Reliability of the Manual Dynamic Mode of the Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment Work Simulator

Twelve Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment Work Simulators (BTEWS) were tested for consistency of resistance in the manual dynamic mode using a previously described timed weight-drop test. Fifty weight-drop measurements were made at five different weight levels: 5, 10, 20, 30, and 401b. Alterations in w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hand therapy 1996-07, Vol.9 (3), p.223-237
Hauptverfasser: Coleman, Edward F., Renfro, Rebecka R., Cetinok, Erhan M., Ewing Fess, Elaine, Shaar, Carl J., Dunipace, Kenneth R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 237
container_issue 3
container_start_page 223
container_title Journal of hand therapy
container_volume 9
creator Coleman, Edward F.
Renfro, Rebecka R.
Cetinok, Erhan M.
Ewing Fess, Elaine
Shaar, Carl J.
Dunipace, Kenneth R.
description Twelve Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment Work Simulators (BTEWS) were tested for consistency of resistance in the manual dynamic mode using a previously described timed weight-drop test. Fifty weight-drop measurements were made at five different weight levels: 5, 10, 20, 30, and 401b. Alterations in weight-drop times indicate changes in exercise-head resistance. Substantial resistance variation was found in the manual dynamic mode. With console resistance set consistently at 92% of applied weight, weight-drop times varied from failures of the weight to drop to times that were not recognized by the electronic timing system. Measurable weight-drop times ranged from 0.75 to 16.97 seconds. Ten Simulators had weight-drop times greater than ±3 standard deviations (SD) from the mean; eight Simulators had times ±4 SD from the mean; and four had times ±5 SD from the mean. Console printout data did not accurately reflect resistance produced by the exercise head. While intermachine correlations based on Simulator printout data ranged from +1.0 to +0.9906, correlations derived from resistance-based weight-drop times ranged from. +0.9866 to -0.9956. For a constant externally applied torque, the weightdrop times should have been constant but were not. Resistance produced in the manual dynamic mode is inconsistent, both within and between machines (p = 0.0001).
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0894-1130(96)80086-X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78416792</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S089411309680086X</els_id><sourcerecordid>78416792</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-7e2bbb562cf49f4665be656b2fc05305ac07ed84033f2e5cd31d6404f25215c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9P3DAQxS1URBfaj4CUU1UOgbFjO8mpKv-RQEjsVt0DkuU4E63bJF5sB2m_PVl22SunObz35s38CDmmcEqByrMpFCVPKc3gZylPCoBCpvM9MqGCixSAz7-Qyc7ylRyG8A-ACgb5ATkoCiGFLCbk-Qlbqyvb2rhKXJPEBSYPuh90m1yuet1Zkzy4Gj-kc91G2zmPyWyBXi9xiKPj6mWwyw77mPx1_n8ytd3Q6uj8N7Lf6Dbg9-08In-ur2YXt-n9483dxe_71LBcxDRHVlWVkMw0vGy4lKLC8bqKNQZEBkIbyLEuOGRZw1CYOqO15MAbJhgVhmVH5Mdm79K7lwFDVJ0NBttW9-iGoPKCU5mXa6PYGI13IXhs1NLbTvuVoqDWVNU7VbVGpkqp3qmq-Zg73hYMVYf1LrXFOOq_NjqOX75a9CoYi73B2no0UdXOftLwBgNHh5E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78416792</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability of the Manual Dynamic Mode of the Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment Work Simulator</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Coleman, Edward F. ; Renfro, Rebecka R. ; Cetinok, Erhan M. ; Ewing Fess, Elaine ; Shaar, Carl J. ; Dunipace, Kenneth R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Edward F. ; Renfro, Rebecka R. ; Cetinok, Erhan M. ; Ewing Fess, Elaine ; Shaar, Carl J. ; Dunipace, Kenneth R.</creatorcontrib><description>Twelve Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment Work Simulators (BTEWS) were tested for consistency of resistance in the manual dynamic mode using a previously described timed weight-drop test. Fifty weight-drop measurements were made at five different weight levels: 5, 10, 20, 30, and 401b. Alterations in weight-drop times indicate changes in exercise-head resistance. Substantial resistance variation was found in the manual dynamic mode. With console resistance set consistently at 92% of applied weight, weight-drop times varied from failures of the weight to drop to times that were not recognized by the electronic timing system. Measurable weight-drop times ranged from 0.75 to 16.97 seconds. Ten Simulators had weight-drop times greater than ±3 standard deviations (SD) from the mean; eight Simulators had times ±4 SD from the mean; and four had times ±5 SD from the mean. Console printout data did not accurately reflect resistance produced by the exercise head. While intermachine correlations based on Simulator printout data ranged from +1.0 to +0.9906, correlations derived from resistance-based weight-drop times ranged from. +0.9866 to -0.9956. For a constant externally applied torque, the weightdrop times should have been constant but were not. Resistance produced in the manual dynamic mode is inconsistent, both within and between machines (p = 0.0001).