Exploring the Use of the Medicinal Leech:A Clinical Risk-Benefit Analysis

ABSTRACT The medicinal leech, HIRUDO MEDICINALIS, has been used with increasing frequency for salvage of compromised pedicled flaps and microvascular free-tissue transfers. The data pertaining to 18 cases in which flap salvage with leeches was attempted were reviewed and contrasted with the data fro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of reconstructive microsurgery 1996-04, Vol.12 (3), p.165-172
1. Verfasser: de Chalain, Tristan M.B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 172
container_issue 3
container_start_page 165
container_title Journal of reconstructive microsurgery
container_volume 12
creator de Chalain, Tristan M.B.
description ABSTRACT The medicinal leech, HIRUDO MEDICINALIS, has been used with increasing frequency for salvage of compromised pedicled flaps and microvascular free-tissue transfers. The data pertaining to 18 cases in which flap salvage with leeches was attempted were reviewed and contrasted with the data from 108 published cases from other centers. A further analysis isolated and examined 19 cases in which infection, secondary to leech utilization, supervened. Results suggested that successful salvage of tissue with leeches occurs in 70 to 80 percent of cases. In contrast, the infection rate of most series is between 7 and 20 percent and, when a clinically significant infection occurs, the flap salvage rate drops to 30 percent or less. In addition to infection, the risks of leech therapy include blood loss, which may require replacement transfusion, loss of leeches into body orifices and spaces, allergic reactions, and adverse psychological responses. Clinical indications and contraindications, and strategies to reduce the risks of leech usage, are discussed. Conclusions are that leeches are best used early, and in accordance with an accepted institutional protocol. For each case, the potential risks and benefits must be rigorously assessed and honestly applied.
doi_str_mv 10.1055/s-2007-1006471
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78156374</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78156374</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-e35ec877f62fd91e9af610d1938625ae1f17933237b277871d46a9fc16e88af63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFu2zAMQIVhRZtmu_Y2wIehN7WiZUvybmmQdQFSFChaYDdBkalFqWNnpgO0fz-1MXrbiQT5SIKPsQsQVyDK8pp4LoTmIIQqNHxiExCV4aYq9Gc2EbqQXJni9xk7J9oKAUUF-Sk7NTpXUqoJWy5e9k3Xx_ZPNmwweyLMuvCe3mEdfWxdk60Q_ebHLJs3sY0-FR4iPfMbbDHEIZsl5JUifWEnwTWEX8c4ZU8_F4_zX3x1f7ucz1bcF2U-cJQleqN1UHmoK8DKBQWihkoalZcOIYCupMylXudaGw11oVwVPCg0JrFyyi6Pe_d99_eANNhdJI9N41rsDmS1gVLJ9PiUXR1B33dEPQa77-PO9a8WhH1zZ8m-ubOjuzTwbdx8WO-w_sBHWan_few7ShpC71of6QOTQpcFmITxIzZsIu7QbrtDnxzR_87-A9GSgmI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78156374</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring the Use of the Medicinal Leech:A Clinical Risk-Benefit Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals</source><creator>de Chalain, Tristan M.B.</creator><creatorcontrib>de Chalain, Tristan M.B.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT The medicinal leech, HIRUDO MEDICINALIS, has been used with increasing frequency for salvage of compromised pedicled flaps and microvascular free-tissue transfers. The data pertaining to 18 cases in which flap salvage with leeches was attempted were reviewed and contrasted with the data from 108 published cases from other centers. A further analysis isolated and examined 19 cases in which infection, secondary to leech utilization, supervened. Results suggested that successful salvage of tissue with leeches occurs in 70 to 80 percent of cases. In contrast, the infection rate of most series is between 7 and 20 percent and, when a clinically significant infection occurs, the flap salvage rate drops to 30 percent or less. In addition to infection, the risks of leech therapy include blood loss, which may require replacement transfusion, loss of leeches into body orifices and spaces, allergic reactions, and adverse psychological responses. Clinical indications and contraindications, and strategies to reduce the risks of leech usage, are discussed. Conclusions are that leeches are best used early, and in accordance with an accepted institutional protocol. For each case, the potential risks and benefits must be rigorously assessed and honestly applied.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0743-684X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-8947</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1006471</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8726336</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JRMIE2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Thieme</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aeromonas hydrophila ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Transfusion ; Case-Control Studies ; CLINICAL REVIEW ; Diseases of the skin. Cosmetics ; Female ; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - epidemiology ; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - etiology ; Humans ; Incidence ; Leeches - microbiology ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Postoperative Complications - therapy ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Surgical Flaps ; Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology ; Surgical Wound Infection - etiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of reconstructive microsurgery, 1996-04, Vol.12 (3), p.165-172</ispartof><rights>1996 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-e35ec877f62fd91e9af610d1938625ae1f17933237b277871d46a9fc16e88af63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/s-2007-1006471.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/s-2007-1006471$$EHTML$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3017,3018,27924,27925,54559,54560</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3075418$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8726336$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Chalain, Tristan M.B.