DNA Index Reflects the Biological Behavior of Ovarian Carcinoma Stage I–IIa

The prognostic significance of histologic grade, morphometric analysis, and DNA flow cytometry was evaluated in 64 patients with well-differentiated (group A) and 30 patients with moderately and poorly differentiated (group B) early-stage (FIGO stages Ia, Ib, Ic, and IIa) epithelial ovarian cancer....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gynecologic oncology 1996-07, Vol.62 (1), p.59-66
Hauptverfasser: Schueler, J.A., Trimbos, J.B., Burg, M.v.d., Cornelisse, C.J., Hermans, J., Fleuren, G.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 66
container_issue 1
container_start_page 59
container_title Gynecologic oncology
container_volume 62
creator Schueler, J.A.
Trimbos, J.B.
Burg, M.v.d.
Cornelisse, C.J.
Hermans, J.
Fleuren, G.J.
description The prognostic significance of histologic grade, morphometric analysis, and DNA flow cytometry was evaluated in 64 patients with well-differentiated (group A) and 30 patients with moderately and poorly differentiated (group B) early-stage (FIGO stages Ia, Ib, Ic, and IIa) epithelial ovarian cancer. The extent of the well-defined staging procedure was assessed strictly in every patient. Of 94 patients, 13 had recurrent ovarian cancer (5 from group A and 8 from group B) and 12 of these patients died. A significant difference was found between groups A and B for 5-year disease-free survival (91% versus 75%), the menopausal status, surgical staging procedure, volume percentage epithelium (VPE), morphometric category, DNA ploidy, and DNA index, but not for histologic cell type. For the 94 patients from groups A and B together, a significant difference was observed between diploid and aneuploid tumors with regard to mean mitotic activity index (MAI), mean VPE, and the morphometric categories that combined MAI and VPE characteristics. Prognostic reliability for the occurrence of tumor relapse was highest for DNA index class, followed by tumor grade and DNA ploidy pattern. With multivariate analysis the primary prognostic factor for disease-free survival appeared to be the DNA index. DNA index class was the only parameter that added prognostic information when histologic grade was selected as the primary prognostic factor. If the DNA index was taken as primary prognostic factor, none of the tested parameters including tumor grade added useful information. It was concluded that the DNA index is a primary prognostic factor for disease-free survival in early-stage ovarian cancer patients. Morphometric measurements do not add supplementary prognostic information.
doi_str_mv 10.1006/gyno.1996.0190
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78162387</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0090825896901900</els_id><sourcerecordid>78162387</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-72e38ab250dc878880a208d7e1155bbc2d5e8eaf6a1aacf08b95d24efdb7a3f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1u1DAUhS0EKkNhyw7JC8Quw7WNE2fZDn-RCpX4WVs39vXUKBMXOzOiO96BN-RJSDSj7ljdxfnu0dHH2HMBawFQv97ejWkt2rZeg2jhAVsJaHVVG90-ZCuAFiojtXnMnpTyAwAUCHnGzkzdgmzVin16-_mCd6OnX_wLhYHcVPh0Q_wypiFto8OBX9INHmLKPAV-fcAcceQbzC6OaYf864Rb4t3f33-6Dp-yRwGHQs9O95x9f__u2-ZjdXX9odtcXFVO1WaqGknKYC81eGcaYwygBOMbEkLrvnfSazKEoUaB6AKYvtVevqHg-wZVkOqcvTr23ub0c09lsrtYHA0DjpT2xTZG1FKZZgbXR9DlVEqmYG9z3GG-swLs4s8u_uzizy7-5ocXp-Z9vyN_j5-EzfnLU45llhMyji6We0wJrVSzDDRHjGYLh0jZFhdpdORjnh1bn-L_FvwDUz2MDQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78162387</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>DNA Index Reflects the Biological Behavior of Ovarian Carcinoma Stage I–IIa</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Schueler, J.A. ; Trimbos, J.B. ; Burg, M.v.d. ; Cornelisse, C.J. ; Hermans, J. ; Fleuren, G.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schueler, J.A. ; Trimbos, J.B. ; Burg, M.v.d. ; Cornelisse, C.J. ; Hermans, J. ; Fleuren, G.J.</creatorcontrib><description>The prognostic significance of histologic grade, morphometric analysis, and DNA flow cytometry was evaluated in 64 patients with well-differentiated (group A) and 30 patients with moderately and poorly differentiated (group B) early-stage (FIGO stages Ia, Ib, Ic, and IIa) epithelial ovarian cancer. The extent of the well-defined staging procedure was assessed strictly in every patient. Of 94 patients, 13 had recurrent ovarian cancer (5 from group A and 8 from group B) and 12 of these patients died. A significant difference was found between groups A and B for 5-year disease-free survival (91% versus 75%), the menopausal status, surgical staging procedure, volume percentage epithelium (VPE), morphometric category, DNA ploidy, and DNA index, but not for histologic cell type. For the 94 patients from groups A and B together, a significant difference was observed between diploid and aneuploid tumors with regard to mean mitotic activity index (MAI), mean VPE, and the morphometric categories that combined MAI and VPE characteristics. Prognostic reliability for the occurrence of tumor relapse was highest for DNA index class, followed by