Appropriateness of Carotid Endarterectomy
To the Editor: Studies such as those reported by Winslow et al. (March 24 issue)* contain valuable data that are likely to influence future management. However, they may also prove to be hazardous if used as definitive guidelines by government agencies, third-party insurance organizations, or worse,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 1988-09, Vol.319 (11), p.724-725 |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 725 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 724 |
container_title | The New England journal of medicine |
container_volume | 319 |
description | To the Editor:
Studies such as those reported by Winslow et al. (March 24 issue)* contain valuable data that are likely to influence future management. However, they may also prove to be hazardous if used as definitive guidelines by government agencies, third-party insurance organizations, or worse, the legal profession.
The "inappropriateness" of any treatment strategy depends on how arbitrarily the "appropriate" criteria are established, and these are clearly subject to tremendous bias, in spite of the appearance of non-bias. Therefore, the inappropriateness becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. For instance, how are the authors so certain that surgery is always inappropriate for . . .
No extract is available for articles shorter than 400 words. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1056/NEJM198809153191115 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78384337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78384337</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-98e95118f1107ea0352ea1fa9ebdaf863a48fcb6b18e60618b6e13cbb537f5273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LAzEQDaLUWv0FIvQkiKxmdrLZ5FhK_aLqRc8h2Z1AS7Nbk-2h_75bWjyJc5mB98Gbx9g18AfghXz8mL29g1aKaygQNAAUJ2zY35gJweUpG3Keq0yUGs_ZRUpL3g8IPWADFJCjxiG7m6zXsV3Hhe2ooZTGrR9PbWy7RT2eNbWNHUWqujZsL9mZt6tEV8c9Yt9Ps6_pSzb_fH6dTuZZlSvZZVqRLgCUB-AlWY5FTha81eRq65VEK5SvnHSgSHIJykkCrJwrsPRFXuKI3R58-1w_G0qdCYtU0WplG2o3yZQKlUDcE_FArGKbUiRv-jeCjVsD3OwLMn8U1KtujvYbF6j-1Rwb6fH7Ax5CMg0tw79uO4xaa_o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78384337</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Appropriateness of Carotid Endarterectomy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><description>To the Editor:
Studies such as those reported by Winslow et al. (March 24 issue)* contain valuable data that are likely to influence future management. However, they may also prove to be hazardous if used as definitive guidelines by government agencies, third-party insurance organizations, or worse, the legal profession.
The "inappropriateness" of any treatment strategy depends on how arbitrarily the "appropriate" criteria are established, and these are clearly subject to tremendous bias, in spite of the appearance of non-bias. Therefore, the inappropriateness becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. For instance, how are the authors so certain that surgery is always inappropriate for . . .
No extract is available for articles shorter than 400 words.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-4793</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198809153191115</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3412393</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Massachusetts Medical Society</publisher><subject>Carotid Arteries - surgery ; Endarterectomy ; Health Status ; Humans</subject><ispartof>The New England journal of medicine, 1988-09, Vol.319 (11), p.724-725</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-98e95118f1107ea0352ea1fa9ebdaf863a48fcb6b18e60618b6e13cbb537f5273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,64387</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3412393$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><title>Appropriateness of Carotid Endarterectomy</title><title>The New England journal of medicine</title><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><description>To the Editor:
Studies such as those reported by Winslow et al. (March 24 issue)* contain valuable data that are likely to influence future management. However, they may also prove to be hazardous if used as definitive guidelines by government agencies, third-party insurance organizations, or worse, the legal profession.
The "inappropriateness" of any treatment strategy depends on how arbitrarily the "appropriate" criteria are established, and these are clearly subject to tremendous bias, in spite of the appearance of non-bias. Therefore, the inappropriateness becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. For instance, how are the authors so certain that surgery is always inappropriate for . . .
No extract is available for articles shorter than 400 words.</description><subject>Carotid Arteries - surgery</subject><subject>Endarterectomy</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><issn>0028-4793</issn><issn>1533-4406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UE1LAzEQDaLUWv0FIvQkiKxmdrLZ5FhK_aLqRc8h2Z1AS7Nbk-2h_75bWjyJc5mB98Gbx9g18AfghXz8mL29g1aKaygQNAAUJ2zY35gJweUpG3Keq0yUGs_ZRUpL3g8IPWADFJCjxiG7m6zXsV3Hhe2ooZTGrR9PbWy7RT2eNbWNHUWqujZsL9mZt6tEV8c9Yt9Ps6_pSzb_fH6dTuZZlSvZZVqRLgCUB-AlWY5FTha81eRq65VEK5SvnHSgSHIJykkCrJwrsPRFXuKI3R58-1w_G0qdCYtU0WplG2o3yZQKlUDcE_FArGKbUiRv-jeCjVsD3OwLMn8U1KtujvYbF6j-1Rwb6fH7Ax5CMg0tw79uO4xaa_o</recordid><startdate>19880915</startdate><enddate>19880915</enddate><general>Massachusetts Medical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19880915</creationdate><title>Appropriateness of Carotid Endarterectomy</title></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-98e95118f1107ea0352ea1fa9ebdaf863a48fcb6b18e60618b6e13cbb537f5273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Carotid Arteries - surgery</topic><topic>Endarterectomy</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Appropriateness of Carotid Endarterectomy</atitle><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><date>1988-09-15</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>319</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>724</spage><epage>725</epage><pages>724-725</pages><issn>0028-4793</issn><eissn>1533-4406</eissn><abstract>To the Editor:
Studies such as those reported by Winslow et al. (March 24 issue)* contain valuable data that are likely to influence future management. However, they may also prove to be hazardous if used as definitive guidelines by government agencies, third-party insurance organizations, or worse, the legal profession.
The "inappropriateness" of any treatment strategy depends on how arbitrarily the "appropriate" criteria are established, and these are clearly subject to tremendous bias, in spite of the appearance of non-bias. Therefore, the inappropriateness becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. For instance, how are the authors so certain that surgery is always inappropriate for . . .
No extract is available for articles shorter than 400 words.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Massachusetts Medical Society</pub><pmid>3412393</pmid><doi>10.1056/NEJM198809153191115</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-4793 |
ispartof | The New England journal of medicine, 1988-09, Vol.319 (11), p.724-725 |
issn | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78384337 |
source | MEDLINE; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Carotid Arteries - surgery Endarterectomy Health Status Humans |
title | Appropriateness of Carotid Endarterectomy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T05%3A00%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Appropriateness%20of%20Carotid%20Endarterectomy&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20England%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.date=1988-09-15&rft.volume=319&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=724&rft.epage=725&rft.pages=724-725&rft.issn=0028-4793&rft.eissn=1533-4406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1056/NEJM198809153191115&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78384337%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78384337&rft_id=info:pmid/3412393&rfr_iscdi=true |