Is passive surveillance always insensitive? An evaluation of shigellosis surveillance in Oklahoma
The authors studied the reporting of shigellosis in Oklahoma to evaluate the sensitivity of the state-based passive surveillance system for shigellosis. They found that passive surveillance for shigellosis can be more sensitive than has been previously observed. Laboratory-based reporting was found...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of epidemiology 1988-10, Vol.128 (4), p.878-881 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 881 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 878 |
| container_title | American journal of epidemiology |
| container_volume | 128 |
| creator | HARKESS, J. R GILDON, B. A ARCHER, P. W ISTRE, G. R |
| description | The authors studied the reporting of shigellosis in Oklahoma to evaluate the sensitivity of the state-based passive surveillance system for shigellosis. They found that passive surveillance for shigellosis can be more sensitive than has been previously observed. Laboratory-based reporting was found to be far superior to reporting by physicians. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115041 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78429284</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1306648427</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p226t-28a36f7c8cc39234eb1285c548e1ae09efce0c7a717ddaef60161fce74d986133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFv1DAQhS0EKtvCT0CyAHHL4rEd2zmhqoJSqVIvcI6mzoR68cZLZrO0_x4jFiS4MJeR5n3z9PSEeAlqDaozb8v9WOZhU5Z5wsxr3NAaAVpl4ZFYgfWucbp1j8VKKaWbTjv9VJwyb5QC6Fp1Ik6MskGFsBJ4xXKHzOlAkpf5QClnnCJJzN_xgWWamCZO-6q_k-eTpAPmBfepTLKMku_SF8q5cOK_v9Mkb75mvCtbfCaejDUlPT_uM_H5w_tPFx-b65vLq4vz62antds3OqBxo48hRtNpY-kWdGhjawMBkupojKSiRw9-GJBGp8BBvXk7dMGBMWfizS_f3Vy-LcT7fps40s9AVBbufbC608H-F4RW-zpQwVf_gL8r78Eo52x19JV6caSW2y0N_W5OW5wf-mPFVX991JEj5nGuBSX-g7nOO23A_ABBc5Df</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1306648427</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is passive surveillance always insensitive? An evaluation of shigellosis surveillance in Oklahoma</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>HARKESS, J. R ; GILDON, B. A ; ARCHER, P. W ; ISTRE, G. R</creator><creatorcontrib>HARKESS, J. R ; GILDON, B. A ; ARCHER, P. W ; ISTRE, G. R</creatorcontrib><description>The authors studied the reporting of shigellosis in Oklahoma to evaluate the sensitivity of the state-based passive surveillance system for shigellosis. They found that passive surveillance for shigellosis can be more sensitive than has been previously observed. Laboratory-based reporting was found to be far superior to reporting by physicians.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-6256</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3048088</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJEPAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cary, NC: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Bacterial diseases ; Bacterial diseases of the digestive system and abdomen ; Biological and medical sciences ; Dysentery, Bacillary - epidemiology ; Hospitals ; Human bacterial diseases ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Laboratories ; Medical sciences ; Oklahoma ; Population Surveillance ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Shigella</subject><ispartof>American journal of epidemiology, 1988-10, Vol.128 (4), p.878-881</ispartof><rights>1989 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27846,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=6976231$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3048088$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HARKESS, J. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GILDON, B. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARCHER, P. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ISTRE, G. R</creatorcontrib><title>Is passive surveillance always insensitive? An evaluation of shigellosis surveillance in Oklahoma</title><title>American journal of epidemiology</title><addtitle>Am J Epidemiol</addtitle><description>The authors studied the reporting of shigellosis in Oklahoma to evaluate the sensitivity of the state-based passive surveillance system for shigellosis. They found that passive surveillance for shigellosis can be more sensitive than has been previously observed. Laboratory-based reporting was found to be far superior to reporting by physicians.