Visible and non-visible endometriosis at laparoscopy in fertile and infertile women and in patients with chronic pelvic pain: a prospective study
In 100 consecutive patients who were undergoing laparoscopy for infertility (group 1, n = 52), chronic pelvic pain (group 2, n = 18) or tubal sterilization (group 3, n = 30, asymptomatic fertile women), peritoneal biopsies were taken from areas of visually normal peritoneum of uterosacral ligaments....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human reproduction (Oxford) 1996-02, Vol.11 (2), p.387-391 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 391 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 387 |
container_title | Human reproduction (Oxford) |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Balasch, Juan Creus, Montserrat Fabregues, Francisco Carmona, Francisco Ordi, Jaime Martinez-Román, Sergio Vanrell, Juan A. |
description | In 100 consecutive patients who were undergoing laparoscopy for infertility (group 1, n = 52), chronic pelvic pain (group 2, n = 18) or tubal sterilization (group 3, n = 30, asymptomatic fertile women), peritoneal biopsies were taken from areas of visually normal peritoneum of uterosacral ligaments. Twenty-six patients in group 1 (50%), eight patients in group 2 (44.4%) and 13 patients in group 3 (43.3%), were found to have laparoscopic evidence of endometriosis elsewhere in the pelvis. The majority of women (80.7% in group 1, 87.5% in group 2, and 100% in group 3) had stage I disease. The incidence of the distinctive appearances of the lesions was similar in the three groups of patients and 7% of all women or 15% (7/47) of those patients having endometriosis at laparoscopy had only subtle (non-‘typical’) endometriotic peritoneal lesions. Uterosacral biopsies showed the presence of endometriotic tissue in three cases (5.7%), two cases (11%) and three cases (10%) in groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively. One of the two patients in group 2 and two of the three patients in group 3 had no evidence of endometriosis at laparoscopy; thus histological study revealed the presence of endometriosis in normal peritoneum hi 11 % (5/47) of patients having macroscopic endometriosis and hi 6% (3/53) of patients without endometriosis at laparoscopy. Previous oral contraceptive users were significantly higher among women having macroscopic and/or microscopic endometriosis than among women without the condition. In conclusion, our prospective study shows a high prevalence (45–50%) of endometriosis (including microscopic forms) in both patients with chronic pelvic pain and asymptomatic women (fertile and infertile), thus supporting the modern concept that in many women endometriosis may be a paraphysiological condition while probably only hi some patients small amounts of endometriosis are an ‘annoyance’ with implications to their reproductive health and may produce symptoms (eg. pelvic pain) and therefore should be defined as a ‘dis-ease’. Previous use of oral contraceptives may increase the risk of developing endometriosis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/HUMREP/11.2.387 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78101949</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/HUMREP/11.2.387</oup_id><sourcerecordid>78101949</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-3781cadbda381f9c2f06f6bbe68972bb991f9df13ea7103d5834931e5de502313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0EKsvCmROSD4gDUnY9dj4cbmhbuqhFfKhFiIvlOBPVkHXS2NmyP4N_jKuke-Y0npnnfWfkIeQlsBWwUqy315--nX1ZA6z4SsjiEVlAmrOEi4w9JgvGc5kA5PCUPPP-F2PxKfMTciLzAjgvF-Tvd-tt1SLVrqauc8l-ztHV3Q7DYDtvPdWBtrrXQ-dN1x-odbTBIdhZZ91Ddhc1bq7RXgeLLnh6Z8MNNTdD56yhPbb7-6Cte0c17aNnjybYPVIfxvrwnDxpdOvxxRyX5PrD2dVmm1x-Pv-4eX-ZmFRCSEQhwei6qrWQ0JSGNyxv8qrCXJYFr6qyjNW6AYG6ACbqTIq0FIBZjRnjAsSSvJl84wa3I_qgdtYbbFvtsBu9iv4MyqhZkvUEmriqH7BR_WB3ejgoYOr-CGo6ggJQXMUjRMWr2Xqsdlgf-fnXY__13Nfe6LYZtDPWHzHBOE9TFrG3E9aN_X_MTCbY-oB_jrgefqu8EEWmtj9-qvTr6cXVRp6rTPwDKreu4g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78101949</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Visible and non-visible endometriosis at laparoscopy in fertile and infertile women and in patients with chronic pelvic pain: a prospective study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Balasch, Juan ; Creus, Montserrat ; Fabregues, Francisco ; Carmona, Francisco ; Ordi, Jaime ; Martinez-Román, Sergio ; Vanrell, Juan A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Balasch, Juan ; Creus, Montserrat ; Fabregues, Francisco ; Carmona, Francisco ; Ordi, Jaime ; Martinez-Román, Sergio ; Vanrell, Juan A.