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-1130</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-004X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0894-1130(96)80086-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8856568</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Hand - physiology ; Humans ; Occupational Therapy - instrumentation ; Physical Therapy Modalities - instrumentation ; Reproducibility of Results ; Statistics as Topic</subject><ispartof>Journal of hand therapy, 1996-07, Vol.9 (3), p.223-237</ispartof><rights>1996 Hanley &amp; Belfus, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-7e2bbb562cf49f4665be656b2fc05305ac07ed84033f2e5cd31d6404f25215c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-7e2bbb562cf49f4665be656b2fc05305ac07ed84033f2e5cd31d6404f25215c23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0894-1130(96)80086-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8856568$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Edward F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renfro, Rebecka R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cetinok, Erhan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewing Fess, Elaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaar, Carl J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunipace, Kenneth R.</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability of the Manual Dynamic Mode of the Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment Work Simulator</title><title>Journal of hand therapy</title><addtitle>J Hand Ther</addtitle><description>Twelve Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment Work Simulators (BTEWS) were tested for consistency of resistance in the manual dynamic mode using a previously described timed weight-drop test. Fifty weight-drop measurements were made at five different weight levels: 5, 10, 20, 30, and 401b. Alterations in weight-drop times indicate changes in exercise-head resistance. Substantial resistance variation was found in the manual dynamic mode. With console resistance set consistently at 92% of applied weight, weight-drop times varied from failures of the weight to drop to times that were not recognized by the electronic timing system. Measurable weight-drop times ranged from 0.75 to 16.97 seconds. Ten Simulators had weight-drop times greater than ±3 standard deviations (SD) from the mean; eight Simulators had times ±4 SD from the mean; and four had times ±5 SD from the mean. Console printout data did not accurately reflect resistance produced by the exercise head. While intermachine correlations based on Simulator printout data ranged from +1.0 to +0.9906, correlations derived from resistance-based weight-drop times ranged from. +0.9866 to -0.9956. For a constant externally applied torque, the weightdrop times should have been constant but were not. Resistance produced in the manual dynamic mode is inconsistent, both within and between machines (p = 0.0001).</description><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Hand - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Occupational Therapy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Physical Therapy Modalities - instrumentation</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Statistics as Topic</subject><issn>0894-1130</issn><issn>1545-004X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE9P3DAQxS1URBfaj4CUU1UOgbFjO8mpKv-RQEjsVt0DkuU4E63bJF5sB2m_PVl22SunObz35s38CDmmcEqByrMpFCVPKc3gZylPCoBCpvM9MqGCixSAz7-Qyc7ylRyG8A-ACgb5ATkoCiGFLCbk-Qlbqyvb2rhKXJPEBSYPuh90m1yuet1Zkzy4Gj-kc91G2zmPyWyBXi9xiKPj6mWwyw77mPx1_n8ytd3Q6uj8N7Lf6Dbg9-08In-ur2YXt-n9483dxe_71LBcxDRHVlWVkMw0vGy4lKLC8bqKNQZEBkIbyLEuOGRZw1CYOqO15MAbJhgVhmVH5Mdm79K7lwFDVJ0NBttW9-iGoPKCU5mXa6PYGI13IXhs1NLbTvuVoqDWVNU7VbVGpkqp3qmq-Zg73hYMVYf1LrXFOOq_NjqOX75a9CoYi73B2no0UdXOftLwBgNHh5E</recordid><startdate>199607</startdate><enddate>199607</enddate><creator>Coleman, Edward F.</creator><creator>Renfro, Rebecka R.</creator><creator>Cetinok, Erhan M.</creator><creator>Ewing Fess, Elaine</creator><creator>Shaar, Carl J.</creator><creator>Dunipace, Kenneth R.