Intraoperative complications of planned extracapsular cataract extraction versus manual nucleofragmentation
Purpose: To compare the intraoperative complications of planned extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) with those of manual nucleofragmentation. Setting: Hospital de la Esperanza, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain. Methods: This retrospective study comprised 567 eyes; 444 had planned ECCE a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cataract and refractive surgery 1996-10, Vol.22 (8), p.1113-1115 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1115 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 1113 |
| container_title | Journal of cataract and refractive surgery |
| container_volume | 22 |
| creator | Mestres, F. Duch Matheu, A. Torres, F. Lillo, J. Castilla, M. |
| description | Purpose: To compare the intraoperative complications of planned extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) with those of manual nucleofragmentation.
Setting: Hospital de la Esperanza, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain.
Methods: This retrospective study comprised 567 eyes; 444 had planned ECCE and 123, manual nucleofragmentation through a scleral tunnel incision.
Results: No significant differences between techniques were found in terms of intraoperative complications (P < .05). Manual nucleofragmentation did not increase the risk of intraoperative complications (P < .05).
Conclusions: Although phacoemulsification is the procedure of choice in many cases, manual nucleofragmentation is a safe and valid alternative that achieves the goals of small incision cataract surgery. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0886-3350(96)80127-1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78530969</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0886335096801271</els_id><sourcerecordid>78530969</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-641c41a8a58e6a6972c436b742b9b68d1a7b0262c35b39c1cf24a8602da2797c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtv1DAQgC1EVZbCT6iUA0JwCPgRv06oqnhUqtRD4WxNnAkyJHGwk1X593h3o71yGs3MNzP2R8g1ox8YZerjIzVG1UJI-s6q94Yyrmv2jOyY0aJuJOXPye6MvCAvc_5FKW24kJfk0lgmDbU78vtuWhLEGRMsYY-Vj-M8BF-SOOUq9tU8wDRhV-FT4TzMeR0gVQWAki5b-UBXe0x5zdUI0wpDNa1-wNgn-DnitBz3vSIXPQwZX2_xivz48vn77bf6_uHr3e3Nfe2FsUutGuYbBgakQQXKau4boVrd8Na2ynQMdEu54l7IVljPfM8bMIryDri22osr8va0d07xz4p5cWPIHofyE4xrdtpIQa2yBZQn0KeYc8LezSmMkP46Rt1BsjtKdgeDzip3lOxYmbveDqztiN15arNa-m-2PmQPQ5Ew-ZDPGG80Y1wW7NMJwyJjHzC57ANOHruQ0C-ui-E_D_kHWKabcg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78530969</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intraoperative complications of planned extracapsular cataract extraction versus manual nucleofragmentation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Mestres, F. Duch ; Matheu, A. ; Torres, F. ; Lillo, J. ; Castilla, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mestres, F. Duch ; Matheu, A. ; Torres, F. ; Lillo, J. ; Castilla, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To compare the intraoperative complications of planned extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) with those of manual nucleofragmentation.
Setting: Hospital de la Esperanza, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain.
Methods: This retrospective study comprised 567 eyes; 444 had planned ECCE and 123, manual nucleofragmentation through a scleral tunnel incision.
Results: No significant differences between techniques were found in terms of intraoperative complications (P < .05). Manual nucleofragmentation did not increase the risk of intraoperative complications (P < .05).
Conclusions: Although phacoemulsification is the procedure of choice in many cases, manual nucleofragmentation is a safe and valid alternative that achieves the goals of small incision cataract surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-3350</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4502</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0886-3350(96)80127-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8915809</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCSUEV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cataract Extraction - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence ; Intraoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Lens Nucleus, Crystalline - surgery ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Regression Analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the eye and orbit</subject><ispartof>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 1996-10, Vol.22 (8), p.1113-1115</ispartof><rights>1996 American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery and European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons. All rights reserved</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-641c41a8a58e6a6972c436b742b9b68d1a7b0262c35b39c1cf24a8602da2797c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-641c41a8a58e6a6972c436b742b9b68d1a7b0262c35b39c1cf24a8602da2797c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(96)80127-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3550,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2471125$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8915809$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mestres, F. Duch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matheu, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lillo, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castilla, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Intraoperative complications of planned extracapsular cataract extraction versus manual nucleofragmentation</title><title>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</title><addtitle>J Cataract Refract Surg</addtitle><description>Purpose: To compare the intraoperative complications of planned extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) with those of manual nucleofragmentation.
Setting: Hospital de la Esperanza, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain.
Methods: This retrospective study comprised 567 eyes; 444 had planned ECCE and 123, manual nucleofragmentation through a scleral tunnel incision.
