spinal cord at one or two levels in the absence of a narrow spinal canal. This procedure is also advantageous when there is significant radiculopathy associated with the level(s) of pathology. Posterior decompression is recommended when there are three or more levels involved, and particularly when there is developmental stenosis of the canal, ie, a DAD below 13 mm and a SAD below 11 mm. Laminectomy and laminoplasty for CSM may not be any different as regards surgical outcome. One well-controlled study showed only one difference, a decrease in the ability of the laminoplasty patients to extend the neck. If there is evidence of instability or a potential for it, posterior decompression procedures should be accompanied by a facet fusion, or in the case of laminoplasty, some fusion modification such as that described by Itoh and Tsuji. There may also be circumstances in which significant multilevel anterior spur formation and compression in association with a stenotic canal should be treated with anterior and posterior surgery with appropriate attention to maintaining adequate stability. The advantages and disadvantages of these various surgical procedures and their relative appropriateness in various clinical situations will be gradually clarified through well-designed and executed laboratory and clinical investigations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-2436</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198807000-00029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3194796</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena ; Humans ; Movement ; Neck ; Spinal Canal - anatomy &amp; histology ; Spinal Canal - physiology ; Spinal Cord Compression - etiology ; Spinal Cord Compression - physiopathology ; Spinal Cord Compression - surgery ; Spinal Osteophytosis - complications ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 1988-07, Vol.13 (7), p.856-860</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-21ab60b32e0151cc601c877e6984682487ff59da03ca9746bdbec4737c0de62e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3194796$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>White, 3rd, A A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panjabi, M M</creatorcontrib><title>Biomechanical considerations in the surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy</title><title>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</title><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><description>Based on a review of previous studies and our opinion, biomechanical considerations suggest the following guidelines for the surgical management of CSM. It is not recommended that the dura mater, the pia mater, and the dentate ligaments be transected in the surgical treatment of CSM. Anterior decompression and fusion, preferably with the Smith-Robinson technique, is recommended for patients with anterior impingement of the spinal cord at one or two levels in the absence of a narrow spinal canal. This procedure is also advantageous when there is significant radiculopathy associated with the level(s) of pathology. Posterior decompression is recommended when there are three or more levels involved, and particularly when there is developmental stenosis of the canal, ie, a DAD below 13 mm and a SAD below 11 mm. Laminectomy and laminoplasty for CSM may not be any different as regards surgical outcome. One well-controlled study showed only one difference, a decrease in the ability of the laminoplasty patients to extend the neck. If there is evidence of instability or a potential for it, posterior decompression procedures should be accompanied by a facet fusion, or in the case of laminoplasty, some fusion modification such as that described by Itoh and Tsuji. There may also be circumstances in which significant multilevel anterior spur formation and compression in association with a stenotic canal should be treated with anterior and posterior surgery with appropriate attention to maintaining adequate stability. The advantages and disadvantages of these various surgical procedures and their relative appropriateness in various clinical situations will be gradually clarified through well-designed and executed laboratory and clinical investigations.</description><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Neck</subject><subject>Spinal Canal - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Spinal Canal - physiology</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Compression - etiology</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Compression - physiopathology</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Compression - surgery</subject><subject>Spinal Osteophytosis - complications</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>0362-2436</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kDlPwzAUgD2ASin8BCRPbAFftZ0RKi6pEgssLJbjvLRGSVzsBCn_HlNKn_TuS_oQwpTcUFKqW5JFSc4KWmpNVM6KrKw8QXPCJSuY4PIMnaf0mcuS03KGZtkKVco5-rj3oQO3tb13tsUu9MnXEO3gc4R9j4ct4DTGzb7d2d5uoIN-wKHBDuL3vpx2oa-nNgze4W6CNuzssJ0u0Glj2wSXB79A748Pb6vnYv369LK6WxeOKzkUjNpKkoozIHRJnZOEOq0UyFILqZnQqmmWZW0Jd7ZUQlZ1BU4orhypQTLgC3T9d3cXw9cIaTCdTw7a1vYQxmSUXgpFhc6D-m_QxZBShMbsou9snAwl5hel-UdpjijNHmVevTr8GKsO6uPigSP_AcDYcok</recordid><startdate>19880701</startdate><enddate>19880701</enddate><creator>White, 3rd, A A</creator><creator>Panjabi, M M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19880701</creationdate><title>Biomechanical considerations in the surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy</title><author>White, 3rd, A A ; Panjabi, M M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-21ab60b32e0151cc601c877e6984682487ff59da03ca9746bdbec4737c0de62e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Neck</topic><topic>Spinal Canal - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Spinal Canal - physiology</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Compression - etiology</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Compression - physiopathology</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Compression - surgery</topic><topic>Spinal Osteophytosis - complications</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>White, 3rd, A A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panjabi, M M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>White, 3rd, A A</au><au>Panjabi, M M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biomechanical considerations in the surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy</atitle><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><date>1988-07-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>856</spage><epage>860</epage><pages>856-860</pages><issn>0362-2436</issn><abstract>Based on a review of previous studies and our opinion, biomechanical considerations suggest the following guidelines for the surgical management of CSM. It is not recommended that the dura mater, the pia mater, and the dentate ligaments be transected in the surgical treatment of CSM. Anterior decompression and fusion, preferably with the Smith-Robinson technique, is recommended for patients with anterior impingement of the spinal cord at one or two levels in the absence of a narrow spinal canal. This procedure is also advantageous when there is significant radiculopathy associated with the level(s) of pathology. Posterior decompression is recommended when there are three or more levels involved, and particularly when there is developmental stenosis of the canal, ie, a DAD below 13 mm and a SAD below 11 mm. Laminectomy and laminoplasty for CSM may not be any different as regards surgical outcome. One well-controlled study showed only one difference, a decrease in the ability of the laminoplasty patients to extend the neck. If there is evidence of instability or a potential for it, posterior decompression procedures should be accompanied by a facet fusion, or in the case of laminoplasty, some fusion modification such as that described by Itoh and Tsuji. There may also be circumstances in which significant multilevel anterior spur formation and compression in association with a stenotic canal should be treated with anterior and posterior surgery with appropriate attention to maintaining adequate stability. The advantages and disadvantages of these various surgical procedures and their relative appropriateness in various clinical situations will be gradually clarified through well-designed and executed laboratory and clinical investigations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>3194796</pmid><doi>10.1097/00007632-198807000-00029</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0362-2436
ispartof Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 1988-07, Vol.13 (7), p.856-860
issn 0362-2436
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78547148
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload
subjects Biomechanical Phenomena
Humans
Movement
Neck
Spinal Canal - anatomy & histology
Spinal Canal - physiology
Spinal Cord Compression - etiology
Spinal Cord Compression - physiopathology
Spinal Cord Compression - surgery
Spinal Osteophytosis - complications
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
title Biomechanical considerations in the surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T10%3A51%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biomechanical%20considerations%20in%20the%20surgical%20management%20of%20cervical%20spondylotic%20myelopathy&rft.jtitle=Spine%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.%201976)&rft.au=White,%203rd,%20A%20A&rft.date=1988-07-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=856&rft.epage=860&rft.pages=856-860&rft.issn=0362-2436&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00007632-198807000-00029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78547148%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78547148&rft_id=info:pmid/3194796&rfr_iscdi=true