Neonatal auditory brainstem responses recorded from four electrode montages

Simultaneous auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to click stimuli at 30 and 60 dB nHL were recorded from 16 full term neonates with four electrode arrays: vertical (Cz-Nape of neck), ipsilateral (Cz-Mi), contralateral (Cz-Mc), and horizontal (Mc-Mi). Results indicated that ABR waveforms were morphol...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of communication disorders 1996-03, Vol.29 (2), p.125-139
Hauptverfasser: Stuart, Andrew, Yang, Edward Y., Botea, Mihaela
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 139
container_issue 2
container_start_page 125
container_title Journal of communication disorders
container_volume 29
creator Stuart, Andrew
Yang, Edward Y.
Botea, Mihaela
description Simultaneous auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to click stimuli at 30 and 60 dB nHL were recorded from 16 full term neonates with four electrode arrays: vertical (Cz-Nape of neck), ipsilateral (Cz-Mi), contralateral (Cz-Mc), and horizontal (Mc-Mi). Results indicated that ABR waveforms were morphologically similar to those recorded in adults: Waves I, III, and V were clearly identifiable and of the same polarity in 15 of 16 subjects 60 dB nHL and Wave V was clearly identifiable in 14 of 16 subjects at 30 dB nHL. Although ABR waves were identified in most cases, waveforms expression was variable with different electrode recording montages. It is suggested that if a clinician must choose one montage array for recording neonatal ABRs at high intensity levels for neurodiagnostic evaluations, the ipsilateral recording array is indicated since it displays the highest expression of wave components. For screening applications or threshold searching at lower stimulus levels, however, either the ipsilateral or vertical montage would be justified. Further, caution should be employed when interpreting ABR results in neonates recorded with unconventional montages due to the variable expression of wave components.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0021-9924(95)00018-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78421545</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ522891</ericid><els_id>0021992495000186</els_id><sourcerecordid>58305643</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-520f9203140bee786b77d9d18a9116649db88991b9cf03eceb4f34114e2864d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EapfCPyhSDqiCQ4ontmP7goSqQr_UXsrZcuwJcpXEi50g9d_Xy0Z7hNOM9D4zGj1DyCnQc6DQfqG0gVrrhn_S4jOlFFTdviIbUJLVUmv-mmwOyDF5m_NTYdoW4IgcaRASpNiQ23uMk53tUNnFhzmm56pLNkx5xrFKmLdxyphL52Ly6Ks-xbHq45IqHNDNKXqsxjjN9hfmd-RNb4eM79d6Qn5-v3y8uKrvHn5cX3y7qx1naq5FQ3vdUAacdohStZ2UXntQVkO5j2vfKaU1dNr1lKHDjveMA3BsVMu9ZCfkbL93m-LvBfNsxpAdDoOdMC7ZSMUbEFz8FxSKUdFyVkC-B12KOSfszTaF0aZnA9TsZJudSbMzabQwf2Wbtox9WPcv3Yj-MLTaLfnHNbfZ2aFPdnIhHzBGJSt_KtjpHsMU3CG9vBFNozSU-OsaF6d_AiaTXcDJoQ_lLbPxMfz7zBcN9qNy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>58305643</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neonatal auditory brainstem responses recorded from four electrode montages</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Stuart, Andrew ; Yang, Edward Y. ; Botea, Mihaela</creator><creatorcontrib>Stuart, Andrew ; Yang, Edward Y. ; Botea, Mihaela</creatorcontrib><description>Simultaneous auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to click stimuli at 30 and 60 dB nHL were recorded from 16 full term neonates with four electrode arrays: vertical (Cz-Nape of neck), ipsilateral (Cz-Mi), contralateral (Cz-Mc), and horizontal (Mc-Mi). Results indicated that ABR waveforms were morphologically similar to those recorded in adults: Waves I, III, and V were clearly identifiable and of the same polarity in 15 of 16 subjects 60 dB nHL and Wave V was clearly identifiable in 14 of 16 subjects at 30 dB nHL. Although ABR waves were identified in most cases, waveforms expression was variable with different electrode recording montages. It is suggested that if a clinician must choose one montage array for recording neonatal ABRs at high intensity levels for neurodiagnostic evaluations, the ipsilateral recording array is indicated since it displays the highest expression of wave components. For screening applications or threshold searching at lower stimulus levels, however, either the ipsilateral or vertical montage would be justified. Further, caution should be employed when interpreting ABR results in neonates recorded with unconventional montages due to the variable expression of wave components.