Design of an optimally-diagnostic skin test solution for diagnosis of sensitivity to timothy grass (Phleum pratense) pollen

Summary Background Although most of the common allergen extracts that are used for diagnosis of type 1 hypersensitivity are now well standardized, this gives no assurance that they are within the concentration range that gives the best chance of a true diagnosis. Objective The objective of this stud...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical and experimental allergy 1996-08, Vol.26 (8), p.897-902
Hauptverfasser: WHEELER, A. W., JESSBERGER, B., DRACHENBERG, K. J., RAKOSKI, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 902
container_issue 8
container_start_page 897
container_title Clinical and experimental allergy
container_volume 26
creator WHEELER, A. W.
JESSBERGER, B.
DRACHENBERG, K. J.
RAKOSKI, J.
description Summary Background Although most of the common allergen extracts that are used for diagnosis of type 1 hypersensitivity are now well standardized, this gives no assurance that they are within the concentration range that gives the best chance of a true diagnosis. Objective The objective of this study was to identify the most appropriate concentration range of timothy grass pollen Phleum pratense extract to diagnose sensitivity to this pollen correctly through skin‐testing. Methods Dilutions of a well‐standardized extract were made and used to skin test ‘true’ positive and ‘true’ negative populations of subjects as identified by case history, challenge tests and radioallergosorbent test (RAST). Weal diameters were measured and the data were submitted to receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. For any particular weal size cut–off, the optimal diagnostic concentration (ODC) range was thus calculated. Results A 3 mm weal diameter cut‐off was chosen as an appropriate size for routine diagnosis. Therefore the ODC range at this diameter was used to establish a product target concentration and specification for formulation of the diagnostic reagent. This method of allergen extract standardization can lead to a true‐biological unitage that can be used for labelling purposes. Conclusion The optimun concentration range at which to formulate an allergen extract, in terms of an in vitro immunologically based assay, can be determined by carrying out ROC analysis of the results of clinical studies as described in this communication. Diagnostic units (DU), are now used by us for labelling of such final formulations which conveys the information that the product is at the most appropriate concentration for diagnosis.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1996.tb00624.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78451577</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15895307</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4677-8687b6dcbaf59639ba31efe7479b464b72beaed0a765f55fb31a8afeecb027bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkV2L1DAUhoMo67j6E4QgInrRmrRNk-yFsM5-KC5-gCJ4E5JOMpvZTFN7MjrFP2_LlLkVz0Vy8T7nPTl5EXpGSU7Her3JaVmzrBgrp1LWeTKE1EWV7--hxVG6jxZEsirjQlYP0SOADSGkZFKcoBMhOKesWqA_Fxb8usXRYT2eXfJbHcKQrbxetxGSbzDc-RYnCwlDDLvkY4td7PFMeJh6wbbgk__l04BTxKNLTLcDXvcaAL_8fBvsbou7XqeRs69wF0Ow7WP0wOkA9sl8n6JvV5dfl--ym0_X75fnN1lT1Zxnohbc1KvGaMdkXUqjS2qd5RWXpqorwwtjtV0RzWvmGHOmpFpoZ21jSMFNU56iFwffro8_d-MiauuhsSHo1sYdKC4qRhnn_wQpE5KVZALPDmDTR4DeOtX148f1g6JETRGpjZpyUFMOaopIzRGp_dj8dJ6yM1u7OrbOmYz681nX0Ojget02Ho5YSSUpBBuxNwfstw92-I8HqOXluZDTEtnBwEOy-6OB7u9UzUvO1PeP1-rq7Q9Bv1wI9aH8C1TLwDc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15895307</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Design of an optimally-diagnostic skin test solution for diagnosis of sensitivity to timothy grass (Phleum pratense) pollen</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>WHEELER, A. W. ; JESSBERGER, B. ; DRACHENBERG, K. J. ; RAKOSKI, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>WHEELER, A. W. ; JESSBERGER, B. ; DRACHENBERG, K. J. ; RAKOSKI, J.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background Although most of the common allergen extracts that are used for diagnosis of type 1 hypersensitivity are now well standardized, this gives no assurance that they are within the concentration range that gives the best chance of a true diagnosis. Objective The objective of this study was to identify the most appropriate concentration range of timothy grass pollen Phleum pratense extract to diagnose sensitivity to this pollen correctly through skin‐testing. Methods Dilutions of a well‐standardized extract were made and used to skin test ‘true’ positive and ‘true’ negative populations of subjects as identified by case history, challenge tests and radioallergosorbent test (RAST). Weal diameters were measured and the data were submitted to receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. For any particular weal size cut–off, the optimal diagnostic concentration (ODC) range was thus calculated. Results A 3 mm weal diameter cut‐off was chosen as an appropriate size for routine diagnosis. Therefore the ODC range at this diameter was used to establish a product target concentration and specification for formulation of the diagnostic reagent. This method of allergen extract standardization can lead to a true‐biological unitage that can be used for labelling purposes. Conclusion The optimun concentration range at which to formulate an allergen extract, in terms of an in vitro immunologically based assay, can be determined by carrying out ROC analysis of the results of clinical studies as described in this communication. Diagnostic units (DU), are now used by us for labelling of such final formulations which conveys the information that the product is at the most appropriate concentration for diagnosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-7894</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2222</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1996.tb00624.