Management of iatrogenic spinal stenosis complicating placement of a fusion cage : A case report
A case of iatrogenic spinal stenosis secondary to fusion cage retropulsion is presented. To highlight fusion cage retropulsion, a potential complication that may become more prevalent as the use of fusion cage instrumentation expands. The difficulty in management of this complication is emphasized....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Pa. 1976), 1996-10, Vol.21 (20), p.2383-2386 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2386 |
---|---|
container_issue | 20 |
container_start_page | 2383 |
container_title | Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | GLASSMAN, S. D JOHNSON, J. R RAQUE, G PUNO, R. M DIMAR, J. R |
description | A case of iatrogenic spinal stenosis secondary to fusion cage retropulsion is presented.
To highlight fusion cage retropulsion, a potential complication that may become more prevalent as the use of fusion cage instrumentation expands. The difficulty in management of this complication is emphasized.
Early reports regarding fusion cage instrumentation have been encouraging. At this point, however, the potential benefits are better defined than the potential complications.
A significant complication of fusion cage instrumentation and the limited literature on this subject are reviewed.
The patient underwent successful revision surgery after retropulsion of a fusion cage, however, an extensive surgical procedure including partial vertebral body resection was required.
The frequency and severity of complications related to fusion cage instrumentation remain poorly defined. Caution should be used in patient selection until additional experience more clearly defines the risk-to-benefit ratio for a given application of this new technology. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00007632-199610150-00018 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78529558</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78529558</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-4b9f713afa82218f3f3609608e635956576893138a8e5c4c9520279594d328cd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1PAyEQhonR1Fr9CSYcjLdVPhYWvDWNX0mNFz0jpdBgdmGF7cF_L9p158KEed6Z5AEAYnSDkWxuUamGU1JhKTlGmKGq_GBxBOaYEVFhzOQxmCPKSUVqyk_BWc6fBeEUyxmYCVkiTTMHHy866J3tbBhgdNDrIcWdDd7A3PugW5gHG2L2GZrY9a03evBhB_tWmymkodtnHwM0ZRO8g8vSZAuT7WMazsGJ0222F-O7AO8P92-rp2r9-vi8Wq4rQ0Q9VPVGugZT7bQgBAtHHeVIciQsp0wyzhouJMVUaGGZqY1kBJFGMllvKRFmSxfg-rC3T_Frb_OgOp-NbVsdbNxn1QhGJGOigOIAmhRzTtapPvlOp2-FkfqVq_7lqkmu-pNbopfjjf2ms9spONos86txrrPRrUs6GJ8njDBU1wX7AS1_gCs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78529558</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Management of iatrogenic spinal stenosis complicating placement of a fusion cage : A case report</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>GLASSMAN, S. D ; JOHNSON, J. R ; RAQUE, G ; PUNO, R. M ; DIMAR, J. R</creator><creatorcontrib>GLASSMAN, S. D ; JOHNSON, J. R ; RAQUE, G ; PUNO, R. M ; DIMAR, J. R</creatorcontrib><description>A case of iatrogenic spinal stenosis secondary to fusion cage retropulsion is presented.
To highlight fusion cage retropulsion, a potential complication that may become more prevalent as the use of fusion cage instrumentation expands. The difficulty in management of this complication is emphasized.
Early reports regarding fusion cage instrumentation have been encouraging. At this point, however, the potential benefits are better defined than the potential complications.
A significant complication of fusion cage instrumentation and the limited literature on this subject are reviewed.
The patient underwent successful revision surgery after retropulsion of a fusion cage, however, an extensive surgical procedure including partial vertebral body resection was required.
The frequency and severity of complications related to fusion cage instrumentation remain poorly defined. Caution should be used in patient selection until additional experience more clearly defines the risk-to-benefit ratio for a given application of this new technology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-2436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199610150-00018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8915077</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SPINDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Myelography ; Orthopedic surgery ; Postoperative Complications ; Reoperation ; Spinal Fusion - adverse effects ; Spinal Fusion - instrumentation ; Spinal Stenosis - rehabilitation ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 1996-10, Vol.21 (20), p.2383-2386</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-4b9f713afa82218f3f3609608e635956576893138a8e5c4c9520279594d328cd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2504477$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8915077$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GLASSMAN, S. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOHNSON, J. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAQUE, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PUNO, R. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DIMAR, J. R</creatorcontrib><title>Management of iatrogenic spinal stenosis complicating placement of a fusion cage : A case report</title><title>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</title><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><description>A case of iatrogenic spinal stenosis secondary to fusion cage retropulsion is presented.
To highlight fusion cage retropulsion, a potential complication that may become more prevalent as the use of fusion cage instrumentation expands. The difficulty in management of this complication is emphasized.
Early reports regarding fusion cage instrumentation have been encouraging. At this point, however, the potential benefits are better defined than the potential complications.
