Factors associated with Pap smear taking in general practice: focusing public health initiatives
This study ascertained the relationships of patient, practitioner and consultation factors with: 1. taking a Pap smear or referral to a specialist in the consultation; and 2. an unsuccessful offer to take a Pap smear or making an appointment for a smear. In a cross‐sectional study of 3478 women pres...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Australian and New Zealand journal of public health 1996-06, Vol.20 (3), p.260-266 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 266 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 260 |
container_title | Australian and New Zealand journal of public health |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Heywood, Alison Firman, David Ring, Ian |
description | This study ascertained the relationships of patient, practitioner and consultation factors with: 1. taking a Pap smear or referral to a specialist in the consultation; and 2. an unsuccessful offer to take a Pap smear or making an appointment for a smear. In a cross‐sectional study of 3478 women presenting to 230 randomly selected general practitioners in Brisbane and Toowoomba, information about most recent Pap smear, screening in the consultation, and independent variables were collected from patients and doctors. Relationships between three levels of outcome variable (no action, Pap smear taken or referral, appointment or refusal), and independent variables (practitioner variables, consultation variables, patient variables) were modelled using polytomous logistic regression. Presenting for a routine checkup and breast cancer screening were associated with all types of action. Younger age, longer consultations and consultations with a female practitioner were associated with Pap smear taking and referrals, and not appointments or refusals. Being due for a Pap smear, having blood pressure measured, consulting a younger general practitioner and one who ascribed to current guidelines on screening were associated with an appointment or a refusal, when compared with no action. Results identify different profiles of those who get a Pap smear and those who do not, the former indicating a more proactive patient group, while the latter suggest more active general practitioners who attempted opportunistic screening of passive patients, or women who do not specifically seek Pap smears. We have identified factors that have significance for developing public health programs focused on consumers and providers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1467-842X.1996.tb01026.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78253706</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1326020023038554</els_id><sourcerecordid>1891867209</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5820-d8f2109a293dcbcfb636d2acd66ed396d9db87b0cf59eba5bda24d4c20bab3bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkc1u1DAUhSMEKm3hEZAskBCbBP8kttMNqtpOi1RgkEAgNsY_N62nmSTYSTt9exzNqAsWCLyJlXvOZ119WfaS4IKk83ZVkJKLXJb0e0HqmhejwQRTXmweZftEVCznJa4epzujPMcU46fZQYwrjDFJv_ayPSm4LEm1n_1caDv2ISIdY2-9HsGhOz9eo6UeUFyDDmjUN767Qr5DV9BB0C0aQip5C0eo6e0U5-kwmdZbdA26TWXf-TGx_C3EZ9mTRrcRnu--h9nXxdmXk4v88tP5-5Pjy9xWkuLcyYYSXGtaM2eNbQxn3FFtHefgWM1d7YwUBtumqsHoyjhNS1daio02zBh2mL3ecofQ_5ogjmrto4W21R30U1RC0ooJzFPwzV-DRNZEckFxnaKv_oiu-il0aQ3FMOeYiprPwKNtyoY-xgCNGoJf63CvCFazL7VSsy81-1KzL7XzpTap_GL3xGTW4B6qO0Fp_m47v_Mt3P8HWR3_WF5QjhMh3xJ8HGHzQNDhRnHBRKW-fTxX8nP54XRBlmpe-nSbh2Tr1kNQ0XroLDgfwI7K9f5fFvsNPcjMmg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3066027966</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors associated with Pap smear taking in general practice: focusing public health initiatives</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Heywood, Alison ; Firman, David ; Ring, Ian</creator><creatorcontrib>Heywood, Alison ; Firman, David ; Ring, Ian</creatorcontrib><description>This study ascertained the relationships of patient, practitioner and consultation factors with: 1. taking a Pap smear or referral to a specialist in the consultation; and 2. an unsuccessful offer to take a Pap smear or making an appointment for a smear. In a cross‐sectional study of 3478 women presenting to 230 randomly selected general practitioners in Brisbane and Toowoomba, information about most recent Pap smear, screening in the consultation, and independent variables were collected from patients and doctors. Relationships between three levels of outcome variable (no action, Pap smear taken or referral, appointment or refusal), and independent variables (practitioner variables, consultation variables, patient variables) were modelled using polytomous logistic regression. Presenting for a routine checkup and breast cancer screening were associated with all types of action. Younger age, longer consultations and consultations with a female practitioner were associated with Pap smear taking and referrals, and not appointments or refusals. Being due for a Pap smear, having blood pressure measured, consulting a younger general practitioner and one who ascribed to current guidelines on screening were associated with an appointment or a refusal, when compared with no action. Results identify different profiles of those who get a Pap smear and those who do not, the former indicating a more proactive patient group, while the latter suggest more active general practitioners who attempted opportunistic screening of passive patients, or women who do not specifically seek Pap smears. We have identified factors that have significance for developing public health programs focused on consumers and providers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1326-0200</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1753-6405</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-842X.1996.tb01026.