</creatorcontrib><description>In 100 consecutive patients who were undergoing laparoscopy for infertility (group 1, n = 52), chronic pelvic pain (group 2, n = 18) or tubal sterilization (group 3, n = 30, asymptomatic fertile women), peritoneal biopsies were taken from areas of visually normal peritoneum of uterosacral ligaments. Twenty-six patients in group 1 (50%), eight patients in group 2 (44.4%) and 13 patients in group 3 (43.3%), were found to have laparoscopic evidence of endometriosis elsewhere in the pelvis. The majority of women (80.7% in group 1, 87.5% in group 2, and 100% in group 3) had stage I disease. The incidence of the distinctive appearances of the lesions was similar in the three groups of patients and 7% of all women or 15% (7/47) of those patients having endometriosis at laparoscopy had only subtle (non-‘typical’) endometriotic peritoneal lesions. Uterosacral biopsies showed the presence of endometriotic tissue in three cases (5.7%), two cases (11%) and three cases (10%) in groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively. One of the two patients in group 2 and two of the three patients in group 3 had no evidence of endometriosis at laparoscopy; thus histological study revealed the presence of endometriosis in normal peritoneum hi 11 % (5/47) of patients having macroscopic endometriosis and hi 6% (3/53) of patients without endometriosis at laparoscopy. Previous oral contraceptive users were significantly higher among women having macroscopic and/or microscopic endometriosis than among women without the condition. In conclusion, our prospective study shows a high prevalence (45–50%) of endometriosis (including microscopic forms) in both patients with chronic pelvic pain and asymptomatic women (fertile and infertile), thus supporting the modern concept that in many women endometriosis may be a paraphysiological condition while probably only hi some patients small amounts of endometriosis are an ‘annoyance’ with implications to their reproductive health and may produce symptoms (eg. pelvic pain) and therefore should be defined as a ‘dis-ease’. Previous use of oral contraceptives may increase the risk of developing endometriosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2350</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/HUMREP/11.2.387</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8671229</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HUREEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy ; Chronic Disease ; Contraceptives, Oral ; endometriosis ; Endometriosis - pathology ; Female ; Female genital diseases ; fertile women ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; infertility ; Infertility, Female - pathology ; Laparoscopy ; Medical sciences ; Non tumoral diseases ; oral contraceptive use ; pelvic pain ; Pelvic Pain - pathology ; Prospective Studies ; Reference Values</subject><ispartof>Human reproduction (Oxford), 1996-02, Vol.11 (2), p.387-391</ispartof><rights>European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology 1996</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-3781cadbda381f9c2f06f6bbe68972bb991f9df13ea7103d5834931e5de502313</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1585,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3022440$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8671229$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Balasch, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creus, Montserrat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabregues, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmona, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ordi, Jaime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez-Román, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanrell, Juan A.</creatorcontrib><title>Visible and non-visible endometriosis at laparoscopy in fertile and infertile women and in patients with chronic pelvic pain: a prospective study</title><title>Human reproduction (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><description>In 100 consecutive patients who were undergoing laparoscopy for infertility (group 1, n = 52), chronic pelvic pain (group 2, n = 18) or tubal sterilization (group 3, n = 30, asymptomatic fertile women), peritoneal biopsies were taken from areas of visually normal peritoneum of uterosacral ligaments. Twenty-six patients in group 1 (50%), eight patients in group 2 (44.4%) and 13 patients in group 3 (43.3%), were found to have laparoscopic evidence of endometriosis elsewhere in the pelvis. The majority