Is There a Risk for Interaction Between Mobile Phones and Single Lead VDD Pacemakers?

Mobile phones may cause pacemaker interference. Patients with a single lead VDD pacemaker might be at special risk, since the atrial sensitivity is often programmed to low (high sensitivity) threshold values and the majority of patients are pacemaker dependent due to the underlying high degree AV bl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 1996-10, Vol.19 (10), p.1447-1450
Hauptverfasser: NOWAK, BERND, ROSOCHA, STEFAN, ZELLERHOFF, CHRISTIAN, LIEBRICH, ANDREAS, HIMMRICH, EWALD, VOIGTLÁNDER, THOMAS, MEYER, JÜRGEN
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1450
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1447
container_title Pacing and clinical electrophysiology
container_volume 19
creator NOWAK, BERND
ROSOCHA, STEFAN
ZELLERHOFF, CHRISTIAN
LIEBRICH, ANDREAS
HIMMRICH, EWALD
VOIGTLÁNDER, THOMAS
MEYER, JÜRGEN
description Mobile phones may cause pacemaker interference. Patients with a single lead VDD pacemaker might be at special risk, since the atrial sensitivity is often programmed to low (high sensitivity) threshold values and the majority of patients are pacemaker dependent due to the underlying high degree AV block. We evaluated 31 patients with three types of single lead VDD pacemakers: 12 Unity, 292–07 (Intermedics, Inc.); 10 Thera VDD, 8948 or 8968i (Medtronic, Inc.); and 9 Saphir 600 (Vitatron, Inc.) for interference from a cellular mobile phone with a power of 2 W (D‐net). For this purpose, atrial and ventricular sensitivity settings were programmed to their most sensitive values (A: 0.1–0.25 mV; V: 1.0 mV) and ventricular sensing was programmed to unipolar. With the ECG continuously monitored, the phone's extendable antenna was brought in direct contact with the patient's skin at the right sternal border, with the tip of the antenna in skin contact just below the clavicle, within 5 cm of the pacemaker connector. Then multiple phases of phone calls were performed, and the effects on the pacemakers recorded. In our group of patients with three different types of single lead VDD pacemakers, no interference could be detected using a 2‐W mobile phone in the digital D‐net. The programmed values remained unchanged after the interference test. Therefore, the risk of interference seems to be low for the VDD pacemakers tested, although our study design does not allow to entirely exclude the possibility of interference from a mobile phone.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03156.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78512209</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78512209</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4517-4f61f73d3f10650e67914326b610f37a784a8ca01ff7dba1d4713e903722dad23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkEtP6zAQRi10EZTHT0CyWNxdgid27IQNjwKlqEAFBZaWk4whfSRgp6L8e1K16p7ZjDTfzBnpEHIMLIS2TsYhxIIFCcRpCGkqwyZjHGIZLrZIZxP9Ix0GQgUJT9Jdsuf9mDEmmYh3yE6Stp2LDnnpezr6QIfU0KfST6itHe1XDTqTN2Vd0UtsvhErel9n5RTp8KOu0FNTFfS5rN7byQBNQV-vrujQ5DgzE3T-7IBsWzP1eLju--Tl5nrUvQ0Gj71-92IQ5CIGFQgrwSpecAtMxgylSkHwSGYSmOXKqESYJDcMrFVFZqAQCjimjKsoKkwR8X3yf8X9dPXXHH2jZ6XPcTo1FdZzr1USQxSxtF08XS3mrvbeodWfrpwZ96OB6aVTPdZLcXopTi-d6rVTvWiPj9Zf5tkMi83pWmKbn6_y79bQzx_IenjRvQYhVIsIVojSN7jYIIybaKm4ivXbQ0_3RqO7y0FXaMZ_ARx0lBE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78512209</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is There a Risk for Interaction Between Mobile Phones and Single Lead VDD Pacemakers?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>NOWAK, BERND ; ROSOCHA, STEFAN ; ZELLERHOFF, CHRISTIAN ; LIEBRICH, ANDREAS ; HIMMRICH, EWALD ; VOIGTLÁNDER, THOMAS ; MEYER, JÜRGEN</creator><creatorcontrib>NOWAK, BERND ; ROSOCHA, STEFAN ; ZELLERHOFF, CHRISTIAN ; LIEBRICH, ANDREAS ; HIMMRICH, EWALD ; VOIGTLÁNDER, THOMAS ; MEYER, JÜRGEN</creatorcontrib><description>Mobile phones may cause pacemaker interference. Patients with a single lead VDD pacemaker might be at special risk, since the atrial sensitivity is often programmed to low (high sensitivity) threshold values and the majority of patients are pacemaker dependent due to the underlying high degree AV block. We evaluated 31 patients with three types of single lead VDD pacemakers: 12 Unity, 292–07 (Intermedics, Inc.); 10 Thera VDD, 8948 or 8968i (Medtronic, Inc.); and 9 Saphir 600 (Vitatron, Inc.) for interference from a cellular mobile phone with a power of 2 W (D‐net). For this purpose, atrial and ventricular sensitivity settings were programmed to their most sensitive values (A: 0.1–0.25 mV; V: 1.0 mV) and ventricular sensing was programmed to unipolar. With the ECG continuously monitored, the phone's extendable antenna was brought in direct contact with the patient's skin at the right sternal border, with the tip of the antenna in skin contact just below the clavicle, within 5 cm of the pacemaker connector. Then multiple phases of phone calls were performed, and the effects on the pacemakers recorded. In our group of patients with three different types of single lead VDD pacemakers, no interference could be detected using a 2‐W mobile phone in the digital D‐net. The programmed values remained unchanged after the interference test. Therefore, the risk of interference seems to be low for the VDD pacemakers tested, although our study design does not allow to entirely exclude the possibility of interference from a mobile phone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-8389</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03156.