Choledochal 'clipoliths' after cholecystectomy

Residual or recurrent stones in the common bile duct can pose a difficult diagnostic problem in the symptomatic postcholecystectomy patient. Although incrustation of unabsorbed suture material is the most important cause of stone recurrence in the common bile duct after surgery, hemostatic clips may...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Southern medical journal (Birmingham, Ala.) Ala.), 1996-11, Vol.89 (11), p.1111-1113
Hauptverfasser: Brogdon, B G, Neuffer, F H, Siner, J R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1113
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1111
container_title Southern medical journal (Birmingham, Ala.)
container_volume 89
creator Brogdon, B G
Neuffer, F H
Siner, J R
description Residual or recurrent stones in the common bile duct can pose a difficult diagnostic problem in the symptomatic postcholecystectomy patient. Although incrustation of unabsorbed suture material is the most important cause of stone recurrence in the common bile duct after surgery, hemostatic clips may also (though rarely) provide a nucleus for stone formation. We present two cases in which this occurred. Careful attention to the position and orientation of surgical clips on serial postoperative film studies can be most helpful in diagnosing this rare condition.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00007611-199611000-00020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78509318</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78509318</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-a294f22a92d7eeba27b12f8d956f42125e8ed68fe1b17570f621ac97901924bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE9PwzAMxXMAjTH4CEg9sVOHnbRNckQT_6RJXOAcpamjFaVkNO1h356OjVmyniy_Z0s_xjKEFYKWDzCVrBBz1HqSacqn5nDB5gBC5YUo1BW7TunrYCxVNWMzpUEIwDlbrbcxUBPd1oZs6UK7i6EdtmmZWT9Qn7nD2u3TQG6I3f6GXXobEt2edME-n58-1q_55v3lbf24yZ1AGHLLdeE5t5o3kqi2XNbIvWp0WfmCIy9JUVMpT1ijLCX4iqN1WmpAzYvaiQW7P97d9fFnpDSYrk2OQrDfFMdkpCpBC1STUR2Nro8p9eTNrm872-8NgjngMf94zBmP-cMzRe9OP8a6o-YcPLERv_WHYPk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78509318</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Choledochal 'clipoliths' after cholecystectomy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>Brogdon, B G ; Neuffer, F H ; Siner, J R</creator><creatorcontrib>Brogdon, B G ; Neuffer, F H ; Siner, J R</creatorcontrib><description>Residual or recurrent stones in the common bile duct can pose a difficult diagnostic problem in the symptomatic postcholecystectomy patient. Although incrustation of unabsorbed suture material is the most important cause of stone recurrence in the common bile duct after surgery, hemostatic clips may also (though rarely) provide a nucleus for stone formation. We present two cases in which this occurred. Careful attention to the position and orientation of surgical clips on serial postoperative film studies can be most helpful in diagnosing this rare condition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-4348</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00007611-199611000-00020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8903301</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde ; Cholecystectomy - adverse effects ; Female ; Foreign-Body Migration - complications ; Gallstones - diagnostic imaging ; Gallstones - etiology ; Gallstones - surgery ; Hemostasis, Surgical - instrumentation ; Humans ; Recurrence ; Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic ; Surgical Stapling - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>Southern medical journal (Birmingham, Ala.), 1996-11, Vol.89 (11), p.1111-1113</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-a294f22a92d7eeba27b12f8d956f42125e8ed68fe1b17570f621ac97901924bc3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8903301$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brogdon, B G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neuffer, F H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siner, J R</creatorcontrib><title>Choledochal 'clipoliths' after cholecystectomy</title><title>Southern medical journal (Birmingham, Ala.)</title><addtitle>South Med J</addtitle><description>Residual or recurrent stones in the common bile duct can pose a difficult diagnostic problem in the symptomatic postcholecystectomy patient. Although incrustation of unabsorbed suture material is the most important cause of stone recurrence in the common bile duct after surgery, hemostatic clips may also (though rarely) provide a nucleus for stone formation. We present two cases in which this occurred. Careful attention to the position and orientation of surgical clips on serial postoperative film studies can be most helpful in diagnosing this rare condition.