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199607</creationdate><title>Reliability of the Manual Dynamic Mode of the Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment Work Simulator</title><author>Coleman, Edward F. ; Renfro, Rebecka R. ; Cetinok, Erhan M. ; Ewing Fess, Elaine ; Shaar, Carl J. ; Dunipace, Kenneth R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-7e2bbb562cf49f4665be656b2fc05305ac07ed84033f2e5cd31d6404f25215c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Hand - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Occupational Therapy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Physical Therapy Modalities - instrumentation</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Statistics as Topic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Edward F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renfro, Rebecka R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cetinok, Erhan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewing Fess, Elaine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaar, Carl J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunipace, Kenneth R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of hand therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Coleman, Edward F.</au><au>Renfro, Rebecka R.</au><au>Cetinok, Erhan M.</au><au>Ewing Fess, Elaine</au><au>Shaar, Carl J.</au><au>Dunipace, Kenneth R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability of the Manual Dynamic Mode of the Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment Work Simulator</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hand therapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Hand Ther</addtitle><date>1996-07</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>223</spage><epage>237</epage><pages>223-237</pages><issn>0894-1130</issn><eissn>1545-004X</eissn><abstract>Twelve Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment Work Simulators (BTEWS) were tested for consistency of resistance in the manual dynamic mode using a previously described timed weight-drop test. Fifty weight-drop measurements were made at five different weight levels: 5, 10, 20, 30, and 401b. Alterations in weight-drop times indicate changes in exercise-head resistance. Substantial resistance variation was found in the manual dynamic mode. With console resistance set consistently at 92% of applied weight, weight-drop times varied from failures of the weight to drop to times that were not recognized by the electronic timing system. Measurable weight-drop times ranged from 0.75 to 16.97 seconds. Ten Simulators had weight-drop times greater than ±3 standard deviations (SD) from the mean; eight Simulators had times ±4 SD from the mean; and four had times ±5 SD from the mean. Console printout data did not accurately reflect resistance produced by the exercise head. While intermachine correlations based on Simulator printout data ranged from +1.0 to +0.9906, correlations derived from resistance-based weight-drop times ranged from. +0.9866 to -0.9956. For a constant externally applied torque, the weightdrop times should have been constant but were not. Resistance produced in the manual dynamic mode is inconsistent, both within and between machines (p = 0.0001).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>8856568</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0894-1130(96)80086-X</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0894-1130
ispartof Journal of hand therapy, 1996-07, Vol.9 (3), p.223-237
issn 0894-1130
1545-004X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78416792
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Evaluation Studies as Topic
Hand - physiology
Humans
Occupational Therapy - instrumentation
Physical Therapy Modalities - instrumentation
Reproducibility of Results
Statistics as Topic
title Reliability of the Manual Dynamic Mode of the Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment Work Simulator
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T12%3A34%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20of%20the%20Manual%20Dynamic%20Mode%20of%20the%20Baltimore%20Therapeutic%20Equipment%20Work%20Simulator&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hand%20therapy&rft.au=Coleman,%20Edward%20F.&rft.date=1996-07&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=237&rft.pages=223-237&rft.issn=0894-1130&rft.eissn=1545-004X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0894-1130(96)80086-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78416792%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78416792&rft_id=info:pmid/8856568&rft_els_id=S089411309680086X&rfr_iscdi=true