Percutaneous nephrostomy in conjunction with ESWL in treatment of nephrolithiasis
The use of percutaneous nephrostomies (PCNs) in 1456 patients (1660 kidneys) treated with extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) was evaluated. In this group, 138 PCNs (130 patients) were performed in 133 kidneys. Forty-seven percent of PCNs were placed in patients with staghorn calculi; 24% w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of roentgenology (1976) 1988-07, Vol.151 (1), p.103-106 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 106 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 103 |
container_title | American journal of roentgenology (1976) |
container_volume | 151 |
creator | Cochran, ST Liu, E Barbaric, ZL |
description | The use of percutaneous nephrostomies (PCNs) in 1456 patients (1660 kidneys) treated with extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) was evaluated. In this group, 138 PCNs (130 patients) were performed in 133 kidneys. Forty-seven percent of PCNs were placed in patients with staghorn calculi; 24% were for stones in the renal pelvis, and 20% for ureteral stones. The most common indication for PCN was fever and obstruction (57%). In 15%, the indications were failure to decompress an obstructed system from a retrograde direction, clogged double-J ureteral stents, and perforation of the ureter. Prophylactic PCN placement in the treatment of staghorn calculi and large stones in the renal pelvis accounted for 12%. Five percent were placed for miscellaneous other reasons, and for 11% there was no documentation of the indication because they were placed before the patients came to our center. Localization of the collecting system for optimal placement of PCN is unique in ESWL patients because the residual stone fragments provide natural contrast. This eliminates the need for administration of contrast material in 50% of the patients. Twenty-six percent of PCN tracts were subsequently used for other procedures (e.g., percutaneous nephrolithotomy, fragment irrigation, ureteral stone manipulation). Bleeding complications from PCN occurred in 7%. Other minor complications occurred in 12% of cases. PCN is a useful adjuvant to ESWL treatment of kidney stones. Although its major use is to relieve urinary tract obstruction, it is also used as a preliminary step in planning other percutaneous interventional procedures. This is particularly the case in the treatment of large bulky stones in the renal pelvis and staghorn calculi. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2214/ajr.151.1.103 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78246473</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78246473</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-7cbc95ce413ceb072b55822e223daef961ddb5dc16792fdfb2a80121928663a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkElPwzAQhS0EKqVw5IiUA-KW4iWJ7SOqyiJVAgQIbpbjOMRVlmI7ivrvcdWo1Rzm8L55M_MAuEZwjjFK7uXazlGK5qEgOQFTlCZZTFCCTsEUkgzFDJKfc3Dh3BpCSBmnEzAhOOWUwyl4f9NW9V62uutd1OpNZTvnu2YbmTZSXbvuW-VN10aD8VW0_Phe7QRvtfSNbn3UleNQHXQjnXGX4KyUtdNXY5-Br8fl5-I5Xr0-vSweVrEijPqYqlzxVOkEEaVzSHGepgxjjTEppC55hooiTwuFMspxWZQ5lgwijDhmWUYkIzNwt_fd2O6v186Lxjil63r_i6AMJ1lCSQDjPajCa87qUmysaaTdCgTFLkIRIhQhQhEK7vib0bjPG10c6DGzoN-OunRK1qWVrTLugFHIKUP8eF9lfqvBWC1cI-s6mCIxDMNx3z-cSoe8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78246473</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Percutaneous nephrostomy in conjunction with ESWL in treatment of nephrolithiasis</title><source>American Roentgen Ray Society</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Cochran, ST ; Liu, E ; Barbaric, ZL</creator><creatorcontrib>Cochran, ST ; Liu, E ; Barbaric, ZL</creatorcontrib><description>The use of percutaneous nephrostomies (PCNs) in 1456 patients (1660 kidneys) treated with extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) was evaluated. In this group, 138 PCNs (130 patients) were performed in 133 kidneys. Forty-seven percent of PCNs were placed in patients with staghorn calculi; 24% were for stones in the renal pelvis, and 20% for ureteral stones. The most common indication for PCN was fever and obstruction (57%). In 15%, the indications were failure to decompress an obstructed system from a retrograde direction, clogged double-J ureteral stents, and perforation of the ureter. Prophylactic PCN placement in the treatment of staghorn calculi and large stones in the renal pelvis accounted for 12%. Five percent were placed for miscellaneous other reasons, and for 11% there was no documentation of the indication because they were placed before the patients came to our center. Localization