Comparison of lumbar paravertebral EMG patterns in chronic low back pain patients and non-patient controls
According to myogenic models that relate abnormal EMG patterns to the experience of pain, lumbar paravertebral muscle activity has been considered to play an important role in chronic low back pain. In the present study, 40 chronic low back pain patients and 40 matched non-patient controls were comp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pain (Amsterdam) 1988-08, Vol.34 (2), p.153-160 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 160 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 153 |
container_title | Pain (Amsterdam) |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Ahern, David K. Follick, Michael J. Council, James R. Laser-Wolston, Nancy Litchman, Henry |
description | According to myogenic models that relate abnormal EMG patterns to the experience of pain, lumbar paravertebral muscle activity has been considered to play an important role in chronic low back pain. In the present study, 40 chronic low back pain patients and 40 matched non-patient controls were compared on lumbar paravertebral EMG during mechanically stabilized static and dynamic postures. Differences between groups in lumbar curvature and spinal range of motion were determined using a dual goniometer technique. Although the two groups did not differ on absolute levels of EMG during quiet standing, significant differences were found for EMG patterns during dynamic postures. In addition, most patients did not show the flexion-relaxation response or the expected pattern of EMG responses during trunk rotation, most likely because of restricted range of motion and/or compensatory posturing. These findings provide support for the biomechanical model of chronic pain and indicate the need for further research pertaining to pain behavior and movement-related lumbar muscle activity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90160-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78457184</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0304395988901601</els_id><sourcerecordid>78457184</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4686-93d5c28caf02d137e5ba7fd7d080e0402e13a1f809d3393f067ce0f5717ce5e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1vFCEUhonR1O22_0ATroy9QA8wH3Bj0mxqNWnTG70mDHMmOy0DK8x047-XdTf1zquTPLzvCTwQ8o7DJw68-QwSKiZ1rT8qdaULAcZfkRVXrWBNI-RrsnqJvCXnOT8CgBBCn5EzoVuuuViRx02cdjaNOQYaB-qXqbOJFmKfMc3YJevpzf1tIfOMKWQ6Buq2KYbRUR_3tLPuqRwWWhIjhjlTG3oaYmAnQF0Mc4o-X5A3g_UZL09zTX5-vfmx-cbuHm6_b67vmKsa1TAt-9oJ5ewAoueyxbqz7dC3PShAqEAgl5YPCnQvpZYDNK1DGOqWl1ljK9fkw3HvLsVfC-bZTGN26L0NGJdsWlWVsKpKsDoGXYo5JxzMLo2TTb8NB3NQbA7-zMGfUcr8VWx4qb0_7V-6CfuX0snpv7X76Iuz_OSXPSazRevnrSl_AI3UDeNaqfIkAHZEa_LlWMPi5nksjeyKP4f9mNDNpo_j_-_1B-k-m04</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78457184</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of lumbar paravertebral EMG patterns in chronic low back pain patients and non-patient controls</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Ahern, David K. ; Follick, Michael J. ; Council, James R. ; Laser-Wolston, Nancy ; Litchman, Henry</creator><creatorcontrib>Ahern, David K. ; Follick, Michael J. ; Council, James R. ; Laser-Wolston, Nancy ; Litchman, Henry</creatorcontrib><description>According to myogenic models that relate abnormal EMG patterns to the experience of pain, lumbar paravertebral muscle activity has been considered to play an important role in chronic low back pain. In the present study, 40 chronic low back pain patients and 40 matched non-patient controls were compared on lumbar paravertebral EMG during mechanically stabilized static and dynamic postures. Differences between groups in lumbar curvature and spinal range of motion were determined using a dual goniometer technique. Although the two groups did not differ on absolute levels of EMG during quiet standing, significant differences were found for EMG patterns during dynamic postures. In addition, most patients did not show the flexion-relaxation response or the expected pattern of EMG responses during trunk rotation, most likely because of restricted range of motion and/or compensatory posturing. These findings provide support for the biomechanical model of chronic pain and indicate the need for further research pertaining to pain behavior and movement-related lumbar muscle activity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-3959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90160-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2971912</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Back pain ; Back Pain - physiopathology ; Chronic Disease ; Electromyography ; EMG ; Female ; Humans ; Intercostal Muscles - physiopathology ; Lumbar curvature ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Muscle function ; Spinal range of motion ; Spine - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Pain (Amsterdam), 1988-08, Vol.34 (2), p.153-160</ispartof><rights>1988</rights><rights>Lippincott-Raven Publishers.Copyright © Lippincott-Raven Publishers.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4686-93d5c28caf02d137e5ba7fd7d080e0402e13a1f809d3393f067ce0f5717ce5e73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4686-93d5c28caf02d137e5ba7fd7d080e0402e13a1f809d3393f067ce0f5717ce5e73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(88)90160-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2971912$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ahern, David K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Follick, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Council, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laser-Wolston, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Litchman, Henry</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of lumbar paravertebral EMG patterns in chronic low back pain patients and non-patient controls</title><title>Pain (Amsterdam)</title><addtitle>Pain</addtitle><description>According to myogenic models that relate abnormal EMG patterns to the experience of pain, lumbar paravertebral muscle activity has been considered to play an important role in chronic low back pain. In the present study, 40 chronic low back pain patients and 40 matched non-patient controls were compared on lumbar paravertebral EMG during mechanically stabilized static and dynamic postures. Differences between groups in lumbar curvature and spinal range of motion were determined using a dual goniometer technique. Although the two groups did not differ on absolute levels of EMG during quiet standing, significant differences were found for EMG patterns during dynamic postures. In addition, most patients did not show the flexion-relaxation response or the expected pattern of EMG responses during trunk rotation, most likely because of restricted range of motion and/or compensatory posturing. These findings provide support for the biomechanical model of chronic pain and indicate the need for further research pertaining to pain behavior and movement-related lumbar muscle activity.