Replication of a P50 auditory gating deficit in Australian patients with schizophrenia

Schizophrenic patients reportedly have a deficit in the control of sensitivity to auditory stimuli as shown by the P50 auditory evoked potential wave in a conditioning-testing paradigm that measures suppression of response to a repeated stimulus. Although this finding has been replicated by several...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychiatry research 1996-09, Vol.64 (2), p.121-135
Hauptverfasser: Ward, Philip B, Hoffer, Lee D, Liebert, Barbara J, Catts, Stanley V, O'Donnell, Maryanne, Adler, Lawrence E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 135
container_issue 2
container_start_page 121
container_title Psychiatry research
container_volume 64
creator Ward, Philip B
Hoffer, Lee D
Liebert, Barbara J
Catts, Stanley V
O'Donnell, Maryanne
Adler, Lawrence E
description Schizophrenic patients reportedly have a deficit in the control of sensitivity to auditory stimuli as shown by the P50 auditory evoked potential wave in a conditioning-testing paradigm that measures suppression of response to a repeated stimulus. Although this finding has been replicated by several US laboratories, one European group has not found differences between schizophrenic patients and normal control subjects. In the present study, investigators in the Schizophrenia Research Center at the Prince of Wales Hospital in Sydney, Australia, selected 22 normal control subjects, 11 acutely ill schizophrenic inpatients, and 11 clinically stable schizophrenic outpatients. Both schizophrenic groups were treated with similar doses of classical neuroleptic medications. Evoked potentials were recorded by an investigator from the US laboratory that initially reported the difference; five averages, each the response to 32 stimulus pairs, were recorded from each subject. The normal control subjects demonstrated significantly more suppression of the P50 response to the repeated stimuli than the schizophrenic groups, as previously reported. There were no significant changes in the suppression measure over the five trials. The suppression of the P50 wave by schizophrenic outpatients was somewhat greater than that by schizophrenic inpatients, but both schizophrenic groups had decreased suppression, compared with the normal subjects. The mean P50 suppression for five averages was successfully used in a logistic regression to classify subjects as normal or schizophrenic. This method was more accurate than attempts to classify subjects with only one average. The mean amplitude of the initial conditioning response did not differ between groups. Schizophrenic patients had slightly shorter mean latencies. There was no direct relationship of P50 suppression to measures of clinical psychopathology.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0165-1781(96)02876-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78526417</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0165178196028764</els_id><sourcerecordid>78526417</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-68deef8a16ccde0d0d3cd866ad69f852c2d16e8ef743e23dd3e6ea36cfe43fca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LHDEUhoO02PXjH1jIRZH2Ymo-ZjOZG0GktgWhRdTbEE9O3MjszJhkKvrrzbDLXvYihPA-5z3hIeSEs--ccXVWzrLijeZfW_WNCd2oqt4jC64bUTVcyA9ksUM-kYOUnhhjgrftPtnXLRftsl6Q-xscuwA2h6Gng6eW_l0yaicX8hBf6WMJ-kfq0AcImYaeXkwpR9sF29OxhNjnRF9CXtEEq_A2jKuIfbBH5KO3XcLj7X1I7q5-3F7-qq7__Px9eXFdgdQqV0o7RK8tVwAOmWNOgtNKWadar5cChOMKNfqmliikcxIVWqnAYy09WHlITje9YxyeJ0zZrEMC7Drb4zAl05QSVfOmgPUGhDikFNGbMYa1ja-GMzPrNLMrM7sybXnMOk1dxj5v-6eHNbrd0NZfyb9sc5vAdj7aHkLaYVIoIcS8_XyDYXHxL2A0CYo6QBciQjZuCP__xzuy4pKR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78526417</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Replication of a P50 auditory gating deficit in Australian patients with schizophrenia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ward, Philip B ; Hoffer, Lee D ; Liebert, Barbara J ; Catts, Stanley V ; O'Donnell, Maryanne ; Adler, Lawrence E</creator><creatorcontrib>Ward, Philip B ; Hoffer, Lee D ; Liebert, Barbara J ; Catts, Stanley V ; O'Donnell, Maryanne ; Adler, Lawrence E</creatorcontrib><description>Schizophrenic patients reportedly have a deficit in the control of sensitivity to auditory stimuli as shown by the P50 auditory evoked potential wave in a conditioning-testing paradigm that measures suppression of response to a repeated stimulus. Although this finding has been replicated by several US laboratories, one European group has not found differences between schizophrenic patients and normal control subjects. In the present study, investigators in the Schizophrenia Research Center at the Prince of Wales Hospital in Sydney, Australia, selected 22 normal control subjects, 11 acutely ill schizophrenic inpatients, and 11 clinically stable schizophrenic outpatients. Both schizophrenic groups were treated with similar doses of classical neuroleptic medications. Evoked potentials were recorded by an investigator from the US laboratory that initially reported the difference; five averages, each the response to 32 stimulus pairs, were recorded from each subject. The normal control subjects demonstrated significantly more suppression of the P50 response to the repeated stimuli than the schizophrenic groups, as previously reported. There were no significant changes in the suppression measure over the five trials. The suppression of the P50 wave by schizophrenic outpatients was somewhat greater than that by schizophrenic inpatients, but both schizophrenic groups had decreased suppression, compared with the normal subjects. The mean P50 suppression for five averages was successfully used in a logistic regression to classify subjects as normal or schizophrenic. This method was more accurate than attempts to classify subjects with only one average. The mean