Laboratory Diagnosis of Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Facilities Within the United States: Results of a National Survey
Background and Objectives: The diagnosis of many sexually transmitted diseases (STD) requires laboratory testing. The authors assessed the effects of the introduction of new tests and regulations on STD testing. Study Design: A questionnaire survey was mailed to a random sample of facilities listed...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sexually transmitted diseases 1996-07, Vol.23 (4), p.342-349 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 349 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 342 |
container_title | Sexually transmitted diseases |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | BECK-SAGUE, CONSUELO M. CORDTS, JEROME R. BROWN, KIMBERLY LARSEN, SANDRA A. BLACK, CAROLYN M. KNAPP, JOAN S. RIDDERHOF, JOHN C. BARNES, FRANKIE G. MORSE, STEPHEN A. |
description | Background and Objectives: The diagnosis of many sexually transmitted diseases (STD) requires laboratory testing. The authors assessed the effects of the introduction of new tests and regulations on STD testing. Study Design: A questionnaire survey was mailed to a random sample of facilities listed in the STD Referral Database inquiring about tests offered, changes in testing, and reasons for changes. Results: Responses from 405 facilities were analyzed. Most responding facilities collected specimens for nontreponemal tests for syphilis (352 of 405 [86.9%]). Since each facility's information was last updated, the number reporting testing for Chlamydia trachomatis rose from 160 of 405 (39.5%) to 288 of 405 (71.1%), but testing for gonorrhea and chancroid decreased (365 of 405 [90.1%] to 328 of 405 [81%], and 182 of 405 [44.9%] to 32 of 405 [7.9%], respectively). Of 364 responses to a question on changes in tests performed in the last 2 years, 249 (68.4%) reported no change, 81 (22.3%) reported an increase, and 37 (10.2%) reported a decrease. The most frequently added tests were nonculture tests for C. trachomatis (34 of 81 [42%]), and the most frequent reason for adding tests was targeted funding (25 of 81 [30.9%]). The most frequently discontinued tests were cultures and gram stains for gonorrhea (15 of 37 [40.5%]) and other in-house tests (9 of 37 [24.3%]). Most facilities that discontinued testing cited the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act as the reason (34 of 37 [91.9%]; 95% confidence interval = 78.1%, 98.3%). Conclusions: The number of facilities testing for C. trachomatis has increased with funding and with the availability of non culture tests, but the number of those testing for chancroid and gonorrhea has decreased. Implementation of the Clinical Labo ratory Improvement Act may be associated with a decrease in the number of facilities performing tests for STD. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00007435-199607000-00014 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78375465</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44964822</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44964822</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-efc8fea6d50f8314043de946359342483043293838319031350017dbb0927c553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkVFvFCEQx4nR1LP6EUyIMb6tAgML-GaqVZOLJl4bHwm3y1oue0tlWOP56eXacx-EEDIzv_mH4U8I5ew1Z1a_YXVpCarh1rZM16iph8sHZMUV6EYqwR-SVc2YRmmuH5MniLsjYRg_I2fGQMuEWZE_a79N2ZeUD_R99D-mhBFpGugm_J79OB7oVfYT7mMpoa8EBo8BaZzope_iGEus0fdYbmqm3AR6PcUjuCm-BHxLvwWcx3In6OkXX2Ka_Eg3c_4VDk_Jo8GPGJ6d7nNyffnh6uJTs_768fPFu3XTAUBpwtCZIfi2V2wwwCWT0AcrW1AWpJAGakJYMHVzy4CDqmPqfrtlVuhOKTgnr-51b3P6OQcsbh-xC-Pop5BmdNqAVrI9gi_-A3dpzvXB6IQQsmVgbIXMPdTlhJjD4G5z3Pt8cJy5ozfunzdu8cbdeVNbn5_05-0-9EvjyYxaf3mqe-z8ONSP7yIuGHBl2jr3IrPDattSltK20ggBfwFoXZ6h</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222460389</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Laboratory Diagnosis of Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Facilities Within the United States: Results of a National Survey</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>BECK-SAGUE, CONSUELO M. ; CORDTS, JEROME R. ; BROWN, KIMBERLY ; LARSEN, SANDRA A. ; BLACK, CAROLYN M. ; KNAPP, JOAN S. ; RIDDERHOF, JOHN C. ; BARNES, FRANKIE G. ; MORSE, STEPHEN A.</creator><creatorcontrib>BECK-SAGUE, CONSUELO M. ; CORDTS, JEROME R. ; BROWN, KIMBERLY ; LARSEN, SANDRA A. ; BLACK, CAROLYN M. ; KNAPP, JOAN S. ; RIDDERHOF, JOHN C. ; BARNES, FRANKIE G. ; MORSE, STEPHEN A.