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foreign-Body Migration - complications</subject><subject>Gallstones - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Gallstones - etiology</subject><subject>Gallstones - surgery</subject><subject>Hemostasis, Surgical - instrumentation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic</subject><subject>Surgical Stapling - adverse effects</subject><issn>0038-4348</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE9PwzAMxXMAjTH4CEg9sVOHnbRNckQT_6RJXOAcpamjFaVkNO1h356OjVmyniy_Z0s_xjKEFYKWDzCVrBBz1HqSacqn5nDB5gBC5YUo1BW7TunrYCxVNWMzpUEIwDlbrbcxUBPd1oZs6UK7i6EdtmmZWT9Qn7nD2u3TQG6I3f6GXXobEt2edME-n58-1q_55v3lbf24yZ1AGHLLdeE5t5o3kqi2XNbIvWp0WfmCIy9JUVMpT1ijLCX4iqN1WmpAzYvaiQW7P97d9fFnpDSYrk2OQrDfFMdkpCpBC1STUR2Nro8p9eTNrm872-8NgjngMf94zBmP-cMzRe9OP8a6o-YcPLERv_WHYPk</recordid><startdate>19961101</startdate><enddate>19961101</enddate><creator>Brogdon, B G</creator><creator>Neuffer, F H</creator><creator>Siner, J R</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19961101</creationdate><title>Choledochal 'clipoliths' after cholecystectomy</title><author>Brogdon, B G ; Neuffer, F H ; Siner, J R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-a294f22a92d7eeba27b12f8d956f42125e8ed68fe1b17570f621ac97901924bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foreign-Body Migration - complications</topic><topic>Gallstones - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Gallstones - etiology</topic><topic>Gallstones - surgery</topic><topic>Hemostasis, Surgical - instrumentation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic</topic><topic>Surgical Stapling - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brogdon, B G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neuffer, F H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siner, J R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Southern medical journal (Birmingham, Ala.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brogdon, B G</au><au>Neuffer, F H</au><au>Siner, J R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Choledochal 'clipoliths' after cholecystectomy</atitle><jtitle>Southern medical journal (Birmingham, Ala.)</jtitle><addtitle>South Med J</addtitle><date>1996-11-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1111</spage><epage>1113</epage><pages>1111-1113</pages><issn>0038-4348</issn><abstract>Residual or recurrent stones in the common bile duct can pose a difficult diagnostic problem in the symptomatic postcholecystectomy patient. Although incrustation of unabsorbed suture material is the most important cause of stone recurrence in the common bile duct after surgery, hemostatic clips may also (though rarely) provide a nucleus for stone formation. We present two cases in which this occurred. Careful attention to the position and orientation of surgical clips on serial postoperative film studies can be most helpful in diagnosing this rare condition.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>8903301</pmid><doi>10.1097/00007611-199611000-00020</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-4348
ispartof Southern medical journal (Birmingham, Ala.), 1996-11, Vol.89 (11), p.1111-1113
issn 0038-4348
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78509318
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload
subjects Aged
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde
Cholecystectomy - adverse effects
Female
Foreign-Body Migration - complications
Gallstones - diagnostic imaging
Gallstones - etiology
Gallstones - surgery
Hemostasis, Surgical - instrumentation
Humans
Recurrence
Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic
Surgical Stapling - adverse effects
title Choledochal 'clipoliths' after cholecystectomy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T17%3A09%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Choledochal%20'clipoliths'%20after%20cholecystectomy&rft.jtitle=Southern%20medical%20journal%20(Birmingham,%20Ala.)&rft.au=Brogdon,%20B%20G&rft.date=1996-11-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1111&rft.epage=1113&rft.pages=1111-1113&rft.issn=0038-4348&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00007611-199611000-00020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78509318%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78509318&rft_id=info:pmid/8903301&rfr_iscdi=true