of women (80.7% in group 1, 87.5% in group 2, and 100% in group 3) had stage I disease. The incidence of the distinctive appearances of the lesions was similar in the three groups of patients and 7% of all women or 15% (7/47) of those patients having endometriosis at laparoscopy had only subtle (non-‘typical’) endometriotic peritoneal lesions. Uterosacral biopsies showed the presence of endometriotic tissue in three cases (5.7%), two cases (11%) and three cases (10%) in groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively. One of the two patients in group 2 and two of the three patients in group 3 had no evidence of endometriosis at laparoscopy; thus histological study revealed the presence of endometriosis in normal peritoneum hi 11 % (5/47) of patients having macroscopic endometriosis and hi 6% (3/53) of patients without endometriosis at laparoscopy. Previous oral contraceptive users were significantly higher among women having macroscopic and/or microscopic endometriosis than among women without the condition. In conclusion, our prospective study shows a high prevalence (45–50%) of endometriosis (including microscopic forms) in both patients with chronic pelvic pain and asymptomatic women (fertile and infertile), thus supporting the modern concept that in many women endometriosis may be a paraphysiological condition while probably only hi some patients small amounts of endometriosis are an ‘annoyance’ with implications to their reproductive health and may produce symptoms (eg. pelvic pain) and therefore should be defined as a ‘dis-ease’. Previous use of oral contraceptives may increase the risk of developing endometriosis.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Contraceptives, Oral</subject><subject>endometriosis</subject><subject>Endometriosis - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female genital diseases</subject><subject>fertile women</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>infertility</subject><subject>Infertility, Female - pathology</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Non tumoral diseases</subject><subject>oral contraceptive use</subject><subject>pelvic pain</subject><subject>Pelvic Pain - pathology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><issn>0268-1161</issn><issn>1460-2350</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0EKsvCmROSD4gDUnY9dj4cbmhbuqhFfKhFiIvlOBPVkHXS2NmyP4N_jKuke-Y0npnnfWfkIeQlsBWwUqy315--nX1ZA6z4SsjiEVlAmrOEi4w9JgvGc5kA5PCUPPP-F2PxKfMTciLzAjgvF-Tvd-tt1SLVrqauc8l-ztHV3Q7DYDtvPdWBtrrXQ-dN1x-odbTBIdhZZ91Ddhc1bq7RXgeLLnh6Z8MNNTdD56yhPbb7-6Cte0c17aNnjybYPVIfxvrwnDxpdOvxxRyX5PrD2dVmm1x-Pv-4eX-ZmFRCSEQhwei6qrWQ0JSGNyxv8qrCXJYFr6qyjNW6AYG6ACbqTIq0FIBZjRnjAsSSvJl84wa3I_qgdtYbbFvtsBu9iv4MyqhZkvUEmriqH7BR_WB3ejgoYOr-CGo6ggJQXMUjRMWr2Xqsdlgf-fnXY__13Nfe6LYZtDPWHzHBOE9TFrG3E9aN_X_MTCbY-oB_jrgefqu8EEWmtj9-qvTr6cXVRp6rTPwDKreu4g</recordid><startdate>19960201</startdate><enddate>19960201</enddate><creator>Balasch, Juan</creator><creator>Creus, Montserrat</creator><creator>Fabregues, Francisco</creator><creator>Carmona, Francisco</creator><creator>Ordi, Jaime</creator><creator>Martinez-Román, Sergio</creator><creator>Vanrell, Juan A.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960201</creationdate><title>Visible and non-visible endometriosis at laparoscopy in fertile and infertile women and in patients with chronic pelvic pain: a prospective study</title><author>Balasch, Juan ; Creus, Montserrat ; Fabregues, Francisco ; Carmona, Francisco ; Ordi, Jaime ; Martinez-Román, Sergio ; Vanrell, Juan A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-3781cadbda381f9c2f06f6bbe68972bb991f9df13ea7103d5834931e5de502313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Contraceptives, Oral</topic><topic>endometriosis</topic><topic>Endometriosis - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female genital diseases</topic><topic>fertile women</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>infertility</topic><topic>Infertility, Female - pathology</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Non tumoral diseases</topic><topic>oral contraceptive use</topic><topic>pelvic pain</topic><topic>Pelvic Pain - pathology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Balasch, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creus, Montserrat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabregues, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmona, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ordi, Jaime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez-Román, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanrell, Juan