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8768415</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Action ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Blood pressure ; Breast cancer ; Cancer ; Cancer screening ; Cervical cancer ; Consumers ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Family physicians ; Family Practice ; Female ; Health care ; Humans ; Independent variables ; Mammography ; Medical screening ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Pap smear ; Papanicolaou Test ; Patients ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Preventive medicine ; Public health ; Publishing ; Referral and Consultation ; Referrals ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Treatment Refusal ; Vaginal Smears - statistics & numerical data ; Variables ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Australian and New Zealand journal of public health, 1996-06, Vol.20 (3), p.260-266</ispartof><rights>1996 Copyright 1996 THE AUTHORS.</rights><rights>1996. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5820-d8f2109a293dcbcfb636d2acd66ed396d9db87b0cf59eba5bda24d4c20bab3bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5820-d8f2109a293dcbcfb636d2acd66ed396d9db87b0cf59eba5bda24d4c20bab3bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1467-842X.1996.tb01026.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1467-842X.1996.tb01026.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27865,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8768415$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heywood, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firman, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ring, Ian</creatorcontrib><title>Factors associated with Pap smear taking in general practice: focusing public health initiatives</title><title>Australian and New Zealand journal of public health</title><addtitle>Aust N Z J Public Health</addtitle><description>This study ascertained the relationships of patient, practitioner and consultation factors with: 1. taking a Pap smear or referral to a specialist in the consultation; and 2. an unsuccessful offer to take a Pap smear or making an appointment for a smear. In a cross‐sectional study of 3478 women presenting to 230 randomly selected general practitioners in Brisbane and Toowoomba, information about most recent Pap smear, screening in the consultation, and independent variables were collected from patients and doctors. Relationships between three levels of outcome variable (no action, Pap smear taken or referral, appointment or refusal), and independent variables (practitioner variables, consultation variables, patient variables) were modelled using polytomous logistic regression. Presenting for a routine checkup and breast cancer screening were associated with all types of action. Younger age, longer consultations and consultations with a female practitioner were associated with Pap smear taking and referrals, and not appointments or refusals. Being due for a Pap smear, having blood pressure measured, consulting a younger general practitioner and one who ascribed to current guidelines on screening were associated with an appointment or a refusal, when compared with no action. Results identify different profiles of those who get a Pap smear and those who do not, the former indicating a more proactive patient group, while the latter suggest more active general practitioners who attempted opportunistic screening of passive patients, or women who do not specifically seek Pap smears. We have identified factors that have significance for developing public health programs focused on consumers and providers.</description><subject>Action</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer screening</subject><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Family physicians</subject><subject>Family Practice</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Independent variables</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Pap smear</subject><subject>Papanicolaou Test</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physician-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Preventive medicine</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Publishing</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>Referrals</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Treatment Refusal</subject><subject>Vaginal Smears - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1326-0200</issn><issn>1753-6405</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkc1u1DAUhSMEKm3hEZAskBCbBP8kttMNqtpOi1RgkEAgNsY_N62nmSTYSTt9exzNqAsWCLyJlXvOZ119WfaS4IKk83ZVkJKLXJb0e0HqmhejwQRTXmweZftEVCznJa4epzujPMcU46fZQYwrjDFJv_ayPSm4LEm1n_1caDv2ISIdY2-9HsGhOz9eo6UeUFyDDmjUN767Qr5DV9BB0C0aQip5C0eo6e0U5-kwmdZbdA26TWXf-TGx_C3EZ9mTRrcRnu--h9nXxdmXk4v88tP5-5Pjy9xWkuLcyYYSXGtaM2eNbQxn3FFtHefgWM1d7YwUBtumqsHoyjhNS1daio02zBh2mL3ecofQ_5ogjmrto4W21R30U1RC0ooJzFPwzV-DRNZEckFxnaKv_oiu-il0aQ3FMOeYiprPwKNtyoY-xgCNGoJf63CvCFazL7VSsy81-1KzL7XzpTap_GL3xGTW4B6qO0Fp_m47v_Mt3P8HWR3_WF5QjhMh3xJ8HGHzQNDhRnHBRKW-fTxX8nP54XRBlmpe-nSbh2Tr1kNQ0XroLDgfwI7K9f5fFvsNPcjMmg</recordid><startdate>199606</startdate><enddate>199606</enddate><creator>Heywood, Alison</creator><creator>Firman, David</creator><creator>Ring, Ian</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199606</creationdate><title>Factors