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8904534</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods ; Electromagnetic Fields - adverse effects ; Equipment Design ; Equipment Failure ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; mobile phones ; pacemaker interference ; Pacemaker, Artificial ; Risk Factors ; single lead VDD pacing ; Telephone</subject><ispartof>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 1996-10, Vol.19 (10), p.1447-1450</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4517-4f61f73d3f10650e67914326b610f37a784a8ca01ff7dba1d4713e903722dad23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4517-4f61f73d3f10650e67914326b610f37a784a8ca01ff7dba1d4713e903722dad23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8159.1996.tb03156.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8159.1996.tb03156.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27933,27934,45583,45584</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8904534$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>NOWAK, BERND</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROSOCHA, STEFAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZELLERHOFF, CHRISTIAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LIEBRICH, ANDREAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HIMMRICH, EWALD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VOIGTLÁNDER, THOMAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEYER, JÜRGEN</creatorcontrib><title>Is There a Risk for Interaction Between Mobile Phones and Single Lead VDD Pacemakers?</title><title>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</title><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>Mobile phones may cause pacemaker interference. Patients with a single lead VDD pacemaker might be at special risk, since the atrial sensitivity is often programmed to low (high sensitivity) threshold values and the majority of patients are pacemaker dependent due to the underlying high degree AV block. We evaluated 31 patients with three types of single lead VDD pacemakers: 12 Unity, 292–07 (Intermedics, Inc.); 10 Thera VDD, 8948 or 8968i (Medtronic, Inc.); and 9 Saphir 600 (Vitatron, Inc.) for interference from a cellular mobile phone with a power of 2 W (D‐net). For this purpose, atrial and ventricular sensitivity settings were programmed to their most sensitive values (A: 0.1–0.25 mV; V: 1.0 mV) and ventricular sensing was programmed to unipolar. With the ECG continuously monitored, the phone's extendable antenna was brought in direct contact with the patient's skin at the right sternal border, with the tip of the antenna in skin contact just below the clavicle, within 5 cm of the pacemaker connector. Then multiple phases of phone calls were performed, and the effects on the pacemakers recorded. In our group of patients with three different types of single lead VDD pacemakers, no interference could be detected using a 2‐W mobile phone in the digital D‐net. The programmed values remained unchanged after the interference test. Therefore, the risk of interference seems to be low for the VDD pacemakers tested, although our study design does not allow to entirely exclude the possibility of interference from a mobile phone.</description><subject>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods</subject><subject>Electromagnetic Fields - adverse effects</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Equipment Failure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>mobile phones</subject><subject>pacemaker interference</subject><subject>Pacemaker, Artificial</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>single lead VDD pacing</subject><subject>Telephone</subject><issn>0147-8389</issn><issn>1540-8159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkEtP6zAQRi10EZTHT0CyWNxdgid27IQNjwKlqEAFBZaWk4whfSRgp6L8e1K16p7ZjDTfzBnpEHIMLIS2TsYhxIIFCcRpCGkqwyZjHGIZLrZIZxP9Ix0GQgUJT9Jdsuf9mDEmmYh3yE6Stp2LDnnpezr6QIfU0KfST6itHe1XDTqTN2Vd0UtsvhErel9n5RTp8KOu0FNTFfS5rN7byQBNQV-vrujQ5DgzE3T-7IBsWzP1eLju--Tl5nrUvQ0Gj71-92IQ5CIGFQgrwSpecAtMxgylSkHwSGYSmOXKqESYJDcMrFVFZqAQCjimjKsoKkwR8X3yf8X9dPXXHH2jZ6XPcTo1FdZzr1USQxSxtF08XS3mrvbeodWfrpwZ96OB6aVTPdZLcXopTi-d6rVTvWiPj9Zf5tkMi83pWmKbn6_y79bQzx_IenjRvQYhVIsIVojSN7jYIIybaKm4ivXbQ0_3RqO7y0FXaMZ_ARx0lBE</recordid><startdate>199610</startdate><enddate>199610</enddate><creator>NOWAK, BERND</creator><creator>ROSOCHA, STEFAN</creator><creator>ZELLERHOFF, CHRISTIAN</creator><creator>LIEBRICH, ANDREAS</creator><creator>HIMMRICH, EWALD</creator><creator>VOIGTLÁNDER, THOMAS</creator><creator>MEYER, JÜRGEN</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199610</creationdate><title>Is There a Risk for Interaction Between Mobile Phones and Single Lead VDD Pacemakers?