Multicenter open trial of cefotetan and cefoxitin in elective biliary surgery
The present study was performed in two phases. In phase I, 112 patients were randomized to either 2 g cefotetan as a single prophylactic dose or 2 g cefoxitin every 6 hours for a maximum of 4 doses; phase II included 148 patients who were randomized to either 1 g cefotetan as a single dose or cefoxi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of surgery 1988-05, Vol.155 (5), p.77-80 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 80 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 77 |
container_title | The American journal of surgery |
container_volume | 155 |
creator | Fabian, Timothy C. Zellner, Stephen R. Gazzaniga, Alan Hanna, Charles Nichols, Ronald Lee Waxman, Kenneth |
description | The present study was performed in two phases. In phase I, 112 patients were randomized to either 2 g cefotetan as a single prophylactic dose or 2 g cefoxitin every 6 hours for a maximum of 4 doses; phase II included 148 patients who were randomized to either 1 g cefotetan as a single dose or cefoxitin dosed as in phase I. The randomization was 2:1 cefotetan to cefoxitin in both phases. Nonevaluability rates were 10 percent for the cefotetan patients and 22 percent for the cefoxitin patients, the majority being due to dosing errors. Demographic characteristics demonstrated 88 percent to be female, 81 percent to be less than 65 years of age, and the average weight to be 165 lb. There were no differences in these characteristics among the groups. Common duct exploration was performed in 6 percent of the 2 g cefotetan patients, 9 percent in the 1 g cefotetan patients, and 13 percent in the 2g cefoxitin patients. There were five clinical failures of prophylaxis: one wound infection in the 2 g cefotetan patients, one wound infection and one drain tract infection in the 1 g cefotetan patients, and one wound infection and one case of cholangitis in the 2 g cefoxitin patients. The clinical success rates were 98 percent in the 2 g cefotetan patients, 98 percent in the 1 g cefotetan patients, and 97 percent in the 2 g cefoxitin patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80218-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78255951</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002961088802186</els_id><sourcerecordid>15475756</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-99b8508ead68eeba1ec707e8826bfe9441e7547a6bc1168ed0cf7b739b089de33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotVZ_QmFPoofVzG6zSU4ixS9o8aCeQzY7K5Htbk2yxf570w96LQyEYZ6ZlzyEjIHeAYXi_oNSmqWyAHojxK2gGYi0OCFDEFymIER-SoYH5JxceP8TW4BJPiCDPIsUz4dkPu-bYA22AV3SLbFNgrO6Sbo6MVh3AYNuE91W2-7PBtsmsbBBE-wKk9I2Vrt14nv3jW59Sc5q3Xi82r8j8vX89Dl9TWfvL2_Tx1lqcgkhlbIUjArUVSEQSw1oOOUoRFaUNcrJBJCzCddFaQAiUlFT85LnsqRCVpjnI3K9u7t03W-PPqiF9QabRrfY9V5xkTEmGRwFIcYwzooIsh1oXOe9w1otnV3ErymgauNbbX2rjUwlhNr6Vpu98T6gLxdYHbb2guP8YTfHqGNl0SlvLLYGK-uiQ1V19kjCP6V-kC8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15475756</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multicenter open trial of cefotetan and cefoxitin in elective biliary surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Fabian, Timothy C. ; Zellner, Stephen R. ; Gazzaniga, Alan ; Hanna, Charles ; Nichols, Ronald Lee ; Waxman, Kenneth</creator><contributor>Barza, M ; Fry, DE ; Neu, HC (eds)</contributor><creatorcontrib>Fabian, Timothy C. ; Zellner, Stephen R. ; Gazzaniga, Alan ; Hanna, Charles ; Nichols, Ronald Lee ; Waxman, Kenneth ; Barza, M ; Fry, DE ; Neu, HC (eds)</creatorcontrib><description>The present study was performed in two phases. In phase I, 112 patients were randomized to either 2 g cefotetan as a single prophylactic dose or 2 g cefoxitin every 6 hours for a maximum of 4 doses; phase II included 148 patients who were randomized to either 1 g cefotetan as a single dose or cefoxitin dosed as in phase I. The randomization was 2:1 cefotetan to cefoxitin in both phases. Nonevaluability rates were 10 percent for the cefotetan patients and 22 percent for the cefoxitin patients, the majority being due to dosing errors. Demographic characteristics demonstrated 88 percent to be female, 81 percent to be less than 65 years of age, and the average weight to be 165 lb. There were no differences in these characteristics among the groups. Common duct exploration was performed in 6 percent of the 2 g cefotetan patients, 9 percent in the 1 g cefotetan patients, and 13 percent in the 2g cefoxitin patients. There were five clinical failures of