Differentiation of yeast‐like fungi using the commercial Auxacolor system

Technical factors preclude the use of conventional fermentation and assimilation procedures for the routine laboratory differentiation of yeast‐like fungal isolates. Commercial biochemical differentiation systems are therefore used to remedy this situation. The predictive accuracy of three commercia...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Mycoses 1996-03, Vol.39 (3‐4), p.135-140
1. Verfasser: Hantschke, D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 140
container_issue 3‐4
container_start_page 135
container_title Mycoses
container_volume 39
creator Hantschke, D.
description Technical factors preclude the use of conventional fermentation and assimilation procedures for the routine laboratory differentiation of yeast‐like fungal isolates. Commercial biochemical differentiation systems are therefore used to remedy this situation. The predictive accuracy of three commercially available differentiation systems was tested using 120 yeast‐like fungal isolates. The morphological characteristics of these fungal strains were identical in the case of all three differentiation systems. The fungal isolates were correctly identified in 98.3% of cases with Auxacolor, in 90.8% of cases with API 20C AUX and in 76.7% of cases with the Mycotube system. The advantages and disadvantages of these biochemical differentiation systems are discussed. Zusammenfassung. Mit den klassischen Methoden der Fermentation und der Assimilation ist es aus arbeitstechnischen Gründen nicht möglich, in Routinelaboratorien die anfallenden Hefepilzisolate zu differenzieren. Aus diesen Gründen werden als Hilfsmittel kommerzielle biochemische Differenzierungssysteme eingesetzt. Drei dieser käuflich zu erwerbenden Bunten Reihen wurden mit 120 Sproßpilzisolaten auf ihre Aussagefähigkeit überprüft. Die morphologischen Merkmale dieser Pilzstämme waren für alle drei Differenzierungssysteme einheitlich. Mit Auxacolor haben wir 98,3%, mit Api 20C AUX 90,8% und mit Mycotube 76,7% der Sproßpilzisolate korrekt bestimmt. Vor‐ und Nachteile dieser biochemi‐schen Differenzierungssysteme werden diskutiert.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1439-0507.1996.tb00116.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78246900</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15925095</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4305-e2ab102ea41e48ed7a92b14653d3594fcf0ebd222af3d13a535ff5039f74b4063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1O20AQgFeIKg3QR0CyEOrN7uyfN3upFKVQEEFcyqGn1dqeTTf4J_XaIrnxCDxjn6SOYuXKXObwfZrDfIRcUUjoMN_WCRVcxyBBJVTrNOkyAErTZHtCpkd0SqagOY-VAPWZnIWwHiSlWTohk5lKFcBsSh5-eOewxbrztvNNHTUu2qEN3b-399K_YOT6euWjPvh6FXV_MMqbqsI297aM5v3W5k3ZtFHYhQ6rC_LJ2TLgl3Gfk-fbm1-Lu3j59PN-MV_GueAgY2Q2o8DQCopihoWymmVUpJIXXGrhcgeYFYwx63hBuZVcOieBa6dEJiDl5-Tr4e6mbf72GDpT-ZBjWdoamz4YNWMi1QAfilRqJkHLQbwcxT6rsDCb1le23ZnxTQO_HrkNuS1da-vch6PGKRdCqUH7ftBefYm7I6Zg9tnM2uzbmH0bs89mxmxmax5_LyiX_D_sJoy0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15925095</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differentiation of yeast‐like fungi using the commercial Auxacolor system</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Hantschke, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hantschke, D.</creatorcontrib><description>Technical factors preclude the use of conventional fermentation and assimilation procedures for the routine laboratory differentiation of yeast‐like fungal isolates. Commercial biochemical differentiation systems are therefore used to remedy this situation. The predictive accuracy of three commercially available differentiation systems was tested using 120 yeast‐like fungal isolates. The morphological characteristics of these fungal strains were identical in the case of all three differentiation systems. The fungal isolates were correctly identified in 98.3% of cases with Auxacolor, in 90.8% of cases with API 20C AUX and in 76.7% of cases with the Mycotube system. The advantages and disadvantages of these biochemical differentiation systems are discussed. Zusammenfassung. Mit den klassischen Methoden der Fermentation und der Assimilation ist es aus arbeitstechnischen Gründen nicht möglich, in Routinelaboratorien die anfallenden Hefepilzisolate zu differenzieren. Aus diesen Gründen werden als Hilfsmittel kommerzielle biochemische Differenzierungssysteme eingesetzt. Drei dieser käuflich zu erwerbenden Bunten Reihen wurden mit 120 Sproßpilzisolaten auf ihre Aussagefähigkeit überprüft. Die morphologischen Merkmale dieser Pilzstämme waren für alle drei Differenzierungssysteme einheitlich. Mit Auxacolor haben wir 98,3%, mit Api 20C AUX 90,8% und mit Mycotube 76,7% der Sproßpilzisolate korrekt bestimmt. Vor‐ und Nachteile dieser biochemi‐schen Differenzierungssysteme werden diskutiert.