amplitude of the initial conditioning response did not differ between groups. Schizophrenic patients had slightly shorter mean latencies. There was no direct relationship of P50 suppression to measures of clinical psychopathology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-1781</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7123</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0165-1781(96)02876-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8912954</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSRSDR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Antipsychotic Agents - therapeutic use ; Auditory evoked potential ; Auditory Perception ; Biological and medical sciences ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory ; Female ; Habituation ; Habituation, Psychophysiologic ; Humans ; Inpatients ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Neuroleptic medication ; Outpatients ; Perceptual Disorders - complications ; Perceptual Disorders - diagnosis ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Psychoses ; Schizophrenia ; Schizophrenia - complications ; Schizophrenia - drug therapy ; Sensory inhibition</subject><ispartof>Psychiatry research, 1996-09, Vol.64 (2), p.121-135</ispartof><rights>1996</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-68deef8a16ccde0d0d3cd866ad69f852c2d16e8ef743e23dd3e6ea36cfe43fca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-68deef8a16ccde0d0d3cd866ad69f852c2d16e8ef743e23dd3e6ea36cfe43fca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0165178196028764$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3262227$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8912954$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ward, Philip B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffer, Lee D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebert, Barbara J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catts, Stanley V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Donnell, Maryanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adler, Lawrence E</creatorcontrib><title>Replication of a P50 auditory gating deficit in Australian patients with schizophrenia</title><title>Psychiatry research</title><addtitle>Psychiatry Res</addtitle><description>Schizophrenic patients reportedly have a deficit in the control of sensitivity to auditory stimuli as shown by the P50 auditory evoked potential wave in a conditioning-testing paradigm that measures suppression of response to a repeated stimulus. Although this finding has been replicated by several US laboratories, one European group has not found differences between schizophrenic patients and normal control subjects. In the present study, investigators in the Schizophrenia Research Center at the Prince of Wales Hospital in Sydney, Australia, selected 22 normal control subjects, 11 acutely ill schizophrenic inpatients, and 11 clinically stable schizophrenic outpatients. Both schizophrenic groups were treated with similar doses of classical neuroleptic medications. Evoked potentials were recorded by an investigator from the US laboratory that initially reported the difference; five averages, each the response to 32 stimulus pairs, were recorded from each subject. The normal control subjects demonstrated significantly more suppression of the P50 response to the repeated stimuli than the schizophrenic groups, as previously reported. There were no significant changes in the suppression measure over the five trials. The suppression of the P50 wave by schizophrenic outpatients was somewhat greater than that by schizophrenic inpatients, but both schizophrenic groups had decreased suppression, compared with the normal subjects. The mean P50 suppression for five averages was successfully used in a logistic regression to classify subjects as normal or schizophrenic. This method was more accurate than attempts to classify subjects with only one average. The mean amplitude of the initial conditioning response did not differ between groups. Schizophrenic patients had slightly shorter mean latencies. There was no direct relationship of P50 suppression to measures of clinical psychopathology.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Antipsychotic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Auditory evoked potential</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Auditory</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Habituation</subject><subject>Habituation, Psychophysiologic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inpatients</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neuroleptic medication</subject><subject>Outpatients</subject><subject>Perceptual Disorders - complications</subject><subject>Perceptual Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychoses</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><subject>Schizophrenia - complications</subject><subject>Schizophrenia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Sensory inhibition</subject><issn>0165-1781</issn><issn>1872-7123</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LHDEUhoO02PXjH1jIRZH2Ymo-ZjOZG0GktgWhRdTbEE9O3MjszJhkKvrrzbDLXvYihPA-5z3hIeSEs--ccXVWzrLijeZfW_WNCd2oqt4jC64bUTVcyA9ksUM-kYOUnhhjgrftPtnXLRftsl6Q-xscuwA2h6Gng6eW_l0yaicX8hBf6WMJ-kfq0AcImYaeXkwpR9sF29OxhNjnRF9CXtEEq_A2jKuIfbBH5KO3XcLj7X1I7q5-3F7-qq7__Px9eXFdgdQqV0o7RK8tVwAOmWNOgtNKWadar5cChOMKNfqmliikcxIVWqnAYy09WHlITje9YxyeJ0zZrEMC7Drb4zAl05QSVfOmgPUGhDikFNGbMYa1ja-GMzPrNLMrM7sybXnMOk1dxj5v-6eHNbrd0NZfyb9sc5vAdj7aHkLaYVIoIcS8_XyDYXHxL2A0CYo6QBciQjZuCP__xzuy4pKR</recordid><startdate>19960927</startdate><enddate>19960927</enddate><creator>Ward, Philip B</creator><creator>Hoffer, Lee D</creator><creator>Liebert, Barbara J</creator><creator>Catts, Stanley V</creator><creator>O'Donnell, Maryanne</creator><creator>Adler, Lawrence