Outcome assessment of double-J stents during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of small solitary renal calculi
The utility of indwelling double-J ureteral stents during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) of renal calculi is ill defined. We evaluated 179 patients treated with SWL for small (< 20 mm in diameter) solitary renal calculi with (N = 27) or without (N = 152) indwelling ureteral stents. Th...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of endourology 1996-08, Vol.10 (4), p.341-343 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 343 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 341 |
| container_title | Journal of endourology |
| container_volume | 10 |
| creator | LOW, R. K STOLLER, M. L IRBY, P KEELER, L ELHILALI, M |
| description | The utility of indwelling double-J ureteral stents during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) of renal calculi is ill defined. We evaluated 179 patients treated with SWL for small (< 20 mm in diameter) solitary renal calculi with (N = 27) or without (N = 152) indwelling ureteral stents. There was no significant difference in the stone-free rates at 1 month (both 52%) and 3 months (61% nonstented group v 67% stented group; P = 0.45) or in the retreatment rates (13.3% nonstented group v 14.8% stented group; P = 0.60). The incidence and severity of pain/renal colic were similar for the two treatment groups. There was minimal morbidity associated with SWL in either group. Placement of double-J stents for the purpose of improving stone-free rates, alleviating pain, or preventing ureteral obstruction in conjunction with SWL of solitary renal calculi < 20 mm in diameter is unnecessary. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1089/end.1996.10.341 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78441279</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78441279</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-9a15ccc7ee7ea0d04cb25c49ac6b90ccbc5aa908d12a49638650d2b6462afbd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1P3DAQhq2qiC6Uc09IPlS9ZfFHEsfHCrWFCokLh96iyWRSUpx48SQU_j1eseJk-X2fGdmPEF-02mrV-Aua-632vs63rS31B7HRVeUKr9Sfj2KTCVM459UnccL8Tylta22PxXHTOOOs3ojH23XBOJEEZmKeaF5kHGQf1y5Q8VvykhOW_ZrG-a-k5yUBxrSLiSBIvo_48B-eSIZxuY9LGnf8sh_nCUKuY44hvchEc6YRAq5h_CyOBghMZ4fzVNz9_HF3eVXc3P66vvx-U6A1eik86AoRHZEjUL0qsTMVlh6w7rxC7LAC8KrptYHS17apK9Wbri5rA0PX21Px7W3tLsXHlXhpp5GRQoCZ4sqta8pSG-czePEGYorMiYZ2l8YpP7vVqt07brPjdu94H2THeeL8sHrtJurf-YPU3H899MD500OCGUd-x6xRtjalfQUJe4hp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78441279</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcome assessment of double-J stents during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of small solitary renal calculi</title><source>Mary Ann Liebert Online Subscription</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>LOW, R. K ; STOLLER, M. L ; IRBY, P ; KEELER, L ; ELHILALI, M</creator><creatorcontrib>LOW, R. K ; STOLLER, M. L ; IRBY, P ; KEELER, L ; ELHILALI, M</creatorcontrib><description>The utility of indwelling double-J ureteral stents during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) of renal calculi is ill defined. We evaluated 179 patients treated with SWL for small (< 20 mm in diameter) solitary renal calculi with (N = 27) or without (N = 152) indwelling ureteral stents. There was no significant difference in the stone-free rates at 1 month (both 52%) and 3 months (61% nonstented group v 67% stented group; P = 0.45) or in the retreatment rates (13.3% nonstented group v 14.8% stented group; P = 0.60). The incidence and severity of pain/renal colic were similar for the two treatment groups. There was minimal morbidity associated with SWL in either group. Placement of double-J stents for the purpose of improving stone-free rates, alleviating pain, or preventing ureteral obstruction in conjunction with SWL of solitary renal calculi < 20 mm in diameter is unnecessary.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0892-7790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-900X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/end.1996.10.341</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8872731</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Liebert</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Diseases of the urinary system ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Female ; Humans ; Kidney Calculi - pathology ; Kidney Calculi - therapy ; Lithotripsy ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Retrospective Studies ; Statistics as Topic ; Stents ; Ureter ; Urinary lithiasis</subject><ispartof>Journal of endourology, 1996-08, Vol.10 (4), p.341-343</ispartof><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-9a15ccc7ee7ea0d04cb25c49ac6b90ccbc5aa908d12a49638650d2b6462afbd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-9a15ccc7ee7ea0d04cb25c49ac6b90ccbc5aa908d12a49638650d2b6462afbd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,777,781,786,787,3029,23911,23912,25121,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3203624$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8872731$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>LOW, R. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STOLLER, M. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IRBY, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KEELER, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELHILALI, M</creatorcontrib><title>Outcome assessment of double-J stents during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of small solitary renal calculi</title><title>Journal of endourology</title><addtitle>J Endourol</addtitle><description>The utility of indwelling double-J ureteral stents during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) of renal calculi is ill defined. We evaluated 179 patients treated with SWL for small (< 20 mm in diameter) solitary renal calculi with (N = 27) or without (N = 152) indwelling ureteral stents. There was no significant difference in the stone-free rates at 1 month (both 52%) and 3 months (61% nonstented group v 67% stented group; P = 0.45) or in the retreatment rates (13.3% nonstented group v 14.8% stented group; P = 0.60). The incidence and severity of pain/renal colic were similar for the two treatment groups. There was minimal morbidity associated with SWL in either group. Placement of double-J stents for the purpose of improving stone-free rates, alleviating pain, or preventing ureteral obstruction in conjunction with SWL of solitary renal calculi < 20 mm in diameter is unnecessary.