Impact of prenatal diagnosis on revised livebirth prevalence estimates of Down syndrome in the Lothian region of Scotland, 1978-1992

Ramsay et al. [(1991) Biomed Pharmacother 45:267–272] reported on the livebirth prevalence of Down syndrome in the Lothian region of Scotland during 1978–1989. Their results suggested a temporal association between the events of Chernobyl in April 1986 and a significant excess of cases in 1987. In t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Genetic epidemiology 1996, Vol.13 (4), p.367-375
Hauptverfasser: Huether, Carl A., Haroldson, Kristin, Ellis, Patricia M., Ramsay, Colin N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 375
container_issue 4
container_start_page 367
container_title Genetic epidemiology
container_volume 13
creator Huether, Carl A.
Haroldson, Kristin
Ellis, Patricia M.
Ramsay, Colin N.
description Ramsay et al. [(1991) Biomed Pharmacother 45:267–272] reported on the livebirth prevalence of Down syndrome in the Lothian region of Scotland during 1978–1989. Their results suggested a temporal association between the events of Chernobyl in April 1986 and a significant excess of cases in 1987. In the current study the data were extended for 3 years and reanalyzed, a major objective being to correct for the differential loss of fetuses with Down syndrome which occurs between prenatal diagnosis and birth. Other objectives were to estimate the prevalence reduction due to prenatal diagnosis, quinquennial maternal age‐specific risk rates, and the level of ascertainment of cases. The reanalysis found a 12‐year prevalence rate of 1.29 vs. the previous rate of 1.34, and a shift of the annual prevalence peak to 1988, with a reduced prevalence in 1987 compared to that found in the earlier study. The new results are less consistent in showing an association of Down syndrome clustering with the Chernobyl accident. For the 15‐year study period, a 23% overall reduction in prevalence occurred due to prenatal diagnosis and elective abortion of affected fetuses, with a 50% reduction to women ≥35 years of age. For 1988–1992, these reductions were 33% and 60%, which are among the highest reported in the literature for these time periods. The estimated quinquennial maternal risk rates were very similar to others already reported, and the data are consistent with a high level of case ascertainment. Since these women are approaching the upper limits of fetal detection through advanced maternal age alone, continued reduction in prevalence rates for Down syndrome through prenatal diagnosis and elective abortion will come mostly from increased use of other (chemical) screening techniques now available. © 1996 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1996)13:4<367::AID-GEPI5>3.0.CO;2-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78489314</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1534844813</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4595-806df70b974c7c41f64caeef456baa148b7d14d9938e7592a02a0605f1a054713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9keGL0zAchoso5zz9E4R8ENmBnUmTNslOhLM7Z3E4YSd-_JGl6S1n186k27nv_uGmbuyLchAIJE9e3l-eKLokeEQwTt4OF0VeXBAsRZwkPBkSKbMLQsfsHc34eHxVTOLp9dcifU9HeJTPL5OYPIoGJ_5xNMCckRhTmT6Nnnl_hzEhTKZn0ZkQkmVUDqLfxXqjdIfaCm2caVSnalRaddu03nrUNsiZnfWmRLXdmaV13arndqo2jTbI-M6uVWd8_37S3jfI75vStWuDbIO6lUGztltZ1cfc2pAWsIVuu1o15RtEJBdxGCp5Hj2pVO3Ni-N-Hn37eH2Tf4pn82mRX81izVKZxgJnZcXxUnKmuWakyphWxlQszZZKESaWvCSslJIKw1OZKBxWhtOKKJwyTuh59PqQu3Htz20oD2vrtalDHdNuPXDBhKSEBXD4IEhSygRjgtCALg6odq33zlSwceFP3B4Ihl4jQK8Rei3Qa4FeIxAKDIJGgKAR_moEChjyOQQipL48Ftgu16Y8ZR69hftXx3vltaorpxpt_QmjCRUZ7ue4OWD3tjb7f5o9WOx_vQ4HITY-xFrfmV-nWOV-QMYpT-H7lyl8SMjnJJ9woPQPyFjSBg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1534844813</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of prenatal diagnosis on revised livebirth prevalence estimates of Down syndrome in the Lothian region of Scotland, 1978-1992</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Huether, Carl A. ; Haroldson, Kristin ; Ellis, Patricia M. ; Ramsay, Colin N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Huether, Carl A. ; Haroldson, Kristin ; Ellis, Patricia M. ; Ramsay, Colin N.</creatorcontrib><description>Ramsay et al. [(1991) Biomed Pharmacother 45:267–272] reported on the livebirth prevalence of Down syndrome in the Lothian region of Scotland during 1978–1989. Their results suggested a temporal association between the events of Chernobyl in April 1986 and a significant excess of cases in 1987. In the current study the data were extended for 3 years and reanalyzed, a major objective being to correct for the differential loss of fetuses with Down syndrome which occurs between prenatal diagnosis and birth. Other objectives were to estimate the prevalence reduction due to prenatal diagnosis, quinquennial maternal age‐specific risk rates, and the level of ascertainment of cases. The reanalysis found a 12‐year prevalence rate of 1.29 vs. the previous rate of 1.34, and a shift of the annual prevalence peak to 1988, with a reduced prevalence in 1987 compared to that found in the earlier study. The new results are less consistent in showing an association of Down syndrome clustering with the Chernobyl accident. For the 15‐year study period, a 23% overall reduction in prevalence occurred due to prenatal diagnosis and elective abortion of affected fetuses, with a 50% reduction to women ≥35 years of age. For 1988–1992, these reductions were 33% and 60%, which are among the highest reported in the literature for these time periods. The estimated quinquennial maternal risk rates were very