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9924</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7994</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0021-9924(95)00018-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9157175</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCDIAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Audiometric Tests ; Auditory Brainstem Responses ; Auditory Evaluation ; Biological and medical sciences ; Disability Identification ; Ear and associated structures. Auditory pathways and centers. Hearing. Vocal organ. Phonation. Sound production. Echolocation ; Electrodes ; Evoked Brain Potentials ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hearing (Physiology) ; Hearing Impairments ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Neonates ; Screening Tests ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><ispartof>Journal of communication disorders, 1996-03, Vol.29 (2), p.125-139</ispartof><rights>1996</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-520f9203140bee786b77d9d18a9116649db88991b9cf03eceb4f34114e2864d73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-520f9203140bee786b77d9d18a9116649db88991b9cf03eceb4f34114e2864d73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0021992495000186$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ522891$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3073994$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9157175$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stuart, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Edward Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botea, Mihaela</creatorcontrib><title>Neonatal auditory brainstem responses recorded from four electrode montages</title><title>Journal of communication disorders</title><addtitle>J Commun Disord</addtitle><description>Simultaneous auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to click stimuli at 30 and 60 dB nHL were recorded from 16 full term neonates with four electrode arrays: vertical (Cz-Nape of neck), ipsilateral (Cz-Mi), contralateral (Cz-Mc), and horizontal (Mc-Mi). Results indicated that ABR waveforms were morphologically similar to those recorded in adults: Waves I, III, and V were clearly identifiable and of the same polarity in 15 of 16 subjects 60 dB nHL and Wave V was clearly identifiable in 14 of 16 subjects at 30 dB nHL. Although ABR waves were identified in most cases, waveforms expression was variable with different electrode recording montages. It is suggested that if a clinician must choose one montage array for recording neonatal ABRs at high intensity levels for neurodiagnostic evaluations, the ipsilateral recording array is indicated since it displays the highest expression of wave components. For screening applications or threshold searching at lower stimulus levels, however, either the ipsilateral or vertical montage would be justified. Further, caution should be employed when interpreting ABR results in neonates recorded with unconventional montages due to the variable expression of wave components.</description><subject>Audiometric Tests</subject><subject>Auditory Brainstem Responses</subject><subject>Auditory Evaluation</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Disability Identification</subject><subject>Ear and associated structures. Auditory pathways and centers. Hearing. Vocal organ. Phonation. Sound production. Echolocation</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Evoked Brain Potentials</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hearing (Physiology)</subject><subject>Hearing Impairments</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Screening Tests</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><issn>0021-9924</issn><issn>1873-7994</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EapfCPyhSDqiCQ4ontmP7goSqQr_UXsrZcuwJcpXEi50g9d_Xy0Z7hNOM9D4zGj1DyCnQc6DQfqG0gVrrhn_S4jOlFFTdviIbUJLVUmv-mmwOyDF5m_NTYdoW4IgcaRASpNiQ23uMk53tUNnFhzmm56pLNkx5xrFKmLdxyphL52Ly6Ks-xbHq45IqHNDNKXqsxjjN9hfmd-RNb4eM79d6Qn5-v3y8uKrvHn5cX3y7qx1naq5FQ3vdUAacdohStZ2UXntQVkO5j2vfKaU1dNr1lKHDjveMA3BsVMu9ZCfkbL93m-LvBfNsxpAdDoOdMC7ZSMUbEFz8FxSKUdFyVkC-B12KOSfszTaF0aZnA9TsZJudSbMzabQwf2Wbtox9WPcv3Yj-MLTaLfnHNbfZ2aFPdnIhHzBGJSt_KtjpHsMU3CG9vBFNozSU-OsaF6d_AiaTXcDJoQ_lLbPxMfz7zBcN9qNy</recordid><startdate>19960301</startdate><enddate>19960301</enddate><creator>Stuart, Andrew</creator><creator>Yang, Edward Y.