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Back pain</subject><subject>Back Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>EMG</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intercostal Muscles - physiopathology</subject><subject>Lumbar curvature</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Muscle function</subject><subject>Spinal range of motion</subject><subject>Spine - physiopathology</subject><issn>0304-3959</issn><issn>1872-6623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV1vFCEUhonR1O22_0ATroy9QA8wH3Bj0mxqNWnTG70mDHMmOy0DK8x047-XdTf1zquTPLzvCTwQ8o7DJw68-QwSKiZ1rT8qdaULAcZfkRVXrWBNI-RrsnqJvCXnOT8CgBBCn5EzoVuuuViRx02cdjaNOQYaB-qXqbOJFmKfMc3YJevpzf1tIfOMKWQ6Buq2KYbRUR_3tLPuqRwWWhIjhjlTG3oaYmAnQF0Mc4o-X5A3g_UZL09zTX5-vfmx-cbuHm6_b67vmKsa1TAt-9oJ5ewAoueyxbqz7dC3PShAqEAgl5YPCnQvpZYDNK1DGOqWl1ljK9fkw3HvLsVfC-bZTGN26L0NGJdsWlWVsKpKsDoGXYo5JxzMLo2TTb8NB3NQbA7-zMGfUcr8VWx4qb0_7V-6CfuX0snpv7X76Iuz_OSXPSazRevnrSl_AI3UDeNaqfIkAHZEa_LlWMPi5nksjeyKP4f9mNDNpo_j_-_1B-k-m04</recordid><startdate>19880801</startdate><enddate>19880801</enddate><creator>Ahern, David K.</creator><creator>Follick, Michael J.</creator><creator>Council, James R.</creator><creator>Laser-Wolston, Nancy</creator><creator>Litchman, Henry</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Lippincott-Raven Publishers.Copyright Lippincott-Raven Publishers</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19880801</creationdate><title>Comparison of lumbar paravertebral EMG patterns in chronic low back pain patients and non-patient controls</title><author>Ahern, David K. ; Follick, Michael J. ; Council, James R. ; Laser-Wolston, Nancy ; Litchman, Henry</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4686-93d5c28caf02d137e5ba7fd7d080e0402e13a1f809d3393f067ce0f5717ce5e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Back pain</topic><topic>Back Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>EMG</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intercostal Muscles - physiopathology</topic><topic>Lumbar curvature</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Muscle function</topic><topic>Spinal range of motion</topic><topic>Spine - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ahern, David K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Follick, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Council, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laser-Wolston, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Litchman, Henry</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pain (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ahern, David K.</au><au>Follick, Michael J.</au><au>Council, James R.</au><au>Laser-Wolston, Nancy</au><au>Litchman, Henry</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of lumbar paravertebral EMG patterns in chronic low back pain patients and non-patient controls</atitle><jtitle>Pain (Amsterdam)</jtitle><addtitle>Pain</addtitle><date>1988-08-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>160</epage><pages>153-160</pages><issn>0304-3959</issn><eissn>1872-6623</eissn><abstract>According to myogenic models that relate abnormal EMG patterns to the experience of pain, lumbar paravertebral muscle activity has been considered to play an important role in chronic low back pain. In the present study, 40 chronic low back pain patients and 40 matched non-patient controls were compared on lumbar paravertebral EMG during mechanically stabilized static and dynamic postures. Differences between groups in lumbar curvature and spinal range of motion were determined using a dual goniometer technique. Although the two groups did not differ on absolute levels of EMG during quiet standing, significant differences were found for EMG patterns during dynamic postures. In addition, most patients did not show the flexion-relaxation response or the expected pattern of EMG responses during trunk rotation, most likely because of restricted range of motion and/or compensatory posturing. These findings provide support for the biomechanical model of chronic pain and indicate the need for further research pertaining to pain behavior and movement-related lumbar muscle activity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>2971912</pmid><doi>10.1016/0304-3959(88)90160-1</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0304-3959 |
ispartof | Pain (Amsterdam), 1988-08, Vol.34 (2), p.153-160 |
issn | 0304-3959 1872-6623 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78457184 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Adult Back pain Back Pain - physiopathology Chronic Disease Electromyography EMG Female Humans Intercostal Muscles - physiopathology Lumbar curvature Male Middle Aged Muscle function Spinal range of motion Spine - physiopathology |
title | Comparison of lumbar paravertebral EMG patterns in chronic low back pain patients and non-patient controls |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A00%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20lumbar%20paravertebral%20EMG%20patterns%20in%20chronic%20low%20back%20pain%20patients%20and%20non-patient%20controls&rft.jtitle=Pain%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Ahern,%20David%20K.&rft.date=1988-08-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=160&rft.pages=153-160&rft.issn=0304-3959&rft.eissn=1872-6623&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0304-3959(88)90160-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78457184%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78457184&rft_id=info:pmid/2971912&rft_els_id=0304395988901601&rfr_iscdi=true |