tumor grade and DNA ploidy pattern. With multivariate analysis the primary prognostic factor for disease-free survival appeared to be the DNA index. DNA index class was the only parameter that added prognostic information when histologic grade was selected as the primary prognostic factor. If the DNA index was taken as primary prognostic factor, none of the tested parameters including tumor grade added useful information. It was concluded that the DNA index is a primary prognostic factor for disease-free survival in early-stage ovarian cancer patients. Morphometric measurements do not add supplementary prognostic information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-8258</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-6859</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1996.0190</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8690293</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GYNOA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carcinoma - genetics ; Carcinoma - mortality ; Carcinoma - pathology ; Disease-Free Survival ; DNA, Neoplasm - genetics ; Female ; Female genital diseases ; Flow Cytometry ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neoplasm Staging ; Ovarian Neoplasms - genetics ; Ovarian Neoplasms - mortality ; Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology ; Prognosis ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Gynecologic oncology, 1996-07, Vol.62 (1), p.59-66</ispartof><rights>1996 Academic Press</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-72e38ab250dc878880a208d7e1155bbc2d5e8eaf6a1aacf08b95d24efdb7a3f23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090825896901900$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3153372$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8690293$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schueler, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trimbos, J.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burg, M.v.d.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornelisse, C.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermans, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleuren, G.J.</creatorcontrib><title>DNA Index Reflects the Biological Behavior of Ovarian Carcinoma Stage I–IIa</title><title>Gynecologic oncology</title><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><description>The prognostic significance of histologic grade, morphometric analysis, and DNA flow cytometry was evaluated in 64 patients with well-differentiated (group A) and 30 patients with moderately and poorly differentiated (group B) early-stage (FIGO stages Ia, Ib, Ic, and IIa) epithelial ovarian cancer. The extent of the well-defined staging procedure was assessed strictly in every patient. Of 94 patients, 13 had recurrent ovarian cancer (5 from group A and 8 from group B) and 12 of these patients died. A significant difference was found between groups A and B for 5-year disease-free survival (91% versus 75%), the menopausal status, surgical staging procedure, volume percentage epithelium (VPE), morphometric category, DNA ploidy, and DNA index, but not for histologic cell type. For the 94 patients from groups A and B together, a significant difference was observed between diploid and aneuploid tumors with regard to mean mitotic activity index (MAI), mean VPE, and the morphometric categories that combined MAI and VPE characteristics. Prognostic reliability for the occurrence of tumor relapse was highest for DNA index class, followed by tumor grade and DNA ploidy pattern. With multivariate analysis the primary prognostic factor for disease-free survival appeared to be the DNA index. DNA index class was the only parameter that added prognostic information when histologic grade was selected as the primary prognostic factor. If the DNA index was taken as primary prognostic factor, none of the tested parameters including tumor grade added useful information. It was concluded that the DNA index is a primary prognostic factor for disease-free survival in early-stage ovarian cancer patients. Morphometric measurements do not add supplementary prognostic information.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carcinoma - genetics</subject><subject>Carcinoma - mortality</subject><subject>Carcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>DNA, Neoplasm - genetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female genital diseases</subject><subject>Flow Cytometry</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0090-8258</issn><issn>1095-6859</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1u1DAUhS0EKkNhyw7JC8Quw7WNE2fZDn-RCpX4WVs39vXUKBMXOzOiO96BN-RJSDSj7ljdxfnu0dHH2HMBawFQv97ejWkt2rZeg2jhAVsJaHVVG90-ZCuAFiojtXnMnpTyAwAUCHnGzkzdgmzVin16-_mCd6OnX_wLhYHcVPh0Q_wypiFto8OBX9INHmLKPAV-fcAcceQbzC6OaYf864Rb4t3f33-6Dp-yRwGHQs9O95x9f__u2-ZjdXX9odtcXFVO1WaqGknKYC81eGcaYwygBOMbEkLrvnfSazKEoUaB6AKYvtVevqHg-wZVkOqcvTr23ub0c09lsrtYHA0DjpT2xTZG1FKZZgbXR9DlVEqmYG9z3GG-swLs4s8u_uzizy7-5ocXp-Z9vyN_j5-EzfnLU45llhMyji6We0wJrVSzDDRHjGYLh0jZFhdpdORjnh1bn-L_FvwDUz2MDQ</recordid><startdate>19960701</startdate><enddate>19960701</enddate><creator>Schueler, J.A.