Pelvic lymph node dissection Guide to patient management in clinically locally confined adenocarcinoma of prostate

Pelvic lymphadenectomy has become a recognized staging procedure in patients with locally confined adenocarcinoma of the prostate prior to therapy for cure. Our study of 343 patients shows that the grade of the primary tumor does definitely affect the results of pelvic lymphadenectomy. As the grade...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urology 1982-12, Vol.20 (6), p.559-565
Hauptverfasser: Donohue, Robert E., Mani, John H., Whitesel, John A., Mohr, Stephen, Scanavino, David, Augspurger, Richard R., Biber, Robert J., Earl Fauver, H., Wettlaufer, John N., Pfister, Ronald R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 565
container_issue 6
container_start_page 559
container_title Urology
container_volume 20
creator Donohue, Robert E.
Mani, John H.
Whitesel, John A.
Mohr, Stephen
Scanavino, David
Augspurger, Richard R.
Biber, Robert J.
Earl Fauver, H.
Wettlaufer, John N.
Pfister, Ronald R.
description Pelvic lymphadenectomy has become a recognized staging procedure in patients with locally confined adenocarcinoma of the prostate prior to therapy for cure. Our study of 343 patients shows that the grade of the primary tumor does definitely affect the results of pelvic lymphadenectomy. As the grade worsens in each clinical stage, the incidence of positive nodes increases. The result of the pelvic lymphadenectomy often directs the selection of the therapy for the patient and definitely influences the results of that therapy.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0090-4295(82)90298-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78084518</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0090429582902989</els_id><sourcerecordid>78084518</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-c7046e56970b55cd4c246ec82876524b22b4d0aa9a72cb9aef951ee1eaff9d423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOAyEUhonR1Hp5A01YGV2MAh1g2JgYo9XERBe6JgycUQwDdZia9O2ltnHp6tz-c_sQOqHkkhIqrghRpKqZ4ucNu1CEqaZSO2hKOZOVUorvoumfZB8d5PxJCBFCyAmaSCqVoGKKhhcI397isOoXHzgmB9j5nMGOPkU8X_qSGBNemNFDHHFvonmHfu36iG3w0VsTwgqHtLE2xc5HcNg4iCU3WB9Tb3Dq8GJIeTQjHKG9zoQMx1t7iN7u715vH6qn5_nj7c1TZWdcjpWVpBbAhZKk5dy62rIS24Y1UnBWt4y1tSPGKCOZbZWBTnEKQMF0nXI1mx2is83csvhrCXnUvc8WQjAR0jJr2ZCm5rQpwnojtOXCPECnF4PvzbDSlOg1ar3mqNccdcP0L2qtStvpdv6y7cH9NW3Zlvr1pg7lyW8Pg862QLTg_FD4apf8_wt-AAFwkB8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78084518</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pelvic lymph node dissection Guide to patient management in clinically locally confined adenocarcinoma of prostate</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Donohue, Robert E. ; Mani, John H. ; Whitesel, John A. ; Mohr, Stephen ; Scanavino, David ; Augspurger, Richard R. ; Biber, Robert J. ; Earl Fauver, H. ; Wettlaufer, John N. ; Pfister, Ronald R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Donohue, Robert E. ; Mani, John H. ; Whitesel, John A. ; Mohr, Stephen ; Scanavino, David ; Augspurger, Richard R. ; Biber, Robert J. ; Earl Fauver, H. ; Wettlaufer, John N. ; Pfister, Ronald R.</creatorcontrib><description>Pelvic lymphadenectomy has become a recognized staging procedure in patients with locally confined adenocarcinoma of the prostate prior to therapy for cure. Our study of 343 patients shows that the grade of the primary tumor does definitely affect the results of pelvic lymphadenectomy. As the grade worsens in each clinical stage, the incidence of positive nodes increases. The result of the pelvic lymphadenectomy often directs the selection of the therapy for the patient and definitely influences the results of that therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-4295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-9995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(82)90298-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7179616</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; Male ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Neoplasm Staging ; Pelvis ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><ispartof>Urology, 1982-12, Vol.20 (6), p.559-565</ispartof><rights>1982</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-c7046e56970b55cd4c246ec82876524b22b4d0aa9a72cb9aef951ee1eaff9d423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-c7046e56970b55cd4c246ec82876524b22b4d0aa9a72cb9aef951ee1eaff9d423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(82)90298-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,3550,27922,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7179616$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Donohue, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mani, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitesel, John A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohr, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scanavino, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augspurger, Richard R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biber, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Earl Fauver, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wettlaufer, John N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfister, Ronald R.