SEROLOGIC RESPONSE TO ORAL POLIO VACCINE AND ENHANCED-POTENCY INACTIVATED POLIO VACCINES
In a randomized, controlled trial carried out from November 1980 to July 1983 involving 1,114 infants in Baltimore City and in Baltimore and Prince George's counties, Maryland, the serologic response to three doses of two enhanced-potency inactivated polio vaccines was compared with the respons...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of epidemiology 1988-09, Vol.128 (3), p.615-628 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 628 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 615 |
container_title | American journal of epidemiology |
container_volume | 128 |
creator | McBEAN, A. MARSHALL THOMS, MARY LOU ALBRECHT, PAUL CUTHIE, JUDITH C. BERNIER, ROGER |
description | In a randomized, controlled trial carried out from November 1980 to July 1983 involving 1,114 infants in Baltimore City and in Baltimore and Prince George's counties, Maryland, the serologic response to three doses of two enhanced-potency inactivated polio vaccines was compared with the response to three doses of oral polio vaccine. The mean ages at vaccination were 2.2, 4.7, and 19.9 months, respectively, for the three doses. Seroconversion after the first dose varied from 35% to 84%, and it was higher after oral polio vaccine than after either of the enhanced-potency inactivated polio vaccines for polioviruses types 2 and 3. Approximately two and one-half and 16 months after the second dose, almost all inactivated polio vaccine recipients had antibodies against all three virus types (98–100%). Fewer oral polio vaccine recipients had detectable antibodies to type 1 (89–92%) and to type 3 (96%). After three doses of vaccine, all children had antibodies against types 2 and 3. Approximately 1% of the inactivated polio vaccine recipients and 3% of the oral polio vaccine recipients lacked antibody to type 1. One or two doses of oral polio vaccine stimulated higher reciprocal geometric mean antibody titers against type 2 poliovirus than did the inactivated polio vaccine. For the other two types, the results were mixed. The third dose of inactivated polio vaccine produced significant increases in the reciprocal geometric mean titers against each of the three poliovirus types and resulted in significantly higher reciprocal geometric mean titers after three doses of vaccine for recipients of inactivated polio vaccine than for recipients of oral polio vaccine. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78395225</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15159091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-b7d4c7f9e3088559289c0a3bbcb290df150902177935adf0cf4fe250a1477b6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcGO0zAQhi0EWsrCIyBFgLiljO3YjrlFaZYGVUnVhKVwsZzEkVraZrFbafftMTRUWi6c5vB_45nxh9AbDFMMkn4Y7vvBdtvhZA9656Z6a6YaYwYgn6AJjgQPOWH8KZoAAAkl4eQ5euHcFgBjyeAKXZE4okDlBK2rbFUuyk95GqyyalkWVRbUZVCukkWwLBd5GdwmaZoXWZAUsyAr5kmRZrNwWdZZkX4L8iJJ6_w2qbPZY7x6iZ71fjnzaqzX6MtNVqfz8M-wZBG2UQTHsBFd1IpeGgpxzJgksWxB06ZpGyKh6_1VEggWQlKmux7aPuoNYaD9maLhhl6j9-d37-zw82TcUe03rjW7nT6Y4eSUiKlkhLD_gphhJkFiD779B_z70wpT4JxRAeCpj2eqtYNz1vTqzm722j4oDOq3JfXYkvKW1GjJN78eR5yavekuraMWn78bc-1aveutPrQbd8F4THksucfCM7ZxR3N_ibX9obiggqn5-rtaA5t9XlVL9ZX-AuuvpvU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1306653700</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SEROLOGIC RESPONSE TO ORAL POLIO VACCINE AND ENHANCED-POTENCY INACTIVATED POLIO VACCINES</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>McBEAN, A. MARSHALL ; THOMS, MARY LOU ; ALBRECHT, PAUL ; CUTHIE, JUDITH C. ; BERNIER, ROGER</creator><creatorcontrib>McBEAN, A. MARSHALL ; THOMS, MARY LOU ; ALBRECHT, PAUL ; CUTHIE, JUDITH C. ; BERNIER, ROGER ; THE FIELD STAFF AND COORDINATING COMMITTEE</creatorcontrib><description>In a randomized, controlled trial carried out from November 1980 to July 1983 involving 1,114 infants in Baltimore City and in Baltimore and Prince George's counties, Maryland, the serologic response to three doses of two enhanced-potency inactivated polio vaccines was compared with the response to three doses of oral polio vaccine. The mean ages at vaccination were 2.2, 4.7, and 19.9 months, respectively, for the three doses. Seroconversion after the first dose varied from 35% to 84%, and it was higher after oral polio vaccine than after either of the enhanced-potency inactivated polio vaccines for polioviruses types 2 and 3. Approximately two and one-half and 16 months after the second dose, almost all inactivated polio vaccine recipients had antibodies against all three virus types (98–100%). Fewer oral polio vaccine recipients had detectable antibodies to type 1 (89–92%) and to type 3 (96%). After three doses of vaccine, all children had antibodies against types 2 and 3. Approximately 1% of the inactivated polio vaccine recipients and 3% of the oral polio vaccine recipients lacked antibody to type 1. One or two doses of oral polio vaccine stimulated higher reciprocal geometric mean antibody titers against type 2 poliovirus than did the inactivated polio vaccine. For the other two types, the results were mixed. The third dose of inactivated polio vaccine produced significant increases in the reciprocal geometric mean titers against each of the three poliovirus types and resulted in significantly higher reciprocal geometric mean titers after three doses of vaccine for recipients of inactivated polio vaccine than for recipients of oral polio vaccine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-6256</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2843039</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJEPAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cary, NC: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Antibodies, Viral - analysis ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Infant ; Microbiology ; poliomyelitis ; Poliomyelitis - immunology ; poliovirus ; Poliovirus - immunology ; poliovirus vaccine ; Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated - administration & dosage ; Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated - adverse effects ; Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated - immunology ; Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral - administration & dosage ; Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral - adverse effects ; Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral - immunology ; Random Allocation ; serology ; Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies ; Vaccines, Attenuated ; Virology</subject><ispartof>American journal of epidemiology, 1988-09, Vol.128 (3), p.615-628</ispartof><rights>1990 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-b7d4c7f9e3088559289c0a3bbcb290df150902177935adf0cf4fe250a1477b6e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27868,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=6836896$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2843039$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McBEAN, A. MARSHALL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THOMS, MARY LOU</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALBRECHT, PAUL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CUTHIE, JUDITH C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BERNIER, ROGER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THE FIELD STAFF AND COORDINATING COMMITTEE</creatorcontrib><title>SEROLOGIC RESPONSE TO ORAL POLIO VACCINE AND ENHANCED-POTENCY INACTIVATED POLIO VACCINES</title><title>American journal of epidemiology</title><addtitle>Am J Epidemiol</addtitle><description>In a randomized, controlled trial carried out from November 1980 to July 1983 involving 1,114 infants in Baltimore City and in Baltimore and Prince George's counties, Maryland, the serologic response to three doses of two enhanced-potency inactivated polio vaccines was compared with the response to three doses of oral polio vaccine. The mean ages at vaccination were 2.2, 4.7, and 19.9 months, respectively, for the three doses. Seroconversion after the first dose varied from 35% to 84%, and it was higher after oral polio vaccine than after either of the enhanced-potency inactivated polio vaccines for polioviruses types 2 and 3. Approximately two and one-half and 16 months after the second dose, almost all inactivated polio vaccine recipients had antibodies against all three virus types (98–100%). Fewer oral polio vaccine recipients had detectable antibodies to type 1 (89–92%) and to type 3 (96%). After three doses of vaccine, all children had antibodies against types 2 and 3. Approximately 1% of the inactivated polio vaccine recipients and 3% of the oral polio vaccine recipients lacked antibody to type 1. One or two doses of oral polio vaccine stimulated higher reciprocal geometric mean antibody titers against type 2 poliovirus than did the inactivated polio vaccine. For the other two types, the results were mixed. The third dose of inactivated polio vaccine produced significant increases in the reciprocal geometric mean titers against each of the three poliovirus types and resulted in significantly higher reciprocal geometric mean titers after three doses of vaccine for recipients of inactivated polio vaccine than for recipients of oral polio vaccine.</description><subject>Antibodies, Viral - analysis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>poliomyelitis</subject><subject>Poliomyelitis - immunology</subject><subject>poliovirus</subject><subject>Poliovirus - immunology</subject><subject>poliovirus vaccine</subject><subject>Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated - adverse effects</subject><subject>Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated - immunology</subject><subject>Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral - adverse effects</subject><subject>Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral - immunology</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>serology</subject><subject>Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Vaccines, Attenuated</subject><subject>Virology</subject><issn>0002-9262</issn><issn>1476-6256</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcGO0zAQhi0EWsrCIyBFgLiljO3YjrlFaZYGVUnVhKVwsZzEkVraZrFbafftMTRUWi6c5vB_45nxh9AbDFMMkn4Y7vvBdtvhZA9656Z6a6YaYwYgn6AJjgQPOWH8KZoAAAkl4eQ5euHcFgBjyeAKXZE4okDlBK2rbFUuyk95GqyyalkWVRbUZVCukkWwLBd5GdwmaZoXWZAUsyAr5kmRZrNwWdZZkX4L8iJJ6_w2qbPZY7x6iZ71fjnzaqzX6MtNVqfz8M-wZBG2UQTHsBFd1IpeGgpxzJgksWxB06ZpGyKh6_1VEggWQlKmux7aPuoNYaD9maLhhl6j9-d37-zw82TcUe03rjW7nT6Y4eSUiKlkhLD_gphhJkFiD779B_z70wpT4JxRAeCpj2eqtYNz1vTqzm722j4oDOq3JfXYkvKW1GjJN78eR5yavekuraMWn78bc-1aveutPrQbd8F4THksucfCM7ZxR3N_ibX9obiggqn5-rtaA5t9XlVL9ZX-AuuvpvU</recordid><startdate>19880901</startdate><enddate>19880901</enddate><creator>McBEAN, A. MARSHALL</creator><creator>THOMS, MARY LOU</creator><creator>ALBRECHT, PAUL</creator><creator>CUTHIE, JUDITH C.