Comparison of lumbar paravertebral EMG patterns in chronic low back pain patients and non-patient controls

According to myogenic models that relate abnormal EMG patterns to the experience of pain, lumbar paravertebral muscle activity has been considered to play an important role in chronic low back pain. In the present study, 40 chronic low back pain patients and 40 matched non-patient controls were comp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pain (Amsterdam) 1988-08, Vol.34 (2), p.153-160
Hauptverfasser: Ahern, David K., Follick, Michael J., Council, James R., Laser-Wolston, Nancy, Litchman, Henry
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 160
container_issue 2
container_start_page 153
container_title Pain (Amsterdam)
container_volume 34
creator Ahern, David K.
Follick, Michael J.
Council, James R.
Laser-Wolston, Nancy
Litchman, Henry
description According to myogenic models that relate abnormal EMG patterns to the experience of pain, lumbar paravertebral muscle activity has been considered to play an important role in chronic low back pain. In the present study, 40 chronic low back pain patients and 40 matched non-patient controls were compared on lumbar paravertebral EMG during mechanically stabilized static and dynamic postures. Differences between groups in lumbar curvature and spinal range of motion were determined using a dual goniometer technique. Although the two groups did not differ on absolute levels of EMG during quiet standing, significant differences were found for EMG patterns during dynamic postures. In addition, most patients did not show the flexion-relaxation response or the expected pattern of EMG responses during trunk rotation, most likely because of restricted range of motion and/or compensatory posturing. These findings provide support for the biomechanical model of chronic pain and indicate the need for further research pertaining to pain behavior and movement-related lumbar muscle activity.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90160-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78457184</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0304395988901601</els_id><sourcerecordid>78457184</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4686-93d5c28caf02d137e5ba7fd7d080e0402e13a1f809d3393f067ce0f5717ce5e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1vFCEUhonR1O22_0ATroy9QA8wH3Bj0mxqNWnTG70mDHMmOy0DK8x047-XdTf1zquTPLzvCTwQ8o7DJw68-QwSKiZ1rT8qdaULAcZfkRVXrWBNI-RrsnqJvCXnOT8CgBBCn5EzoVuuuViRx02cdjaNOQYaB-qXqbOJFmKfMc3YJevpzf1tIfOMKWQ6Buq2KYbRUR_3tLPuqRwWWhIjhjlTG3oaYmAnQF0Mc4o-X5A3g_UZL09zTX5-vfmx-cbuHm6_b67vmKsa1TAt-9oJ5ewAoueyxbqz7dC3PShAqEAgl5YPCnQvpZYDNK1DGOqWl1ljK9fkw3HvLsVfC-bZTGN26L0NGJdsWlWVsKpKsDoGXYo5JxzMLo2TTb8NB3NQbA7-zMGfUcr8VWx4qb0_7V-6CfuX0snpv7X76Iuz_OSXPSazRevnrSl_AI3UDeNaqfIkAHZEa_LlWMPi5nksjeyKP4f9mNDNpo_j_-_1B-k-m04</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78457184</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of lumbar paravertebral EMG patterns in chronic low back pain patients and non-patient controls</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Ahern, David K. ; Follick, Michael J. ; Council, James R. ; Laser-Wolston, Nancy ; Litchman, Henry</creator><creatorcontrib>Ahern, David K. ; Follick, Michael J. ; Council, James R. ; Laser-Wolston, Nancy ; Litchman, Henry</creatorcontrib><description>According to myogenic models that relate abnormal EMG patterns to the experience of pain, lumbar paravertebral muscle activity has been considered to play an important role in chronic low back pain. In the present study, 40 chronic low back pain patients and 40 matched non-patient controls were compared on lumbar paravertebral EMG during mechanically stabilized static and dynamic postures. Differences between groups in lumbar curvature and spinal range of motion were determined using a dual goniometer technique. Although the two groups did not differ on absolute levels of EMG during quiet standing, significant differences were found for EMG patterns during dynamic postures. In addition, most patients did not show the flexion-relaxation response or the expected pattern of EMG responses during trunk rotation, most likely because of restricted range of motion and/or compensatory posturing. These findings provide support for the biomechanical model of chronic pain and indicate the need for further research pertaining to pain behavior and movement-related lumbar muscle activity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-3959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90160-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2971912</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Back pain ; Back Pain - physiopathology ; Chronic Disease ; Electromyography ; EMG ; Female ; Humans ; Intercostal Muscles - physiopathology ; Lumbar curvature ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Muscle function ; Spinal range of motion ; Spine - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Pain (Amsterdam), 1988-08, Vol.34 (2), p.153-160</ispartof><rights>1988</rights><rights>Lippincott-Raven Publishers.Copyright © Lippincott-Raven Publishers.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4686-93d5c28caf02d137e5ba7fd7d080e0402e13a1f809d3393f067ce0f5717ce5e73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4686-93d5c28caf02d137e5ba7fd7d080e0402e13a1f809d3393f067ce0f5717ce5e73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(88)90160-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2971912$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ahern, David K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Follick, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Council, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laser-Wolston, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Litchman, Henry</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of lumbar paravertebral EMG patterns in chronic low back pain patients and non-patient controls</title><title>Pain (Amsterdam)</title><addtitle>Pain</addtitle><description>According to myogenic models that relate abnormal EMG patterns to the experience of pain, lumbar paravertebral muscle activity has been considered to play an important role in chronic low back pain. In the present study, 40 chronic low back pain patients and 40 matched non-patient controls were compared on lumbar paravertebral EMG during mechanically stabilized static and dynamic postures. Differences between groups in lumbar curvature and spinal range of motion were determined using a dual goniometer technique. Although the two groups did not differ on absolute levels of EMG during quiet standing, significant differences were found for EMG patterns during dynamic postures. In addition, most patients did not show the flexion-relaxation response or the expected pattern of EMG responses during trunk rotation, most likely because of restricted range of motion and/or compensatory posturing. These findings provide support for the biomechanical model of chronic pain and indicate the need for further research pertaining to pain behavior and movement-related lumbar muscle activity.