</creator><creator>Trimbos, J.B.</creator><creator>Burg, M.v.d.</creator><creator>Cornelisse, C.J.</creator><creator>Hermans, J.</creator><creator>Fleuren, G.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960701</creationdate><title>DNA Index Reflects the Biological Behavior of Ovarian Carcinoma Stage I–IIa</title><author>Schueler, J.A. ; Trimbos, J.B. ; Burg, M.v.d. ; Cornelisse, C.J. ; Hermans, J. ; Fleuren, G.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-72e38ab250dc878880a208d7e1155bbc2d5e8eaf6a1aacf08b95d24efdb7a3f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carcinoma - genetics</topic><topic>Carcinoma - mortality</topic><topic>Carcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>DNA, Neoplasm - genetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female genital diseases</topic><topic>Flow Cytometry</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schueler, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trimbos, J.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burg, M.v.d.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornelisse, C.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermans, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleuren, G.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schueler, J.A.</au><au>Trimbos, J.B.</au><au>Burg, M.v.d.</au><au>Cornelisse, C.J.</au><au>Hermans, J.</au><au>Fleuren, G.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DNA Index Reflects the Biological Behavior of Ovarian Carcinoma Stage I–IIa</atitle><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><date>1996-07-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>66</epage><pages>59-66</pages><issn>0090-8258</issn><eissn>1095-6859</eissn><coden>GYNOA3</coden><abstract>The prognostic significance of histologic grade, morphometric analysis, and DNA flow cytometry was evaluated in 64 patients with well-differentiated (group A) and 30 patients with moderately and poorly differentiated (group B) early-stage (FIGO stages Ia, Ib, Ic, and IIa) epithelial ovarian cancer. The extent of the well-defined staging procedure was assessed strictly in every patient. Of 94 patients, 13 had recurrent ovarian cancer (5 from group A and 8 from group B) and 12 of these patients died. A significant difference was found between groups A and B for 5-year disease-free survival (91% versus 75%), the menopausal status, surgical staging procedure, volume percentage epithelium (VPE), morphometric category, DNA ploidy, and DNA index, but not for histologic cell type. For the 94 patients from groups A and B together, a significant difference was observed between diploid and aneuploid tumors with regard to mean mitotic activity index (MAI), mean VPE, and the morphometric categories that combined MAI and VPE characteristics. Prognostic reliability for the occurrence of tumor relapse was highest for DNA index class, followed by tumor grade and DNA ploidy pattern. With multivariate analysis the primary prognostic factor for disease-free survival appeared to be the DNA index. DNA index class was the only parameter that added prognostic information when histologic grade was selected as the primary prognostic factor. If the DNA index was taken as primary prognostic factor, none of the tested parameters including tumor grade added useful information. It was concluded that the DNA index is a primary prognostic factor for disease-free survival in early-stage ovarian cancer patients. Morphometric measurements do not add supplementary prognostic information.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>8690293</pmid><doi>10.1006/gyno.1996.0190</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-8258
ispartof Gynecologic oncology, 1996-07, Vol.62 (1), p.59-66
issn 0090-8258
1095-6859
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78162387
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Carcinoma - genetics
Carcinoma - mortality
Carcinoma - pathology
Disease-Free Survival
DNA, Neoplasm - genetics
Female
Female genital diseases
Flow Cytometry
Follow-Up Studies
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Neoplasm Staging
Ovarian Neoplasms - genetics
Ovarian Neoplasms - mortality
Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology
Prognosis
Tumors
title DNA Index Reflects the Biological Behavior of Ovarian Carcinoma Stage I–IIa
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T06%3A16%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DNA%20Index%20Reflects%20the%20Biological%20Behavior%20of%20Ovarian%20Carcinoma%20Stage%20I%E2%80%93IIa&rft.jtitle=Gynecologic%20oncology&rft.au=Schueler,%20J.A.&rft.date=1996-07-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=66&rft.pages=59-66&rft.issn=0090-8258&rft.eissn=1095-6859&rft.coden=GYNOA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/gyno.1996.0190&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78162387%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78162387&rft_id=info:pmid/8690293&rft_els_id=S0090825896901900&rfr_iscdi=true