similar to others already reported, and the data are consistent with a high level of case ascertainment. Since these women are approaching the upper limits of fetal detection through advanced maternal age alone, continued reduction in prevalence rates for Down syndrome through prenatal diagnosis and elective abortion will come mostly from increased use of other (chemical) screening techniques now available. © 1996 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-0395</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2272</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1996)13:4&lt;367::AID-GEPI5&gt;3.0.CO;2-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8894639</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GENYEX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chromosome aberrations ; Down syndrome ; Down Syndrome - diagnosis ; Down Syndrome - epidemiology ; Female ; Humans ; levels of ascertainment ; maternal age-specific risk rates ; Medical genetics ; Medical sciences ; Power Plants ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal Diagnosis ; Prevalence ; prevalence rates ; prevalence reduction ; Radioactive Hazard Release ; Scotland - epidemiology ; Sex Ratio ; Ukraine</subject><ispartof>Genetic epidemiology, 1996, Vol.13 (4), p.367-375</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1996 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4595-806df70b974c7c41f64caeef456baa148b7d14d9938e7592a02a0605f1a054713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3238604$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8894639$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huether, Carl A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haroldson, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, Patricia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsay, Colin N.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of prenatal diagnosis on revised livebirth prevalence estimates of Down syndrome in the Lothian region of Scotland, 1978-1992</title><title>Genetic epidemiology</title><addtitle>Genet. Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Ramsay et al. [(1991) Biomed Pharmacother 45:267–272] reported on the livebirth prevalence of Down syndrome in the Lothian region of Scotland during 1978–1989. Their results suggested a temporal association between the events of Chernobyl in April 1986 and a significant excess of cases in 1987. In the current study the data were extended for 3 years and reanalyzed, a major objective being to correct for the differential loss of fetuses with Down syndrome which occurs between prenatal diagnosis and birth. Other objectives were to estimate the prevalence reduction due to prenatal diagnosis, quinquennial maternal age‐specific risk rates, and the level of ascertainment of cases. The reanalysis found a 12‐year prevalence rate of 1.29 vs. the previous rate of 1.34, and a shift of the annual prevalence peak to 1988, with a reduced prevalence in 1987 compared to that found in the earlier study. The new results are less consistent in showing an association of Down syndrome clustering with the Chernobyl accident. For the 15‐year study period, a 23% overall reduction in prevalence occurred due to prenatal diagnosis and elective abortion of affected fetuses, with a 50% reduction to women ≥35 years of age. For 1988–1992, these reductions were 33% and 60%, which are among the highest reported in the literature for these time periods. The estimated quinquennial maternal risk rates were very similar to others already reported, and the data are consistent with a high level of case ascertainment. Since these women are approaching the upper limits of fetal detection through advanced maternal age alone, continued reduction in prevalence rates for Down syndrome through prenatal diagnosis and elective abortion will come mostly from increased use of other (chemical) screening techniques now available. © 1996 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chromosome aberrations</subject><subject>Down syndrome</subject><subject>Down Syndrome - diagnosis</subject><subject>Down Syndrome - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>levels of ascertainment</subject><subject>maternal age-specific risk rates</subject><subject>Medical genetics</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Power Plants</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prenatal Diagnosis</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>prevalence rates</subject><subject>prevalence reduction</subject><subject>Radioactive Hazard Release</subject><subject>Scotland - epidemiology</subject><subject>Sex Ratio</subject><subject>Ukraine</subject><issn>0741-0395</issn><issn>1098-2272</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9keGL0zAchoso5zz9E4R8ENmBnUmTNslOhLM7Z3E4YSd-_JGl6S1n186k27nv_uGmbuyLchAIJE9e3l-eKLokeEQwTt4OF0VeXBAsRZwkPBkSKbMLQsfsHc34eHxVTOLp9dcifU9HeJTPL5OYPIoGJ_5xNMCckRhTmT6Nnnl_hzEhTKZn0ZkQkmVUDqLfxXqjdIfaCm2caVSnalRaddu03nrUNsiZnfWmRLXdmaV13arndqo2jTbI-M6uVWd8_37S3jfI75vStWuDbIO6lUGztltZ1cfc2pAWsIVuu1o15RtEJBdxGCp5Hj2pVO3Ni-N-Hn37eH2Tf4pn82mRX81izVKZxgJnZcXxUnKmuWakyphWxlQszZZKESaWvCSslJIKw1OZKBxWhtOKKJwyTuh59PqQu3Htz20oD2vrtalDHdNuPXDBhKSEBXD4IEhSygRjgtCALg6odq33zlSwceFP3B4Ihl4jQK8Rei3Qa4FeIxAKDIJGgKAR_moEChjyOQQipL48Ftgu16Y8ZR69hftXx3vltaorpxpt_QmjCRUZ7ue4OWD3tjb7f5o9WOx_vQ4HITY-xFrfmV-nWOV-QMYpT-H7lyl8SMjnJJ9woPQPyFjSBg</recordid><startdate>1996</startdate><enddate>1996</enddate><creator>Huether, Carl A.</creator><creator>Haroldson, Kristin</creator><creator>Ellis, Patricia M.</creator><creator>Ramsay, Colin N.