Dobutamine stress echocardiography for noninvasive diagnosis of cardiac allograft vasculopathy: a comparison with angiography and intravascular ultrasound

This study was performed to assess the value of dobutamine stress echocardiography for noninvasive diagnosis of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) compared with coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in 50 consecutive orthotopic heart transplant recipients. In 46 of 50 patients,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of cardiology 1996-07, Vol.78 (2), p.168-174
Hauptverfasser: Spes, C H, Mudra, H, Schnaack, S D, Klauss, V, Reichle, F M, Uberfuhr, P, Theisen, K, Angermann, C E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 174
container_issue 2
container_start_page 168
container_title The American journal of cardiology
container_volume 78
creator Spes, C H
Mudra, H
Schnaack, S D
Klauss, V
Reichle, F M
Uberfuhr, P
Theisen, K
Angermann, C E
description This study was performed to assess the value of dobutamine stress echocardiography for noninvasive diagnosis of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) compared with coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in 50 consecutive orthotopic heart transplant recipients. In 46 of 50 patients, a technically adequate echocardiogram could be obtained. Using a 16-segment model, a total of 675 segments were analyzed. At rest, wall motion abnormalities were found in 61 of 675 (9.0%) left ventricular segments in 15 of 46 patients. At maximal dobutamine stress, 103 of 675 segments (15.3%) had wall motion abnormalities (25 of 46 patients). Based on IVUS and angiographic findings, patients were allocated to 2 groups. Group I (n=18) had absent or only mild intimal hyperplasia (mean IVUS grade < or = 3.0 on a 6-grade scale). Group II (n=28) had moderate to severe intimal hyperplasia (mean grade > 3.0 with or without angiographic evidence of CAV. The prevalence of wall motion abnormalities was significantly higher in group II than in group I, both at rest (50 of 415 vs 11 of 270 coronary segments in 13 of 28 vs 2 of 18 patients) and during maximal stress (88 of 415 vs 15 of 270 coronary segments in 22 of 28 vs 3 of 18 patients). Quantitative M-mode echocardiography demonstrated decreased wall thickening in group II versus group I patients at maximal dobutamine dosage in the septum (48 +/- 18% vs 61 +/- 17%; p < 0.01) as well as in the left ventricular posterior wall (77 +/- 21% vs 96 +/- 21%; p
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0002-9149(96)00252-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78219062</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78219062</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1788-5891498e898be214269654f10b1b06abc2a8a4b557e5b868dc86014e7f0fb8cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc2O1DAQhC0EWoaFR1jJ4oDgEHA7sWNzQ8uvtBIH4Gy1HWfGq8QOdrJoXoWnJfOjOXDqbumrUrWKkBtgb4GBfPeDMcYrDY1-reWbdRe8ah6RDahWV6Chfkw2F-QpeVbK_XoCCHlFrlQLHGq1IX8_JrvMOIboaZmzL4V6t0sOcxfSNuO029M-ZRpTDPEBS3jwtAu4jamEQlNPjyQ6isNw4PuZrpRbhjThvNu_p0hdGifMoaRI_4R5RzFuL9YYOxrinPEkwkyXYb1KWmL3nDzpcSj-xXlek1-fP_28_Vrdff_y7fbDXeWgVaoS6vCg8kor6zk0XGopmh6YBcskWsdRYWOFaL2wSqrOKcmg8W3PeqtcX1-TVyffKaffiy-zGUNxfhgw-rQU0yoOmkm-gi__A-_TkuOazfCa1a1QvF0hcYJcTqVk35sphxHz3gAzh-LMsThzCG20NMfiTLPqbs7mix19d1Gdm6r_Af5ll8g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230375827</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dobutamine stress echocardiography for noninvasive diagnosis of cardiac allograft vasculopathy: a comparison with angiography and intravascular ultrasound</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Spes, C H ; Mudra, H ; Schnaack, S D ; Klauss, V ; Reichle, F M ; Uberfuhr, P ; Theisen, K ; Angermann, C E</creator><creatorcontrib>Spes, C H ; Mudra, H ; Schnaack, S D ; Klauss, V ; Reichle, F M ; Uberfuhr, P ; Theisen, K ; Angermann, C E</creatorcontrib><description>This study was performed to assess the value of dobutamine stress echocardiography for noninvasive diagnosis of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) compared with coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in 50 consecutive orthotopic heart transplant recipients. In 46 of 50 patients, a technically adequate echocardiogram could be obtained. Using a 16-segment model, a total of 675 segments were analyzed. At rest, wall motion abnormalities were found in 61 of 675 (9.0%) left ventricular segments in 15 of 46 patients. At maximal dobutamine stress, 103 of 675 segments (15.3%) had wall motion abnormalities (25 of 46 patients). Based on IVUS and angiographic findings, patients were allocated to 2 groups. Group I (n=18) had absent or only mild intimal hyperplasia (mean IVUS grade &lt; or = 3.0 on a 6-grade scale). Group II (n=28) had moderate to severe intimal hyperplasia (mean grade &gt; 3.0 with or without angiographic evidence of CAV. The prevalence of wall motion abnormalities was significantly higher in group II than in group I, both at rest (50 of 415 vs 11 of 270 coronary segments in 13 of 28 vs 2 of 18 patients) and during maximal stress (88 of 415 vs 15 of 270 coronary segments in 22 of 28 vs 3 of 18 patients). Quantitative M-mode echocardiography demonstrated decreased wall thickening in group II versus group I patients at maximal dobutamine dosage in the septum (48 +/- 18% vs 61 +/- 17%; p &lt; 0.01) as well as in the left ventricular posterior wall (77 +/- 21% vs 96 +/- 21%; p &lt;0.005). Regional myocardial dysfunction as assessed by dobutamine stress echocardiography was associated with IVUS evidence of moderate to severe intimal hyperplasia. Dobutamine stress echocardiography appears to be a feasible noninvasive method for detection of CAV in heart transplant recipients, which may reduce the need for routine coronary angiography.