Differences of Postextrasystolic Behavior of Left Ventricular and Aortic Pressures Between Fixed and Dynamic Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Stenosis

The dynamic behavior of fixed LV outflow tract stenosis partly resembles that of OCM. To analyze their differences we studied basal and postextrasystolic (post-PVC) peak-to-peak LV aortic gradients, aortic systolic pressure, and pulse pressure in 14 OCM and in 36 pure VAS without two-dimensional ech...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chest 1988-11, Vol.94 (5), p.1058-1062
Hauptverfasser: Angel, J., Domingo, E., Serrat, R., Anivarro, I., Soler-Soler, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1062
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1058
container_title Chest
container_volume 94
creator Angel, J.
Domingo, E.
Serrat, R.
Anivarro, I.
Soler-Soler, J.
description The dynamic behavior of fixed LV outflow tract stenosis partly resembles that of OCM. To analyze their differences we studied basal and postextrasystolic (post-PVC) peak-to-peak LV aortic gradients, aortic systolic pressure, and pulse pressure in 14 OCM and in 36 pure VAS without two-dimensional echocardiographic findings of OCM. Fifteen mild VAS had basal gradients similar to those of OCM (39 ± 17 mm Hg vs 24 ± 16 mm Hg). Patients with OCM show a post-PVC gradient (109 ± 41 mm Hg) similar to that of VAS (110 ± 50 mm Hg). However, the latter were departing from much higher gradients (VAS 72 ± 30 mm Hg vs OCM 24 ± 16 mm Hg). Decrement of post-PVC aortic systolic pressure and pulse pressure were frequent in both groups, but decrement of pulse pressure >5 mm Hg were more frequent in OCM. We concluded that (1) post-PVC increased aortic gradients and decreased aortic systolic pressure occurred in both VAS and OCM; (2) post-PVC decreased aortic pulse pressure might occur in VAS; and (3) association of post-PVC gradient increment >75 percent and pulse pressure decrement >5 mm Hg are strongly suggestive of OCM.
doi_str_mv 10.1378/chest.94.5.1058
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78495127</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0012369216314258</els_id><sourcerecordid>78495127</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-c21ff98070acbd6b565e3e23754c9c2e21208e846a484f64374999374629a9843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9vEzEQxS0EKqFw5oS0B9Tbpv6_62NpKSBFaiUKV8vxjokrZ11sb9N8Dz4wThMVJMRlLGt-b95oHkJvCZ4T1vWndgW5zBWfiznBon-GZkQx0jLB2XM0w5jQlklFX6JXOd_i-idKHqEjyiWmSszQrwvvHCQYLeQmuuY65gIPJZm8zSUGb5sPsDL3PqZddwGuNN9hLMnbKZjUmHFozmIqlbtOkPNUS1WUDcDYXPoHGB6Ri-1o1pX5R381FRfiprlJxpbma4ExZp9foxfOhAxvDu8x-nb58eb8c7u4-vTl_GzRWiZFaS0lzqked9jY5SCXQgpgQFknuFWWAiUU99BzaXjPneSs40qpWiVVRvWcHaOT_dy7FH9O9ZB67bOFEMwIccq667kShHYVPN2DNsWcEzh9l_zapK0mWO9y0I85aMW10LscquLdYfS0XMPwxB8OX_vvD32TrQkumdH6_IR1GPeSyT_GK_9jtfEJdF6bEOpQtre8jVMaTfjbWO0VUA937yHpbP0u3qGqbdFD9P9d-jfKRLfi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78495127</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences of Postextrasystolic Behavior of Left Ventricular and Aortic Pressures Between Fixed and Dynamic Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Stenosis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Angel, J. ; Domingo, E. ; Serrat, R. ; Anivarro, I. ; Soler-Soler, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Angel, J. ; Domingo, E. ; Serrat, R. ; Anivarro, I. ; Soler-Soler, J.</creatorcontrib><description>The dynamic behavior of fixed LV outflow tract stenosis partly resembles that of OCM. To analyze their differences we studied basal and postextrasystolic (post-PVC) peak-to-peak LV aortic gradients, aortic systolic pressure, and pulse pressure in 14 OCM and in 36 pure VAS without two-dimensional echocardiographic findings of OCM. Fifteen mild VAS had basal gradients similar to those of OCM (39 ± 17 mm Hg vs 24 ± 16 mm Hg). Patients with OCM show a post-PVC gradient (109 ± 41 mm Hg) similar to that of VAS (110 ± 50 mm Hg). However, the latter were departing from much higher gradients (VAS 72 ± 30 mm Hg vs OCM 24 ± 16 mm Hg). Decrement of post-PVC aortic systolic pressure and pulse pressure were frequent in both groups, but decrement of pulse pressure &gt;5 mm Hg were more frequent in OCM. We concluded that (1) post-PVC increased aortic gradients and decreased aortic systolic pressure occurred in both VAS and OCM; (2) post-PVC decreased aortic pulse pressure might occur in VAS; and (3) association of post-PVC