Is There a Risk for Interaction Between Mobile Phones and Single Lead VDD Pacemakers?
Mobile phones may cause pacemaker interference. Patients with a single lead VDD pacemaker might be at special risk, since the atrial sensitivity is often programmed to low (high sensitivity) threshold values and the majority of patients are pacemaker dependent due to the underlying high degree AV bl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 1996-10, Vol.19 (10), p.1447-1450 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1450 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1447 |
container_title | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | NOWAK, BERND ROSOCHA, STEFAN ZELLERHOFF, CHRISTIAN LIEBRICH, ANDREAS HIMMRICH, EWALD VOIGTLÁNDER, THOMAS MEYER, JÜRGEN |
description | Mobile phones may cause pacemaker interference. Patients with a single lead VDD pacemaker might be at special risk, since the atrial sensitivity is often programmed to low (high sensitivity) threshold values and the majority of patients are pacemaker dependent due to the underlying high degree AV block. We evaluated 31 patients with three types of single lead VDD pacemakers: 12 Unity, 292–07 (Intermedics, Inc.); 10 Thera VDD, 8948 or 8968i (Medtronic, Inc.); and 9 Saphir 600 (Vitatron, Inc.) for interference from a cellular mobile phone with a power of 2 W (D‐net). For this purpose, atrial and ventricular sensitivity settings were programmed to their most sensitive values (A: 0.1–0.25 mV; V: 1.0 mV) and ventricular sensing was programmed to unipolar. With the ECG continuously monitored, the phone's extendable antenna was brought in direct contact with the patient's skin at the right sternal border, with the tip of the antenna in skin contact just below the clavicle, within 5 cm of the pacemaker connector. Then multiple phases of phone calls were performed, and the effects on the pacemakers recorded. In our group of patients with three different types of single lead VDD pacemakers, no interference could be detected using a 2‐W mobile phone in the digital D‐net. The programmed values remained unchanged after the interference test. Therefore, the risk of interference seems to be low for the VDD pacemakers tested, although our study design does not allow to entirely exclude the possibility of interference from a mobile phone. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03156.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78512209</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78512209</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4517-4f61f73d3f10650e67914326b610f37a784a8ca01ff7dba1d4713e903722dad23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkEtP6zAQRi10EZTHT0CyWNxdgid27IQNjwKlqEAFBZaWk4whfSRgp6L8e1K16p7ZjDTfzBnpEHIMLIS2TsYhxIIFCcRpCGkqwyZjHGIZLrZIZxP9Ix0GQgUJT9Jdsuf9mDEmmYh3yE6Stp2LDnnpezr6QIfU0KfST6itHe1XDTqTN2Vd0UtsvhErel9n5RTp8KOu0FNTFfS5rN7byQBNQV-vrujQ5DgzE3T-7IBsWzP1eLju--Tl5nrUvQ0Gj71-92IQ5CIGFQgrwSpecAtMxgylSkHwSGYSmOXKqESYJDcMrFVFZqAQCjimjKsoKkwR8X3yf8X9dPXXHH2jZ6XPcTo1FdZzr1USQxSxtF08XS3mrvbeodWfrpwZ96OB6aVTPdZLcXopTi-d6rVTvWiPj9Zf5tkMi83pWmKbn6_y79bQzx_IenjRvQYhVIsIVojSN7jYIIybaKm4ivXbQ0_3RqO7y0FXaMZ_ARx0lBE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78512209</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is There a Risk for Interaction Between Mobile Phones and Single Lead VDD Pacemakers?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>NOWAK, BERND ; ROSOCHA, STEFAN ; ZELLERHOFF, CHRISTIAN ; LIEBRICH, ANDREAS ; HIMMRICH, EWALD ; VOIGTLÁNDER, THOMAS ; MEYER, JÜRGEN</creator><creatorcontrib>NOWAK, BERND ; ROSOCHA, STEFAN ; ZELLERHOFF, CHRISTIAN ; LIEBRICH, ANDREAS ; HIMMRICH, EWALD ; VOIGTLÁNDER, THOMAS ; MEYER, JÜRGEN</creatorcontrib><description>Mobile phones may cause pacemaker interference. Patients with a single lead VDD pacemaker might be at special risk, since the atrial sensitivity is often programmed to low (high sensitivity) threshold values and the majority of patients are pacemaker dependent due to the underlying high degree AV block. We evaluated 31 patients with three types of single lead VDD pacemakers: 12 Unity, 292–07 (Intermedics, Inc.); 10 Thera VDD, 8948 or 8968i (Medtronic, Inc.); and 9 Saphir 600 (Vitatron, Inc.) for interference from a cellular mobile phone with a power of 2 W (D‐net). For this purpose, atrial and ventricular sensitivity settings were programmed to their most sensitive values (A: 0.1–0.25 mV; V: 1.0 mV) and ventricular sensing was programmed to unipolar. With the ECG continuously monitored, the phone's extendable antenna was brought in direct contact with the patient's skin at the right sternal border, with the tip of the antenna in skin contact just below the clavicle, within 5 cm of the pacemaker connector. Then multiple phases of phone calls were performed, and the effects on the pacemakers recorded. In our group of patients with three different types of single lead VDD pacemakers, no interference could be detected using a 2‐W mobile phone in the digital D‐net. The programmed values remained unchanged after the interference test. Therefore, the risk of interference seems to be low for the VDD pacemakers tested, although our study design does not allow to entirely exclude the possibility of interference from a mobile phone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-8389</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03156.