</title><author>NOWAK, BERND ; ROSOCHA, STEFAN ; ZELLERHOFF, CHRISTIAN ; LIEBRICH, ANDREAS ; HIMMRICH, EWALD ; VOIGTLÁNDER, THOMAS ; MEYER, JÜRGEN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4517-4f61f73d3f10650e67914326b610f37a784a8ca01ff7dba1d4713e903722dad23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods</topic><topic>Electromagnetic Fields - adverse effects</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Equipment Failure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>mobile phones</topic><topic>pacemaker interference</topic><topic>Pacemaker, Artificial</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>single lead VDD pacing</topic><topic>Telephone</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>NOWAK, BERND</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROSOCHA, STEFAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZELLERHOFF, CHRISTIAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LIEBRICH, ANDREAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HIMMRICH, EWALD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VOIGTLÁNDER, THOMAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEYER, JÜRGEN</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>NOWAK, BERND</au><au>ROSOCHA, STEFAN</au><au>ZELLERHOFF, CHRISTIAN</au><au>LIEBRICH, ANDREAS</au><au>HIMMRICH, EWALD</au><au>VOIGTLÁNDER, THOMAS</au><au>MEYER, JÜRGEN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is There a Risk for Interaction Between Mobile Phones and Single Lead VDD Pacemakers?</atitle><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>1996-10</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1447</spage><epage>1450</epage><pages>1447-1450</pages><issn>0147-8389</issn><eissn>1540-8159</eissn><abstract>Mobile phones may cause pacemaker interference. Patients with a single lead VDD pacemaker might be at special risk, since the atrial sensitivity is often programmed to low (high sensitivity) threshold values and the majority of patients are pacemaker dependent due to the underlying high degree AV block. We evaluated 31 patients with three types of single lead VDD pacemakers: 12 Unity, 292–07 (Intermedics, Inc.); 10 Thera VDD, 8948 or 8968i (Medtronic, Inc.); and 9 Saphir 600 (Vitatron, Inc.) for interference from a cellular mobile phone with a power of 2 W (D‐net). For this purpose, atrial and ventricular sensitivity settings were programmed to their most sensitive values (A: 0.1–0.25 mV; V: 1.0 mV) and ventricular sensing was programmed to unipolar. With the ECG continuously monitored, the phone's extendable antenna was brought in direct contact with the patient's skin at the right sternal border, with the tip of the antenna in skin contact just below the clavicle, within 5 cm of the pacemaker connector. Then multiple phases of phone calls were performed, and the effects on the pacemakers recorded. In our group of patients with three different types of single lead VDD pacemakers, no interference could be detected using a 2‐W mobile phone in the digital D‐net. The programmed values remained unchanged after the interference test. Therefore, the risk of interference seems to be low for the VDD pacemakers tested, although our study design does not allow to entirely exclude the possibility of interference from a mobile phone.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>8904534</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03156.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0147-8389
ispartof Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 1996-10, Vol.19 (10), p.1447-1450
issn 0147-8389
1540-8159
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78512209
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods
Electromagnetic Fields - adverse effects
Equipment Design
Equipment Failure
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
mobile phones
pacemaker interference
Pacemaker, Artificial
Risk Factors
single lead VDD pacing
Telephone
title Is There a Risk for Interaction Between Mobile Phones and Single Lead VDD Pacemakers?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T16%3A58%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20There%20a%20Risk%20for%20Interaction%20Between%20Mobile%20Phones%20and%20Single%20Lead%20VDD%20Pacemakers?&rft.jtitle=Pacing%20and%20clinical%20electrophysiology&rft.au=NOWAK,%20BERND&rft.date=1996-10&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1447&rft.epage=1450&rft.pages=1447-1450&rft.issn=0147-8389&rft.eissn=1540-8159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03156.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78512209%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78512209&rft_id=info:pmid/8904534&rfr_iscdi=true