AN EXAMINATION OF DIFFERENTIAL FOLLOW-UP RATES IN BREAST CANCER SCREENING
This study was designed to test the hypothesis that follow-up rates for women with abnormal breast screening results would vary by age, ethnicity and initial screening results in California's Breast and Cervical Cancer Control Program. The sample was composed of women in this screening program...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of community health 1996-04, Vol.21 (2), p.123-132 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 132 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 123 |
| container_title | Journal of community health |
| container_volume | 21 |
| creator | Webber, Pamela Arnsberger Fox, Patrick Zhang, Xiulan Pond, Mikki |
| description | This study was designed to test the hypothesis that follow-up rates for women with abnormal breast screening results would vary by age, ethnicity and initial screening results in California's Breast and Cervical Cancer Control Program. The sample was composed of women in this screening program who had received abnormal clinical breast exam (N = 5239) or mammography results (N = 1202). Chi-squared analysis showed significant differences by age and initial screening results but in logistic regression analysis the only demographic variable to retain significance in analysis was age, although size of the clinic was also highly significant. Older women should be targeted as a group needing assistance with compliance with follow-up recommendations. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF01682303 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78159813</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45444270</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45444270</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-e41b0525bf72d49b240c8c16fdd103484e90c9ea15147dc32f898097b80acfa23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1Lw0AUxBdRtFYv3oVFwYMQffuV3T3GuNFATCSN6C3kYwOW1tRse_C_N2JREDy9w_yYN8wgdELgigDI65sIiK8oA7aDJkRI5jGfwC6aAGjuCcLFATp0bg4ABKS_j_aVpIr5MEFxkGLzEjzEaVDEWYqzCN_GUWRykxZxkOAoS5Ls2Xt6xHlQmBmOU3yTm2BW4DBIQ5PjWZgbk8bp3RHa66qFs8fbO0VPkSnCey_J7uIwSLyGCb32LCc1CCrqTtKW65pyaFRD_K5tCTCuuNXQaFuRMbZsG0Y7pRVoWSuomq6ibIouvn1XQ_--sW5dLl9dYxeL6s32G1dKRYRWhI3g2R9w3m-GtzFbScevYgT1CJ3_BxEGkmkqxlqn6PKbaobeucF25Wp4XVbDR0mg_Jqg_J1ghE-3lpt6adsfdNv5rz536374kbngnFMJ7BM6P3_2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224057819</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>AN EXAMINATION OF DIFFERENTIAL FOLLOW-UP RATES IN BREAST CANCER SCREENING</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Webber, Pamela Arnsberger ; Fox, Patrick ; Zhang, Xiulan ; Pond, Mikki</creator><creatorcontrib>Webber, Pamela Arnsberger ; Fox, Patrick ; Zhang, Xiulan ; Pond, Mikki</creatorcontrib><description>This study was designed to test the hypothesis that follow-up rates for women with abnormal breast screening results would vary by age, ethnicity and initial screening results in California's Breast and Cervical Cancer Control Program. The sample was composed of women in this screening program who had received abnormal clinical breast exam (N = 5239) or mammography results (N = 1202). Chi-squared analysis showed significant differences by age and initial screening results but in logistic regression analysis the only demographic variable to retain significance in analysis was age, although size of the clinic was also highly significant. Older women should be targeted as a group needing assistance with compliance with follow-up recommendations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-5145</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3610</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF01682303</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8728360</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCMHBR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Springer Science + Business Media, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Area Studies ; Attrition (Research Studies) ; Behavior ; Breast ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Breast Neoplasms - ethnology ; Breast Neoplasms - psychology ; California ; Cancer ; Economic Status ; Ethnic Groups - psychology ; Ethnicity ; Female ; Females ; Goodness of Fit ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Mammography ; Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data ; Medical Evaluation ; Medical screening ; Middle Aged ; Mortality Rate ; Palpation ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care ; Regression (Statistics) ; Regression analysis ; Screening Tests ; Statistical Significance ; Whites ; Women</subject><ispartof>Journal of community health, 1996-04, Vol.21 (2), p.123-132</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 1996 Human Sciences Press, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Human Sciences Press, Inc. Apr 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-e41b0525bf72d49b240c8c16fdd103484e90c9ea15147dc32f898097b80acfa23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-e41b0525bf72d49b240c8c16fdd103484e90c9ea15147dc32f898097b80acfa23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45444270$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45444270$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27868,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8728360$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Webber, Pamela Arnsberger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiulan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pond, Mikki</creatorcontrib><title>AN EXAMINATION OF DIFFERENTIAL FOLLOW-UP RATES IN BREAST CANCER SCREENING</title><title>Journal of community health</title><addtitle>J Community Health</addtitle><description>This study was designed to test the hypothesis that follow-up rates for women with abnormal breast screening results would vary by age, ethnicity and initial screening results in California's Breast and Cervical Cancer Control Program. The sample was composed of women in this screening program who had received abnormal clinical breast exam (N = 5239) or mammography results (N = 1202). Chi-squared analysis showed significant differences by age and initial screening results but in logistic regression analysis the only demographic variable to retain significance in analysis was age, although size of the clinic was also highly significant. Older women should be targeted as a group needing assistance with compliance with follow-up recommendations.