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9149</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9149(96)00252-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8712138</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJCDAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cardiotonic Agents ; Coronary Angiography ; Coronary Disease - diagnostic imaging ; Dobutamine ; Echocardiography ; Exercise Test ; Feasibility Studies ; Graft Occlusion, Vascular - diagnostic imaging ; Heart ; Heart Transplantation - adverse effects ; Humans ; Medical research ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Transplants &amp; implants ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography, Interventional</subject><ispartof>The American journal of cardiology, 1996-07, Vol.78 (2), p.168-174</ispartof><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Jul 15, 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1788-5891498e898be214269654f10b1b06abc2a8a4b557e5b868dc86014e7f0fb8cf3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8712138$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spes, C H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mudra, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnaack, S D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klauss, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reichle, F M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uberfuhr, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theisen, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angermann, C E</creatorcontrib><title>Dobutamine stress echocardiography for noninvasive diagnosis of cardiac allograft vasculopathy: a comparison with angiography and intravascular ultrasound</title><title>The American journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><description>This study was performed to assess the value of dobutamine stress echocardiography for noninvasive diagnosis of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) compared with coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in 50 consecutive orthotopic heart transplant recipients. In 46 of 50 patients, a technically adequate echocardiogram could be obtained. Using a 16-segment model, a total of 675 segments were analyzed. At rest, wall motion abnormalities were found in 61 of 675 (9.0%) left ventricular segments in 15 of 46 patients. At maximal dobutamine stress, 103 of 675 segments (15.3%) had wall motion abnormalities (25 of 46 patients). Based on IVUS and angiographic findings, patients were allocated to 2 groups. Group I (n=18) had absent or only mild intimal hyperplasia (mean IVUS grade &lt; or = 3.0 on a 6-grade scale). Group II (n=28) had moderate to severe intimal hyperplasia (mean grade &gt; 3.0 with or without angiographic evidence of CAV. The prevalence of wall motion abnormalities was significantly higher in group II than in group I, both at rest (50 of 415 vs 11 of 270 coronary segments in 13 of 28 vs 2 of 18 patients) and during maximal stress (88 of 415 vs 15 of 270 coronary segments in 22 of 28 vs 3 of 18 patients). Quantitative M-mode echocardiography demonstrated decreased wall thickening in group II versus group I patients at maximal dobutamine dosage in the septum (48 +/- 18% vs 61 +/- 17%; p &lt; 0.01) as well as in the left ventricular posterior wall (77 +/- 21% vs 96 +/- 21%; p &lt;0.005). Regional myocardial dysfunction as assessed by dobutamine stress echocardiography was associated with IVUS evidence of moderate to severe intimal hyperplasia. Dobutamine stress echocardiography appears to be a feasible noninvasive method for detection of CAV in heart transplant recipients, which may reduce the need for routine coronary angiography.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cardiotonic Agents</subject><subject>Coronary Angiography</subject><subject>Coronary Disease - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Dobutamine</subject><subject>Echocardiography</subject><subject>Exercise Test</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Graft Occlusion, Vascular - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Heart Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional</subject><issn>0002-9149</issn><issn>1879-1913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc2O1DAQhC0EWoaFR1jJ4oDgEHA7sWNzQ8uvtBIH4Gy1HWfGq8QOdrJoXoWnJfOjOXDqbumrUrWKkBtgb4GBfPeDMcYrDY1-reWbdRe8ah6RDahWV6Chfkw2F-QpeVbK_XoCCHlFrlQLHGq1IX8_JrvMOIboaZmzL4V6t0sOcxfSNuO029M-ZRpTDPEBS3jwtAu4jamEQlNPjyQ6isNw4PuZrpRbhjThvNu_p0hdGifMoaRI_4R5RzFuL9YYOxrinPEkwkyXYb1KWmL3nDzpcSj-xXlek1-fP_28_Vrdff_y7fbDXeWgVaoS6vCg8kor6zk0XGopmh6YBcskWsdRYWOFaL2wSqrOKcmg8W3PeqtcX1-TVyffKaffiy-zGUNxfhgw-rQU0yoOmkm-gi__A-_TkuOazfCa1a1QvF0hcYJcTqVk35sphxHz3gAzh-LMsThzCG20NMfiTLPqbs7mix19d1Gdm6r_Af5ll8g</recordid><startdate>19960715</startdate><enddate>19960715</enddate><creator>Spes, C H</creator><creator>Mudra, H</creator><creator>Schnaack, S D</creator><creator>Klauss, V</creator><creator>Reichle, F M</creator><creator>Uberfuhr, P</creator><creator>Theisen, K</creator><creator>Angermann, C E</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960715</creationdate><title>Dobutamine stress echocardiography for noninvasive diagnosis of cardiac allograft