Is deep vein thrombosis surveillance warranted in high-risk trauma patients?

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has been reported to occur in 20% to 40% of high-risk trauma patients if no prophylaxis is used. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of DVT and utility of a screening program in a high-risk group of trauma patients for whom routine DVT prophylaxis was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of surgery 1996-08, Vol.172 (2), p.210-213
Hauptverfasser: Piotrowski, J J, Alexander, J J, Brandt, C P, McHenry, C R, Yuhas, J P, Jacobs, D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 213
container_issue 2
container_start_page 210
container_title The American journal of surgery
container_volume 172
creator Piotrowski, J J
Alexander, J J
Brandt, C P
McHenry, C R
Yuhas, J P
Jacobs, D
description Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has been reported to occur in 20% to 40% of high-risk trauma patients if no prophylaxis is used. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of DVT and utility of a screening program in a high-risk group of trauma patients for whom routine DVT prophylaxis was utilized. Of 3,154 trauma admissions over a 20-month period, 343 patients (10.9%) identified as high risk based on established criteria (prolonged bed rest, Glasgow coma score (GCS) of 7, spinal injury, lower extremity or pelvic fracture) were placed on a prospective surveillance protocol using color-flow duplex scanning and received thromboembolic prophylaxis. Twenty-three thromboembolic complications occurred, including 20 DVTs (5.8%) and 3 pulmonary emboli ([PE] 1%). Univariate analysis showed that the risk of DVT was related to age (52.6 + 19.9 years versus 38.1 + 18.5; P = 0.001), a longer hospital stay (31.4 versus 17.8 days; P = 0.001), or the presence of spinal fracture (12.6% versus 3.5%; P = 0.01). Discriminant function analysis revealed that length of stay, intensive care unit days, age, and GCS allowed correct classification of those who did not develop DVT in 97% of cases but was only correct in 15% of cases in predicting those who would develop DVT. Injury severity score (ISS) was not predictive in this multivariate analysis. Seventeen (85%) DVTs were unsuspected clinically. Study patients received an average of 3.5 studies at an overall charge of $313,330 to detect 17 clinically unsuspected DVTs (5%). This represents about 5% of the total bed charges for these patients, or $18,000 per DVT. These results suggest that standard use of DVT prophylaxis in a high-risk trauma population leads to a low incidence of DVT and that a screening protocol is effective in detecting unsuspected DVTs. Use of a surveillance protocol, however, may reduce but will not eliminate the incidence of pulmonary emboli in this patient population.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00154-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78320711</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78320711</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p206t-f85011cbdfe1f1f5115e6d00c1c904a44be22c6f99e5a816ac5a95786b36a5c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j01LxDAYhHNQ1nX1JyzkJHqovm_bpM1JZPFjYcGDey9p-tZG-2WSKv57Ky6ehhkehhnG1gjXCChvXgAgjpREuFTyCgBFGmVHbPkfn7BT799mi5gmC7bIMyVEki7Zbut5RTTyT7I9D40bunLw1nM_uTlqW90b4l_aOd0HqvgMNfa1iZz17zw4PXWajzpY6oO_PWPHtW49nR90xfYP9_vNU7R7ftxu7nbRGIMMUZ2LeYcpq5qwxlogCpIVgEGjINVpWlIcG1krRULnKLURWoksl2UitTDJil381Y5u-JjIh6Kz3tDvVhomX2R5EkOGOIPrAziVHVXF6Gyn3XdxeJ_8AKLdW7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78320711</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is deep vein thrombosis surveillance warranted in high-risk trauma patients?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Piotrowski, J J ; Alexander, J J ; Brandt, C P ; McHenry, C R ; Yuhas, J P ; Jacobs, D</creator><creatorcontrib>Piotrowski, J J ; Alexander, J J ; Brandt, C P ; McHenry, C R ; Yuhas, J P ; Jacobs, D</creatorcontrib><description>Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has been reported to occur in 20% to 40% of high-risk trauma patients if no prophylaxis is used. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of DVT and utility of a screening program in a high-risk group of trauma patients for whom routine DVT prophylaxis was utilized. Of 3,154 trauma admissions over a 20-month period, 343 patients (10.9%) identified as high risk based on established criteria (prolonged bed rest, Glasgow coma score (GCS) of 7, spinal injury, lower extremity or pelvic fracture) were placed on a prospective surveillance protocol using color-flow duplex scanning and received thromboembolic prophylaxis. Twenty-three thromboembolic complications occurred, including 20 DVTs (5.8%) and 3 pulmonary emboli ([PE] 1%). Univariate analysis showed that the risk of DVT was related to age (52.6 + 19.9 years versus 38.1 + 18.5; P = 0.001), a longer hospital stay (31.4 versus 17.8 days; P = 0.001), or the presence of spinal fracture (12.6% versus 3.5%; P = 0.01). Discriminant function analysis revealed that length of stay, intensive care unit days, age, and GCS allowed correct classification of those who did not develop DVT in 97% of cases but was only correct in 15% of cases in predicting those who would develop DVT. Injury severity score (ISS) was not predictive in this multivariate analysis. Seventeen (85%) DVTs were unsuspected clinically. Study patients received