Donation of frozen embryos after in vitro fertilization is uncommon
To determine the availability of donated cryopreserved embryos. Retrospective review. Community hospital-based IVF-ET program. Eighty-three consecutive infertile couples who had 98 sets of embryos cryopreserved after IVF-ET and GIFT between January 1, 1989 and December 31, 1991. Cryopreservation of...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Fertility and sterility 1996-11, Vol.66 (5), p.837-838 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 838 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 837 |
| container_title | Fertility and sterility |
| container_volume | 66 |
| creator | Hounshell, Catherine V. Chetkowski, Ryszard J. |
| description | To determine the availability of donated cryopreserved embryos.
Retrospective review.
Community hospital-based IVF-ET program.
Eighty-three consecutive infertile couples who had 98 sets of embryos cryopreserved after IVF-ET and GIFT between January 1, 1989 and December 31, 1991.
Cryopreservation of fertilized oocytes or cleaving embryos after IVF-ET and GIFT.
Disposition of frozen embryos as of December 31, 1995.
Of 98 sets of frozen embryos, 71 (72.4%) were thawed for transfer into the infertile woman. At an average of 6years since the treatment cycle, six sets of embryos (6.1%) remain in storage. Of 21 sets of embryos not thawed for autologous transfer, the majority (17.4%) were discarded, leaving only four clutches (4.1%) available for donation.
Couples who did not use their frozen embryos after IVF-ET and GIFT were four times more likely to destroy them than to donate them. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58647-6 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78487232</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0015028216586476</els_id><sourcerecordid>78487232</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-95297b12b00c50dbb5b317c95d2734cbad4055a7f5ca16398e2dc3b7743793393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEQx4MotVY_QmEPInpYzWPzOonUJxQ8qOeQZLMQ2U002RbaT-_2Qa-ehmF-_5nhB8AUwVsEEbv7gBDREmKBrxG7oYJVvGRHYIwoZSVllByD8QE5BWc5f0MIGeJ4BEZCSMIkG4PZYwy69zEUsSmaFNcuFK4zaRVzoZvepcKHYun7FIvGpd63fr3DfS4Wwcaui-EcnDS6ze5iXyfg6_npc_Zazt9f3mYP89ISIftSUiy5QdhAaCmsjaGGIG4lrTEnlTW6riClmjfUasSIFA7XlhjOK8IlIZJMwNVu70-KvwuXe9X5bF3b6uDiIisuKsExwQNId6BNMefkGvWTfKfTSiGoNvLUVp7amFFDt5Wn2JCb7g8sTOfqQ2pva5hf7uc6W902SQfr8wEjmCFByYDd7zA3yFh6l1S23gXrap-c7VUd_T-P_AGDaIq7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78487232</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Donation of frozen embryos after in vitro fertilization is uncommon</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hounshell, Catherine V. ; Chetkowski, Ryszard J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hounshell, Catherine V. ; Chetkowski, Ryszard J.</creatorcontrib><description>To determine the availability of donated cryopreserved embryos.
Retrospective review.
Community hospital-based IVF-ET program.
Eighty-three consecutive infertile couples who had 98 sets of embryos cryopreserved after IVF-ET and GIFT between January 1, 1989 and December 31, 1991.
Cryopreservation of fertilized oocytes or cleaving embryos after IVF-ET and GIFT.
Disposition of frozen embryos as of December 31, 1995.
Of 98 sets of frozen embryos, 71 (72.4%) were thawed for transfer into the infertile woman. At an average of 6years since the treatment cycle, six sets of embryos (6.1%) remain in storage. Of 21 sets of embryos not thawed for autologous transfer, the majority (17.4%) were discarded, leaving only four clutches (4.1%) available for donation.
Couples who did not use their frozen embryos after IVF-ET and GIFT were four times more likely to destroy them than to donate them.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-0282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-5653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58647-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8893696</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FESTAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Birth control ; Cryopreservation ; disposition of cryopreserved embryos ; Embryo adoption ; embryo cryopreservation ; embryo donation ; Embryo Transfer ; Embryo, Mammalian ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro ; frozen embryos ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Infertility - therapy ; Medical sciences ; Retrospective Studies ; Sterility. Assisted procreation ; Time Factors ; Tissue Donors</subject><ispartof>Fertility and sterility, 1996-11, Vol.66 (5), p.837-838</ispartof><rights>1996 American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-95297b12b00c50dbb5b317c95d2734cbad4055a7f5ca16398e2dc3b7743793393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-95297b12b00c50dbb5b317c95d2734cbad4055a7f5ca16398e2dc3b7743793393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58647-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3261853$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8893696$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hounshell, Catherine V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chetkowski, Ryszard J.</creatorcontrib><title>Donation of frozen embryos after in vitro fertilization is uncommon</title><title>Fertility and sterility</title><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><description>To determine the availability of donated cryopreserved embryos.
Retrospective review.
Community hospital-based IVF-ET program.
Eighty-three consecutive infertile couples who had 98 sets of embryos cryopreserved after IVF-ET and GIFT between January 1, 1989 and December 31, 1991.
Cryopreservation of fertilized oocytes or cleaving embryos after IVF-ET and GIFT.