A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Balasch, Juan</au><au>Creus, Montserrat</au><au>Fabregues, Francisco</au><au>Carmona, Francisco</au><au>Ordi, Jaime</au><au>Martinez-Román, Sergio</au><au>Vanrell, Juan A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Visible and non-visible endometriosis at laparoscopy in fertile and infertile women and in patients with chronic pelvic pain: a prospective study</atitle><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><date>1996-02-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>387</spage><epage>391</epage><pages>387-391</pages><issn>0268-1161</issn><eissn>1460-2350</eissn><coden>HUREEE</coden><abstract>In 100 consecutive patients who were undergoing laparoscopy for infertility (group 1, n = 52), chronic pelvic pain (group 2, n = 18) or tubal sterilization (group 3, n = 30, asymptomatic fertile women), peritoneal biopsies were taken from areas of visually normal peritoneum of uterosacral ligaments. Twenty-six patients in group 1 (50%), eight patients in group 2 (44.4%) and 13 patients in group 3 (43.3%), were found to have laparoscopic evidence of endometriosis elsewhere in the pelvis. The majority of women (80.7% in group 1, 87.5% in group 2, and 100% in group 3) had stage I disease. The incidence of the distinctive appearances of the lesions was similar in the three groups of patients and 7% of all women or 15% (7/47) of those patients having endometriosis at laparoscopy had only subtle (non-‘typical’) endometriotic peritoneal lesions. Uterosacral biopsies showed the presence of endometriotic tissue in three cases (5.7%), two cases (11%) and three cases (10%) in groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively. One of the two patients in group 2 and two of the three patients in group 3 had no evidence of endometriosis at laparoscopy; thus histological study revealed the presence of endometriosis in normal peritoneum hi 11 % (5/47) of patients having macroscopic endometriosis and hi 6% (3/53) of patients without endometriosis at laparoscopy. Previous oral contraceptive users were significantly higher among women having macroscopic and/or microscopic endometriosis than among women without the condition. In conclusion, our prospective study shows a high prevalence (45–50%) of endometriosis (including microscopic forms) in both patients with chronic pelvic pain and asymptomatic women (fertile and infertile), thus supporting the modern concept that in many women endometriosis may be a paraphysiological condition while probably only hi some patients small amounts of endometriosis are an ‘annoyance’ with implications to their reproductive health and may produce symptoms (eg. pelvic pain) and therefore should be defined as a ‘dis-ease’. Previous use of oral contraceptives may increase the risk of developing endometriosis.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>8671229</pmid><doi>10.1093/HUMREP/11.2.387</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-1161 |
ispartof | Human reproduction (Oxford), 1996-02, Vol.11 (2), p.387-391 |
issn | 0268-1161 1460-2350 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78101949 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Biopsy Chronic Disease Contraceptives, Oral endometriosis Endometriosis - pathology Female Female genital diseases fertile women Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans infertility Infertility, Female - pathology Laparoscopy Medical sciences Non tumoral diseases oral contraceptive use pelvic pain Pelvic Pain - pathology Prospective Studies Reference Values |
title | Visible and non-visible endometriosis at laparoscopy in fertile and infertile women and in patients with chronic pelvic pain: a prospective study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T22%3A34%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Visible%20and%20non-visible%20endometriosis%20at%20laparoscopy%20in%20fertile%20and%20infertile%20women%20and%20in%20patients%20with%20chronic%20pelvic%20pain:%20a%20prospective%20study&rft.jtitle=Human%20reproduction%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Balasch,%20Juan&rft.date=1996-02-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=387&rft.epage=391&rft.pages=387-391&rft.issn=0268-1161&rft.eissn=1460-2350&rft.coden=HUREEE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/HUMREP/11.2.387&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78101949%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78101949&rft_id=info:pmid/8671229&rft_oup_id=10.1093/HUMREP/11.2.387&rfr_iscdi=true |