Otoacoustic emissions of full-term and preterm neonates

Transiently evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE), distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE), and spontaneous otoacoustic emission (SOAE) were measured in 45 full-term neonates (68 ears) and 12 preterm neonates (20 ears) with ILO88 & 92. Measurements were performed in the nursery of the obst...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nippon Jibi Inkoka Gakkai Kaiho 1996, Vol.99 (1), p.103-111,123
Hauptverfasser: Kashiwamura, M, Ohwatari, R, Satoh, N, Kawanami, M, Chida, E, Sakamoto, T, Fukuda, S, Inuyama, Y
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; jpn
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Transiently evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE), distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE), and spontaneous otoacoustic emission (SOAE) were measured in 45 full-term neonates (68 ears) and 12 preterm neonates (20 ears) with ILO88 & 92. Measurements were performed in the nursery of the obstetrics ward or NICU (not sound proof room) under natural sleeping condition after nursing. No sedating agent was used. TEOAEs were rated "good response" in 61 (89.7%) of 68 full-term neonate ears. DPOAEs were rated "good response" in 40 (71.4%) of 56 full-term neonate ears. SOAEs were detectable in 25 (62.5%) of 40 full-term neonate ears. Considering the high positive rate of TEOAE in full-term neonates and the easy and noninvasive method of measurement, we concluded that TEOAE is useful for auditory screening in neonates. There was failure to detect TEOAEs in 7 ears and the measurements were all performed within 6 days after birth. Some reports claim that residual amnion in the external auditory canal or the middle ear in the first few days after birth causes slight hearing loss. Thus, we expected that making the measurements more than 7 days after birth might yield higher "good response" rates. We sometimes found that the Total Echo Powers of TEOAEs were reduced by the poor condition of the ear probe. Thus, we must be very careful in regard to this technical problem in order to perform accurate examinations. Because of its lower "good response" rate, DPOAE was not as useful for screening as TEOAE. Because of the movements or respiratory noises of the newborn infants, it was hard to detect reliable DPOAEs, particularly in the low frequency range. On the other hand, because of its frequency specificity, particurally at high frequencies, DPOAE will be useful for detecting the partial hearing impairment such as congenital high-tone hearing impairment. It would be difficult to use SOAE as a clinical test. Because it is not an evoked response, its mechanism of generation is not well understood. We expect that following longitudinal changes in SOAE in neonates may yield some information about it. We measured mainly TEOAE in preterm neonates because we had to complete the measurements as soon as possible. High Total Echo Powers of TEOAEs were recorded in most infants over 38 weeks of PCA (post conceptional age). The earliest case showed reliable TEOAE at 35 weeks PCA. In most cases that could be measured twice on different days, the Total Echo Powers of TEOAE, were higher
ISSN:0030-6622
1883-0854
DOI:10.3950/jibiinkoka.99.103