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8877154</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Allergens - analysis ; Allergological tests ; Biological and medical sciences ; biological unit ; diagnostic unit ; Drug Evaluation - methods ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity, Immediate - diagnosis ; Immunological methods for diagnosis and exploration ; Immunopathology ; Medical sciences ; optimal diagnostic concentration ; Phleum pratense ; Poaceae - immunology ; Pollen - immunology ; quality assurance units ; RAST ; ROC analysis ; Skin Tests - methods ; skin-prick test ; standardization</subject><ispartof>Clinical and experimental allergy, 1996-08, Vol.26 (8), p.897-902</ispartof><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4677-8687b6dcbaf59639ba31efe7479b464b72beaed0a765f55fb31a8afeecb027bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4677-8687b6dcbaf59639ba31efe7479b464b72beaed0a765f55fb31a8afeecb027bc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2222.1996.tb00624.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2222.1996.tb00624.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,778,782,787,788,1414,23913,23914,25123,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3190285$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8877154$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>WHEELER, A. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JESSBERGER, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DRACHENBERG, K. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAKOSKI, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Design of an optimally-diagnostic skin test solution for diagnosis of sensitivity to timothy grass (Phleum pratense) pollen</title><title>Clinical and experimental allergy</title><addtitle>Clin Exp Allergy</addtitle><description>Summary Background Although most of the common allergen extracts that are used for diagnosis of type 1 hypersensitivity are now well standardized, this gives no assurance that they are within the concentration range that gives the best chance of a true diagnosis. Objective The objective of this study was to identify the most appropriate concentration range of timothy grass pollen Phleum pratense extract to diagnose sensitivity to this pollen correctly through skin‐testing. Methods Dilutions of a well‐standardized extract were made and used to skin test ‘true’ positive and ‘true’ negative populations of subjects as identified by case history, challenge tests and radioallergosorbent test (RAST). Weal diameters were measured and the data were submitted to receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. For any particular weal size cut–off, the optimal diagnostic concentration (ODC) range was thus calculated. Results A 3 mm weal diameter cut‐off was chosen as an appropriate size for routine diagnosis. Therefore the ODC range at this diameter was used to establish a product target concentration and specification for formulation of the diagnostic reagent. This method of allergen extract standardization can lead to a true‐biological unitage that can be used for labelling purposes. Conclusion The optimun concentration range at which to formulate an allergen extract, in terms of an in vitro immunologically based assay, can be determined by carrying out ROC analysis of the results of clinical studies as described in this communication. Diagnostic units (DU), are now used by us for labelling of such final formulations which conveys the information that the product is at the most appropriate concentration for diagnosis.</description><subject>Allergens - analysis</subject><subject>Allergological tests</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>biological unit</subject><subject>diagnostic unit</subject><subject>Drug Evaluation - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypersensitivity, Immediate - diagnosis</subject><subject>Immunological methods for diagnosis and exploration</subject><subject>Immunopathology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>optimal diagnostic concentration</subject><subject>Phleum pratense</subject><subject>Poaceae - immunology</subject><subject>Pollen - immunology</subject><subject>quality assurance units</subject><subject>RAST</subject><subject>ROC analysis</subject><subject>Skin Tests - methods</subject><subject>skin-prick test</subject><subject>standardization</subject><issn>0954-7894</issn><issn>1365-2222</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkV2L1DAUhoMo67j6E4QgInrRmrRNk-yFsM5-KC5-gCJ4E5JOMpvZTFN7MjrFP2_LlLkVz0Vy8T7nPTl5EXpGSU7Her3JaVmzrBgrp1LWeTKE1EWV7--hxVG6jxZEsirjQlYP0SOADSGkZFKcoBMhOKesWqA_Fxb8usXRYT2eXfJbHcKQrbxetxGSbzDc-RYnCwlDDLvkY4td7PFMeJh6wbbgk__l04BTxKNLTLcDXvcaAL_8fBvsbou7XqeRs69wF0Ow7WP0wOkA9sl8n6JvV5dfl--ym0_X75fnN1lT1Zxnohbc1KvGaMdkXUqjS2qd5RWXpqorwwtjtV0RzWvmGHOmpFpoZ21jSMFNU56iFwffro8_d-MiauuhsSHo1sYdKC4qRhnn_wQpE5KVZALPDmDTR4DeOtX148f1g6JETRGpjZpyUFMOaopIzRGp_dj8dJ6yM1u7OrbOmYz681nX0Ojget02Ho5YSSUpBBuxNwfstw92-I8HqOXluZDTEtnBwEOy-6OB7u9UzUvO1PeP1-rq7Q9Bv1wI9aH8C1TLwDc</recordid><startdate>199608</startdate><enddate>199608</enddate><creator>WHEELER, A. W.</creator><creator>JESSBERGER, B.</creator><creator>DRACHENBERG, K. J.