</creator><creator>Botea, Mihaela</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960301</creationdate><title>Neonatal auditory brainstem responses recorded from four electrode montages</title><author>Stuart, Andrew ; Yang, Edward Y. ; Botea, Mihaela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-520f9203140bee786b77d9d18a9116649db88991b9cf03eceb4f34114e2864d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Audiometric Tests</topic><topic>Auditory Brainstem Responses</topic><topic>Auditory Evaluation</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Disability Identification</topic><topic>Ear and associated structures. Auditory pathways and centers. Hearing. Vocal organ. Phonation. Sound production. Echolocation</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Evoked Brain Potentials</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hearing (Physiology)</topic><topic>Hearing Impairments</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Screening Tests</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stuart, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Edward Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botea, Mihaela</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Journal of communication disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stuart, Andrew</au><au>Yang, Edward Y.</au><au>Botea, Mihaela</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ522891</ericid><atitle>Neonatal auditory brainstem responses recorded from four electrode montages</atitle><jtitle>Journal of communication disorders</jtitle><addtitle>J Commun Disord</addtitle><date>1996-03-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>125</spage><epage>139</epage><pages>125-139</pages><issn>0021-9924</issn><eissn>1873-7994</eissn><coden>JCDIAI</coden><abstract>Simultaneous auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to click stimuli at 30 and 60 dB nHL were recorded from 16 full term neonates with four electrode arrays: vertical (Cz-Nape of neck), ipsilateral (Cz-Mi), contralateral (Cz-Mc), and horizontal (Mc-Mi). Results indicated that ABR waveforms were morphologically similar to those recorded in adults: Waves I, III, and V were clearly identifiable and of the same polarity in 15 of 16 subjects 60 dB nHL and Wave V was clearly identifiable in 14 of 16 subjects at 30 dB nHL. Although ABR waves were identified in most cases, waveforms expression was variable with different electrode recording montages. It is suggested that if a clinician must choose one montage array for recording neonatal ABRs at high intensity levels for neurodiagnostic evaluations, the ipsilateral recording array is indicated since it displays the highest expression of wave components. For screening applications or threshold searching at lower stimulus levels, however, either the ipsilateral or vertical montage would be justified. Further, caution should be employed when interpreting ABR results in neonates recorded with unconventional montages due to the variable expression of wave components.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>9157175</pmid><doi>10.1016/0021-9924(95)00018-6</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9924
ispartof Journal of communication disorders, 1996-03, Vol.29 (2), p.125-139
issn 0021-9924
1873-7994
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78421545
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Audiometric Tests
Auditory Brainstem Responses
Auditory Evaluation
Biological and medical sciences
Disability Identification
Ear and associated structures. Auditory pathways and centers. Hearing. Vocal organ. Phonation. Sound production. Echolocation
Electrodes
Evoked Brain Potentials
Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Hearing (Physiology)
Hearing Impairments
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Neonates
Screening Tests
Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs
title Neonatal auditory brainstem responses recorded from four electrode montages
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T07%3A16%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neonatal%20auditory%20brainstem%20responses%20recorded%20from%20four%20electrode%20montages&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20communication%20disorders&rft.au=Stuart,%20Andrew&rft.date=1996-03-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=125&rft.epage=139&rft.pages=125-139&rft.issn=0021-9924&rft.eissn=1873-7994&rft.coden=JCDIAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0021-9924(95)00018-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E58305643%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=58305643&rft_id=info:pmid/9157175&rft_ericid=EJ522891&rft_els_id=0021992495000186&rfr_iscdi=true