Choledochal 'clipoliths' after cholecystectomy
Residual or recurrent stones in the common bile duct can pose a difficult diagnostic problem in the symptomatic postcholecystectomy patient. Although incrustation of unabsorbed suture material is the most important cause of stone recurrence in the common bile duct after surgery, hemostatic clips may...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Southern medical journal (Birmingham, Ala.) Ala.), 1996-11, Vol.89 (11), p.1111-1113 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1113 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1111 |
container_title | Southern medical journal (Birmingham, Ala.) |
container_volume | 89 |
creator | Brogdon, B G Neuffer, F H Siner, J R |
description | Residual or recurrent stones in the common bile duct can pose a difficult diagnostic problem in the symptomatic postcholecystectomy patient. Although incrustation of unabsorbed suture material is the most important cause of stone recurrence in the common bile duct after surgery, hemostatic clips may also (though rarely) provide a nucleus for stone formation. We present two cases in which this occurred. Careful attention to the position and orientation of surgical clips on serial postoperative film studies can be most helpful in diagnosing this rare condition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00007611-199611000-00020 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78509318</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78509318</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-a294f22a92d7eeba27b12f8d956f42125e8ed68fe1b17570f621ac97901924bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE9PwzAMxXMAjTH4CEg9sVOHnbRNckQT_6RJXOAcpamjFaVkNO1h356OjVmyniy_Z0s_xjKEFYKWDzCVrBBz1HqSacqn5nDB5gBC5YUo1BW7TunrYCxVNWMzpUEIwDlbrbcxUBPd1oZs6UK7i6EdtmmZWT9Qn7nD2u3TQG6I3f6GXXobEt2edME-n58-1q_55v3lbf24yZ1AGHLLdeE5t5o3kqi2XNbIvWp0WfmCIy9JUVMpT1ijLCX4iqN1WmpAzYvaiQW7P97d9fFnpDSYrk2OQrDfFMdkpCpBC1STUR2Nro8p9eTNrm872-8NgjngMf94zBmP-cMzRe9OP8a6o-YcPLERv_WHYPk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78509318</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Choledochal 'clipoliths' after cholecystectomy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>Brogdon, B G ; Neuffer, F H ; Siner, J R</creator><creatorcontrib>Brogdon, B G ; Neuffer, F H ; Siner, J R</creatorcontrib><description>Residual or recurrent stones in the common bile duct can pose a difficult diagnostic problem in the symptomatic postcholecystectomy patient. Although incrustation of unabsorbed suture material is the most important cause of stone recurrence in the common bile duct after surgery, hemostatic clips may also (though rarely) provide a nucleus for stone formation. We present two cases in which this occurred. Careful attention to the position and orientation of surgical clips on serial postoperative film studies can be most helpful in diagnosing this rare condition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-4348</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00007611-199611000-00020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8903301</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde ; Cholecystectomy - adverse effects ; Female ; Foreign-Body Migration - complications ; Gallstones - diagnostic imaging ; Gallstones - etiology ; Gallstones - surgery ; Hemostasis, Surgical - instrumentation ; Humans ; Recurrence ; Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic ; Surgical Stapling - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>Southern medical journal (Birmingham, Ala.), 1996-11, Vol.89 (11), p.1111-1113</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-a294f22a92d7eeba27b12f8d956f42125e8ed68fe1b17570f621ac97901924bc3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8903301$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brogdon, B G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neuffer, F H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siner, J R</creatorcontrib><title>Choledochal 'clipoliths' after cholecystectomy</title><title>Southern medical journal (Birmingham, Ala.)</title><addtitle>South Med J</addtitle><description>Residual or recurrent stones in the common bile duct can pose a difficult diagnostic problem in the symptomatic postcholecystectomy patient. Although incrustation of unabsorbed suture material is the most important cause of stone recurrence in the common bile duct after surgery, hemostatic clips may also (though rarely) provide a nucleus for stone formation. We present two cases in which this occurred. Careful attention to the position and orientation of surgical clips on serial postoperative film studies can be most helpful in diagnosing this rare condition.