Neonatal auditory brainstem responses recorded from four electrode montages
Simultaneous auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to click stimuli at 30 and 60 dB nHL were recorded from 16 full term neonates with four electrode arrays: vertical (Cz-Nape of neck), ipsilateral (Cz-Mi), contralateral (Cz-Mc), and horizontal (Mc-Mi). Results indicated that ABR waveforms were morphol...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of communication disorders 1996-03, Vol.29 (2), p.125-139 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 139 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 125 |
container_title | Journal of communication disorders |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Stuart, Andrew Yang, Edward Y. Botea, Mihaela |
description | Simultaneous auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to click stimuli at 30 and 60 dB nHL were recorded from 16 full term neonates with four electrode arrays: vertical (Cz-Nape of neck), ipsilateral (Cz-Mi), contralateral (Cz-Mc), and horizontal (Mc-Mi). Results indicated that ABR waveforms were morphologically similar to those recorded in adults: Waves I, III, and V were clearly identifiable and of the same polarity in 15 of 16 subjects 60 dB nHL and Wave V was clearly identifiable in 14 of 16 subjects at 30 dB nHL. Although ABR waves were identified in most cases, waveforms expression was variable with different electrode recording montages. It is suggested that if a clinician must choose one montage array for recording neonatal ABRs at high intensity levels for neurodiagnostic evaluations, the ipsilateral recording array is indicated since it displays the highest expression of wave components. For screening applications or threshold searching at lower stimulus levels, however, either the ipsilateral or vertical montage would be justified. Further, caution should be employed when interpreting ABR results in neonates recorded with unconventional montages due to the variable expression of wave components. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0021-9924(95)00018-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78421545</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ522891</ericid><els_id>0021992495000186</els_id><sourcerecordid>58305643</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-520f9203140bee786b77d9d18a9116649db88991b9cf03eceb4f34114e2864d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EapfCPyhSDqiCQ4ontmP7goSqQr_UXsrZcuwJcpXEi50g9d_Xy0Z7hNOM9D4zGj1DyCnQc6DQfqG0gVrrhn_S4jOlFFTdviIbUJLVUmv-mmwOyDF5m_NTYdoW4IgcaRASpNiQ23uMk53tUNnFhzmm56pLNkx5xrFKmLdxyphL52Ly6Ks-xbHq45IqHNDNKXqsxjjN9hfmd-RNb4eM79d6Qn5-v3y8uKrvHn5cX3y7qx1naq5FQ3vdUAacdohStZ2UXntQVkO5j2vfKaU1dNr1lKHDjveMA3BsVMu9ZCfkbL93m-LvBfNsxpAdDoOdMC7ZSMUbEFz8FxSKUdFyVkC-B12KOSfszTaF0aZnA9TsZJudSbMzabQwf2Wbtox9WPcv3Yj-MLTaLfnHNbfZ2aFPdnIhHzBGJSt_KtjpHsMU3CG9vBFNozSU-OsaF6d_AiaTXcDJoQ_lLbPxMfz7zBcN9qNy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>58305643</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neonatal auditory brainstem responses recorded from four electrode montages</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Stuart, Andrew ; Yang, Edward Y. ; Botea, Mihaela</creator><creatorcontrib>Stuart, Andrew ; Yang, Edward Y. ; Botea, Mihaela</creatorcontrib><description>Simultaneous auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to click stimuli at 30 and 60 dB nHL were recorded from 16 full term neonates with four electrode arrays: vertical (Cz-Nape of neck), ipsilateral (Cz-Mi), contralateral (Cz-Mc), and horizontal (Mc-Mi). Results indicated that ABR waveforms were morphologically similar to those recorded in adults: Waves I, III, and V were clearly identifiable and of the same polarity in 15 of 16 subjects 60 dB nHL and Wave V was clearly identifiable in 14 of 16 subjects at 30 dB nHL. Although ABR waves were identified in most cases, waveforms expression was variable with different electrode recording montages. It is suggested that if a clinician must choose one montage array for recording neonatal ABRs at high intensity levels for neurodiagnostic evaluations, the ipsilateral recording array is indicated since it displays the highest expression of wave components. For screening applications or threshold searching at lower stimulus levels, however, either the ipsilateral or vertical montage would be justified. Further, caution should be employed when interpreting ABR results in neonates recorded with unconventional montages due to the variable expression of wave components.