prophylaxis: one wound infection in the 2 g cefotetan patients, one wound infection and one drain tract infection in the 1 g cefotetan patients, and one wound infection and one case of cholangitis in the 2 g cefoxitin patients. The clinical success rates were 98 percent in the 2 g cefotetan patients, 98 percent in the 1 g cefotetan patients, and 97 percent in the 2 g cefoxitin patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80218-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3287973</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures ; Cefotetan ; Cefoxitin - administration & dosage ; Cefoxitin - therapeutic use ; Cephamycins - administration & dosage ; Cephamycins - therapeutic use ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Premedication ; Random Allocation ; Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 1988-05, Vol.155 (5), p.77-80</ispartof><rights>1988 Reed Publishing USA</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-99b8508ead68eeba1ec707e8826bfe9441e7547a6bc1168ed0cf7b739b089de33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-99b8508ead68eeba1ec707e8826bfe9441e7547a6bc1168ed0cf7b739b089de33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961088802186$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3537,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3287973$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Barza, M</contributor><contributor>Fry, DE</contributor><contributor>Neu, HC (eds)</contributor><creatorcontrib>Fabian, Timothy C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zellner, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazzaniga, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanna, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, Ronald Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waxman, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><title>Multicenter open trial of cefotetan and cefoxitin in elective biliary surgery</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>The present study was performed in two phases. In phase I, 112 patients were randomized to either 2 g cefotetan as a single prophylactic dose or 2 g cefoxitin every 6 hours for a maximum of 4 doses; phase II included 148 patients who were randomized to either 1 g cefotetan as a single dose or cefoxitin dosed as in phase I. The randomization was 2:1 cefotetan to cefoxitin in both phases. Nonevaluability rates were 10 percent for the cefotetan patients and 22 percent for the cefoxitin patients, the majority being due to dosing errors. Demographic characteristics demonstrated 88 percent to be female, 81 percent to be less than 65 years of age, and the average weight to be 165 lb. There were no differences in these characteristics among the groups. Common duct exploration was performed in 6 percent of the 2 g cefotetan patients, 9 percent in the 1 g cefotetan patients, and 13 percent in the 2g cefoxitin patients. There were five clinical failures of prophylaxis: one wound infection in the 2 g cefotetan patients, one wound infection and one drain tract infection in the 1 g cefotetan patients, and one wound infection and one case of cholangitis in the 2 g cefoxitin patients. The clinical success rates were 98 percent in the 2 g cefotetan patients, 98 percent in the 1 g cefotetan patients, and 97 percent in the 2 g cefoxitin patients.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Cefotetan</subject><subject>Cefoxitin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Cefoxitin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cephamycins - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Cephamycins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Premedication</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotVZ_QmFPoofVzG6zSU4ixS9o8aCeQzY7K5Htbk2yxf570w96LQyEYZ6ZlzyEjIHeAYXi_oNSmqWyAHojxK2gGYi0OCFDEFymIER-SoYH5JxceP8TW4BJPiCDPIsUz4dkPu-bYA22AV3SLbFNgrO6Sbo6MVh3AYNuE91W2-7PBtsmsbBBE-wKk9I2Vrt14nv3jW59Sc5q3Xi82r8j8vX89Dl9TWfvL2_Tx1lqcgkhlbIUjArUVSEQSw1oOOUoRFaUNcrJBJCzCddFaQAiUlFT85LnsqRCVpjnI3K9u7t03W-PPqiF9QabRrfY9V5xkTEmGRwFIcYwzooIsh1oXOe9w1otnV3ErymgauNbbX2rjUwlhNr6Vpu98T6gLxdYHbb2guP8YTfHqGNl0SlvLLYGK-uiQ1V19kjCP6V-kC8</recordid><startdate>19880531</startdate><enddate>19880531</enddate><creator>Fabian, Timothy C.</creator><creator>Zellner, Stephen R.