</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Objectives: The diagnosis of many sexually transmitted diseases (STD) requires laboratory testing. The authors assessed the effects of the introduction of new tests and regulations on STD testing. Study Design: A questionnaire survey was mailed to a random sample of facilities listed in the STD Referral Database inquiring about tests offered, changes in testing, and reasons for changes. Results: Responses from 405 facilities were analyzed. Most responding facilities collected specimens for nontreponemal tests for syphilis (352 of 405 [86.9%]). Since each facility's information was last updated, the number reporting testing for Chlamydia trachomatis rose from 160 of 405 (39.5%) to 288 of 405 (71.1%), but testing for gonorrhea and chancroid decreased (365 of 405 [90.1%] to 328 of 405 [81%], and 182 of 405 [44.9%] to 32 of 405 [7.9%], respectively). Of 364 responses to a question on changes in tests performed in the last 2 years, 249 (68.4%) reported no change, 81 (22.3%) reported an increase, and 37 (10.2%) reported a decrease. The most frequently added tests were nonculture tests for C. trachomatis (34 of 81 [42%]), and the most frequent reason for adding tests was targeted funding (25 of 81 [30.9%]). The most frequently discontinued tests were cultures and gram stains for gonorrhea (15 of 37 [40.5%]) and other in-house tests (9 of 37 [24.3%]). Most facilities that discontinued testing cited the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act as the reason (34 of 37 [91.9%]; 95% confidence interval = 78.1%, 98.3%). Conclusions: The number of facilities testing for C. trachomatis has increased with funding and with the availability of non culture tests, but the number of those testing for chancroid and gonorrhea has decreased. Implementation of the Clinical Labo ratory Improvement Act may be associated with a decrease in the number of facilities performing tests for STD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-5717</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-4521</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00007435-199607000-00014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8836028</identifier><identifier>CODEN: STRDDM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott-Raven Publishers</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods ; Clinical Laboratory Techniques - standards ; Disease transmission ; Facility Regulation and Control ; From the CDC ; General aspects ; Human infectious diseases. Experimental studies and models ; Humans ; Incidence ; Infectious diseases ; Laboratories - organization & administration ; Medical sciences ; Medical screening ; Odds Ratio ; Organizational Innovation ; Referral and Consultation ; Regulation ; Sexually transmitted diseases ; Sexually Transmitted Diseases - diagnosis ; STD ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tests ; United States</subject><ispartof>Sexually transmitted diseases, 1996-07, Vol.23 (4), p.342-349</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 American Venereal Disease Association</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Jul 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-efc8fea6d50f8314043de946359342483043293838319031350017dbb0927c553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44964822$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44964822$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,30999,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3158646$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8836028$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BECK-SAGUE, CONSUELO M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CORDTS, JEROME R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BROWN, KIMBERLY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LARSEN, SANDRA A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BLACK, CAROLYN M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KNAPP, JOAN S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RIDDERHOF, JOHN C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARNES, FRANKIE G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORSE, STEPHEN A.</creatorcontrib><title>Laboratory Diagnosis of Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Facilities Within the United States: Results of a National Survey</title><title>Sexually transmitted diseases</title><addtitle>Sex Transm Dis</addtitle><description>Background and Objectives: The diagnosis of many sexually transmitted diseases (STD) requires laboratory testing. The authors assessed the effects of the introduction of new tests and regulations on STD testing. Study Design: A questionnaire survey was mailed to a random sample of facilities listed in the STD Referral Database inquiring about tests offered, changes in testing, and reasons for changes. Results: Responses from 405 facilities were analyzed. Most responding facilities collected specimens for nontreponemal tests for syphilis (352 of 405 [86.9%]). Since each facility's