gradient increment &gt;75 percent and pulse pressure decrement &gt;5 mm Hg are strongly suggestive of OCM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-3692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-3543</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1378/chest.94.5.1058</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2460295</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CHETBF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Northbrook, IL: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - physiopathology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiac Complexes, Premature - physiopathology ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic - physiopathology ; Female ; Heart ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Myocardial Contraction ; Myocarditis. Cardiomyopathies ; Ventricular Outflow Obstruction - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Chest, 1988-11, Vol.94 (5), p.1058-1062</ispartof><rights>1988 The American College of Chest Physicians</rights><rights>1989 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-c21ff98070acbd6b565e3e23754c9c2e21208e846a484f64374999374629a9843</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7008636$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2460295$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Angel, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domingo, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serrat, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anivarro, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soler-Soler, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Differences of Postextrasystolic Behavior of Left Ventricular and Aortic Pressures Between Fixed and Dynamic Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Stenosis</title><title>Chest</title><addtitle>Chest</addtitle><description>The dynamic behavior of fixed LV outflow tract stenosis partly resembles that of OCM. To analyze their differences we studied basal and postextrasystolic (post-PVC) peak-to-peak LV aortic gradients, aortic systolic pressure, and pulse pressure in 14 OCM and in 36 pure VAS without two-dimensional echocardiographic findings of OCM. Fifteen mild VAS had basal gradients similar to those of OCM (39 ± 17 mm Hg vs 24 ± 16 mm Hg). Patients with OCM show a post-PVC gradient (109 ± 41 mm Hg) similar to that of VAS (110 ± 50 mm Hg). However, the latter were departing from much higher gradients (VAS 72 ± 30 mm Hg vs OCM 24 ± 16 mm Hg). Decrement of post-PVC aortic systolic pressure and pulse pressure were frequent in both groups, but decrement of pulse pressure &gt;5 mm Hg were more frequent in OCM. We concluded that (1) post-PVC increased aortic gradients and decreased aortic systolic pressure occurred in both VAS and OCM; (2) post-PVC decreased aortic pulse pressure might occur in VAS; and (3) association of post-PVC gradient increment &gt;75 percent and pulse pressure decrement &gt;5 mm Hg are strongly suggestive of OCM.</description><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiac Complexes, Premature - physiopathology</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic - physiopathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Myocardial Contraction</subject><subject>Myocarditis. Cardiomyopathies</subject><subject>Ventricular Outflow Obstruction - physiopathology</subject><issn>0012-3692</issn><issn>1931-3543</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9vEzEQxS0EKqFw5oS0B9Tbpv6_62NpKSBFaiUKV8vxjokrZ11sb9N8Dz4wThMVJMRlLGt-b95oHkJvCZ4T1vWndgW5zBWfiznBon-GZkQx0jLB2XM0w5jQlklFX6JXOd_i-idKHqEjyiWmSszQrwvvHCQYLeQmuuY65gIPJZm8zSUGb5sPsDL3PqZddwGuNN9hLMnbKZjUmHFozmIqlbtOkPNUS1WUDcDYXPoHGB6Ri-1o1pX5R381FRfiprlJxpbma4ExZp9foxfOhAxvDu8x-nb58eb8c7u4-vTl_GzRWiZFaS0lzqked9jY5SCXQgpgQFknuFWWAiUU99BzaXjPneSs40qpWiVVRvWcHaOT_dy7FH9O9ZB67bOFEMwIccq667kShHYVPN2DNsWcEzh9l_zapK0mWO9y0I85aMW10LscquLdYfS0XMPwxB8OX_vvD32TrQkumdH6_IR1GPeSyT_GK_9jtfEJdF6bEOpQtre8jVMaTfjbWO0VUA937yHpbP0u3qGqbdFD9P9d-jfKRLfi</recordid><startdate>19881101</startdate><enddate>19881101</enddate><creator>Angel, J.</creator><creator>Domingo, E.</creator><creator>Serrat, R.</creator><creator>Anivarro, I.