Intraoperative complications of planned extracapsular cataract extraction versus manual nucleofragmentation

Purpose: To compare the intraoperative complications of planned extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) with those of manual nucleofragmentation. Setting: Hospital de la Esperanza, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain. Methods: This retrospective study comprised 567 eyes; 444 had planned ECCE a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cataract and refractive surgery 1996-10, Vol.22 (8), p.1113-1115
Hauptverfasser: Mestres, F. Duch, Matheu, A., Torres, F., Lillo, J., Castilla, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: To compare the intraoperative complications of planned extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) with those of manual nucleofragmentation. Setting: Hospital de la Esperanza, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain. Methods: This retrospective study comprised 567 eyes; 444 had planned ECCE and 123, manual nucleofragmentation through a scleral tunnel incision. Results: No significant differences between techniques were found in terms of intraoperative complications (P < .05). Manual nucleofragmentation did not increase the risk of intraoperative complications (P < .05). Conclusions: Although phacoemulsification is the procedure of choice in many cases, manual nucleofragmentation is a safe and valid alternative that achieves the goals of small incision cataract surgery.
ISSN:0886-3350
1873-4502
DOI:10.1016/S0886-3350(96)80127-1