Disposition of frozen embryos as of December 31, 1995.
Of 98 sets of frozen embryos, 71 (72.4%) were thawed for transfer into the infertile woman. At an average of 6years since the treatment cycle, six sets of embryos (6.1%) remain in storage. Of 21 sets of embryos not thawed for autologous transfer, the majority (17.4%) were discarded, leaving only four clutches (4.1%) available for donation.
Couples who did not use their frozen embryos after IVF-ET and GIFT were four times more likely to destroy them than to donate them.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Cryopreservation</subject><subject>disposition of cryopreserved embryos</subject><subject>Embryo adoption</subject><subject>embryo cryopreservation</subject><subject>embryo donation</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer</subject><subject>Embryo, Mammalian</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro</subject><subject>frozen embryos</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infertility - therapy</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sterility. Assisted procreation</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tissue Donors</subject><issn>0015-0282</issn><issn>1556-5653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEQx4MotVY_QmEPInpYzWPzOonUJxQ8qOeQZLMQ2U002RbaT-_2Qa-ehmF-_5nhB8AUwVsEEbv7gBDREmKBrxG7oYJVvGRHYIwoZSVllByD8QE5BWc5f0MIGeJ4BEZCSMIkG4PZYwy69zEUsSmaFNcuFK4zaRVzoZvepcKHYun7FIvGpd63fr3DfS4Wwcaui-EcnDS6ze5iXyfg6_npc_Zazt9f3mYP89ISIftSUiy5QdhAaCmsjaGGIG4lrTEnlTW6riClmjfUasSIFA7XlhjOK8IlIZJMwNVu70-KvwuXe9X5bF3b6uDiIisuKsExwQNId6BNMefkGvWTfKfTSiGoNvLUVp7amFFDt5Wn2JCb7g8sTOfqQ2pva5hf7uc6W902SQfr8wEjmCFByYDd7zA3yFh6l1S23gXrap-c7VUd_T-P_AGDaIq7</recordid><startdate>19961101</startdate><enddate>19961101</enddate><creator>Hounshell, Catherine V.</creator><creator>Chetkowski, Ryszard J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19961101</creationdate><title>Donation of frozen embryos after in vitro fertilization is uncommon</title><author>Hounshell, Catherine V. ; Chetkowski, Ryszard J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-95297b12b00c50dbb5b317c95d2734cbad4055a7f5ca16398e2dc3b7743793393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Cryopreservation</topic><topic>disposition of cryopreserved embryos</topic><topic>Embryo adoption</topic><topic>embryo cryopreservation</topic><topic>embryo donation</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer</topic><topic>Embryo, Mammalian</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro</topic><topic>frozen embryos</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infertility - therapy</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sterility. Assisted procreation</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tissue Donors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hounshell, Catherine V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chetkowski, Ryszard J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hounshell, Catherine V.</au><au>Chetkowski, Ryszard J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Donation of frozen embryos after in vitro fertilization is uncommon</atitle><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><date>1996-11-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>837</spage><epage>838</epage><pages>837-838</pages><issn>0015-0282</issn><eissn>1556-5653</eissn><coden>FESTAS</coden><abstract>To determine the availability of donated cryopreserved embryos.
Retrospective review.
Community hospital-based IVF-ET program.
Eighty-three consecutive infertile couples who had 98 sets of embryos cryopreserved after IVF-ET and GIFT between January 1, 1989 and December 31, 1991.
Cryopreservation of fertilized oocytes or cleaving embryos after IVF-ET and GIFT.
Disposition of frozen embryos as of December 31, 1995.
Of 98 sets of frozen embryos, 71 (72.4%) were thawed for transfer into the infertile woman. At an average of 6years since the treatment cycle, six sets of embryos (6.1%) remain in storage. Of 21 sets of embryos not thawed for autologous transfer, the majority (17.4%) were discarded, leaving only four clutches (4.1%) available for donation.
Couples who did not use their frozen embryos after IVF-ET and GIFT were four times more likely to destroy them than to donate them.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>8893696</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58647-6</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0015-0282 |
| ispartof | Fertility and sterility, 1996-11, Vol.66 (5), p.837-838 |
| issn | 0015-0282 1556-5653 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78487232 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences Birth control Cryopreservation disposition of cryopreserved embryos Embryo adoption embryo cryopreservation embryo donation Embryo Transfer Embryo, Mammalian Female Fertilization in Vitro frozen embryos Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Infertility - therapy Medical sciences Retrospective Studies Sterility. Assisted procreation Time Factors Tissue Donors |
| title | Donation of frozen embryos after in vitro fertilization is uncommon |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T11%3A57%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Donation%20of%20frozen%20embryos%20after%20in%20vitro%20fertilization%20is%20uncommon&rft.jtitle=Fertility%20and%20sterility&rft.au=Hounshell,%20Catherine%20V.&rft.date=1996-11-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=837&rft.epage=838&rft.pages=837-838&rft.issn=0015-0282&rft.eissn=1556-5653&rft.coden=FESTAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58647-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78487232%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78487232&rft_id=info:pmid/8893696&rft_els_id=S0015028216586476&rfr_iscdi=true |