E</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960927</creationdate><title>Replication of a P50 auditory gating deficit in Australian patients with schizophrenia</title><author>Ward, Philip B ; Hoffer, Lee D ; Liebert, Barbara J ; Catts, Stanley V ; O'Donnell, Maryanne ; Adler, Lawrence E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-68deef8a16ccde0d0d3cd866ad69f852c2d16e8ef743e23dd3e6ea36cfe43fca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Antipsychotic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Auditory evoked potential</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Auditory</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Habituation</topic><topic>Habituation, Psychophysiologic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inpatients</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neuroleptic medication</topic><topic>Outpatients</topic><topic>Perceptual Disorders - complications</topic><topic>Perceptual Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychoses</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><topic>Schizophrenia - complications</topic><topic>Schizophrenia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Sensory inhibition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ward, Philip B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffer, Lee D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebert, Barbara J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catts, Stanley V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Donnell, Maryanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adler, Lawrence E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychiatry research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ward, Philip B</au><au>Hoffer, Lee D</au><au>Liebert, Barbara J</au><au>Catts, Stanley V</au><au>O'Donnell, Maryanne</au><au>Adler, Lawrence E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Replication of a P50 auditory gating deficit in Australian patients with schizophrenia</atitle><jtitle>Psychiatry research</jtitle><addtitle>Psychiatry Res</addtitle><date>1996-09-27</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>121</spage><epage>135</epage><pages>121-135</pages><issn>0165-1781</issn><eissn>1872-7123</eissn><coden>PSRSDR</coden><abstract>Schizophrenic patients reportedly have a deficit in the control of sensitivity to auditory stimuli as shown by the P50 auditory evoked potential wave in a conditioning-testing paradigm that measures suppression of response to a repeated stimulus. Although this finding has been replicated by several US laboratories, one European group has not found differences between schizophrenic patients and normal control subjects. In the present study, investigators in the Schizophrenia Research Center at the Prince of Wales Hospital in Sydney, Australia, selected 22 normal control subjects, 11 acutely ill schizophrenic inpatients, and 11 clinically stable schizophrenic outpatients. Both schizophrenic groups were treated with similar doses of classical neuroleptic medications. Evoked potentials were recorded by an investigator from the US laboratory that initially reported the difference; five averages, each the response to 32 stimulus pairs, were recorded from each subject. The normal control subjects demonstrated significantly more suppression of the P50 response to the repeated stimuli than the schizophrenic groups, as previously reported. There were no significant changes in the suppression measure over the five trials. The suppression of the P50 wave by schizophrenic outpatients was somewhat greater than that by schizophrenic inpatients, but both schizophrenic groups had decreased suppression, compared with the normal subjects. The mean P50 suppression for five averages was successfully used in a logistic regression to classify subjects as normal or schizophrenic. This method was more accurate than attempts to classify subjects with only one average. The mean amplitude of the initial conditioning response did not differ between groups. Schizophrenic patients had slightly shorter mean latencies. There was no direct relationship of P50 suppression to measures of clinical psychopathology.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>8912954</pmid><doi>10.1016/0165-1781(96)02876-4</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-1781
ispartof Psychiatry research, 1996-09, Vol.64 (2), p.121-135
issn 0165-1781
1872-7123
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78526417
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Adult and adolescent clinical studies
Antipsychotic Agents - therapeutic use
Auditory evoked potential
Auditory Perception
Biological and medical sciences
Evoked Potentials, Auditory
Female
Habituation
Habituation, Psychophysiologic
Humans
Inpatients
Male
Medical sciences
Neuroleptic medication
Outpatients
Perceptual Disorders - complications
Perceptual Disorders - diagnosis
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Psychoses
Schizophrenia
Schizophrenia - complications
Schizophrenia - drug therapy
Sensory inhibition
title Replication of a P50 auditory gating deficit in Australian patients with schizophrenia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T23%3A00%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Replication%20of%20a%20P50%20auditory%20gating%20deficit%20in%20Australian%20patients%20with%20schizophrenia&rft.jtitle=Psychiatry%20research&rft.au=Ward,%20Philip%20B&rft.date=1996-09-27&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=135&rft.pages=121-135&rft.issn=0165-1781&rft.eissn=1872-7123&rft.coden=PSRSDR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0165-1781(96)02876-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78526417%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78526417&rft_id=info:pmid/8912954&rft_els_id=0165178196028764&rfr_iscdi=true