Prognostic value of estrogen and progesterone receptors in operable breast cancer: Results of a univariate and multivariate analysis

From October 1977 to December 1983, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) levels were measured in 645 tumors from women with primary, unilateral, nonmetastatic breast cancer. All of them were treated surgically. Some received adjuvant radiotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, or adjuvant...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 1988-12, Vol.62 (12), p.2517-2524
Hauptverfasser: Chevallier, Bernard, Heintzmann, Francois, Mosseri, Veronique, Dauce, Jean Paul, Bastit, Philippe, Graic, Won, Brunelle, Philippe, Basuyau, Jean Pierre, Comoz, Marc, Asselain, Bernard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:From October 1977 to December 1983, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) levels were measured in 645 tumors from women with primary, unilateral, nonmetastatic breast cancer. All of them were treated surgically. Some received adjuvant radiotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, or adjuvant hormonotherapy. A level of >5 fmol/mg cytosolic protein was considered as positive for both ER and PR. Unifactorial analysis, using Kaplan and Meier estimates and the log‐rank test, revealed that disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (SV) were both strongly related to age, tumor size, nodal status, nodal effraction, histopathologic grading (SBR), ER, and PR. Menopausal status and number of intra‐mammary tumor foci were not significant. Multifactorial analysis, using Cox's model, revealed a strong relationship between SV and age (poor prognosis [pp]: ≤37 years old), menopausal status (pp: postmeno‐pausal), tumor size, nodal status (pp: N+ > 3), nodal effraction, ER (pp: ≤5 fmol/mg), histopathologic grading (pp: SBR = 3), and PR (pp: ≤5 fmol/mg). Similarly, multifactorial analysis revealed a strong correlation between DFS and age, tumor size, nodal status, nodal effraction, histopathologic grading, and PR. A prognostic score taking into account these prognostic factors was calculated for DFS and SV. Analysis of this score allowed us to divide our patients into four significantly different (P < 0.0001) groups with high, intermediate, and low risk of relapse. Our procedure was then validated using the sample test technique. These results show that both ER and PR have their own prognostic weight and should be considered, among other classic prognostic factors, when adjuvant therapies are indicated after surgical treatment of breast cancer.
ISSN:0008-543X
1097-0142
DOI:10.1002/1097-0142(19881215)62:12<2517::AID-CNCR2820621211>3.0.CO;2-9