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9924</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7994</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0021-9924(95)00018-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9157175</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCDIAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Audiometric Tests ; Auditory Brainstem Responses ; Auditory Evaluation ; Biological and medical sciences ; Disability Identification ; Ear and associated structures. Auditory pathways and centers. Hearing. Vocal organ. Phonation. Sound production. Echolocation ; Electrodes ; Evoked Brain Potentials ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hearing (Physiology) ; Hearing Impairments ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Neonates ; Screening Tests ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><ispartof>Journal of communication disorders, 1996-03, Vol.29 (2), p.125-139</ispartof><rights>1996</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-520f9203140bee786b77d9d18a9116649db88991b9cf03eceb4f34114e2864d73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-520f9203140bee786b77d9d18a9116649db88991b9cf03eceb4f34114e2864d73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0021992495000186$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ522891$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3073994$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9157175$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stuart, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Edward Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botea, Mihaela</creatorcontrib><title>Neonatal auditory brainstem responses recorded from four electrode montages</title><title>Journal of communication disorders</title><addtitle>J Commun Disord</addtitle><description>Simultaneous auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to click stimuli at 30 and 60 dB nHL were recorded from 16 full term neonates with four electrode arrays: vertical (Cz-Nape of neck), ipsilateral (Cz-Mi), contralateral (Cz-Mc), and horizontal (Mc-Mi). Results indicated that ABR waveforms were morphologically similar to those recorded in adults: Waves I, III, and V were clearly identifiable and of the same polarity in 15 of 16 subjects 60 dB nHL and Wave V was clearly identifiable in 14 of 16 subjects at 30 dB nHL. Although ABR waves were identified in most cases, waveforms expression was variable with different electrode recording montages. It is suggested that if a clinician must choose one montage array for recording neonatal ABRs at high intensity levels for neurodiagnostic evaluations, the ipsilateral recording array is indicated since it displays the highest expression of wave components. For screening applications or threshold searching at lower stimulus levels, however, either the ipsilateral or vertical montage would be justified. Further, caution should be employed when interpreting ABR results in neonates recorded with unconventional montages due to the variable expression of wave components.</description><subject>Audiometric Tests</subject><subject>Auditory Brainstem Responses</subject><subject>Auditory Evaluation</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Disability Identification</subject><subject>Ear and associated structures. Auditory pathways and centers. Hearing. Vocal organ. Phonation. Sound production. Echolocation</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Evoked Brain Potentials</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hearing (Physiology)</subject><subject>Hearing Impairments</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Screening Tests</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><issn>0021-9924</issn><issn>1873-7994</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EapfCPyhSDqiCQ4ontmP7goSqQr_UXsrZcuwJcpXEi50g9d_Xy0Z7hNOM9D4zGj1DyCnQc6DQfqG0gVrrhn_S4jOlFFTdviIbUJLVUmv-mmwOyDF5m_NTYdoW4IgcaRASpNiQ23uMk53tUNnFhzmm56pLNkx5xrFKmLdxyphL52Ly6Ks-xbHq45IqHNDNKXqsxjjN9hfmd-RNb4eM79d6Qn5-v3y8uKrvHn5cX3y7qx1naq5FQ3vdUAacdohStZ2UXntQVkO5j2vfKaU1dNr1lKHDjveMA3BsVMu9ZCfkbL93m-LvBfNsxpAdDoOdMC7ZSMUbEFz8FxSKUdFyVkC-B12KOSfszTaF0aZnA9TsZJudSbMzabQwf2Wbtox9WPcv3Yj-MLTaLfnHNbfZ2aFPdnIhHzBGJSt_KtjpHsMU3CG9vBFNozSU-OsaF6d_AiaTXcDJoQ_lLbPxMfz7zBcN9qNy</recordid><startdate>19960301</startdate><enddate>19960301</enddate><creator>Stuart, Andrew</creator><creator>Yang, Edward Y.