Differential binding of two monoclonal antibodies directed against the chicken CD8α molecule

Two murine monoclonal antibodies (mAb), CT8 and AV14, have been shown to recognise the avian homologue of the mammalian CD8α molecule. In previous flow cytometry studies we could discriminate two subpopulations of CD8 + T cells, expressing either a high level (CD8 Bright+) or a low level (CD8 Dim+)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary immunology and immunopathology 1996-06, Vol.52 (1), p.117-125
Hauptverfasser: Breed, Dominique G.J., Carr, Patricia, Vermeulen, Arno N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 125
container_issue 1
container_start_page 117
container_title Veterinary immunology and immunopathology
container_volume 52
creator Breed, Dominique G.J.
Carr, Patricia
Vermeulen, Arno N.
description Two murine monoclonal antibodies (mAb), CT8 and AV14, have been shown to recognise the avian homologue of the mammalian CD8α molecule. In previous flow cytometry studies we could discriminate two subpopulations of CD8 + T cells, expressing either a high level (CD8 Bright+) or a low level (CD8 Dim+) of CD8 molecules. The staining patterns of mAb AV14 and mAb CT8 were not always identical for individual chickens. In this study the discrepancy in the reactivity of these mAb was examined, using outbred White Leghorn chickens as well as (B 14B 14)-MHC inbred Wellcome chickens. The results show that mAb AV14 and mAb CT8 recognise different epitopes on the chicken CD8α molecule. The CD8 Bright+ cells appeared to express the CD8αβ heterodimer and the CD8 Dim+ cells the CD8αα homodimer. Conformational differences between the αβ heterodimer and the αα homodimer could account for the differences in binding characteristics found for the two mAb. The existence of a polymorphism of the CD8α molecule in outbred White Leghorn chickens was suggested by the failure of peripheral blood leucocytes from some chickens to react with mAb AV14. This heterogeneity was not observed in the Wellcome line.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0165-2427(95)05531-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78331190</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0165242795055312</els_id><sourcerecordid>78331190</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-d024113136ae0a1cce71ab18307478bb25c33caf224369de98312a1e72ad46f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9OGzEQh60KFALtGxTJJwSHbT32eu29IKGk_6RIXNpjZXnt2WDY2GG9AfWxeBGeiU0TcYTDaA6_7zcjfYR8BvYFGFRfx5EFL7k6r-UFk1JAwT-QKWglCi5FeUCmr8gROc75ljEma60nZKI1U0rDlPydh7bFHuMQbEebEH2IS5paOjwmukoxuS7FMbEj0CQfMFMfenQDemqXNsQ80OEGqbsJ7g4jnc3189NY7NBtOvxIDlvbZfy03yfkz_dvv2c_i8X1j1-zq0XhhNZD4RkvAQSIyiKz4BwqsA1owVSpdNNw6YRwtuW8FFXtsdYCuAVU3PqyakGckLPd3XWf7jeYB7MK2WHX2Yhpk43SQgDU7F0QZFULLqoRLHeg61POPbZm3YeV7f8ZYGar32zdmq1bU0vzX7_hY-10f3_TrNC_lva-x_xyl-No4yFgb7ILGB3upBqfwtsPXgDgfZRS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15693236</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differential binding of two monoclonal antibodies directed against the chicken CD8α molecule</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Breed, Dominique G.J. ; Carr, Patricia ; Vermeulen, Arno N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Breed, Dominique G.J. ; Carr, Patricia ; Vermeulen, Arno N.</creatorcontrib><description>Two murine monoclonal antibodies (mAb), CT8 and AV14, have been shown to recognise the avian homologue of the mammalian CD8α molecule. In previous flow cytometry studies we could discriminate two subpopulations of CD8 + T cells, expressing either a high level (CD8 Bright+) or a low level (CD8 Dim+) of CD8 molecules. The staining patterns of mAb AV14 and mAb CT8 were not always identical for individual chickens. In this study the discrepancy in the reactivity of these mAb was examined, using outbred White Leghorn chickens as well as (B 14B 14)-MHC inbred Wellcome chickens. The results show that mAb AV14 and mAb CT8 recognise different epitopes on the chicken CD8α molecule. The CD8 Bright+ cells appeared to express the CD8αβ heterodimer and the CD8 Dim+ cells the CD8αα homodimer. Conformational differences between the αβ heterodimer and the αα homodimer could account for the differences in binding characteristics found for the two mAb. The existence of a polymorphism of the CD8α molecule in outbred White Leghorn chickens was suggested by the failure of peripheral blood leucocytes from some chickens to react with mAb AV14. This heterogeneity was not observed in the Wellcome line.