</creator><creator>BERNIER, ROGER</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>School of Hygiene and Public Health of the Johns Hopkins University</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HVZBN</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19880901</creationdate><title>SEROLOGIC RESPONSE TO ORAL POLIO VACCINE AND ENHANCED-POTENCY INACTIVATED POLIO VACCINES</title><author>McBEAN, A. MARSHALL ; THOMS, MARY LOU ; ALBRECHT, PAUL ; CUTHIE, JUDITH C. ; BERNIER, ROGER</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-b7d4c7f9e3088559289c0a3bbcb290df150902177935adf0cf4fe250a1477b6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Antibodies, Viral - analysis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>poliomyelitis</topic><topic>Poliomyelitis - immunology</topic><topic>poliovirus</topic><topic>Poliovirus - immunology</topic><topic>poliovirus vaccine</topic><topic>Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated - adverse effects</topic><topic>Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated - immunology</topic><topic>Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral - adverse effects</topic><topic>Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral - immunology</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>serology</topic><topic>Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Vaccines, Attenuated</topic><topic>Virology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McBEAN, A. MARSHALL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THOMS, MARY LOU</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALBRECHT, PAUL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CUTHIE, JUDITH C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BERNIER, ROGER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THE FIELD STAFF AND COORDINATING COMMITTEE</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 24</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McBEAN, A. MARSHALL</au><au>THOMS, MARY LOU</au><au>ALBRECHT, PAUL</au><au>CUTHIE, JUDITH C.</au><au>BERNIER, ROGER</au><aucorp>THE FIELD STAFF AND COORDINATING COMMITTEE</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SEROLOGIC RESPONSE TO ORAL POLIO VACCINE AND ENHANCED-POTENCY INACTIVATED POLIO VACCINES</atitle><jtitle>American journal of epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Epidemiol</addtitle><date>1988-09-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>615</spage><epage>628</epage><pages>615-628</pages><issn>0002-9262</issn><eissn>1476-6256</eissn><coden>AJEPAS</coden><abstract>In a randomized, controlled trial carried out from November 1980 to July 1983 involving 1,114 infants in Baltimore City and in Baltimore and Prince George's counties, Maryland, the serologic response to three doses of two enhanced-potency inactivated polio vaccines was compared with the response to three doses of oral polio vaccine. The mean ages at vaccination were 2.2, 4.7, and 19.9 months, respectively, for the three doses. Seroconversion after the first dose varied from 35% to 84%, and it was higher after oral polio vaccine than after either of the enhanced-potency inactivated polio vaccines for polioviruses types 2 and 3. Approximately two and one-half and 16 months after the second dose, almost all inactivated polio vaccine recipients had antibodies against all three virus types (98–100%). Fewer oral polio vaccine recipients had detectable antibodies to type 1 (89–92%) and to type 3 (96%). After three doses of vaccine, all children had antibodies against types 2 and 3. Approximately 1% of the inactivated polio vaccine recipients and 3% of the oral polio vaccine recipients lacked antibody to type 1. One or two doses of oral polio vaccine stimulated higher reciprocal geometric mean antibody titers against type 2 poliovirus than did the inactivated polio vaccine. For the other two types, the results were mixed. The third dose of inactivated polio vaccine produced significant increases in the reciprocal geometric mean titers against each of the three poliovirus types and resulted in significantly higher reciprocal geometric mean titers after three doses of vaccine for recipients of inactivated polio vaccine than for recipients of oral polio vaccine.</abstract><cop>Cary, NC</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>2843039</pmid><doi>10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115009</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9262 |
ispartof | American journal of epidemiology, 1988-09, Vol.128 (3), p.615-628 |
issn | 0002-9262 1476-6256 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78395225 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy; Periodicals Index Online |
subjects | Antibodies, Viral - analysis Biological and medical sciences Clinical Trials as Topic Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Infant Microbiology poliomyelitis Poliomyelitis - immunology poliovirus Poliovirus - immunology poliovirus vaccine Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated - administration & dosage Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated - adverse effects Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated - immunology Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral - administration & dosage Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral - adverse effects Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral - immunology Random Allocation serology Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies Vaccines, Attenuated Virology |
title | SEROLOGIC RESPONSE TO ORAL POLIO VACCINE AND ENHANCED-POTENCY INACTIVATED POLIO VACCINES |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T07%3A15%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SEROLOGIC%20RESPONSE%20TO%20ORAL%20POLIO%20VACCINE%20AND%20ENHANCED-POTENCY%20INACTIVATED%20POLIO%20VACCINES&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20epidemiology&rft.au=McBEAN,%20A.%20MARSHALL&rft.aucorp=THE%20FIELD%20STAFF%20AND%20COORDINATING%20COMMITTEE&rft.date=1988-09-01&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=615&rft.epage=628&rft.pages=615-628&rft.issn=0002-9262&rft.eissn=1476-6256&rft.coden=AJEPAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E15159091%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1306653700&rft_id=info:pmid/2843039&rfr_iscdi=true |