of the collecting system for optimal placement of PCN is unique in ESWL patients because the residual stone fragments provide natural contrast. This eliminates the need for administration of contrast material in 50% of the patients. Twenty-six percent of PCN tracts were subsequently used for other procedures (e.g., percutaneous nephrolithotomy, fragment irrigation, ureteral stone manipulation). Bleeding complications from PCN occurred in 7%. Other minor complications occurred in 12% of cases. PCN is a useful adjuvant to ESWL treatment of kidney stones. Although its major use is to relieve urinary tract obstruction, it is also used as a preliminary step in planning other percutaneous interventional procedures. This is particularly the case in the treatment of large bulky stones in the renal pelvis and staghorn calculi.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-803X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1546-3141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2214/ajr.151.1.103</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3259790</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AAJRDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Leesburg, VA: Am Roentgen Ray Soc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Humans ; Kidney Calculi - therapy ; Lithotripsy ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; Nephrostomy, Percutaneous ; Urinary lithiasis</subject><ispartof>American journal of roentgenology (1976), 1988-07, Vol.151 (1), p.103-106</ispartof><rights>1989 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-7cbc95ce413ceb072b55822e223daef961ddb5dc16792fdfb2a80121928663a83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,4106,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=7097819$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3259790$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cochran, ST</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbaric, ZL</creatorcontrib><title>Percutaneous nephrostomy in conjunction with ESWL in treatment of nephrolithiasis</title><title>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</title><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><description>The use of percutaneous nephrostomies (PCNs) in 1456 patients (1660 kidneys) treated with extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) was evaluated. In this group, 138 PCNs (130 patients) were performed in 133 kidneys. Forty-seven percent of PCNs were placed in patients with staghorn calculi; 24% were for stones in the renal pelvis, and 20% for ureteral stones. The most common indication for PCN was fever and obstruction (57%). In 15%, the indications were failure to decompress an obstructed system from a retrograde direction, clogged double-J ureteral stents, and perforation of the ureter. Prophylactic PCN placement in the treatment of staghorn calculi and large stones in the renal pelvis accounted for 12%. Five percent were placed for miscellaneous other reasons, and for 11% there was no documentation of the indication because they were placed before the patients came to our center. Localization of the collecting system for optimal placement of PCN is unique in ESWL patients because the residual stone fragments provide natural contrast. This eliminates the need for administration of contrast material in 50% of the patients. Twenty-six percent of PCN tracts were subsequently used for other procedures (e.g., percutaneous nephrolithotomy, fragment irrigation, ureteral stone manipulation). Bleeding complications from PCN occurred in 7%. Other minor complications occurred in 12% of cases. PCN is a useful adjuvant to ESWL treatment of kidney stones. Although its major use is to relieve urinary tract obstruction, it is also used as a preliminary step in planning other percutaneous interventional procedures. This is particularly the case in the treatment of large bulky stones in the renal pelvis and staghorn calculi.