an average of 3.5 studies at an overall charge of $313,330 to detect 17 clinically unsuspected DVTs (5%). This represents about 5% of the total bed charges for these patients, or $18,000 per DVT. These results suggest that standard use of DVT prophylaxis in a high-risk trauma population leads to a low incidence of DVT and that a screening protocol is effective in detecting unsuspected DVTs. Use of a surveillance protocol, however, may reduce but will not eliminate the incidence of pulmonary emboli in this patient population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00154-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8795534</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Hospital Charges ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Population Surveillance ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Pulmonary Embolism - prevention &amp; control ; Risk ; Risk Factors ; Thromboembolism - prevention &amp; control ; Thrombosis - diagnostic imaging ; Thrombosis - economics ; Thrombosis - etiology ; Thrombosis - prevention &amp; control ; Time Factors ; Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color ; Wounds and Injuries - complications ; Wounds and Injuries - diagnostic imaging ; Wounds and Injuries - economics</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 1996-08, Vol.172 (2), p.210-213</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,64387</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8795534$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Piotrowski, J J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, J J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandt, C P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McHenry, C R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuhas, J P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, D</creatorcontrib><title>Is deep vein thrombosis surveillance warranted in high-risk trauma patients?</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has been reported to occur in 20% to 40% of high-risk trauma patients if no prophylaxis is used. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of DVT and utility of a screening program in a high-risk group of trauma patients for whom routine DVT prophylaxis was utilized. Of 3,154 trauma admissions over a 20-month period, 343 patients (10.9%) identified as high risk based on established criteria (prolonged bed rest, Glasgow coma score (GCS) of 7, spinal injury, lower extremity or pelvic fracture) were placed on a prospective surveillance protocol using color-flow duplex scanning and received thromboembolic prophylaxis. Twenty-three thromboembolic complications occurred, including 20 DVTs (5.8%) and 3 pulmonary emboli ([PE] 1%). Univariate analysis showed that the risk of DVT was related to age (52.6 + 19.9 years versus 38.1 + 18.5; P = 0.001), a longer hospital stay (31.4 versus 17.8 days; P = 0.001), or the presence of spinal fracture (12.6% versus 3.5%; P = 0.01). Discriminant function analysis revealed that length of stay, intensive care unit days, age, and GCS allowed correct classification of those who did not develop DVT in 97% of cases but was only correct in 15% of cases in predicting those who would develop DVT. Injury severity score (ISS) was not predictive in this multivariate analysis. Seventeen (85%) DVTs were unsuspected clinically. Study patients received an average of 3.5 studies at an overall charge of $313,330 to detect 17 clinically unsuspected DVTs (5%). This represents about 5% of the total bed charges for these patients, or $18,000 per DVT. These results suggest that standard use of DVT prophylaxis in a high-risk trauma population leads to a low incidence of DVT and that a screening protocol is effective in detecting unsuspected DVTs. Use of a surveillance protocol, however, may reduce but will not eliminate the incidence of pulmonary emboli in this patient population.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospital Charges</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injury Severity Score</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Population Surveillance</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Pulmonary Embolism - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Thromboembolism - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Thrombosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Thrombosis - economics</subject><subject>Thrombosis - etiology</subject><subject>Thrombosis - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - complications</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - economics</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9j01LxDAYhHNQ1nX1JyzkJHqovm_bpM1JZPFjYcGDey9p-tZG-2WSKv57Ky6ehhkehhnG1gjXCChvXgAgjpREuFTyCgBFGmVHbPkfn7BT799mi5gmC7bIMyVEki7Zbut5RTTyT7I9D40bunLw1nM_uTlqW90b4l_aOd0HqvgMNfa1iZz17zw4PXWajzpY6oO_PWPHtW49nR90xfYP9_vNU7R7ftxu7nbRGIMMUZ2LeYcpq5qwxlogCpIVgEGjINVpWlIcG1krRULnKLURWoksl2UitTDJil381Y5u-JjIh6Kz3tDvVhomX2R5EkOGOIPrAziVHVXF6Gyn3XdxeJ_8AKLdW7A</recordid><startdate>19960801</startdate><enddate>19960801</enddate><creator>Piotrowski, J J</creator><creator>Alexander, J J</creator><creator>Brandt, C P</creator><creator>McHenry, C R</creator><creator>Yuhas, J P</creator><creator>Jacobs, D</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960801</creationdate><title>Is deep vein thrombosis surveillance warranted in high-risk trauma patients?