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-2427</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2534</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0165-2427(95)05531-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8807781</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antibodies, Monoclonal - immunology ; Antibodies, Monoclonal - metabolism ; AV14 ; Avian ; CD8 Antigens - immunology ; CD8 Antigens - metabolism ; CD8αα ; CD8αβ ; Chicken ; Chickens ; CT8 ; Epitopes - immunology ; Epitopes - metabolism ; Flow Cytometry ; Polymorphism ; Protein Binding - immunology ; T cell</subject><ispartof>Veterinary immunology and immunopathology, 1996-06, Vol.52 (1), p.117-125</ispartof><rights>1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-d024113136ae0a1cce71ab18307478bb25c33caf224369de98312a1e72ad46f13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-d024113136ae0a1cce71ab18307478bb25c33caf224369de98312a1e72ad46f13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0165242795055312$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8807781$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Breed, Dominique G.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carr, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermeulen, Arno N.</creatorcontrib><title>Differential binding of two monoclonal antibodies directed against the chicken CD8α molecule</title><title>Veterinary immunology and immunopathology</title><addtitle>Vet Immunol Immunopathol</addtitle><description>Two murine monoclonal antibodies (mAb), CT8 and AV14, have been shown to recognise the avian homologue of the mammalian CD8α molecule. In previous flow cytometry studies we could discriminate two subpopulations of CD8 + T cells, expressing either a high level (CD8 Bright+) or a low level (CD8 Dim+) of CD8 molecules. The staining patterns of mAb AV14 and mAb CT8 were not always identical for individual chickens. In this study the discrepancy in the reactivity of these mAb was examined, using outbred White Leghorn chickens as well as (B 14B 14)-MHC inbred Wellcome chickens. The results show that mAb AV14 and mAb CT8 recognise different epitopes on the chicken CD8α molecule. The CD8 Bright+ cells appeared to express the CD8αβ heterodimer and the CD8 Dim+ cells the CD8αα homodimer. Conformational differences between the αβ heterodimer and the αα homodimer could account for the differences in binding characteristics found for the two mAb. The existence of a polymorphism of the CD8α molecule in outbred White Leghorn chickens was suggested by the failure of peripheral blood leucocytes from some chickens to react with mAb AV14. This heterogeneity was not observed in the Wellcome line.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal - immunology</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal - metabolism</subject><subject>AV14</subject><subject>Avian</subject><subject>CD8 Antigens - immunology</subject><subject>CD8 Antigens - metabolism</subject><subject>CD8αα</subject><subject>CD8αβ</subject><subject>Chicken</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>CT8</subject><subject>Epitopes - immunology</subject><subject>Epitopes - metabolism</subject><subject>Flow Cytometry</subject><subject>Polymorphism</subject><subject>Protein Binding - immunology</subject><subject>T cell</subject><issn>0165-2427</issn><issn>1873-2534</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM9OGzEQh60KFALtGxTJJwSHbT32eu29IKGk_6RIXNpjZXnt2WDY2GG9AfWxeBGeiU0TcYTDaA6_7zcjfYR8BvYFGFRfx5EFL7k6r-UFk1JAwT-QKWglCi5FeUCmr8gROc75ljEma60nZKI1U0rDlPydh7bFHuMQbEebEH2IS5paOjwmukoxuS7FMbEj0CQfMFMfenQDemqXNsQ80OEGqbsJ7g4jnc3189NY7NBtOvxIDlvbZfy03yfkz_dvv2c_i8X1j1-zq0XhhNZD4RkvAQSIyiKz4BwqsA1owVSpdNNw6YRwtuW8FFXtsdYCuAVU3PqyakGckLPd3XWf7jeYB7MK2WHX2Yhpk43SQgDU7F0QZFULLqoRLHeg61POPbZm3YeV7f8ZYGar32zdmq1bU0vzX7_hY-10f3_TrNC_lva-x_xyl-No4yFgb7ILGB3upBqfwtsPXgDgfZRS</recordid><startdate>19960615</startdate><enddate>19960615</enddate><creator>Breed, Dominique G.J.</creator><creator>Carr, Patricia</creator><creator>Vermeulen, Arno N.