Impact of prenatal diagnosis on revised livebirth prevalence estimates of Down syndrome in the Lothian region of Scotland, 1978-1992
Ramsay et al. [(1991) Biomed Pharmacother 45:267–272] reported on the livebirth prevalence of Down syndrome in the Lothian region of Scotland during 1978–1989. Their results suggested a temporal association between the events of Chernobyl in April 1986 and a significant excess of cases in 1987. In t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Genetic epidemiology 1996, Vol.13 (4), p.367-375 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 375 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 367 |
container_title | Genetic epidemiology |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Huether, Carl A. Haroldson, Kristin Ellis, Patricia M. Ramsay, Colin N. |
description | Ramsay et al. [(1991) Biomed Pharmacother 45:267–272] reported on the livebirth prevalence of Down syndrome in the Lothian region of Scotland during 1978–1989. Their results suggested a temporal association between the events of Chernobyl in April 1986 and a significant excess of cases in 1987. In the current study the data were extended for 3 years and reanalyzed, a major objective being to correct for the differential loss of fetuses with Down syndrome which occurs between prenatal diagnosis and birth. Other objectives were to estimate the prevalence reduction due to prenatal diagnosis, quinquennial maternal age‐specific risk rates, and the level of ascertainment of cases. The reanalysis found a 12‐year prevalence rate of 1.29 vs. the previous rate of 1.34, and a shift of the annual prevalence peak to 1988, with a reduced prevalence in 1987 compared to that found in the earlier study. The new results are less consistent in showing an association of Down syndrome clustering with the Chernobyl accident. For the 15‐year study period, a 23% overall reduction in prevalence occurred due to prenatal diagnosis and elective abortion of affected fetuses, with a 50% reduction to women ≥35 years of age. For 1988–1992, these reductions were 33% and 60%, which are among the highest reported in the literature for these time periods. The estimated quinquennial maternal risk rates were very similar to others already reported, and the data are consistent with a high level of case ascertainment. Since these women are approaching the upper limits of fetal detection through advanced maternal age alone, continued reduction in prevalence rates for Down syndrome through prenatal diagnosis and elective abortion will come mostly from increased use of other (chemical) screening techniques now available. © 1996 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1996)13:4<367::AID-GEPI5>3.0.CO;2-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78489314</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1534844813</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4595-806df70b974c7c41f64caeef456baa148b7d14d9938e7592a02a0605f1a054713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9keGL0zAchoso5zz9E4R8ENmBnUmTNslOhLM7Z3E4YSd-_JGl6S1n186k27nv_uGmbuyLchAIJE9e3l-eKLokeEQwTt4OF0VeXBAsRZwkPBkSKbMLQsfsHc34eHxVTOLp9dcifU9HeJTPL5OYPIoGJ_5xNMCckRhTmT6Nnnl_hzEhTKZn0ZkQkmVUDqLfxXqjdIfaCm2caVSnalRaddu03nrUNsiZnfWmRLXdmaV13arndqo2jTbI-M6uVWd8_37S3jfI75vStWuDbIO6lUGztltZ1cfc2pAWsIVuu1o15RtEJBdxGCp5Hj2pVO3Ni-N-Hn37eH2Tf4pn82mRX81izVKZxgJnZcXxUnKmuWakyphWxlQszZZKESaWvCSslJIKw1OZKBxWhtOKKJwyTuh59PqQu3Htz20oD2vrtalDHdNuPXDBhKSEBXD4IEhSygRjgtCALg6odq33zlSwceFP3B4Ihl4jQK8Rei3Qa4FeIxAKDIJGgKAR_moEChjyOQQipL48Ftgu16Y8ZR69hftXx3vltaorpxpt_QmjCRUZ7ue4OWD3tjb7f5o9WOx_vQ4HITY-xFrfmV-nWOV-QMYpT-H7lyl8SMjnJJ9woPQPyFjSBg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1534844813</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of prenatal diagnosis on revised livebirth prevalence estimates of Down syndrome in the Lothian region of Scotland, 1978-1992</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Huether, Carl A. ; Haroldson, Kristin ; Ellis, Patricia M. ; Ramsay, Colin N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Huether, Carl A. ; Haroldson, Kristin ; Ellis, Patricia M. ; Ramsay, Colin N.</creatorcontrib><description>Ramsay et al. [(1991) Biomed Pharmacother 45:267–272] reported on the livebirth prevalence of Down syndrome in the Lothian region of Scotland during 1978–1989. Their results suggested a temporal association between the events of Chernobyl in April 1986 and a significant excess of cases in 1987. In the current study the data were extended for 3 years and reanalyzed, a major objective being to correct for the differential loss of fetuses with Down syndrome which occurs between prenatal diagnosis and birth. Other objectives were to estimate the prevalence reduction due to prenatal diagnosis, quinquennial maternal age‐specific risk rates, and the level of ascertainment of cases. The reanalysis found a 12‐year prevalence rate of 1.29 vs. the previous rate of 1.34, and a shift of the annual prevalence peak to 1988, with a reduced prevalence in 1987 compared to that found in the earlier study. The new results are less consistent in showing an association of Down syndrome clustering with the Chernobyl accident. For the 15‐year study period, a 23% overall reduction in prevalence occurred due to prenatal diagnosis and elective abortion of affected fetuses, with a 50% reduction to women ≥35 years of age. For 1988–1992, these reductions were 33% and 60%, which are among the highest reported in the literature for these time periods. The estimated quinquennial maternal risk rates were very similar to others