</title><author>Piotrowski, J J ; Alexander, J J ; Brandt, C P ; McHenry, C R ; Yuhas, J P ; Jacobs, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p206t-f85011cbdfe1f1f5115e6d00c1c904a44be22c6f99e5a816ac5a95786b36a5c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospital Charges</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injury Severity Score</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Population Surveillance</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Pulmonary Embolism - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Thromboembolism - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Thrombosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Thrombosis - economics</topic><topic>Thrombosis - etiology</topic><topic>Thrombosis - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - complications</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - economics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Piotrowski, J J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, J J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandt, C P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McHenry, C R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuhas, J P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Piotrowski, J J</au><au>Alexander, J J</au><au>Brandt, C P</au><au>McHenry, C R</au><au>Yuhas, J P</au><au>Jacobs, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is deep vein thrombosis surveillance warranted in high-risk trauma patients?</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>1996-08-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>172</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>210</spage><epage>213</epage><pages>210-213</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><abstract>Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has been reported to occur in 20% to 40% of high-risk trauma patients if no prophylaxis is used. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of DVT and utility of a screening program in a high-risk group of trauma patients for whom routine DVT prophylaxis was utilized. Of 3,154 trauma admissions over a 20-month period, 343 patients (10.9%) identified as high risk based on established criteria (prolonged bed rest, Glasgow coma score (GCS) of 7, spinal injury, lower extremity or pelvic fracture) were placed on a prospective surveillance protocol using color-flow duplex scanning and received thromboembolic prophylaxis. Twenty-three thromboembolic complications occurred, including 20 DVTs (5.8%) and 3 pulmonary emboli ([PE] 1%). Univariate analysis showed that the risk of DVT was related to age (52.6 + 19.9 years versus 38.1 + 18.5; P = 0.001), a longer hospital stay (31.4 versus 17.8 days; P = 0.001), or the presence of spinal fracture (12.6% versus 3.5%; P = 0.01). Discriminant function analysis revealed that length of stay, intensive care unit days, age, and GCS allowed correct classification of those who did not develop DVT in 97% of cases but was only correct in 15% of cases in predicting those who would develop DVT. Injury severity score (ISS) was not predictive in this multivariate analysis. Seventeen (85%) DVTs were unsuspected clinically. Study patients received an average of 3.5 studies at an overall charge of $313,330 to detect 17 clinically unsuspected DVTs (5%). This represents about 5% of the total bed charges for these patients, or $18,000 per DVT. These results suggest that standard use of DVT prophylaxis in a high-risk trauma population leads to a low incidence of DVT and that a screening protocol is effective in detecting unsuspected DVTs. Use of a surveillance protocol, however, may reduce but will not eliminate the incidence of pulmonary emboli in this patient population.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>8795534</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00154-7</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9610
ispartof The American journal of surgery, 1996-08, Vol.172 (2), p.210-213
issn 0002-9610
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78320711
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Adult
Aged
Female
Hospital Charges
Humans
Injury Severity Score
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Population Surveillance
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Pulmonary Embolism - prevention & control
Risk
Risk Factors
Thromboembolism - prevention & control
Thrombosis - diagnostic imaging
Thrombosis - economics
Thrombosis - etiology
Thrombosis - prevention & control
Time Factors
Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color
Wounds and Injuries - complications
Wounds and Injuries - diagnostic imaging
Wounds and Injuries - economics
title Is deep vein thrombosis surveillance warranted in high-risk trauma patients?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T02%3A38%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20deep%20vein%20thrombosis%20surveillance%20warranted%20in%20high-risk%20trauma%20patients?&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Piotrowski,%20J%20J&rft.date=1996-08-01&rft.volume=172&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=210&rft.epage=213&rft.pages=210-213&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00154-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E78320711%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78320711&rft_id=info:pmid/8795534&rfr_iscdi=true