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Calculi - therapy</subject><subject>Lithotripsy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>Nephrostomy, Percutaneous</subject><subject>Urinary lithiasis</subject><issn>0361-803X</issn><issn>1546-3141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkElPwzAQhS0EKqVw5IiUA-KW4iWJ7SOqyiJVAgQIbpbjOMRVlmI7ivrvcdWo1Rzm8L55M_MAuEZwjjFK7uXazlGK5qEgOQFTlCZZTFCCTsEUkgzFDJKfc3Dh3BpCSBmnEzAhOOWUwyl4f9NW9V62uutd1OpNZTvnu2YbmTZSXbvuW-VN10aD8VW0_Phe7QRvtfSNbn3UleNQHXQjnXGX4KyUtdNXY5-Br8fl5-I5Xr0-vSweVrEijPqYqlzxVOkEEaVzSHGepgxjjTEppC55hooiTwuFMspxWZQ5lgwijDhmWUYkIzNwt_fd2O6v186Lxjil63r_i6AMJ1lCSQDjPajCa87qUmysaaTdCgTFLkIRIhQhQhEK7vib0bjPG10c6DGzoN-OunRK1qWVrTLugFHIKUP8eF9lfqvBWC1cI-s6mCIxDMNx3z-cSoe8</recordid><startdate>19880701</startdate><enddate>19880701</enddate><creator>Cochran, ST</creator><creator>Liu, E</creator><creator>Barbaric, ZL</creator><general>Am Roentgen Ray Soc</general><general>American Roentgen Ray Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19880701</creationdate><title>Percutaneous nephrostomy in conjunction with ESWL in treatment of nephrolithiasis</title><author>Cochran, ST ; Liu, E ; Barbaric, ZL</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-7cbc95ce413ceb072b55822e223daef961ddb5dc16792fdfb2a80121928663a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Calculi - therapy</topic><topic>Lithotripsy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>Nephrostomy, Percutaneous</topic><topic>Urinary lithiasis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cochran, ST</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbaric, ZL</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cochran, ST</au><au>Liu, E</au><au>Barbaric, ZL</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Percutaneous nephrostomy in conjunction with ESWL in treatment of nephrolithiasis</atitle><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><date>1988-07-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>151</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>106</epage><pages>103-106</pages><issn>0361-803X</issn><eissn>1546-3141</eissn><coden>AAJRDX</coden><abstract>The use of percutaneous nephrostomies (PCNs) in 1456 patients (1660 kidneys) treated with extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) was evaluated. In this group, 138 PCNs (130 patients) were performed in 133 kidneys. Forty-seven percent of PCNs were placed in patients with staghorn calculi; 24% were for stones in the renal pelvis, and 20% for ureteral stones. The most common indication for PCN was fever and obstruction (57%). In 15%, the indications were failure to decompress an obstructed system from a retrograde direction, clogged double-J ureteral stents, and perforation of the ureter. Prophylactic PCN placement in the treatment of staghorn calculi and large stones in the renal pelvis accounted for 12%. Five percent were placed for miscellaneous other reasons, and for 11% there was no documentation of the indication because they were placed before the patients came to our center. Localization of the collecting system for optimal placement of PCN is unique in ESWL patients because the residual stone fragments provide natural contrast. This eliminates the need for administration of contrast material in 50% of the patients. Twenty-six percent of PCN tracts were subsequently used for other procedures (e.g., percutaneous nephrolithotomy, fragment irrigation, ureteral stone manipulation). Bleeding complications from PCN occurred in 7%. Other minor complications occurred in 12% of cases. PCN is a useful adjuvant to ESWL treatment of kidney stones. Although its major use is to relieve urinary tract obstruction, it is also used as a preliminary step in planning other percutaneous interventional procedures. This is particularly the case in the treatment of large bulky stones in the renal pelvis and staghorn calculi.</abstract><cop>Leesburg, VA</cop><pub>Am Roentgen Ray Soc</pub><pmid>3259790</pmid><doi>10.2214/ajr.151.1.103</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0361-803X |
ispartof | American journal of roentgenology (1976), 1988-07, Vol.151 (1), p.103-106 |
issn | 0361-803X 1546-3141 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78246473 |
source | American Roentgen Ray Society; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences Female Humans Kidney Calculi - therapy Lithotripsy Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases Nephrostomy, Percutaneous Urinary lithiasis |
title | Percutaneous nephrostomy in conjunction with ESWL in treatment of nephrolithiasis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T20%3A04%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Percutaneous%20nephrostomy%20in%20conjunction%20with%20ESWL%20in%20treatment%20of%20nephrolithiasis&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20roentgenology%20(1976)&rft.au=Cochran,%20ST&rft.date=1988-07-01&rft.volume=151&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=106&rft.pages=103-106&rft.issn=0361-803X&rft.eissn=1546-3141&rft.coden=AAJRDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.2214/ajr.151.1.103&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78246473%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78246473&rft_id=info:pmid/3259790&rfr_iscdi=true |