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foreign-Body Migration - complications</subject><subject>Gallstones - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Gallstones - etiology</subject><subject>Gallstones - surgery</subject><subject>Hemostasis, Surgical - instrumentation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic</subject><subject>Surgical Stapling - adverse effects</subject><issn>0038-4348</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE9PwzAMxXMAjTH4CEg9sVOHnbRNckQT_6RJXOAcpamjFaVkNO1h356OjVmyniy_Z0s_xjKEFYKWDzCVrBBz1HqSacqn5nDB5gBC5YUo1BW7TunrYCxVNWMzpUEIwDlbrbcxUBPd1oZs6UK7i6EdtmmZWT9Qn7nD2u3TQG6I3f6GXXobEt2edME-n58-1q_55v3lbf24yZ1AGHLLdeE5t5o3kqi2XNbIvWp0WfmCIy9JUVMpT1ijLCX4iqN1WmpAzYvaiQW7P97d9fFnpDSYrk2OQrDfFMdkpCpBC1STUR2Nro8p9eTNrm872-8NgjngMf94zBmP-cMzRe9OP8a6o-YcPLERv_WHYPk</recordid><startdate>19961101</startdate><enddate>19961101</enddate><creator>Brogdon, B G</creator><creator>Neuffer, F H</creator><creator>Siner, J R</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19961101</creationdate><title>Choledochal 'clipoliths' after cholecystectomy</title><author>Brogdon, B G ; Neuffer, F H ; Siner, J R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-a294f22a92d7eeba27b12f8d956f42125e8ed68fe1b17570f621ac97901924bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foreign-Body Migration - complications</topic><topic>Gallstones - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Gallstones - etiology</topic><topic>Gallstones - surgery</topic><topic>Hemostasis, Surgical - instrumentation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic</topic><topic>Surgical Stapling - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brogdon, B G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neuffer, F H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siner, J R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Southern medical journal (Birmingham, Ala.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brogdon, B G</au><au>Neuffer, F H</au><au>Siner, J R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Choledochal 'clipoliths' after cholecystectomy</atitle><jtitle>Southern medical journal (Birmingham, Ala.)</jtitle><addtitle>South Med J</addtitle><date>1996-11-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1111</spage><epage>1113</epage><pages>1111-1113</pages><issn>0038-4348</issn><abstract>Residual or recurrent stones in the common bile duct can pose a difficult diagnostic problem in the symptomatic postcholecystectomy patient. Although incrustation of unabsorbed suture material is the most important cause of stone recurrence in the common bile duct after surgery, hemostatic clips may also (though rarely) provide a nucleus for stone formation. We present two cases in which this occurred. Careful attention to the position and orientation of surgical clips on serial postoperative film studies can be most helpful in diagnosing this rare condition.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>8903301</pmid><doi>10.1097/00007611-199611000-00020</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0038-4348 |
ispartof | Southern medical journal (Birmingham, Ala.), 1996-11, Vol.89 (11), p.1111-1113 |
issn | 0038-4348 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78509318 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload |
subjects | Aged Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholecystectomy - adverse effects Female Foreign-Body Migration - complications Gallstones - diagnostic imaging Gallstones - etiology Gallstones - surgery Hemostasis, Surgical - instrumentation Humans Recurrence Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic Surgical Stapling - adverse effects |
title | Choledochal 'clipoliths' after cholecystectomy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T17%3A09%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Choledochal%20'clipoliths'%20after%20cholecystectomy&rft.jtitle=Southern%20medical%20journal%20(Birmingham,%20Ala.)&rft.au=Brogdon,%20B%20G&rft.date=1996-11-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1111&rft.epage=1113&rft.pages=1111-1113&rft.issn=0038-4348&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00007611-199611000-00020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78509318%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78509318&rft_id=info:pmid/8903301&rfr_iscdi=true |