</creator><creator>Botea, Mihaela</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960301</creationdate><title>Neonatal auditory brainstem responses recorded from four electrode montages</title><author>Stuart, Andrew ; Yang, Edward Y. ; Botea, Mihaela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-520f9203140bee786b77d9d18a9116649db88991b9cf03eceb4f34114e2864d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Audiometric Tests</topic><topic>Auditory Brainstem Responses</topic><topic>Auditory Evaluation</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Disability Identification</topic><topic>Ear and associated structures. Auditory pathways and centers. Hearing. Vocal organ. Phonation. Sound production. Echolocation</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Evoked Brain Potentials</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hearing (Physiology)</topic><topic>Hearing Impairments</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Screening Tests</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stuart, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Edward Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botea, Mihaela</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Journal of communication disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stuart, Andrew</au><au>Yang, Edward Y.</au><au>Botea, Mihaela</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ522891</ericid><atitle>Neonatal auditory brainstem responses recorded from four electrode montages</atitle><jtitle>Journal of communication disorders</jtitle><addtitle>J Commun Disord</addtitle><date>1996-03-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>125</spage><epage>139</epage><pages>125-139</pages><issn>0021-9924</issn><eissn>1873-7994</eissn><coden>JCDIAI</coden><abstract>Simultaneous auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to click stimuli at 30 and 60 dB nHL were recorded from 16 full term neonates with four electrode arrays: vertical (Cz-Nape of neck), ipsilateral (Cz-Mi), contralateral (Cz-Mc), and horizontal (Mc-Mi). Results indicated that ABR waveforms were morphologically similar to those recorded in adults: Waves I, III, and V were clearly identifiable and of the same polarity in 15 of 16 subjects 60 dB nHL and Wave V was clearly identifiable in 14 of 16 subjects at 30 dB nHL. Although ABR waves were identified in most cases, waveforms expression was variable with different electrode recording montages. It is suggested that if a clinician must choose one montage array for recording neonatal ABRs at high intensity levels for neurodiagnostic evaluations, the ipsilateral recording array is indicated since it displays the highest expression of wave components. For screening applications or threshold searching at lower stimulus levels, however, either the ipsilateral or vertical montage would be justified. Further, caution should be employed when interpreting ABR results in neonates recorded with unconventional montages due to the variable expression of wave components.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>9157175</pmid><doi>10.1016/0021-9924(95)00018-6</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9924 |
ispartof | Journal of communication disorders, 1996-03, Vol.29 (2), p.125-139 |
issn | 0021-9924 1873-7994 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78421545 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Audiometric Tests Auditory Brainstem Responses Auditory Evaluation Biological and medical sciences Disability Identification Ear and associated structures. Auditory pathways and centers. Hearing. Vocal organ. Phonation. Sound production. Echolocation Electrodes Evoked Brain Potentials Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Hearing (Physiology) Hearing Impairments Humans Infant, Newborn Neonates Screening Tests Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs |
title | Neonatal auditory brainstem responses recorded from four electrode montages |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T07%3A16%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neonatal%20auditory%20brainstem%20responses%20recorded%20from%20four%20electrode%20montages&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20communication%20disorders&rft.au=Stuart,%20Andrew&rft.date=1996-03-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=125&rft.epage=139&rft.pages=125-139&rft.issn=0021-9924&rft.eissn=1873-7994&rft.coden=JCDIAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0021-9924(95)00018-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E58305643%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=58305643&rft_id=info:pmid/9157175&rft_ericid=EJ522891&rft_els_id=0021992495000186&rfr_iscdi=true |