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Area Studies</subject><subject>Attrition (Research Studies)</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Breast</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - ethnology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Economic Status</subject><subject>Ethnic Groups - psychology</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Goodness of Fit</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Medical Evaluation</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality Rate</subject><subject>Palpation</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</subject><subject>Regression (Statistics)</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Screening Tests</subject><subject>Statistical Significance</subject><subject>Whites</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0094-5145</issn><issn>1573-3610</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1Lw0AUxBdRtFYv3oVFwYMQffuV3T3GuNFATCSN6C3kYwOW1tRse_C_N2JREDy9w_yYN8wgdELgigDI65sIiK8oA7aDJkRI5jGfwC6aAGjuCcLFATp0bg4ABKS_j_aVpIr5MEFxkGLzEjzEaVDEWYqzCN_GUWRykxZxkOAoS5Ls2Xt6xHlQmBmOU3yTm2BW4DBIQ5PjWZgbk8bp3RHa66qFs8fbO0VPkSnCey_J7uIwSLyGCb32LCc1CCrqTtKW65pyaFRD_K5tCTCuuNXQaFuRMbZsG0Y7pRVoWSuomq6ibIouvn1XQ_--sW5dLl9dYxeL6s32G1dKRYRWhI3g2R9w3m-GtzFbScevYgT1CJ3_BxEGkmkqxlqn6PKbaobeucF25Wp4XVbDR0mg_Jqg_J1ghE-3lpt6adsfdNv5rz536374kbngnFMJ7BM6P3_2</recordid><startdate>19960401</startdate><enddate>19960401</enddate><creator>Webber, Pamela Arnsberger</creator><creator>Fox, Patrick</creator><creator>Zhang, Xiulan</creator><creator>Pond, Mikki</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media, Inc</general><general>Human Sciences Press</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HOKLE</scope><scope>JVXPA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960401</creationdate><title>AN EXAMINATION OF DIFFERENTIAL FOLLOW-UP RATES IN BREAST CANCER SCREENING</title><author>Webber, Pamela Arnsberger ; Fox, Patrick ; Zhang, Xiulan ; Pond, Mikki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-e41b0525bf72d49b240c8c16fdd103484e90c9ea15147dc32f898097b80acfa23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Area Studies</topic><topic>Attrition (Research Studies)</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Breast</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - ethnology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Economic Status</topic><topic>Ethnic Groups - psychology</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Goodness of Fit</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Medical Evaluation</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality Rate</topic><topic>Palpation</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</topic><topic>Regression (Statistics)</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Screening Tests</topic><topic>Statistical Significance</topic><topic>Whites</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Webber, Pamela Arnsberger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiulan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pond, Mikki</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 22</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 38</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of community health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Webber, Pamela Arnsberger</au><au>Fox, Patrick</au><au>Zhang, Xiulan</au><au>Pond, Mikki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>AN EXAMINATION OF DIFFERENTIAL FOLLOW-UP RATES IN BREAST CANCER SCREENING</atitle><jtitle>Journal of community health</jtitle><addtitle>J Community Health</addtitle><date>1996-04-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>123</spage><epage>132</epage><pages>123-132</pages><issn>0094-5145</issn><eissn>1573-3610</eissn><coden>JCMHBR</coden><abstract>This study was designed to test the hypothesis that follow-up rates for women with abnormal breast screening results would vary by age, ethnicity and initial screening results in California's Breast and Cervical Cancer Control Program. The sample was composed of women in this screening program who had received abnormal clinical breast exam (N = 5239) or mammography results (N = 1202). Chi-squared analysis showed significant differences by age and initial screening results but in logistic regression analysis the only demographic variable to retain significance in analysis was age, although size of the clinic was also highly significant. Older women should be targeted as a group needing assistance with compliance with follow-up recommendations.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media, Inc</pub><pmid>8728360</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF01682303</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0094-5145 |
| ispartof | Journal of community health, 1996-04, Vol.21 (2), p.123-132 |
| issn | 0094-5145 1573-3610 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78159813 |
| source | MEDLINE; Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Adult Aged Area Studies Attrition (Research Studies) Behavior Breast Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology Breast Neoplasms - ethnology Breast Neoplasms - psychology California Cancer Economic Status Ethnic Groups - psychology Ethnicity Female Females Goodness of Fit Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Humans Mammography Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data Medical Evaluation Medical screening Middle Aged Mortality Rate Palpation Patient Acceptance of Health Care Regression (Statistics) Regression analysis Screening Tests Statistical Significance Whites Women |
| title | AN EXAMINATION OF DIFFERENTIAL FOLLOW-UP RATES IN BREAST CANCER SCREENING |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T03%3A50%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=AN%20EXAMINATION%20OF%20DIFFERENTIAL%20FOLLOW-UP%20RATES%20IN%20BREAST%20CANCER%20SCREENING&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20community%20health&rft.au=Webber,%20Pamela%20Arnsberger&rft.date=1996-04-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=132&rft.pages=123-132&rft.issn=0094-5145&rft.eissn=1573-3610&rft.coden=JCMHBR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF01682303&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45444270%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224057819&rft_id=info:pmid/8728360&rft_jstor_id=45444270&rfr_iscdi=true |