already reported, and the data are consistent with a high level of case ascertainment. Since these women are approaching the upper limits of fetal detection through advanced maternal age alone, continued reduction in prevalence rates for Down syndrome through prenatal diagnosis and elective abortion will come mostly from increased use of other (chemical) screening techniques now available. © 1996 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-0395</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2272</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1996)13:4<367::AID-GEPI5>3.0.CO;2-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8894639</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GENYEX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chromosome aberrations ; Down syndrome ; Down Syndrome - diagnosis ; Down Syndrome - epidemiology ; Female ; Humans ; levels of ascertainment ; maternal age-specific risk rates ; Medical genetics ; Medical sciences ; Power Plants ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal Diagnosis ; Prevalence ; prevalence rates ; prevalence reduction ; Radioactive Hazard Release ; Scotland - epidemiology ; Sex Ratio ; Ukraine</subject><ispartof>Genetic epidemiology, 1996, Vol.13 (4), p.367-375</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1996 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4595-806df70b974c7c41f64caeef456baa148b7d14d9938e7592a02a0605f1a054713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3238604$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8894639$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huether, Carl A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haroldson, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, Patricia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsay, Colin N.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of prenatal diagnosis on revised livebirth prevalence estimates of Down syndrome in the Lothian region of Scotland, 1978-1992</title><title>Genetic epidemiology</title><addtitle>Genet. Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Ramsay et al. [(1991) Biomed Pharmacother 45:267–272] reported on the livebirth prevalence of Down syndrome in the Lothian region of Scotland during 1978–1989. Their results suggested a temporal association between the events of Chernobyl in April 1986 and a significant excess of cases in 1987. In the current study the data were extended for 3 years and reanalyzed, a major objective being to correct for the differential loss of fetuses with Down syndrome which occurs between prenatal diagnosis and birth. Other objectives were to estimate the prevalence reduction due to prenatal diagnosis, quinquennial maternal age‐specific risk rates, and the level of ascertainment of cases. The reanalysis found a 12‐year prevalence rate of 1.29 vs. the previous rate of 1.34, and a shift of the annual prevalence peak to 1988, with a reduced prevalence in 1987 compared to that found in the earlier study. The new results are less consistent in showing an association of Down syndrome clustering with the Chernobyl accident. For the 15‐year study period, a 23% overall reduction in prevalence occurred due to prenatal diagnosis and elective abortion of affected fetuses, with a 50% reduction to women ≥35 years of age. For 1988–1992, these reductions were 33% and 60%, which are among the highest reported in the literature for these time periods. The estimated quinquennial maternal risk rates were very similar to others already reported, and the data are consistent with a high level of case ascertainment. Since these women are approaching the upper limits of fetal detection through advanced maternal age alone, continued reduction in prevalence rates for Down syndrome through prenatal diagnosis and elective abortion will come mostly from increased use of other (chemical) screening techniques now available. © 1996 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chromosome aberrations</subject><subject>Down syndrome</subject><subject>Down Syndrome - diagnosis</subject><subject>Down Syndrome - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>levels of ascertainment</subject><subject>maternal age-specific risk rates</subject><subject>Medical genetics</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Power Plants</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prenatal Diagnosis</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>prevalence rates</subject><subject>prevalence reduction</subject><subject>Radioactive Hazard Release</subject><subject>Scotland - epidemiology</subject><subject>Sex Ratio</subject><subject>Ukraine</subject><issn>0741-0395</issn><issn>1098-2272</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9keGL0zAchoso5zz9E4R8ENmBnUmTNslOhLM7Z3E4YSd-_JGl6S1n186k27nv_uGmbuyLchAIJE9e3l-eKLokeEQwTt4OF0VeXBAsRZwkPBkSKbMLQsfsHc34eHxVTOLp9dcifU9HeJTPL5OYPIoGJ_5xNMCckRhTmT6Nnnl_hzEhTKZn0ZkQkmVUDqLfxXqjdIfaCm2caVSnalRaddu03nrUNsiZnfWmRLXdmaV13arndqo2jTbI-M6uVWd8_37S3jfI75vStWuDbIO6lUGztltZ1cfc2pAWsIVuu1o15RtEJBdxGCp5Hj2pVO3Ni-N-Hn37eH2Tf4pn82mRX81izVKZxgJnZcXxUnKmuWakyphWxlQszZZKESaWvCSslJIKw1OZKBxWhtOKKJwyTuh59PqQu3Htz20oD2vrtalDHdNuPXDBhKSEBXD4IEhSygRjgtCALg6odq33zlSwceFP3B4Ihl4jQK8Rei3Qa4FeIxAKDIJGgKAR_moEChjyOQQipL48Ftgu16Y8ZR69hftXx3vltaorpxpt_QmjCRUZ7ue4OWD3tjb7f5o9WOx_vQ4HITY-xFrfmV-nWOV-QMYpT-H7lyl8SMjnJJ9woPQPyFjSBg</recordid><startdate>1996</startdate><enddate>1996</enddate><creator>Huether, Carl A.</creator><creator>Haroldson, Kristin</creator><creator>Ellis, Patricia M.</creator><creator>Ramsay, Colin N.