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960615</creationdate><title>Differential binding of two monoclonal antibodies directed against the chicken CD8α molecule</title><author>Breed, Dominique G.J. ; Carr, Patricia ; Vermeulen, Arno N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-d024113136ae0a1cce71ab18307478bb25c33caf224369de98312a1e72ad46f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal - immunology</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal - metabolism</topic><topic>AV14</topic><topic>Avian</topic><topic>CD8 Antigens - immunology</topic><topic>CD8 Antigens - metabolism</topic><topic>CD8αα</topic><topic>CD8αβ</topic><topic>Chicken</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>CT8</topic><topic>Epitopes - immunology</topic><topic>Epitopes - metabolism</topic><topic>Flow Cytometry</topic><topic>Polymorphism</topic><topic>Protein Binding - immunology</topic><topic>T cell</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Breed, Dominique G.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carr, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermeulen, Arno N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary immunology and immunopathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Breed, Dominique G.J.</au><au>Carr, Patricia</au><au>Vermeulen, Arno N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differential binding of two monoclonal antibodies directed against the chicken CD8α molecule</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary immunology and immunopathology</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Immunol Immunopathol</addtitle><date>1996-06-15</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>117</spage><epage>125</epage><pages>117-125</pages><issn>0165-2427</issn><eissn>1873-2534</eissn><abstract>Two murine monoclonal antibodies (mAb), CT8 and AV14, have been shown to recognise the avian homologue of the mammalian CD8α molecule. In previous flow cytometry studies we could discriminate two subpopulations of CD8 + T cells, expressing either a high level (CD8 Bright+) or a low level (CD8 Dim+) of CD8 molecules. The staining patterns of mAb AV14 and mAb CT8 were not always identical for individual chickens. In this study the discrepancy in the reactivity of these mAb was examined, using outbred White Leghorn chickens as well as (B 14B 14)-MHC inbred Wellcome chickens. The results show that mAb AV14 and mAb CT8 recognise different epitopes on the chicken CD8α molecule. The CD8 Bright+ cells appeared to express the CD8αβ heterodimer and the CD8 Dim+ cells the CD8αα homodimer. Conformational differences between the αβ heterodimer and the αα homodimer could account for the differences in binding characteristics found for the two mAb. The existence of a polymorphism of the CD8α molecule in outbred White Leghorn chickens was suggested by the failure of peripheral blood leucocytes from some chickens to react with mAb AV14. This heterogeneity was not observed in the Wellcome line.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>8807781</pmid><doi>10.1016/0165-2427(95)05531-2</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-2427
ispartof Veterinary immunology and immunopathology, 1996-06, Vol.52 (1), p.117-125
issn 0165-2427
1873-2534
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78331190
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Animals
Antibodies, Monoclonal - immunology
Antibodies, Monoclonal - metabolism
AV14
Avian
CD8 Antigens - immunology
CD8 Antigens - metabolism
CD8αα
CD8αβ
Chicken
Chickens
CT8
Epitopes - immunology
Epitopes - metabolism
Flow Cytometry
Polymorphism
Protein Binding - immunology
T cell
title Differential binding of two monoclonal antibodies directed against the chicken CD8α molecule
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T01%3A15%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differential%20binding%20of%20two%20monoclonal%20antibodies%20directed%20against%20the%20chicken%20CD8%CE%B1%20molecule&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20immunology%20and%20immunopathology&rft.au=Breed,%20Dominique%20G.J.&rft.date=1996-06-15&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=117&rft.epage=125&rft.pages=117-125&rft.issn=0165-2427&rft.eissn=1873-2534&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0165-2427(95)05531-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78331190%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15693236&rft_id=info:pmid/8807781&rft_els_id=0165242795055312&rfr_iscdi=true