Role of bacterial vaginosis–associated microorganisms in endometritis

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to define the role of bacterial vaginosis and bacterial vaginosis–associated microorganisms in endometritis. STUDY DESIGN: Endometrial biopsies were obtained for histologic and microbiologic study from 178 consecutive women with suspected pelvic inflammatory disease, and 85 o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 1996-08, Vol.175 (2), p.435-441
Hauptverfasser: Hillier, Sharon L., Kiviat, Nancy B., Hawes, Stephen E., Hasselquist, Mary Beth, Hanssen, Pål Wølner, Eschenbach, David A., Holmes, King K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 441
container_issue 2
container_start_page 435
container_title American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 175
creator Hillier, Sharon L.
Kiviat, Nancy B.
Hawes, Stephen E.
Hasselquist, Mary Beth
Hanssen, Pål Wølner
Eschenbach, David A.
Holmes, King K.
description OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to define the role of bacterial vaginosis and bacterial vaginosis–associated microorganisms in endometritis. STUDY DESIGN: Endometrial biopsies were obtained for histologic and microbiologic study from 178 consecutive women with suspected pelvic inflammatory disease, and 85 of them underwent laparoscopy to diagnose salpingitis. RESULTS: Histologic endometritis was confirmed in 117 (65%) of the women. Among women who underwent laparoscopy, salpingitis was present in 68% of those with and 23% of those without endometritis. Some but not all bacterial vaginosis–associated microorganisms were linked with endometritis. By logistic regression analysis, after adjustment for bacterial vaginosis and isolation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis, endometritis was associated with endometrial N. gonorrhoeae (odds ratio 5.7, 95% confidence interval 1.8 to 17.5), C. trachomatis (odds ratio 4.8, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 18.2), anaerobic gram-negative rods (odds ratio 2.6, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 5.7), and nonwhite race (odds ratio 2.3, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 4.8). CONCLUSIONS: The association of anaerobic gram-negative rods with endometritis, after adjustment for bacterial vaginosis, N. gonorrhoeae, and C. trachomatis, supports the role of these microorganisms in the etiology of histologic endometritis among women with clinically suspected pelvic inflammatory disease. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:435-41.)
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70158-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78249518</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937896701588</els_id><sourcerecordid>78249518</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-15e240eec6312e56bfce2fb17ae59164547553481bf0c5d4ace418aca965a0d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtOwzAQhr0AlVI4QqWsECwCtmM79gqhCgpSJSQea8txJpVREhc7rcSOO3BDTkLSVt2yGs3jn3_mQ2hK8DXBRNy8YoxpqrJcXipxlWPCZSqP0PhQPkGnMX4MKVV0hEYyF5wKPkbzF19D4qukMLaD4EydbMzStT66-Pv9Y2L01pkOyqRxNngflqZ1sYmJaxNoS99AF1zn4hk6rkwd4XwfJ-j94f5t9pgunudPs7tFalkuu5RwoAwDWJERClwUlQVaFSQ3wBURjLOc84xJUlTY8pIZC4xIY40S3OBSZRN0sdu7Cv5zDbHTjYsW6tq04NdR55IyxYnsB_lusL86xgCVXgXXmPClCdYDNL2Fpgc6Wgm9haYH3XRvsC4aKA-qPbG-f7vrQ__lxkHQ0TpoLZQugO106d0_Dn_PNYAb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78249518</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Role of bacterial vaginosis–associated microorganisms in endometritis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Hillier, Sharon L. ; Kiviat, Nancy B. ; Hawes, Stephen E. ; Hasselquist, Mary Beth ; Hanssen, Pål Wølner ; Eschenbach, David A. ; Holmes, King K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hillier, Sharon L. ; Kiviat, Nancy B. ; Hawes, Stephen E. ; Hasselquist, Mary Beth ; Hanssen, Pål Wølner ; Eschenbach, David A. ; Holmes, King K.</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to define the role of bacterial vaginosis and bacterial vaginosis–associated microorganisms in endometritis. STUDY DESIGN: Endometrial biopsies were obtained for histologic and microbiologic study from 178 consecutive women with suspected pelvic inflammatory disease, and 85 of them underwent laparoscopy to diagnose salpingitis. RESULTS: Histologic endometritis was confirmed in 117 (65%) of the women. Among women who underwent laparoscopy, salpingitis was present in 68% of those with and 23% of those without endometritis. Some but not all bacterial vaginosis–associated microorganisms were linked with endometritis. By logistic regression analysis, after adjustment for bacterial vaginosis and isolation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis, endometritis was associated with endometrial N. gonorrhoeae (odds ratio 5.7, 95% confidence interval 1.8 to 17.5), C. trachomatis (odds ratio 4.8, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 18.2), anaerobic gram-negative rods (odds ratio 2.6, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 5.7), and nonwhite race (odds ratio 2.3, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 4.8). CONCLUSIONS: The association of anaerobic gram-negative rods with endometritis, after adjustment for bacterial vaginosis, N. gonorrhoeae, and C. trachomatis, supports the role of these microorganisms in the etiology of histologic endometritis among women with clinically suspected pelvic inflammatory disease. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:435-41.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70158-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8765265</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; anaerobic gram negative rods ; bacterial vaginosis ; Chlamydia trachomatis - isolation &amp; purification ; Endometritis ; Endometritis - microbiology ; Female ; Gram-Negative Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Neisseria gonorrhoeae - isolation &amp; purification ; Odds Ratio ; Regression Analysis ; Vaginosis, Bacterial - microbiology</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1996-08, Vol.175 (2), p.435-441</ispartof><rights>1996 Mosby, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-15e240eec6312e56bfce2fb17ae59164547553481bf0c5d4ace418aca965a0d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-15e240eec6312e56bfce2fb17ae59164547553481bf0c5d4ace418aca965a0d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70158-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8765265$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hillier, Sharon L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiviat, Nancy B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawes, Stephen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasselquist, Mary Beth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanssen, Pål Wølner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eschenbach, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, King K.</creatorcontrib><title>Role of bacterial vaginosis–associated microorganisms in endometritis</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to define the role of bacterial vaginosis and bacterial vaginosis–associated microorganisms in endometritis. STUDY DESIGN: Endometrial biopsies were obtained for histologic and microbiologic study from 178 consecutive women with suspected pelvic inflammatory disease, and 85 of them underwent laparoscopy to diagnose salpingitis. RESULTS: Histologic endometritis was confirmed in 117 (65%) of the women. Among women who underwent laparoscopy, salpingitis was present in 68% of those with and 23% of those without endometritis. Some but not all bacterial vaginosis–associated microorganisms were linked with endometritis. By logistic regression analysis, after adjustment for bacterial vaginosis and isolation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis, endometritis was associated with endometrial N. gonorrhoeae (odds ratio 5.7, 95% confidence interval 1.8 to 17.5), C. trachomatis (odds ratio 4.8, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 18.2), anaerobic gram-negative rods (odds ratio 2.6, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 5.7), and nonwhite race (odds ratio 2.3, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 4.8). CONCLUSIONS: The association of anaerobic gram-negative rods with endometritis, after adjustment for bacterial vaginosis, N. gonorrhoeae, and C. trachomatis, supports the role of these microorganisms in the etiology of histologic endometritis among women with clinically suspected pelvic inflammatory disease. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:435-41.)</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>anaerobic gram negative rods</subject><subject>bacterial vaginosis</subject><subject>Chlamydia trachomatis - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Endometritis</subject><subject>Endometritis - microbiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gram-Negative Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neisseria gonorrhoeae - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Vaginosis, Bacterial - microbiology</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtOwzAQhr0AlVI4QqWsECwCtmM79gqhCgpSJSQea8txJpVREhc7rcSOO3BDTkLSVt2yGs3jn3_mQ2hK8DXBRNy8YoxpqrJcXipxlWPCZSqP0PhQPkGnMX4MKVV0hEYyF5wKPkbzF19D4qukMLaD4EydbMzStT66-Pv9Y2L01pkOyqRxNngflqZ1sYmJaxNoS99AF1zn4hk6rkwd4XwfJ-j94f5t9pgunudPs7tFalkuu5RwoAwDWJERClwUlQVaFSQ3wBURjLOc84xJUlTY8pIZC4xIY40S3OBSZRN0sdu7Cv5zDbHTjYsW6tq04NdR55IyxYnsB_lusL86xgCVXgXXmPClCdYDNL2Fpgc6Wgm9haYH3XRvsC4aKA-qPbG-f7vrQ__lxkHQ0TpoLZQugO106d0_Dn_PNYAb</recordid><startdate>19960801</startdate><enddate>19960801</enddate><creator>Hillier, Sharon L.</creator><creator>Kiviat, Nancy B.</creator><creator>Hawes, Stephen E.</creator><creator>Hasselquist, Mary Beth</creator><creator>Hanssen, Pål Wølner</creator><creator>Eschenbach, David A.</creator><creator>Holmes, King K.