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8904534</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods ; Electromagnetic Fields - adverse effects ; Equipment Design ; Equipment Failure ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; mobile phones ; pacemaker interference ; Pacemaker, Artificial ; Risk Factors ; single lead VDD pacing ; Telephone</subject><ispartof>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 1996-10, Vol.19 (10), p.1447-1450</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4517-4f61f73d3f10650e67914326b610f37a784a8ca01ff7dba1d4713e903722dad23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4517-4f61f73d3f10650e67914326b610f37a784a8ca01ff7dba1d4713e903722dad23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8159.1996.tb03156.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8159.1996.tb03156.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27933,27934,45583,45584</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8904534$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>NOWAK, BERND</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROSOCHA, STEFAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZELLERHOFF, CHRISTIAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LIEBRICH, ANDREAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HIMMRICH, EWALD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VOIGTLÁNDER, THOMAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEYER, JÜRGEN</creatorcontrib><title>Is There a Risk for Interaction Between Mobile Phones and Single Lead VDD Pacemakers?</title><title>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</title><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>Mobile phones may cause pacemaker interference. Patients with a single lead VDD pacemaker might be at special risk, since the atrial sensitivity is often programmed to low (high sensitivity) threshold values and the majority of patients are pacemaker dependent due to the underlying high degree AV block. We evaluated 31 patients with three types of single lead VDD pacemakers: 12 Unity, 292–07 (Intermedics, Inc.); 10 Thera VDD, 8948 or 8968i (Medtronic, Inc.); and 9 Saphir 600 (Vitatron, Inc.) for interference from a cellular mobile phone with a power of 2 W (D‐net). For this purpose, atrial and ventricular sensitivity settings were programmed to their most sensitive values (A: 0.1–0.25 mV; V: 1.0 mV) and ventricular sensing was programmed to unipolar. With the ECG continuously monitored, the phone's extendable antenna was brought in direct contact with the patient's skin at the right sternal border, with the tip of the antenna in skin contact just below the clavicle, within 5 cm of the pacemaker connector. Then multiple phases of phone calls were performed, and the effects on the pacemakers recorded. In our group of patients with three different types of single lead VDD pacemakers, no interference could be detected using a 2‐W mobile phone in the digital D‐net. The programmed values remained unchanged after the interference test. Therefore, the risk of interference seems to be low for the VDD pacemakers tested, although our study design does not allow to entirely exclude the possibility of interference from a mobile phone.</description><subject>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods</subject><subject>Electromagnetic Fields - adverse effects</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Equipment Failure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>mobile phones</subject><subject>pacemaker interference</subject><subject>Pacemaker, Artificial</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>single lead VDD pacing</subject><subject>Telephone</subject><issn>0147-8389</issn><issn>1540-8159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkEtP6zAQRi10EZTHT0CyWNxdgid27IQNjwKlqEAFBZaWk4whfSRgp6L8e1K16p7ZjDTfzBnpEHIMLIS2TsYhxIIFCcRpCGkqwyZjHGIZLrZIZxP9Ix0GQgUJT9Jdsuf9mDEmmYh3yE6Stp2LDnnpezr6QIfU0KfST6itHe1XDTqTN2Vd0UtsvhErel9n5RTp8KOu0FNTFfS5rN7byQBNQV-vrujQ5DgzE3T-7IBsWzP1eLju--Tl5nrUvQ0Gj71-92IQ5CIGFQgrwSpecAtMxgylSkHwSGYSmOXKqESYJDcMrFVFZqAQCjimjKsoKkwR8X3yf8X9dPXXHH2jZ6XPcTo1FdZzr1USQxSxtF08XS3mrvbeodWfrpwZ96OB6aVTPdZLcXopTi-d6rVTvWiPj9Zf5tkMi83pWmKbn6_y79bQzx_IenjRvQYhVIsIVojSN7jYIIybaKm4ivXbQ0_3RqO7y0FXaMZ_ARx0lBE</recordid><startdate>199610</startdate><enddate>199610</enddate><creator>NOWAK, BERND</creator><creator>ROSOCHA, STEFAN</creator><creator>ZELLERHOFF, CHRISTIAN</creator><creator>LIEBRICH, ANDREAS</creator><creator>HIMMRICH, EWALD</creator><creator>VOIGTLÁNDER, THOMAS</creator><creator>MEYER, JÜRGEN</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199610</creationdate><title>Is There a Risk for Interaction Between Mobile Phones and Single Lead VDD Pacemakers?