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Liss</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1996</creationdate><title>Impact of prenatal diagnosis on revised livebirth prevalence estimates of Down syndrome in the Lothian region of Scotland, 1978-1992</title><author>Huether, Carl A. ; Haroldson, Kristin ; Ellis, Patricia M. ; Ramsay, Colin N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4595-806df70b974c7c41f64caeef456baa148b7d14d9938e7592a02a0605f1a054713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chromosome aberrations</topic><topic>Down syndrome</topic><topic>Down Syndrome - diagnosis</topic><topic>Down Syndrome - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>levels of ascertainment</topic><topic>maternal age-specific risk rates</topic><topic>Medical genetics</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Power Plants</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prenatal Diagnosis</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>prevalence rates</topic><topic>prevalence reduction</topic><topic>Radioactive Hazard Release</topic><topic>Scotland - epidemiology</topic><topic>Sex Ratio</topic><topic>Ukraine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huether, Carl A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haroldson, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, Patricia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsay, Colin N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Genetic epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huether, Carl A.</au><au>Haroldson, Kristin</au><au>Ellis, Patricia M.</au><au>Ramsay, Colin N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of prenatal diagnosis on revised livebirth prevalence estimates of Down syndrome in the Lothian region of Scotland, 1978-1992</atitle><jtitle>Genetic epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Genet. Epidemiol</addtitle><date>1996</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>367</spage><epage>375</epage><pages>367-375</pages><issn>0741-0395</issn><eissn>1098-2272</eissn><coden>GENYEX</coden><abstract>Ramsay et al. [(1991) Biomed Pharmacother 45:267–272] reported on the livebirth prevalence of Down syndrome in the Lothian region of Scotland during 1978–1989. Their results suggested a temporal association between the events of Chernobyl in April 1986 and a significant excess of cases in 1987. In the current study the data were extended for 3 years and reanalyzed, a major objective being to correct for the differential loss of fetuses with Down syndrome which occurs between prenatal diagnosis and birth. Other objectives were to estimate the prevalence reduction due to prenatal diagnosis, quinquennial maternal age‐specific risk rates, and the level of ascertainment of cases. The reanalysis found a 12‐year prevalence rate of 1.29 vs. the previous rate of 1.34, and a shift of the annual prevalence peak to 1988, with a reduced prevalence in 1987 compared to that found in the earlier study. The new results are less consistent in showing an association of Down syndrome clustering with the Chernobyl accident. For the 15‐year study period, a 23% overall reduction in prevalence occurred due to prenatal diagnosis and elective abortion of affected fetuses, with a 50% reduction to women ≥35 years of age. For 1988–1992, these reductions were 33% and 60%, which are among the highest reported in the literature for these time periods. The estimated quinquennial maternal risk rates were very similar to others already reported, and the data are consistent with a high level of case ascertainment. Since these women are approaching the upper limits of fetal detection through advanced maternal age alone, continued reduction in prevalence rates for Down syndrome through prenatal diagnosis and elective abortion will come mostly from increased use of other (chemical) screening techniques now available. © 1996 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>8894639</pmid><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1996)13:4<367::AID-GEPI5>3.0.CO;2-1</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0741-0395 |
ispartof | Genetic epidemiology, 1996, Vol.13 (4), p.367-375 |
issn | 0741-0395 1098-2272 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78489314 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Chromosome aberrations Down syndrome Down Syndrome - diagnosis Down Syndrome - epidemiology Female Humans levels of ascertainment maternal age-specific risk rates Medical genetics Medical sciences Power Plants Pregnancy Prenatal Diagnosis Prevalence prevalence rates prevalence reduction Radioactive Hazard Release Scotland - epidemiology Sex Ratio Ukraine |
title | Impact of prenatal diagnosis on revised livebirth prevalence estimates of Down syndrome in the Lothian region of Scotland, 1978-1992 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T16%3A07%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20prenatal%20diagnosis%20on%20revised%20livebirth%20prevalence%20estimates%20of%20Down%20syndrome%20in%20the%20Lothian%20region%20of%20Scotland,%201978-1992&rft.jtitle=Genetic%20epidemiology&rft.au=Huether,%20Carl%20A.&rft.date=1996&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=367&rft.epage=375&rft.pages=367-375&rft.issn=0741-0395&rft.eissn=1098-2272&rft.coden=GENYEX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1996)13:4%3C367::AID-GEPI5%3E3.0.CO;2-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1534844813%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1534844813&rft_id=info:pmid/8894639&rfr_iscdi=true |