</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring the Use of the Medicinal Leech:A Clinical Risk-Benefit Analysis</title><title>Journal of reconstructive microsurgery</title><addtitle>J reconstr Microsurg</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT The medicinal leech, HIRUDO MEDICINALIS, has been used with increasing frequency for salvage of compromised pedicled flaps and microvascular free-tissue transfers. The data pertaining to 18 cases in which flap salvage with leeches was attempted were reviewed and contrasted with the data from 108 published cases from other centers. A further analysis isolated and examined 19 cases in which infection, secondary to leech utilization, supervened. Results suggested that successful salvage of tissue with leeches occurs in 70 to 80 percent of cases. In contrast, the infection rate of most series is between 7 and 20 percent and, when a clinically significant infection occurs, the flap salvage rate drops to 30 percent or less. In addition to infection, the risks of leech therapy include blood loss, which may require replacement transfusion, loss of leeches into body orifices and spaces, allergic reactions, and adverse psychological responses. Clinical indications and contraindications, and strategies to reduce the risks of leech usage, are discussed. Conclusions are that leeches are best used early, and in accordance with an accepted institutional protocol. For each case, the potential risks and benefits must be rigorously assessed and honestly applied.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aeromonas hydrophila</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Transfusion</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>CLINICAL REVIEW</subject><subject>Diseases of the skin. Cosmetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - etiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Leeches - microbiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - therapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Surgical Flaps</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - etiology</subject><issn>0743-684X</issn><issn>1098-8947</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMFu2zAMQIVhRZtmu_Y2wIehN7WiZUvybmmQdQFSFChaYDdBkalFqWNnpgO0fz-1MXrbiQT5SIKPsQsQVyDK8pp4LoTmIIQqNHxiExCV4aYq9Gc2EbqQXJni9xk7J9oKAUUF-Sk7NTpXUqoJWy5e9k3Xx_ZPNmwweyLMuvCe3mEdfWxdk60Q_ebHLJs3sY0-FR4iPfMbbDHEIZsl5JUifWEnwTWEX8c4ZU8_F4_zX3x1f7ucz1bcF2U-cJQleqN1UHmoK8DKBQWihkoalZcOIYCupMylXudaGw11oVwVPCg0JrFyyi6Pe_d99_eANNhdJI9N41rsDmS1gVLJ9PiUXR1B33dEPQa77-PO9a8WhH1zZ8m-ubOjuzTwbdx8WO-w_sBHWan_few7ShpC71of6QOTQpcFmITxIzZsIu7QbrtDnxzR_87-A9GSgmI</recordid><startdate>19960401</startdate><enddate>19960401</enddate><creator>de Chalain, Tristan M.B.</creator><general>Thieme</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960401</creationdate><title>Exploring the Use of the Medicinal Leech:A Clinical Risk-Benefit Analysis</title><author>de Chalain, Tristan M.B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-e35ec877f62fd91e9af610d1938625ae1f17933237b277871d46a9fc16e88af63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aeromonas hydrophila</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Transfusion</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>CLINICAL REVIEW</topic><topic>Diseases of the skin. Cosmetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - etiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Leeches - microbiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - therapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Surgical Flaps</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - etiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Chalain, Tristan M.B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of reconstructive microsurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Chalain, Tristan M.B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring the Use of the Medicinal Leech:A Clinical Risk-Benefit Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of reconstructive microsurgery</jtitle><addtitle>J reconstr Microsurg</addtitle><date>1996-04-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>165</spage><epage>172</epage><pages>165-172</pages><issn>0743-684X</issn><eissn>1098-8947</eissn><coden>JRMIE2</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT The medicinal leech, HIRUDO MEDICINALIS, has been used with increasing frequency for salvage of compromised pedicled flaps and microvascular free-tissue transfers. The data pertaining to 18 cases in which flap salvage with leeches was attempted were reviewed and contrasted with the data from 108 published cases from other centers. A further analysis isolated and examined 19 cases in which infection, secondary to leech utilization, supervened. Results suggested that successful salvage of tissue with leeches occurs in 70 to 80 percent of cases. In contrast, the infection rate of most series is between 7 and 20 percent and, when a clinically significant infection occurs, the flap salvage rate drops to 30 percent or less. In addition to infection, the risks of leech therapy include blood loss, which may require replacement transfusion, loss of leeches into body orifices and spaces, allergic reactions, and adverse psychological responses. Clinical indications and contraindications, and strategies to reduce the risks of leech usage, are discussed. Conclusions are that leeches are best used early, and in accordance with an accepted institutional protocol. For each case, the potential risks and benefits must be rigorously assessed and honestly applied.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Thieme</pub><pmid>8726336</pmid><doi>10.1055/s-2007-1006471</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0743-684X
ispartof Journal of reconstructive microsurgery, 1996-04, Vol.12 (3), p.165-172
issn 0743-684X
1098-8947
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78156374
source MEDLINE; Thieme Connect Journals
subjects Adult
Aeromonas hydrophila
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Blood Transfusion
Case-Control Studies
CLINICAL REVIEW
Diseases of the skin. Cosmetics
Female
Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - epidemiology
Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - etiology
Humans
Incidence
Leeches - microbiology
Male
Medical sciences
Postoperative Complications - therapy
Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Surgical Flaps
Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology
Surgical Wound Infection - etiology
title Exploring the Use of the Medicinal Leech:A Clinical Risk-Benefit Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T20%3A48%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20the%20Use%20of%20the%20Medicinal%20Leech:A%20Clinical%20Risk-Benefit%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20reconstructive%20microsurgery&rft.au=de%20Chalain,%20Tristan%20M.B.&rft.date=1996-04-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=165&rft.epage=172&rft.pages=165-172&rft.issn=0743-684X&rft.eissn=1098-8947&rft.coden=JRMIE2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-2007-1006471&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78156374%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78156374&rft_id=info:pmid/8726336&rfr_iscdi=true