associated with Pap smear taking in general practice: focusing public health initiatives</title><author>Heywood, Alison ; Firman, David ; Ring, Ian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5820-d8f2109a293dcbcfb636d2acd66ed396d9db87b0cf59eba5bda24d4c20bab3bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Action</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer screening</topic><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Family physicians</topic><topic>Family Practice</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Independent variables</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Pap smear</topic><topic>Papanicolaou Test</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physician-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Preventive medicine</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Publishing</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>Referrals</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Treatment Refusal</topic><topic>Vaginal Smears - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heywood, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firman, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ring, Ian</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Australian and New Zealand journal of public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heywood, Alison</au><au>Firman, David</au><au>Ring, Ian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors associated with Pap smear taking in general practice: focusing public health initiatives</atitle><jtitle>Australian and New Zealand journal of public health</jtitle><addtitle>Aust N Z J Public Health</addtitle><date>1996-06</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>260</spage><epage>266</epage><pages>260-266</pages><issn>1326-0200</issn><eissn>1753-6405</eissn><abstract>This study ascertained the relationships of patient, practitioner and consultation factors with: 1. taking a Pap smear or referral to a specialist in the consultation; and 2. an unsuccessful offer to take a Pap smear or making an appointment for a smear. In a cross‐sectional study of 3478 women presenting to 230 randomly selected general practitioners in Brisbane and Toowoomba, information about most recent Pap smear, screening in the consultation, and independent variables were collected from patients and doctors. Relationships between three levels of outcome variable (no action, Pap smear taken or referral, appointment or refusal), and independent variables (practitioner variables, consultation variables, patient variables) were modelled using polytomous logistic regression. Presenting for a routine checkup and breast cancer screening were associated with all types of action. Younger age, longer consultations and consultations with a female practitioner were associated with Pap smear taking and referrals, and not appointments or refusals. Being due for a Pap smear, having blood pressure measured, consulting a younger general practitioner and one who ascribed to current guidelines on screening were associated with an appointment or a refusal, when compared with no action. Results identify different profiles of those who get a Pap smear and those who do not, the former indicating a more proactive patient group, while the latter suggest more active general practitioners who attempted opportunistic screening of passive patients, or women who do not specifically seek Pap smears. We have identified factors that have significance for developing public health programs focused on consumers and providers.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>8768415</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1467-842X.1996.tb01026.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1326-0200 |
ispartof | Australian and New Zealand journal of public health, 1996-06, Vol.20 (3), p.260-266 |
issn | 1326-0200 1753-6405 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78253706 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library; PAIS Index; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Action Adolescent Adult Aged Blood pressure Breast cancer Cancer Cancer screening Cervical cancer Consumers Cross-Sectional Studies Family physicians Family Practice Female Health care Humans Independent variables Mammography Medical screening Middle Aged Multivariate Analysis Pap smear Papanicolaou Test Patients Physician-Patient Relations Preventive medicine Public health Publishing Referral and Consultation Referrals Surveys and Questionnaires Treatment Refusal Vaginal Smears - statistics & numerical data Variables Womens health |
title | Factors associated with Pap smear taking in general practice: focusing public health initiatives |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T17%3A35%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20associated%20with%20Pap%20smear%20taking%20in%20general%20practice:%20focusing%20public%20health%20initiatives&rft.jtitle=Australian%20and%20New%20Zealand%20journal%20of%20public%20health&rft.au=Heywood,%20Alison&rft.date=1996-06&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=260&rft.epage=266&rft.pages=260-266&rft.issn=1326-0200&rft.eissn=1753-6405&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-842X.1996.tb01026.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1891867209%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3066027966&rft_id=info:pmid/8768415&rft_els_id=S1326020023038554&rfr_iscdi=true |