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0933-7407</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0507</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.1996.tb00116.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8767008</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>API 20C AUX ; Auxacolor ; biochemical pattern ; Biological and medical sciences ; Candida - classification ; Candida - isolation &amp; purification ; differentiation ; Fermentation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Fungi - classification ; Fungi - isolation &amp; purification ; Humans ; Microbiology ; morphological characteristics ; Mycological methods and techniques used in mycology ; Mycology ; Mycoses - microbiology ; Mycotube ; Reproducibility of Results ; Yeasts - classification ; Yeast‐like fungi</subject><ispartof>Mycoses, 1996-03, Vol.39 (3‐4), p.135-140</ispartof><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4305-e2ab102ea41e48ed7a92b14653d3594fcf0ebd222af3d13a535ff5039f74b4063</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1439-0507.1996.tb00116.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1439-0507.1996.tb00116.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3134477$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8767008$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hantschke, D.</creatorcontrib><title>Differentiation of yeast‐like fungi using the commercial Auxacolor system</title><title>Mycoses</title><addtitle>Mycoses</addtitle><description>Technical factors preclude the use of conventional fermentation and assimilation procedures for the routine laboratory differentiation of yeast‐like fungal isolates. Commercial biochemical differentiation systems are therefore used to remedy this situation. The predictive accuracy of three commercially available differentiation systems was tested using 120 yeast‐like fungal isolates. The morphological characteristics of these fungal strains were identical in the case of all three differentiation systems. The fungal isolates were correctly identified in 98.3% of cases with Auxacolor, in 90.8% of cases with API 20C AUX and in 76.7% of cases with the Mycotube system. The advantages and disadvantages of these biochemical differentiation systems are discussed. Zusammenfassung. Mit den klassischen Methoden der Fermentation und der Assimilation ist es aus arbeitstechnischen Gründen nicht möglich, in Routinelaboratorien die anfallenden Hefepilzisolate zu differenzieren. Aus diesen Gründen werden als Hilfsmittel kommerzielle biochemische Differenzierungssysteme eingesetzt. Drei dieser käuflich zu erwerbenden Bunten Reihen wurden mit 120 Sproßpilzisolaten auf ihre Aussagefähigkeit überprüft. Die morphologischen Merkmale dieser Pilzstämme waren für alle drei Differenzierungssysteme einheitlich. Mit Auxacolor haben wir 98,3%, mit Api 20C AUX 90,8% und mit Mycotube 76,7% der Sproßpilzisolate korrekt bestimmt. Vor‐ und Nachteile dieser biochemi‐schen Differenzierungssysteme werden diskutiert.</description><subject>API 20C AUX</subject><subject>Auxacolor</subject><subject>biochemical pattern</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Candida - classification</subject><subject>Candida - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>differentiation</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Fungi - classification</subject><subject>Fungi - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>morphological characteristics</subject><subject>Mycological methods and techniques used in mycology</subject><subject>Mycology</subject><subject>Mycoses - microbiology</subject><subject>Mycotube</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Yeasts - classification</subject><subject>Yeast‐like fungi</subject><issn>0933-7407</issn><issn>1439-0507</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1O20AQgFeIKg3QR0CyEOrN7uyfN3upFKVQEEFcyqGn1dqeTTf4J_XaIrnxCDxjn6SOYuXKXObwfZrDfIRcUUjoMN_WCRVcxyBBJVTrNOkyAErTZHtCpkd0SqagOY-VAPWZnIWwHiSlWTohk5lKFcBsSh5-eOewxbrztvNNHTUu2qEN3b-399K_YOT6euWjPvh6FXV_MMqbqsI297aM5v3W5k3ZtFHYhQ6rC_LJ2TLgl3Gfk-fbm1-Lu3j59PN-MV_GueAgY2Q2o8DQCopihoWymmVUpJIXXGrhcgeYFYwx63hBuZVcOieBa6dEJiDl5-Tr4e6mbf72GDpT-ZBjWdoamz4YNWMi1QAfilRqJkHLQbwcxT6rsDCb1le23ZnxTQO_HrkNuS1da-vch6PGKRdCqUH7ftBefYm7I6Zg9tnM2uzbmH0bs89mxmxmax5_LyiX_D_sJoy0</recordid><startdate>199603</startdate><enddate>199603</enddate><creator>Hantschke, D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199603</creationdate><title>Differentiation