</creatorcontrib><title>Pelvic lymph node dissection Guide to patient management in clinically locally confined adenocarcinoma of prostate</title><title>Urology</title><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><description>Pelvic lymphadenectomy has become a recognized staging procedure in patients with locally confined adenocarcinoma of the prostate prior to therapy for cure. Our study of 343 patients shows that the grade of the primary tumor does definitely affect the results of pelvic lymphadenectomy. As the grade worsens in each clinical stage, the incidence of positive nodes increases. The result of the pelvic lymphadenectomy often directs the selection of the therapy for the patient and definitely influences the results of that therapy.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neoplasm Metastasis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Pelvis</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><issn>0090-4295</issn><issn>1527-9995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOAyEUhonR1Hp5A01YGV2MAh1g2JgYo9XERBe6JgycUQwDdZia9O2ltnHp6tz-c_sQOqHkkhIqrghRpKqZ4ucNu1CEqaZSO2hKOZOVUorvoumfZB8d5PxJCBFCyAmaSCqVoGKKhhcI397isOoXHzgmB9j5nMGOPkU8X_qSGBNemNFDHHFvonmHfu36iG3w0VsTwgqHtLE2xc5HcNg4iCU3WB9Tb3Dq8GJIeTQjHKG9zoQMx1t7iN7u715vH6qn5_nj7c1TZWdcjpWVpBbAhZKk5dy62rIS24Y1UnBWt4y1tSPGKCOZbZWBTnEKQMF0nXI1mx2is83csvhrCXnUvc8WQjAR0jJr2ZCm5rQpwnojtOXCPECnF4PvzbDSlOg1ar3mqNccdcP0L2qtStvpdv6y7cH9NW3Zlvr1pg7lyW8Pg862QLTg_FD4apf8_wt-AAFwkB8</recordid><startdate>198212</startdate><enddate>198212</enddate><creator>Donohue, Robert E.</creator><creator>Mani, John H.</creator><creator>Whitesel, John A.</creator><creator>Mohr, Stephen</creator><creator>Scanavino, David</creator><creator>Augspurger, Richard R.</creator><creator>Biber, Robert J.</creator><creator>Earl Fauver, H.</creator><creator>Wettlaufer, John N.</creator><creator>Pfister, Ronald R.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198212</creationdate><title>Pelvic lymph node dissection Guide to patient management in clinically locally confined adenocarcinoma of prostate</title><author>Donohue, Robert E. ; Mani, John H. ; Whitesel, John A. ; Mohr, Stephen ; Scanavino, David ; Augspurger, Richard R. ; Biber, Robert J. ; Earl Fauver, H. ; Wettlaufer, John N. ; Pfister, Ronald R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-c7046e56970b55cd4c246ec82876524b22b4d0aa9a72cb9aef951ee1eaff9d423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neoplasm Metastasis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Pelvis</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Donohue, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mani, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitesel, John A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohr, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scanavino, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augspurger, Richard R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biber, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Earl Fauver, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wettlaufer, John N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfister, Ronald R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Donohue, Robert E.</au><au>Mani, John H.</au><au>Whitesel, John A.</au><au>Mohr, Stephen</au><au>Scanavino, David</au><au>Augspurger, Richard R.</au><au>Biber, Robert J.</au><au>Earl Fauver, H.</au><au>Wettlaufer, John N.</au><au>Pfister, Ronald R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pelvic lymph node dissection Guide to patient management in clinically locally confined adenocarcinoma of prostate</atitle><jtitle>Urology</jtitle><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><date>1982-12</date><risdate>1982</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>559</spage><epage>565</epage><pages>559-565</pages><issn>0090-4295</issn><eissn>1527-9995</eissn><abstract>Pelvic lymphadenectomy has become a recognized staging procedure in patients with locally confined adenocarcinoma of the prostate prior to therapy for cure. Our study of 343 patients shows that the grade of the primary tumor does definitely affect the results of pelvic lymphadenectomy. As the grade worsens in each clinical stage, the incidence of positive nodes increases. The result of the pelvic lymphadenectomy often directs the selection of the therapy for the patient and definitely influences the results of that therapy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>7179616</pmid><doi>10.1016/0090-4295(82)90298-9</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-4295
ispartof Urology, 1982-12, Vol.20 (6), p.559-565
issn 0090-4295
1527-9995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78084518
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adenocarcinoma - pathology
Humans
Lymph Node Excision
Male
Neoplasm Metastasis
Neoplasm Staging
Pelvis
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
title Pelvic lymph node dissection Guide to patient management in clinically locally confined adenocarcinoma of prostate
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T08%3A53%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pelvic%20lymph%20node%20dissection%20Guide%20to%20patient%20management%20in%20clinically%20locally%20confined%20adenocarcinoma%20of%20prostate&rft.jtitle=Urology&rft.au=Donohue,%20Robert%20E.&rft.date=1982-12&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=559&rft.epage=565&rft.pages=559-565&rft.issn=0090-4295&rft.eissn=1527-9995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0090-4295(82)90298-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78084518%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78084518&rft_id=info:pmid/7179616&rft_els_id=0090429582902989&rfr_iscdi=true