vasculopathy: a comparison with angiography and intravascular ultrasound</title><author>Spes, C H ; Mudra, H ; Schnaack, S D ; Klauss, V ; Reichle, F M ; Uberfuhr, P ; Theisen, K ; Angermann, C E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1788-5891498e898be214269654f10b1b06abc2a8a4b557e5b868dc86014e7f0fb8cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cardiotonic Agents</topic><topic>Coronary Angiography</topic><topic>Coronary Disease - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Dobutamine</topic><topic>Echocardiography</topic><topic>Exercise Test</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Graft Occlusion, Vascular - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Heart Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spes, C H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mudra, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnaack, S D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klauss, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reichle, F M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uberfuhr, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theisen, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angermann, C E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spes, C H</au><au>Mudra, H</au><au>Schnaack, S D</au><au>Klauss, V</au><au>Reichle, F M</au><au>Uberfuhr, P</au><au>Theisen, K</au><au>Angermann, C E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dobutamine stress echocardiography for noninvasive diagnosis of cardiac allograft vasculopathy: a comparison with angiography and intravascular ultrasound</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><date>1996-07-15</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>168</spage><epage>174</epage><pages>168-174</pages><issn>0002-9149</issn><eissn>1879-1913</eissn><coden>AJCDAG</coden><abstract>This study was performed to assess the value of dobutamine stress echocardiography for noninvasive diagnosis of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) compared with coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in 50 consecutive orthotopic heart transplant recipients. In 46 of 50 patients, a technically adequate echocardiogram could be obtained. Using a 16-segment model, a total of 675 segments were analyzed. At rest, wall motion abnormalities were found in 61 of 675 (9.0%) left ventricular segments in 15 of 46 patients. At maximal dobutamine stress, 103 of 675 segments (15.3%) had wall motion abnormalities (25 of 46 patients). Based on IVUS and angiographic findings, patients were allocated to 2 groups. Group I (n=18) had absent or only mild intimal hyperplasia (mean IVUS grade &lt; or = 3.0 on a 6-grade scale). Group II (n=28) had moderate to severe intimal hyperplasia (mean grade &gt; 3.0 with or without angiographic evidence of CAV. The prevalence of wall motion abnormalities was significantly higher in group II than in group I, both at rest (50 of 415 vs 11 of 270 coronary segments in 13 of 28 vs 2 of 18 patients) and during maximal stress (88 of 415 vs 15 of 270 coronary segments in 22 of 28 vs 3 of 18 patients). Quantitative M-mode echocardiography demonstrated decreased wall thickening in group II versus group I patients at maximal dobutamine dosage in the septum (48 +/- 18% vs 61 +/- 17%; p &lt; 0.01) as well as in the left ventricular posterior wall (77 +/- 21% vs 96 +/- 21%; p &lt;0.005). Regional myocardial dysfunction as assessed by dobutamine stress echocardiography was associated with IVUS evidence of moderate to severe intimal hyperplasia. Dobutamine stress echocardiography appears to be a feasible noninvasive method for detection of CAV in heart transplant recipients, which may reduce the need for routine coronary angiography.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><pmid>8712138</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0002-9149(96)00252-4</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9149
ispartof The American journal of cardiology, 1996-07, Vol.78 (2), p.168-174
issn 0002-9149
1879-1913
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78219062
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
Cardiotonic Agents
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Disease - diagnostic imaging
Dobutamine
Echocardiography
Exercise Test
Feasibility Studies
Graft Occlusion, Vascular - diagnostic imaging
Heart
Heart Transplantation - adverse effects
Humans
Medical research
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Transplants & implants
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasonography, Interventional
title Dobutamine stress echocardiography for noninvasive diagnosis of cardiac allograft vasculopathy: a comparison with angiography and intravascular ultrasound
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T17%3A58%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dobutamine%20stress%20echocardiography%20for%20noninvasive%20diagnosis%20of%20cardiac%20allograft%20vasculopathy:%20a%20comparison%20with%20angiography%20and%20intravascular%20ultrasound&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Spes,%20C%20H&rft.date=1996-07-15&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=168&rft.epage=174&rft.pages=168-174&rft.issn=0002-9149&rft.eissn=1879-1913&rft.coden=AJCDAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0002-9149(96)00252-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78219062%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230375827&rft_id=info:pmid/8712138&rfr_iscdi=true