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960801</creationdate><title>Role of bacterial vaginosis–associated microorganisms in endometritis</title><author>Hillier, Sharon L. ; Kiviat, Nancy B. ; Hawes, Stephen E. ; Hasselquist, Mary Beth ; Hanssen, Pål Wølner ; Eschenbach, David A. ; Holmes, King K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-15e240eec6312e56bfce2fb17ae59164547553481bf0c5d4ace418aca965a0d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>anaerobic gram negative rods</topic><topic>bacterial vaginosis</topic><topic>Chlamydia trachomatis - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Endometritis</topic><topic>Endometritis - microbiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gram-Negative Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neisseria gonorrhoeae - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Vaginosis, Bacterial - microbiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hillier, Sharon L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiviat, Nancy B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawes, Stephen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasselquist, Mary Beth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanssen, Pål Wølner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eschenbach, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, King K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hillier, Sharon L.</au><au>Kiviat, Nancy B.</au><au>Hawes, Stephen E.</au><au>Hasselquist, Mary Beth</au><au>Hanssen, Pål Wølner</au><au>Eschenbach, David A.</au><au>Holmes, King K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Role of bacterial vaginosis–associated microorganisms in endometritis</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>1996-08-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>175</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>435</spage><epage>441</epage><pages>435-441</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><abstract>OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to define the role of bacterial vaginosis and bacterial vaginosis–associated microorganisms in endometritis. STUDY DESIGN: Endometrial biopsies were obtained for histologic and microbiologic study from 178 consecutive women with suspected pelvic inflammatory disease, and 85 of them underwent laparoscopy to diagnose salpingitis. RESULTS: Histologic endometritis was confirmed in 117 (65%) of the women. Among women who underwent laparoscopy, salpingitis was present in 68% of those with and 23% of those without endometritis. Some but not all bacterial vaginosis–associated microorganisms were linked with endometritis. By logistic regression analysis, after adjustment for bacterial vaginosis and isolation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis, endometritis was associated with endometrial N. gonorrhoeae (odds ratio 5.7, 95% confidence interval 1.8 to 17.5), C. trachomatis (odds ratio 4.8, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 18.2), anaerobic gram-negative rods (odds ratio 2.6, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 5.7), and nonwhite race (odds ratio 2.3, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 4.8). CONCLUSIONS: The association of anaerobic gram-negative rods with endometritis, after adjustment for bacterial vaginosis, N. gonorrhoeae, and C. trachomatis, supports the role of these microorganisms in the etiology of histologic endometritis among women with clinically suspected pelvic inflammatory disease. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:435-41.)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>8765265</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70158-8</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9378
ispartof American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1996-08, Vol.175 (2), p.435-441
issn 0002-9378
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78249518
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
anaerobic gram negative rods
bacterial vaginosis
Chlamydia trachomatis - isolation & purification
Endometritis
Endometritis - microbiology
Female
Gram-Negative Bacteria - isolation & purification
Humans
Middle Aged
Neisseria gonorrhoeae - isolation & purification
Odds Ratio
Regression Analysis
Vaginosis, Bacterial - microbiology
title Role of bacterial vaginosis–associated microorganisms in endometritis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T06%3A07%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Role%20of%20bacterial%20vaginosis%E2%80%93associated%20microorganisms%20in%20endometritis&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Hillier,%20Sharon%20L.&rft.date=1996-08-01&rft.volume=175&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=435&rft.epage=441&rft.pages=435-441&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70158-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78249518%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78249518&rft_id=info:pmid/8765265&rft_els_id=S0002937896701588&rfr_iscdi=true