information was last updated, the number reporting testing for Chlamydia trachomatis rose from 160 of 405 (39.5%) to 288 of 405 (71.1%), but testing for gonorrhea and chancroid decreased (365 of 405 [90.1%] to 328 of 405 [81%], and 182 of 405 [44.9%] to 32 of 405 [7.9%], respectively). Of 364 responses to a question on changes in tests performed in the last 2 years, 249 (68.4%) reported no change, 81 (22.3%) reported an increase, and 37 (10.2%) reported a decrease. The most frequently added tests were nonculture tests for C. trachomatis (34 of 81 [42%]), and the most frequent reason for adding tests was targeted funding (25 of 81 [30.9%]). The most frequently discontinued tests were cultures and gram stains for gonorrhea (15 of 37 [40.5%]) and other in-house tests (9 of 37 [24.3%]). Most facilities that discontinued testing cited the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act as the reason (34 of 37 [91.9%]; 95% confidence interval = 78.1%, 98.3%). Conclusions: The number of facilities testing for C. trachomatis has increased with funding and with the availability of non culture tests, but the number of those testing for chancroid and gonorrhea has decreased. Implementation of the Clinical Labo ratory Improvement Act may be associated with a decrease in the number of facilities performing tests for STD.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - standards</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Facility Regulation and Control</subject><subject>From the CDC</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Human infectious diseases. Experimental studies and models</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Laboratories - organization & administration</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Organizational Innovation</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Sexually transmitted diseases</subject><subject>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>STD</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Tests</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0148-5717</issn><issn>1537-4521</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkVFvFCEQx4nR1LP6EUyIMb6tAgML-GaqVZOLJl4bHwm3y1oue0tlWOP56eXacx-EEDIzv_mH4U8I5ew1Z1a_YXVpCarh1rZM16iph8sHZMUV6EYqwR-SVc2YRmmuH5MniLsjYRg_I2fGQMuEWZE_a79N2ZeUD_R99D-mhBFpGugm_J79OB7oVfYT7mMpoa8EBo8BaZzope_iGEus0fdYbmqm3AR6PcUjuCm-BHxLvwWcx3In6OkXX2Ka_Eg3c_4VDk_Jo8GPGJ6d7nNyffnh6uJTs_768fPFu3XTAUBpwtCZIfi2V2wwwCWT0AcrW1AWpJAGakJYMHVzy4CDqmPqfrtlVuhOKTgnr-51b3P6OQcsbh-xC-Pop5BmdNqAVrI9gi_-A3dpzvXB6IQQsmVgbIXMPdTlhJjD4G5z3Pt8cJy5ozfunzdu8cbdeVNbn5_05-0-9EvjyYxaf3mqe-z8ONSP7yIuGHBl2jr3IrPDattSltK20ggBfwFoXZ6h</recordid><startdate>19960701</startdate><enddate>19960701</enddate><creator>BECK-SAGUE, CONSUELO M.</creator><creator>CORDTS, JEROME R.</creator><creator>BROWN, KIMBERLY</creator><creator>LARSEN, SANDRA A.</creator><creator>BLACK, CAROLYN M.</creator><creator>KNAPP, JOAN S.</creator><creator>RIDDERHOF, JOHN C.</creator><creator>BARNES, FRANKIE G.</creator><creator>MORSE, STEPHEN A.</creator><general>Lippincott-Raven Publishers</general><general>Lippincott</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960701</creationdate><title>Laboratory Diagnosis of Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Facilities Within the United States: Results of a National Survey</title><author>BECK-SAGUE, CONSUELO M. ; CORDTS, JEROME R. ; BROWN, KIMBERLY ; LARSEN, SANDRA A. ; BLACK, CAROLYN M. ; KNAPP, JOAN S. ; RIDDERHOF, JOHN C. ; BARNES, FRANKIE G. ; MORSE, STEPHEN A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-efc8fea6d50f8314043de946359342483043293838319031350017dbb0927c553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - standards</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Facility Regulation and Control</topic><topic>From the CDC</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Human infectious diseases. Experimental studies and models</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Laboratories - organization & administration</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Organizational Innovation</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Sexually transmitted diseases</topic><topic>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>STD</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Tests</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BECK-SAGUE, CONSUELO M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CORDTS, JEROME R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BROWN, KIMBERLY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LARSEN, SANDRA A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BLACK, CAROLYN M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KNAPP, JOAN S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RIDDERHOF, JOHN C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARNES, FRANKIE G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORSE, STEPHEN A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Sexually transmitted diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BECK-SAGUE, CONSUELO M.