</description><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases of the digestive system and abdomen</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Dysentery, Bacillary - epidemiology</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Human bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Oklahoma</subject><subject>Population Surveillance</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Shigella</subject><issn>0002-9262</issn><issn>1476-6256</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEFv1DAQhS0EKtvCT0CyAHHL4rEd2zmhqoJSqVIvcI6mzoR68cZLZrO0_x4jFiS4MJeR5n3z9PSEeAlqDaozb8v9WOZhU5Z5wsxr3NAaAVpl4ZFYgfWucbp1j8VKKaWbTjv9VJwyb5QC6Fp1Ik6MskGFsBJ4xXKHzOlAkpf5QClnnCJJzN_xgWWamCZO-6q_k-eTpAPmBfepTLKMku_SF8q5cOK_v9Mkb75mvCtbfCaejDUlPT_uM_H5w_tPFx-b65vLq4vz62antds3OqBxo48hRtNpY-kWdGhjawMBkupojKSiRw9-GJBGp8BBvXk7dMGBMWfizS_f3Vy-LcT7fps40s9AVBbufbC608H-F4RW-zpQwVf_gL8r78Eo52x19JV6caSW2y0N_W5OW5wf-mPFVX991JEj5nGuBSX-g7nOO23A_ABBc5Df</recordid><startdate>19881001</startdate><enddate>19881001</enddate><creator>HARKESS, J. R</creator><creator>GILDON, B. A</creator><creator>ARCHER, P. W</creator><creator>ISTRE, G. R</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>School of Hygiene and Public Health of the Johns Hopkins University</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>HVZBN</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19881001</creationdate><title>Is passive surveillance always insensitive? An evaluation of shigellosis surveillance in Oklahoma</title><author>HARKESS, J. R ; GILDON, B. A ; ARCHER, P. W ; ISTRE, G. R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p226t-28a36f7c8cc39234eb1285c548e1ae09efce0c7a717ddaef60161fce74d986133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases of the digestive system and abdomen</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Dysentery, Bacillary - epidemiology</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Human bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Oklahoma</topic><topic>Population Surveillance</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Shigella</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HARKESS, J. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GILDON, B. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARCHER, P. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ISTRE, G. R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 24</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HARKESS, J. R</au><au>GILDON, B. A</au><au>ARCHER, P. W</au><au>ISTRE, G. R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is passive surveillance always insensitive? An evaluation of shigellosis surveillance in Oklahoma</atitle><jtitle>American journal of epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Epidemiol</addtitle><date>1988-10-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>878</spage><epage>881</epage><pages>878-881</pages><issn>0002-9262</issn><eissn>1476-6256</eissn><coden>AJEPAS</coden><abstract>The authors studied the reporting of shigellosis in Oklahoma to evaluate the sensitivity of the state-based passive surveillance system for shigellosis. They found that passive surveillance for shigellosis can be more sensitive than has been previously observed. Laboratory-based reporting was found to be far superior to reporting by physicians.</abstract><cop>Cary, NC</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>3048088</pmid><doi>10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115041</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0002-9262 |
| ispartof | American journal of epidemiology, 1988-10, Vol.128 (4), p.878-881 |
| issn | 0002-9262 1476-6256 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78429284 |
| source | Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive legacy; MEDLINE; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Bacterial diseases Bacterial diseases of the digestive system and abdomen Biological and medical sciences Dysentery, Bacillary - epidemiology Hospitals Human bacterial diseases Humans Infectious diseases Laboratories Medical sciences Oklahoma Population Surveillance Sensitivity and Specificity Shigella |
| title | Is passive surveillance always insensitive? An evaluation of shigellosis surveillance in Oklahoma |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T20%3A41%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20passive%20surveillance%20always%20insensitive?%20An%20evaluation%20of%20shigellosis%20surveillance%20in%20Oklahoma&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20epidemiology&rft.au=HARKESS,%20J.%20R&rft.date=1988-10-01&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=878&rft.epage=881&rft.pages=878-881&rft.issn=0002-9262&rft.eissn=1476-6256&rft.coden=AJEPAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1306648427%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1306648427&rft_id=info:pmid/3048088&rfr_iscdi=true |