</title><author>NOWAK, BERND ; ROSOCHA, STEFAN ; ZELLERHOFF, CHRISTIAN ; LIEBRICH, ANDREAS ; HIMMRICH, EWALD ; VOIGTLÁNDER, THOMAS ; MEYER, JÜRGEN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4517-4f61f73d3f10650e67914326b610f37a784a8ca01ff7dba1d4713e903722dad23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods</topic><topic>Electromagnetic Fields - adverse effects</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Equipment Failure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>mobile phones</topic><topic>pacemaker interference</topic><topic>Pacemaker, Artificial</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>single lead VDD pacing</topic><topic>Telephone</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>NOWAK, BERND</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROSOCHA, STEFAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZELLERHOFF, CHRISTIAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LIEBRICH, ANDREAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HIMMRICH, EWALD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VOIGTLÁNDER, THOMAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEYER, JÜRGEN</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>NOWAK, BERND</au><au>ROSOCHA, STEFAN</au><au>ZELLERHOFF, CHRISTIAN</au><au>LIEBRICH, ANDREAS</au><au>HIMMRICH, EWALD</au><au>VOIGTLÁNDER, THOMAS</au><au>MEYER, JÜRGEN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is There a Risk for Interaction Between Mobile Phones and Single Lead VDD Pacemakers?</atitle><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>1996-10</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1447</spage><epage>1450</epage><pages>1447-1450</pages><issn>0147-8389</issn><eissn>1540-8159</eissn><abstract>Mobile phones may cause pacemaker interference. Patients with a single lead VDD pacemaker might be at special risk, since the atrial sensitivity is often programmed to low (high sensitivity) threshold values and the majority of patients are pacemaker dependent due to the underlying high degree AV block. We evaluated 31 patients with three types of single lead VDD pacemakers: 12 Unity, 292–07 (Intermedics, Inc.); 10 Thera VDD, 8948 or 8968i (Medtronic, Inc.); and 9 Saphir 600 (Vitatron, Inc.) for interference from a cellular mobile phone with a power of 2 W (D‐net). For this purpose, atrial and ventricular sensitivity settings were programmed to their most sensitive values (A: 0.1–0.25 mV; V: 1.0 mV) and ventricular sensing was programmed to unipolar. With the ECG continuously monitored, the phone's extendable antenna was brought in direct contact with the patient's skin at the right sternal border, with the tip of the antenna in skin contact just below the clavicle, within 5 cm of the pacemaker connector. Then multiple phases of phone calls were performed, and the effects on the pacemakers recorded. In our group of patients with three different types of single lead VDD pacemakers, no interference could be detected using a 2‐W mobile phone in the digital D‐net. The programmed values remained unchanged after the interference test. Therefore, the risk of interference seems to be low for the VDD pacemakers tested, although our study design does not allow to entirely exclude the possibility of interference from a mobile phone.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>8904534</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03156.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0147-8389 |
ispartof | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 1996-10, Vol.19 (10), p.1447-1450 |
issn | 0147-8389 1540-8159 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78512209 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods Electromagnetic Fields - adverse effects Equipment Design Equipment Failure Female Humans Male Middle Aged mobile phones pacemaker interference Pacemaker, Artificial Risk Factors single lead VDD pacing Telephone |
title | Is There a Risk for Interaction Between Mobile Phones and Single Lead VDD Pacemakers? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T16%3A58%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20There%20a%20Risk%20for%20Interaction%20Between%20Mobile%20Phones%20and%20Single%20Lead%20VDD%20Pacemakers?&rft.jtitle=Pacing%20and%20clinical%20electrophysiology&rft.au=NOWAK,%20BERND&rft.date=1996-10&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1447&rft.epage=1450&rft.pages=1447-1450&rft.issn=0147-8389&rft.eissn=1540-8159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03156.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78512209%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78512209&rft_id=info:pmid/8904534&rfr_iscdi=true |