Results: No significant differences between techniques were found in terms of intraoperative complications (P < .05). Manual nucleofragmentation did not increase the risk of intraoperative complications (P < .05).
Conclusions: Although phacoemulsification is the procedure of choice in many cases, manual nucleofragmentation is a safe and valid alternative that achieves the goals of small incision cataract surgery.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cataract Extraction - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Intraoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Lens Nucleus, Crystalline - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the eye and orbit</subject><issn>0886-3350</issn><issn>1873-4502</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtv1DAQgC1EVZbCT6iUA0JwCPgRv06oqnhUqtRD4WxNnAkyJHGwk1X593h3o71yGs3MNzP2R8g1ox8YZerjIzVG1UJI-s6q94Yyrmv2jOyY0aJuJOXPye6MvCAvc_5FKW24kJfk0lgmDbU78vtuWhLEGRMsYY-Vj-M8BF-SOOUq9tU8wDRhV-FT4TzMeR0gVQWAki5b-UBXe0x5zdUI0wpDNa1-wNgn-DnitBz3vSIXPQwZX2_xivz48vn77bf6_uHr3e3Nfe2FsUutGuYbBgakQQXKau4boVrd8Na2ynQMdEu54l7IVljPfM8bMIryDri22osr8va0d07xz4p5cWPIHofyE4xrdtpIQa2yBZQn0KeYc8LezSmMkP46Rt1BsjtKdgeDzip3lOxYmbveDqztiN15arNa-m-2PmQPQ5Ew-ZDPGG80Y1wW7NMJwyJjHzC57ANOHruQ0C-ui-E_D_kHWKabcg</recordid><startdate>19961001</startdate><enddate>19961001</enddate><creator>Mestres, F. Duch</creator><creator>Matheu, A.</creator><creator>Torres, F.</creator><creator>Lillo, J.</creator><creator>Castilla, M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19961001</creationdate><title>Intraoperative complications of planned extracapsular cataract extraction versus manual nucleofragmentation</title><author>Mestres, F. Duch ; Matheu, A. ; Torres, F. ; Lillo, J. ; Castilla, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-641c41a8a58e6a6972c436b742b9b68d1a7b0262c35b39c1cf24a8602da2797c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cataract Extraction - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Intraoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Lens Nucleus, Crystalline - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the eye and orbit</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mestres, F. Duch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matheu, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lillo, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castilla, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mestres, F. Duch</au><au>Matheu, A.</au><au>Torres, F.</au><au>Lillo, J.</au><au>Castilla, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intraoperative complications of planned extracapsular cataract extraction versus manual nucleofragmentation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Cataract Refract Surg</addtitle><date>1996-10-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1113</spage><epage>1115</epage><pages>1113-1115</pages><issn>0886-3350</issn><eissn>1873-4502</eissn><coden>JCSUEV</coden><abstract>Purpose: To compare the intraoperative complications of planned extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) with those of manual nucleofragmentation.
Setting: Hospital de la Esperanza, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain.
Methods: This retrospective study comprised 567 eyes; 444 had planned ECCE and 123, manual nucleofragmentation through a scleral tunnel incision.
Results: No significant differences between techniques were found in terms of intraoperative complications (P < .05). Manual nucleofragmentation did not increase the risk of intraoperative complications (P < .05).
Conclusions: Although phacoemulsification is the procedure of choice in many cases, manual nucleofragmentation is a safe and valid alternative that achieves the goals of small incision cataract surgery.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>8915809</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0886-3350(96)80127-1</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0886-3350 |
| ispartof | Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 1996-10, Vol.22 (8), p.1113-1115 |
| issn | 0886-3350 1873-4502 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78530969 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Aged Biological and medical sciences Cataract Extraction - methods Female Humans Incidence Intraoperative Complications - epidemiology Lens Nucleus, Crystalline - surgery Male Medical sciences Regression Analysis Retrospective Studies Risk Factors Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the eye and orbit |
| title | Intraoperative complications of planned extracapsular cataract extraction versus manual nucleofragmentation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T16%3A51%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intraoperative%20complications%20of%20planned%20extracapsular%20cataract%20extraction%20versus%20manual%20nucleofragmentation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cataract%20and%20refractive%20surgery&rft.au=Mestres,%20F.%20Duch&rft.date=1996-10-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1113&rft.epage=1115&rft.pages=1113-1115&rft.issn=0886-3350&rft.eissn=1873-4502&rft.coden=JCSUEV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0886-3350(96)80127-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78530969%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78530969&rft_id=info:pmid/8915809&rft_els_id=S0886335096801271&rfr_iscdi=true |