Appropriateness of Carotid Endarterectomy

To the Editor: Studies such as those reported by Winslow et al. (March 24 issue)* contain valuable data that are likely to influence future management. However, they may also prove to be hazardous if used as definitive guidelines by government agencies, third-party insurance organizations, or worse,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 1988-09, Vol.319 (11), p.724-725
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 725
container_issue 11
container_start_page 724
container_title The New England journal of medicine
container_volume 319
description To the Editor: Studies such as those reported by Winslow et al. (March 24 issue)* contain valuable data that are likely to influence future management. However, they may also prove to be hazardous if used as definitive guidelines by government agencies, third-party insurance organizations, or worse, the legal profession. The "inappropriateness" of any treatment strategy depends on how arbitrarily the "appropriate" criteria are established, and these are clearly subject to tremendous bias, in spite of the appearance of non-bias. Therefore, the inappropriateness becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. For instance, how are the authors so certain that surgery is always inappropriate for . . . No extract is available for articles shorter than 400 words.
doi_str_mv 10.1056/NEJM198809153191115
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78384337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78384337</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-98e95118f1107ea0352ea1fa9ebdaf863a48fcb6b18e60618b6e13cbb537f5273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LAzEQDaLUWv0FIvQkiKxmdrLZ5FhK_aLqRc8h2Z1AS7Nbk-2h_75bWjyJc5mB98Gbx9g18AfghXz8mL29g1aKaygQNAAUJ2zY35gJweUpG3Keq0yUGs_ZRUpL3g8IPWADFJCjxiG7m6zXsV3Hhe2ooZTGrR9PbWy7RT2eNbWNHUWqujZsL9mZt6tEV8c9Yt9Ps6_pSzb_fH6dTuZZlSvZZVqRLgCUB-AlWY5FTha81eRq65VEK5SvnHSgSHIJykkCrJwrsPRFXuKI3R58-1w_G0qdCYtU0WplG2o3yZQKlUDcE_FArGKbUiRv-jeCjVsD3OwLMn8U1KtujvYbF6j-1Rwb6fH7Ax5CMg0tw79uO4xaa_o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78384337</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Appropriateness of Carotid Endarterectomy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><description>To the Editor: Studies such as those reported by Winslow et al. (March 24 issue)* contain valuable data that are likely to influence future management. However, they may also prove to be hazardous if used as definitive guidelines by government agencies, third-party insurance organizations, or worse, the legal profession. The "inappropriateness" of any treatment strategy depends on how arbitrarily the "appropriate" criteria are established, and these are clearly subject to tremendous bias, in spite of the appearance of non-bias. Therefore, the inappropriateness becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. For instance, how are the authors so certain that surgery is always inappropriate for . . . No extract is available for articles shorter than 400 words.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-4793</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198809153191115</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3412393</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Massachusetts Medical Society</publisher><subject>Carotid Arteries - surgery ; Endarterectomy ; Health Status ; Humans</subject><ispartof>The New England journal of medicine, 1988-09, Vol.319 (11), p.724-725</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-98e95118f1107ea0352ea1fa9ebdaf863a48fcb6b18e60618b6e13cbb537f5273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,64387</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3412393$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><title>Appropriateness of Carotid Endarterectomy</title><title>The New England journal of medicine</title><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><description>To the Editor: Studies such as those reported by Winslow et al. (March 24 issue)* contain valuable data that are likely to influence future management. However, they may also prove to be hazardous if used as definitive guidelines by government agencies, third-party insurance organizations, or worse, the legal profession. The "inappropriateness" of any treatment strategy depends on how arbitrarily the "appropriate" criteria are established, and these are clearly subject to tremendous bias, in spite of the appearance of non-bias. Therefore, the inappropriateness becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. For instance, how are the authors so certain that surgery is always inappropriate for . . . No extract is available for articles shorter than 400 words.</description><subject>Carotid Arteries - surgery</subject><subject>Endarterectomy</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><issn>0028-4793</issn><issn>1533-4406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UE1LAzEQDaLUWv0FIvQkiKxmdrLZ5FhK_aLqRc8h2Z1AS7Nbk-2h_75bWjyJc5mB98Gbx9g18AfghXz8mL29g1aKaygQNAAUJ2zY35gJweUpG3Keq0yUGs_ZRUpL3g8IPWADFJCjxiG7m6zXsV3Hhe2ooZTGrR9PbWy7RT2eNbWNHUWqujZsL9mZt6tEV8c9Yt9Ps6_pSzb_fH6dTuZZlSvZZVqRLgCUB-AlWY5FTha81eRq65VEK5SvnHSgSHIJykkCrJwrsPRFXuKI3R58-1w_G0qdCYtU0WplG2o3yZQKlUDcE_FArGKbUiRv-jeCjVsD3OwLMn8U1KtujvYbF6j-1Rwb6fH7Ax5CMg0tw79uO4xaa_o</recordid><startdate>19880915</startdate><enddate>19880915</enddate><general>Massachusetts Medical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19880915</creationdate><title>Appropriateness of Carotid Endarterectomy</title></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-98e95118f1107ea0352ea1fa9ebdaf863a48fcb6b18e60618b6e13cbb537f5273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Carotid Arteries - surgery</topic><topic>Endarterectomy</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Appropriateness of Carotid Endarterectomy</atitle><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><date>1988-09-15</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>319</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>724</spage><epage>725</epage><pages>724-725</pages><issn>0028-4793</issn><eissn>1533-4406</eissn><abstract>To the Editor: Studies such as those reported by Winslow et al. (March 24 issue)* contain valuable data that are likely to influence future management. However, they may also prove to be hazardous if used as definitive guidelines by government agencies, third-party insurance organizations, or worse, the legal profession. The "inappropriateness" of any treatment strategy depends on how arbitrarily the "appropriate" criteria are established, and these are clearly subject to tremendous bias, in spite of the appearance of non-bias. Therefore, the inappropriateness becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. For instance, how are the authors so certain that surgery is always inappropriate for . . . No extract is available for articles shorter than 400 words.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Massachusetts Medical Society</pub><pmid>3412393</pmid><doi>10.1056/NEJM198809153191115</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-4793
ispartof The New England journal of medicine, 1988-09, Vol.319 (11), p.724-725
issn 0028-4793
1533-4406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78384337
source MEDLINE; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Carotid Arteries - surgery
Endarterectomy
Health Status
Humans
title Appropriateness of Carotid Endarterectomy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T05%3A00%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Appropriateness%20of%20Carotid%20Endarterectomy&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20England%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.date=1988-09-15&rft.volume=319&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=724&rft.epage=725&rft.pages=724-725&rft.issn=0028-4793&rft.eissn=1533-4406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1056/NEJM198809153191115&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78384337%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78384337&rft_id=info:pmid/3412393&rfr_iscdi=true