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Liss</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1996</creationdate><title>Impact of prenatal diagnosis on revised livebirth prevalence estimates of Down syndrome in the Lothian region of Scotland, 1978-1992</title><author>Huether, Carl A. ; Haroldson, Kristin ; Ellis, Patricia M. ; Ramsay, Colin N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4595-806df70b974c7c41f64caeef456baa148b7d14d9938e7592a02a0605f1a054713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chromosome aberrations</topic><topic>Down syndrome</topic><topic>Down Syndrome - diagnosis</topic><topic>Down Syndrome - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>levels of ascertainment</topic><topic>maternal age-specific risk rates</topic><topic>Medical genetics</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Power Plants</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prenatal Diagnosis</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>prevalence rates</topic><topic>prevalence reduction</topic><topic>Radioactive Hazard Release</topic><topic>Scotland - epidemiology</topic><topic>Sex Ratio</topic><topic>Ukraine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huether, Carl A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haroldson, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, Patricia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsay, Colin N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Genetic epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huether, Carl A.</au><au>Haroldson, Kristin</au><au>Ellis, Patricia M.</au><au>Ramsay, Colin N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of prenatal diagnosis on revised livebirth prevalence estimates of Down syndrome in the Lothian region of Scotland, 1978-1992</atitle><jtitle>Genetic epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Genet. Epidemiol</addtitle><date>1996</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>367</spage><epage>375</epage><pages>367-375</pages><issn>0741-0395</issn><eissn>1098-2272</eissn><coden>GENYEX</coden><abstract>Ramsay et al. [(1991) Biomed Pharmacother 45:267–272] reported on the livebirth prevalence of Down syndrome in the Lothian region of Scotland during 1978–1989. Their results suggested a temporal association between the events of Chernobyl in April 1986 and a significant excess of cases in 1987. In the current study the data were extended for 3 years and reanalyzed, a major objective being to correct for the differential loss of fetuses with Down syndrome which occurs between prenatal diagnosis and birth. Other objectives were to estimate the prevalence reduction due to prenatal diagnosis, quinquennial maternal age‐specific risk rates, and the level of ascertainment of cases. The reanalysis found a 12‐year prevalence rate of 1.29 vs. the previous rate of 1.34, and a shift of the annual prevalence peak to 1988, with a reduced prevalence in 1987 compared to that found in the earlier study. The new results are less consistent in showing an association of Down syndrome clustering with the Chernobyl accident. For the 15‐year study period, a 23% overall reduction in prevalence occurred due to prenatal diagnosis and elective abortion of affected fetuses, with a 50% reduction to women ≥35 years of age. For 1988–1992, these reductions were 33% and 60%, which are among the highest reported in the literature for these time periods. The estimated quinquennial maternal risk rates were very similar to others already reported, and the data are consistent with a high level of case ascertainment. Since these women are approaching the upper limits of fetal detection through advanced maternal age alone, continued reduction in prevalence rates for Down syndrome through prenatal diagnosis and elective abortion will come mostly from increased use of other (chemical) screening techniques now available. © 1996 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>8894639</pmid><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1996)13:4&lt;367::AID-GEPI5&gt;3.0.CO;2-1</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0741-0395
ispartof Genetic epidemiology, 1996, Vol.13 (4), p.367-375
issn 0741-0395
1098-2272
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78489314
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Chromosome aberrations
Down syndrome
Down Syndrome - diagnosis
Down Syndrome - epidemiology
Female
Humans
levels of ascertainment
maternal age-specific risk rates
Medical genetics
Medical sciences
Power Plants
Pregnancy
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prevalence
prevalence rates
prevalence reduction
Radioactive Hazard Release
Scotland - epidemiology
Sex Ratio
Ukraine
title Impact of prenatal diagnosis on revised livebirth prevalence estimates of Down syndrome in the Lothian region of Scotland, 1978-1992
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T16%3A07%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20prenatal%20diagnosis%20on%20revised%20livebirth%20prevalence%20estimates%20of%20Down%20syndrome%20in%20the%20Lothian%20region%20of%20Scotland,%201978-1992&rft.jtitle=Genetic%20epidemiology&rft.au=Huether,%20Carl%20A.&rft.date=1996&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=367&rft.epage=375&rft.pages=367-375&rft.issn=0741-0395&rft.eissn=1098-2272&rft.coden=GENYEX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1996)13:4%3C367::AID-GEPI5%3E3.0.CO;2-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1534844813%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1534844813&rft_id=info:pmid/8894639&rfr_iscdi=true