</creator><creator>Gazzaniga, Alan</creator><creator>Hanna, Charles</creator><creator>Nichols, Ronald Lee</creator><creator>Waxman, Kenneth</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19880531</creationdate><title>Multicenter open trial of cefotetan and cefoxitin in elective biliary surgery</title><author>Fabian, Timothy C. ; Zellner, Stephen R. ; Gazzaniga, Alan ; Hanna, Charles ; Nichols, Ronald Lee ; Waxman, Kenneth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-99b8508ead68eeba1ec707e8826bfe9441e7547a6bc1168ed0cf7b739b089de33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Cefotetan</topic><topic>Cefoxitin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Cefoxitin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cephamycins - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Cephamycins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Premedication</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fabian, Timothy C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zellner, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazzaniga, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanna, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, Ronald Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waxman, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fabian, Timothy C.</au><au>Zellner, Stephen R.</au><au>Gazzaniga, Alan</au><au>Hanna, Charles</au><au>Nichols, Ronald Lee</au><au>Waxman, Kenneth</au><au>Barza, M</au><au>Fry, DE</au><au>Neu, HC (eds)</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multicenter open trial of cefotetan and cefoxitin in elective biliary surgery</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>1988-05-31</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>155</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>77</spage><epage>80</epage><pages>77-80</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><abstract>The present study was performed in two phases. In phase I, 112 patients were randomized to either 2 g cefotetan as a single prophylactic dose or 2 g cefoxitin every 6 hours for a maximum of 4 doses; phase II included 148 patients who were randomized to either 1 g cefotetan as a single dose or cefoxitin dosed as in phase I. The randomization was 2:1 cefotetan to cefoxitin in both phases. Nonevaluability rates were 10 percent for the cefotetan patients and 22 percent for the cefoxitin patients, the majority being due to dosing errors. Demographic characteristics demonstrated 88 percent to be female, 81 percent to be less than 65 years of age, and the average weight to be 165 lb. There were no differences in these characteristics among the groups. Common duct exploration was performed in 6 percent of the 2 g cefotetan patients, 9 percent in the 1 g cefotetan patients, and 13 percent in the 2g cefoxitin patients. There were five clinical failures of prophylaxis: one wound infection in the 2 g cefotetan patients, one wound infection and one drain tract infection in the 1 g cefotetan patients, and one wound infection and one case of cholangitis in the 2 g cefoxitin patients. The clinical success rates were 98 percent in the 2 g cefotetan patients, 98 percent in the 1 g cefotetan patients, and 97 percent in the 2 g cefoxitin patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>3287973</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80218-6</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9610 |
ispartof | The American journal of surgery, 1988-05, Vol.155 (5), p.77-80 |
issn | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78255951 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Aged Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures Cefotetan Cefoxitin - administration & dosage Cefoxitin - therapeutic use Cephamycins - administration & dosage Cephamycins - therapeutic use Clinical Trials as Topic Female Humans Male Middle Aged Premedication Random Allocation Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control |
title | Multicenter open trial of cefotetan and cefoxitin in elective biliary surgery |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T05%3A18%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multicenter%20open%20trial%20of%20cefotetan%20and%20cefoxitin%20in%20elective%20biliary%20surgery&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Fabian,%20Timothy%20C.&rft.date=1988-05-31&rft.volume=155&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=77&rft.epage=80&rft.pages=77-80&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80218-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E15475756%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15475756&rft_id=info:pmid/3287973&rft_els_id=S0002961088802186&rfr_iscdi=true |