of yeast‐like fungi using the commercial Auxacolor system</title><author>Hantschke, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4305-e2ab102ea41e48ed7a92b14653d3594fcf0ebd222af3d13a535ff5039f74b4063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>API 20C AUX</topic><topic>Auxacolor</topic><topic>biochemical pattern</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Candida - classification</topic><topic>Candida - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>differentiation</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Fungi - classification</topic><topic>Fungi - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>morphological characteristics</topic><topic>Mycological methods and techniques used in mycology</topic><topic>Mycology</topic><topic>Mycoses - microbiology</topic><topic>Mycotube</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Yeasts - classification</topic><topic>Yeast‐like fungi</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hantschke, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Mycoses</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hantschke, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differentiation of yeast‐like fungi using the commercial Auxacolor system</atitle><jtitle>Mycoses</jtitle><addtitle>Mycoses</addtitle><date>1996-03</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>3‐4</issue><spage>135</spage><epage>140</epage><pages>135-140</pages><issn>0933-7407</issn><eissn>1439-0507</eissn><abstract>Technical factors preclude the use of conventional fermentation and assimilation procedures for the routine laboratory differentiation of yeast‐like fungal isolates. Commercial biochemical differentiation systems are therefore used to remedy this situation. The predictive accuracy of three commercially available differentiation systems was tested using 120 yeast‐like fungal isolates. The morphological characteristics of these fungal strains were identical in the case of all three differentiation systems. The fungal isolates were correctly identified in 98.3% of cases with Auxacolor, in 90.8% of cases with API 20C AUX and in 76.7% of cases with the Mycotube system. The advantages and disadvantages of these biochemical differentiation systems are discussed. Zusammenfassung. Mit den klassischen Methoden der Fermentation und der Assimilation ist es aus arbeitstechnischen Gründen nicht möglich, in Routinelaboratorien die anfallenden Hefepilzisolate zu differenzieren. Aus diesen Gründen werden als Hilfsmittel kommerzielle biochemische Differenzierungssysteme eingesetzt. Drei dieser käuflich zu erwerbenden Bunten Reihen wurden mit 120 Sproßpilzisolaten auf ihre Aussagefähigkeit überprüft. Die morphologischen Merkmale dieser Pilzstämme waren für alle drei Differenzierungssysteme einheitlich. Mit Auxacolor haben wir 98,3%, mit Api 20C AUX 90,8% und mit Mycotube 76,7% der Sproßpilzisolate korrekt bestimmt. Vor‐ und Nachteile dieser biochemi‐schen Differenzierungssysteme werden diskutiert.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>8767008</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1439-0507.1996.tb00116.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0933-7407
ispartof Mycoses, 1996-03, Vol.39 (3‐4), p.135-140
issn 0933-7407
1439-0507
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78246900
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects API 20C AUX
Auxacolor
biochemical pattern
Biological and medical sciences
Candida - classification
Candida - isolation & purification
differentiation
Fermentation
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Fungi - classification
Fungi - isolation & purification
Humans
Microbiology
morphological characteristics
Mycological methods and techniques used in mycology
Mycology
Mycoses - microbiology
Mycotube
Reproducibility of Results
Yeasts - classification
Yeast‐like fungi
title Differentiation of yeast‐like fungi using the commercial Auxacolor system
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T10%3A38%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differentiation%20of%20yeast%E2%80%90like%20fungi%20using%20the%20commercial%20Auxacolor%20system&rft.jtitle=Mycoses&rft.au=Hantschke,%20D.&rft.date=1996-03&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=3%E2%80%904&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=140&rft.pages=135-140&rft.issn=0933-7407&rft.eissn=1439-0507&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1439-0507.1996.tb00116.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E15925095%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15925095&rft_id=info:pmid/8767008&rfr_iscdi=true