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diseases of the urinary system</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Calculi - pathology</subject><subject>Kidney Calculi - therapy</subject><subject>Lithotripsy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistics as Topic</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Ureter</subject><subject>Urinary lithiasis</subject><issn>0892-7790</issn><issn>1557-900X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1P3DAQhq2qiC6Uc09IPlS9ZfFHEsfHCrWFCokLh96iyWRSUpx48SQU_j1eseJk-X2fGdmPEF-02mrV-Aua-632vs63rS31B7HRVeUKr9Sfj2KTCVM459UnccL8Tylta22PxXHTOOOs3ojH23XBOJEEZmKeaF5kHGQf1y5Q8VvykhOW_ZrG-a-k5yUBxrSLiSBIvo_48B-eSIZxuY9LGnf8sh_nCUKuY44hvchEc6YRAq5h_CyOBghMZ4fzVNz9_HF3eVXc3P66vvx-U6A1eik86AoRHZEjUL0qsTMVlh6w7rxC7LAC8KrptYHS17apK9Wbri5rA0PX21Px7W3tLsXHlXhpp5GRQoCZ4sqta8pSG-czePEGYorMiYZ2l8YpP7vVqt07brPjdu94H2THeeL8sHrtJurf-YPU3H899MD500OCGUd-x6xRtjalfQUJe4hp</recordid><startdate>19960801</startdate><enddate>19960801</enddate><creator>LOW, R. K</creator><creator>STOLLER, M. L</creator><creator>IRBY, P</creator><creator>KEELER, L</creator><creator>ELHILALI, M</creator><general>Liebert</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960801</creationdate><title>Outcome assessment of double-J stents during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of small solitary renal calculi</title><author>LOW, R. K ; STOLLER, M. L ; IRBY, P ; KEELER, L ; ELHILALI, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c321t-9a15ccc7ee7ea0d04cb25c49ac6b90ccbc5aa908d12a49638650d2b6462afbd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diseases of the urinary system</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Calculi - pathology</topic><topic>Kidney Calculi - therapy</topic><topic>Lithotripsy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistics as Topic</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Ureter</topic><topic>Urinary lithiasis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LOW, R. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STOLLER, M. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IRBY, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KEELER, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELHILALI, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of endourology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LOW, R. K</au><au>STOLLER, M. L</au><au>IRBY, P</au><au>KEELER, L</au><au>ELHILALI, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcome assessment of double-J stents during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of small solitary renal calculi</atitle><jtitle>Journal of endourology</jtitle><addtitle>J Endourol</addtitle><date>1996-08-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>341</spage><epage>343</epage><pages>341-343</pages><issn>0892-7790</issn><eissn>1557-900X</eissn><abstract>The utility of indwelling double-J ureteral stents during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) of renal calculi is ill defined. We evaluated 179 patients treated with SWL for small (< 20 mm in diameter) solitary renal calculi with (N = 27) or without (N = 152) indwelling ureteral stents. There was no significant difference in the stone-free rates at 1 month (both 52%) and 3 months (61% nonstented group v 67% stented group; P = 0.45) or in the retreatment rates (13.3% nonstented group v 14.8% stented group; P = 0.60). The incidence and severity of pain/renal colic were similar for the two treatment groups. There was minimal morbidity associated with SWL in either group. Placement of double-J stents for the purpose of improving stone-free rates, alleviating pain, or preventing ureteral obstruction in conjunction with SWL of solitary renal calculi < 20 mm in diameter is unnecessary.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Liebert</pub><pmid>8872731</pmid><doi>10.1089/end.1996.10.341</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0892-7790 |
| ispartof | Journal of endourology, 1996-08, Vol.10 (4), p.341-343 |
| issn | 0892-7790 1557-900X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78441279 |
| source | Mary Ann Liebert Online Subscription; MEDLINE |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences Diseases of the urinary system Evaluation Studies as Topic Female Humans Kidney Calculi - pathology Kidney Calculi - therapy Lithotripsy Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases Outcome Assessment (Health Care) Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) Retrospective Studies Statistics as Topic Stents Ureter Urinary lithiasis |
| title | Outcome assessment of double-J stents during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of small solitary renal calculi |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T15%3A49%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcome%20assessment%20of%20double-J%20stents%20during%20extracorporeal%20shockwave%20lithotripsy%20of%20small%20solitary%20renal%20calculi&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20endourology&rft.au=LOW,%20R.%20K&rft.date=1996-08-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=341&rft.epage=343&rft.pages=341-343&rft.issn=0892-7790&rft.eissn=1557-900X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/end.1996.10.341&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78441279%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78441279&rft_id=info:pmid/8872731&rfr_iscdi=true |