</creator><creator>Soler-Soler, J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>American College of Chest Physicians</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19881101</creationdate><title>Differences of Postextrasystolic Behavior of Left Ventricular and Aortic Pressures Between Fixed and Dynamic Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Stenosis</title><author>Angel, J. ; Domingo, E. ; Serrat, R. ; Anivarro, I. ; Soler-Soler, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-c21ff98070acbd6b565e3e23754c9c2e21208e846a484f64374999374629a9843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiac Complexes, Premature - physiopathology</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic - physiopathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Myocardial Contraction</topic><topic>Myocarditis. Cardiomyopathies</topic><topic>Ventricular Outflow Obstruction - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Angel, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domingo, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serrat, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anivarro, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soler-Soler, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Chest</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Angel, J.</au><au>Domingo, E.</au><au>Serrat, R.</au><au>Anivarro, I.</au><au>Soler-Soler, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences of Postextrasystolic Behavior of Left Ventricular and Aortic Pressures Between Fixed and Dynamic Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Stenosis</atitle><jtitle>Chest</jtitle><addtitle>Chest</addtitle><date>1988-11-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1058</spage><epage>1062</epage><pages>1058-1062</pages><issn>0012-3692</issn><eissn>1931-3543</eissn><coden>CHETBF</coden><abstract>The dynamic behavior of fixed LV outflow tract stenosis partly resembles that of OCM. To analyze their differences we studied basal and postextrasystolic (post-PVC) peak-to-peak LV aortic gradients, aortic systolic pressure, and pulse pressure in 14 OCM and in 36 pure VAS without two-dimensional echocardiographic findings of OCM. Fifteen mild VAS had basal gradients similar to those of OCM (39 ± 17 mm Hg vs 24 ± 16 mm Hg). Patients with OCM show a post-PVC gradient (109 ± 41 mm Hg) similar to that of VAS (110 ± 50 mm Hg). However, the latter were departing from much higher gradients (VAS 72 ± 30 mm Hg vs OCM 24 ± 16 mm Hg). Decrement of post-PVC aortic systolic pressure and pulse pressure were frequent in both groups, but decrement of pulse pressure &gt;5 mm Hg were more frequent in OCM. We concluded that (1) post-PVC increased aortic gradients and decreased aortic systolic pressure occurred in both VAS and OCM; (2) post-PVC decreased aortic pulse pressure might occur in VAS; and (3) association of post-PVC gradient increment &gt;75 percent and pulse pressure decrement &gt;5 mm Hg are strongly suggestive of OCM.</abstract><cop>Northbrook, IL</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>2460295</pmid><doi>10.1378/chest.94.5.1058</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-3692
ispartof Chest, 1988-11, Vol.94 (5), p.1058-1062
issn 0012-3692
1931-3543
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78495127
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aortic Valve Stenosis - physiopathology
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiac Complexes, Premature - physiopathology
Cardiology. Vascular system
Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic - physiopathology
Female
Heart
Hemodynamics
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Myocardial Contraction
Myocarditis. Cardiomyopathies
Ventricular Outflow Obstruction - physiopathology
title Differences of Postextrasystolic Behavior of Left Ventricular and Aortic Pressures Between Fixed and Dynamic Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Stenosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T16%3A07%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20of%20Postextrasystolic%20Behavior%20of%20Left%20Ventricular%20and%20Aortic%20Pressures%20Between%20Fixed%20and%20Dynamic%20Left%20Ventricular%20Outflow%20Tract%20Stenosis&rft.jtitle=Chest&rft.au=Angel,%20J.&rft.date=1988-11-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1058&rft.epage=1062&rft.pages=1058-1062&rft.issn=0012-3692&rft.eissn=1931-3543&rft.coden=CHETBF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1378/chest.94.5.1058&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78495127%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78495127&rft_id=info:pmid/2460295&rft_els_id=S0012369216314258&rfr_iscdi=true