</creator><creator>RAKOSKI, J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199608</creationdate><title>Design of an optimally-diagnostic skin test solution for diagnosis of sensitivity to timothy grass (Phleum pratense) pollen</title><author>WHEELER, A. W. ; JESSBERGER, B. ; DRACHENBERG, K. J. ; RAKOSKI, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4677-8687b6dcbaf59639ba31efe7479b464b72beaed0a765f55fb31a8afeecb027bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Allergens - analysis</topic><topic>Allergological tests</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>biological unit</topic><topic>diagnostic unit</topic><topic>Drug Evaluation - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypersensitivity, Immediate - diagnosis</topic><topic>Immunological methods for diagnosis and exploration</topic><topic>Immunopathology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>optimal diagnostic concentration</topic><topic>Phleum pratense</topic><topic>Poaceae - immunology</topic><topic>Pollen - immunology</topic><topic>quality assurance units</topic><topic>RAST</topic><topic>ROC analysis</topic><topic>Skin Tests - methods</topic><topic>skin-prick test</topic><topic>standardization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WHEELER, A. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JESSBERGER, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DRACHENBERG, K. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAKOSKI, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical and experimental allergy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WHEELER, A. W.</au><au>JESSBERGER, B.</au><au>DRACHENBERG, K. J.</au><au>RAKOSKI, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Design of an optimally-diagnostic skin test solution for diagnosis of sensitivity to timothy grass (Phleum pratense) pollen</atitle><jtitle>Clinical and experimental allergy</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Exp Allergy</addtitle><date>1996-08</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>897</spage><epage>902</epage><pages>897-902</pages><issn>0954-7894</issn><eissn>1365-2222</eissn><abstract>Summary Background Although most of the common allergen extracts that are used for diagnosis of type 1 hypersensitivity are now well standardized, this gives no assurance that they are within the concentration range that gives the best chance of a true diagnosis. Objective The objective of this study was to identify the most appropriate concentration range of timothy grass pollen Phleum pratense extract to diagnose sensitivity to this pollen correctly through skin‐testing. Methods Dilutions of a well‐standardized extract were made and used to skin test ‘true’ positive and ‘true’ negative populations of subjects as identified by case history, challenge tests and radioallergosorbent test (RAST). Weal diameters were measured and the data were submitted to receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. For any particular weal size cut–off, the optimal diagnostic concentration (ODC) range was thus calculated. Results A 3 mm weal diameter cut‐off was chosen as an appropriate size for routine diagnosis. Therefore the ODC range at this diameter was used to establish a product target concentration and specification for formulation of the diagnostic reagent. This method of allergen extract standardization can lead to a true‐biological unitage that can be used for labelling purposes. Conclusion The optimun concentration range at which to formulate an allergen extract, in terms of an in vitro immunologically based assay, can be determined by carrying out ROC analysis of the results of clinical studies as described in this communication. Diagnostic units (DU), are now used by us for labelling of such final formulations which conveys the information that the product is at the most appropriate concentration for diagnosis.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>8877154</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2222.1996.tb00624.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0954-7894
ispartof Clinical and experimental allergy, 1996-08, Vol.26 (8), p.897-902
issn 0954-7894
1365-2222
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78451577
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Allergens - analysis
Allergological tests
Biological and medical sciences
biological unit
diagnostic unit
Drug Evaluation - methods
Humans
Hypersensitivity, Immediate - diagnosis
Immunological methods for diagnosis and exploration
Immunopathology
Medical sciences
optimal diagnostic concentration
Phleum pratense
Poaceae - immunology
Pollen - immunology
quality assurance units
RAST
ROC analysis
Skin Tests - methods
skin-prick test
standardization
title Design of an optimally-diagnostic skin test solution for diagnosis of sensitivity to timothy grass (Phleum pratense) pollen
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T07%3A36%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Design%20of%20an%20optimally-diagnostic%20skin%20test%20solution%20for%20diagnosis%20of%20sensitivity%20to%20timothy%20grass%20(Phleum%20pratense)%20pollen&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20and%20experimental%20allergy&rft.au=WHEELER,%20A.%20W.&rft.date=1996-08&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=897&rft.epage=902&rft.pages=897-902&rft.issn=0954-7894&rft.eissn=1365-2222&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2222.1996.tb00624.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E15895307%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15895307&rft_id=info:pmid/8877154&rfr_iscdi=true