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Back pain</subject><subject>Back Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>EMG</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intercostal Muscles - physiopathology</subject><subject>Lumbar curvature</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Muscle function</subject><subject>Spinal range of motion</subject><subject>Spine - physiopathology</subject><issn>0304-3959</issn><issn>1872-6623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV1vFCEUhonR1O22_0ATroy9QA8wH3Bj0mxqNWnTG70mDHMmOy0DK8x047-XdTf1zquTPLzvCTwQ8o7DJw68-QwSKiZ1rT8qdaULAcZfkRVXrWBNI-RrsnqJvCXnOT8CgBBCn5EzoVuuuViRx02cdjaNOQYaB-qXqbOJFmKfMc3YJevpzf1tIfOMKWQ6Buq2KYbRUR_3tLPuqRwWWhIjhjlTG3oaYmAnQF0Mc4o-X5A3g_UZL09zTX5-vfmx-cbuHm6_b67vmKsa1TAt-9oJ5ewAoueyxbqz7dC3PShAqEAgl5YPCnQvpZYDNK1DGOqWl1ljK9fkw3HvLsVfC-bZTGN26L0NGJdsWlWVsKpKsDoGXYo5JxzMLo2TTb8NB3NQbA7-zMGfUcr8VWx4qb0_7V-6CfuX0snpv7X76Iuz_OSXPSazRevnrSl_AI3UDeNaqfIkAHZEa_LlWMPi5nksjeyKP4f9mNDNpo_j_-_1B-k-m04</recordid><startdate>19880801</startdate><enddate>19880801</enddate><creator>Ahern, David K.</creator><creator>Follick, Michael J.</creator><creator>Council, James R.</creator><creator>Laser-Wolston, Nancy</creator><creator>Litchman, Henry</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Lippincott-Raven Publishers.Copyright Lippincott-Raven Publishers</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19880801</creationdate><title>Comparison of lumbar paravertebral EMG patterns in chronic low back pain patients and non-patient controls</title><author>Ahern, David K. ; Follick, Michael J. ; Council, James R. ; Laser-Wolston, Nancy ; Litchman, Henry</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4686-93d5c28caf02d137e5ba7fd7d080e0402e13a1f809d3393f067ce0f5717ce5e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Back pain</topic><topic>Back Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>EMG</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intercostal Muscles - physiopathology</topic><topic>Lumbar curvature</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Muscle function</topic><topic>Spinal range of motion</topic><topic>Spine - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ahern, David K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Follick, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Council, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laser-Wolston, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Litchman, Henry</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pain (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ahern, David K.</au><au>Follick, Michael J.</au><au>Council, James R.</au><au>Laser-Wolston, Nancy</au><au>Litchman, Henry</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of lumbar paravertebral EMG patterns in chronic low back pain patients and non-patient controls</atitle><jtitle>Pain (Amsterdam)</jtitle><addtitle>Pain</addtitle><date>1988-08-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>160</epage><pages>153-160</pages><issn>0304-3959</issn><eissn>1872-6623</eissn><abstract>According to myogenic models that relate abnormal EMG patterns to the experience of pain, lumbar paravertebral muscle activity has been considered to play an important role in chronic low back pain. In the present study, 40 chronic low back pain patients and 40 matched non-patient controls were compared on lumbar paravertebral EMG during mechanically stabilized static and dynamic postures. Differences between groups in lumbar curvature and spinal range of motion were determined using a dual goniometer technique. Although the two groups did not differ on absolute levels of EMG during quiet standing, significant differences were found for EMG patterns during dynamic postures. In addition, most patients did not show the flexion-relaxation response or the expected pattern of EMG responses during trunk rotation, most likely because of restricted range of motion and/or compensatory posturing. These findings provide support for the biomechanical model of chronic pain and indicate the need for further research pertaining to pain behavior and movement-related lumbar muscle activity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>2971912</pmid><doi>10.1016/0304-3959(88)90160-1</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0304-3959
ispartof Pain (Amsterdam), 1988-08, Vol.34 (2), p.153-160
issn 0304-3959
1872-6623
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78457184
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Back pain
Back Pain - physiopathology
Chronic Disease
Electromyography
EMG
Female
Humans
Intercostal Muscles - physiopathology
Lumbar curvature
Male
Middle Aged
Muscle function
Spinal range of motion
Spine - physiopathology
title Comparison of lumbar paravertebral EMG patterns in chronic low back pain patients and non-patient controls
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A00%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20lumbar%20paravertebral%20EMG%20patterns%20in%20chronic%20low%20back%20pain%20patients%20and%20non-patient%20controls&rft.jtitle=Pain%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Ahern,%20David%20K.&rft.date=1988-08-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=160&rft.pages=153-160&rft.issn=0304-3959&rft.eissn=1872-6623&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0304-3959(88)90160-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78457184%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78457184&rft_id=info:pmid/2971912&rft_els_id=0304395988901601&rfr_iscdi=true