A significant complication of fusion cage instrumentation and the limited literature on this subject are reviewed.
The patient underwent successful revision surgery after retropulsion of a fusion cage, however, an extensive surgical procedure including partial vertebral body resection was required.
The frequency and severity of complications related to fusion cage instrumentation remain poorly defined. Caution should be used in patient selection until additional experience more clearly defines the risk-to-benefit ratio for a given application of this new technology.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Myelography</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - adverse effects</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - instrumentation</subject><subject>Spinal Stenosis - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>0362-2436</issn><issn>1528-1159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1PAyEQhonR1Fr9CSYcjLdVPhYWvDWNX0mNFz0jpdBgdmGF7cF_L9p158KEed6Z5AEAYnSDkWxuUamGU1JhKTlGmKGq_GBxBOaYEVFhzOQxmCPKSUVqyk_BWc6fBeEUyxmYCVkiTTMHHy866J3tbBhgdNDrIcWdDd7A3PugW5gHG2L2GZrY9a03evBhB_tWmymkodtnHwM0ZRO8g8vSZAuT7WMazsGJ0222F-O7AO8P92-rp2r9-vi8Wq4rQ0Q9VPVGugZT7bQgBAtHHeVIciQsp0wyzhouJMVUaGGZqY1kBJFGMllvKRFmSxfg-rC3T_Frb_OgOp-NbVsdbNxn1QhGJGOigOIAmhRzTtapPvlOp2-FkfqVq_7lqkmu-pNbopfjjf2ms9spONos86txrrPRrUs6GJ8njDBU1wX7AS1_gCs</recordid><startdate>19961015</startdate><enddate>19961015</enddate><creator>GLASSMAN, S. D</creator><creator>JOHNSON, J. R</creator><creator>RAQUE, G</creator><creator>PUNO, R. M</creator><creator>DIMAR, J. R</creator><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19961015</creationdate><title>Management of iatrogenic spinal stenosis complicating placement of a fusion cage : A case report</title><author>GLASSMAN, S. D ; JOHNSON, J. R ; RAQUE, G ; PUNO, R. M ; DIMAR, J. R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-4b9f713afa82218f3f3609608e635956576893138a8e5c4c9520279594d328cd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Myelography</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - adverse effects</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - instrumentation</topic><topic>Spinal Stenosis - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GLASSMAN, S. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOHNSON, J. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAQUE, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PUNO, R. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DIMAR, J. R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GLASSMAN, S. D</au><au>JOHNSON, J. R</au><au>RAQUE, G</au><au>PUNO, R. M</au><au>DIMAR, J. R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Management of iatrogenic spinal stenosis complicating placement of a fusion cage : A case report</atitle><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><date>1996-10-15</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>2383</spage><epage>2386</epage><pages>2383-2386</pages><issn>0362-2436</issn><eissn>1528-1159</eissn><coden>SPINDD</coden><abstract>A case of iatrogenic spinal stenosis secondary to fusion cage retropulsion is presented.
To highlight fusion cage retropulsion, a potential complication that may become more prevalent as the use of fusion cage instrumentation expands. The difficulty in management of this complication is emphasized.
Early reports regarding fusion cage instrumentation have been encouraging. At this point, however, the potential benefits are better defined than the potential complications.
A significant complication of fusion cage instrumentation and the limited literature on this subject are reviewed.
The patient underwent successful revision surgery after retropulsion of a fusion cage, however, an extensive surgical procedure including partial vertebral body resection was required.
The frequency and severity of complications related to fusion cage instrumentation remain poorly defined. Caution should be used in patient selection until additional experience more clearly defines the risk-to-benefit ratio for a given application of this new technology.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott</pub><pmid>8915077</pmid><doi>10.1097/00007632-199610150-00018</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0362-2436 |
ispartof | Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 1996-10, Vol.21 (20), p.2383-2386 |
issn | 0362-2436 1528-1159 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78529558 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Humans Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Myelography Orthopedic surgery Postoperative Complications Reoperation Spinal Fusion - adverse effects Spinal Fusion - instrumentation Spinal Stenosis - rehabilitation Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Tomography, X-Ray Computed |
title | Management of iatrogenic spinal stenosis complicating placement of a fusion cage : A case report |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A10%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Management%20of%20iatrogenic%20spinal%20stenosis%20complicating%20placement%20of%20a%20fusion%20cage%20:%20A%20case%20report&rft.jtitle=Spine%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.%201976)&rft.au=GLASSMAN,%20S.%20D&rft.date=1996-10-15&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=2383&rft.epage=2386&rft.pages=2383-2386&rft.issn=0362-2436&rft.eissn=1528-1159&rft.coden=SPINDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00007632-199610150-00018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78529558%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78529558&rft_id=info:pmid/8915077&rfr_iscdi=true |