</au><au>CORDTS, JEROME R.</au><au>BROWN, KIMBERLY</au><au>LARSEN, SANDRA A.</au><au>BLACK, CAROLYN M.</au><au>KNAPP, JOAN S.</au><au>RIDDERHOF, JOHN C.</au><au>BARNES, FRANKIE G.</au><au>MORSE, STEPHEN A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Laboratory Diagnosis of Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Facilities Within the United States: Results of a National Survey</atitle><jtitle>Sexually transmitted diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Sex Transm Dis</addtitle><date>1996-07-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>342</spage><epage>349</epage><pages>342-349</pages><issn>0148-5717</issn><eissn>1537-4521</eissn><coden>STRDDM</coden><abstract>Background and Objectives: The diagnosis of many sexually transmitted diseases (STD) requires laboratory testing. The authors assessed the effects of the introduction of new tests and regulations on STD testing. Study Design: A questionnaire survey was mailed to a random sample of facilities listed in the STD Referral Database inquiring about tests offered, changes in testing, and reasons for changes. Results: Responses from 405 facilities were analyzed. Most responding facilities collected specimens for nontreponemal tests for syphilis (352 of 405 [86.9%]). Since each facility's information was last updated, the number reporting testing for Chlamydia trachomatis rose from 160 of 405 (39.5%) to 288 of 405 (71.1%), but testing for gonorrhea and chancroid decreased (365 of 405 [90.1%] to 328 of 405 [81%], and 182 of 405 [44.9%] to 32 of 405 [7.9%], respectively). Of 364 responses to a question on changes in tests performed in the last 2 years, 249 (68.4%) reported no change, 81 (22.3%) reported an increase, and 37 (10.2%) reported a decrease. The most frequently added tests were nonculture tests for C. trachomatis (34 of 81 [42%]), and the most frequent reason for adding tests was targeted funding (25 of 81 [30.9%]). The most frequently discontinued tests were cultures and gram stains for gonorrhea (15 of 37 [40.5%]) and other in-house tests (9 of 37 [24.3%]). Most facilities that discontinued testing cited the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act as the reason (34 of 37 [91.9%]; 95% confidence interval = 78.1%, 98.3%). Conclusions: The number of facilities testing for C. trachomatis has increased with funding and with the availability of non culture tests, but the number of those testing for chancroid and gonorrhea has decreased. Implementation of the Clinical Labo ratory Improvement Act may be associated with a decrease in the number of facilities performing tests for STD.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott-Raven Publishers</pub><pmid>8836028</pmid><doi>10.1097/00007435-199607000-00014</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0148-5717 |
ispartof | Sexually transmitted diseases, 1996-07, Vol.23 (4), p.342-349 |
issn | 0148-5717 1537-4521 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78375465 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods Clinical Laboratory Techniques - standards Disease transmission Facility Regulation and Control From the CDC General aspects Human infectious diseases. Experimental studies and models Humans Incidence Infectious diseases Laboratories - organization & administration Medical sciences Medical screening Odds Ratio Organizational Innovation Referral and Consultation Regulation Sexually transmitted diseases Sexually Transmitted Diseases - diagnosis STD Surveys and Questionnaires Tests United States |
title | Laboratory Diagnosis of Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Facilities Within the United States: Results of a National Survey |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T00%3A14%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laboratory%20Diagnosis%20of%20Sexually%20Transmitted%20Diseases%20in%20Facilities%20Within%20the%20United%20States:%20Results%20of%20a%20National%20Survey&rft.jtitle=Sexually%20transmitted%20diseases&rft.au=BECK-SAGUE,%20CONSUELO%20M.&rft.date=1996-07-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=342&rft.epage=349&rft.pages=342-349&rft.issn=0148-5717&rft.eissn=1537-4521&rft.coden=STRDDM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00007435-199607000-00014&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44964822%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222460389&rft_id=info:pmid/8836028&rft_jstor_id=44964822&rfr_iscdi=true |