Maximum acceptable lifting loads during seated and standing work positions
The psychophysical method was used to determine the maximal acceptable load that eight males (age 22–30 years) would lift in each of four different positions: (1) seated, two-handed, symmetrical lift from a table, to a position 38 cm forward of the edge, (2) a seated lift from a position at the subj...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Applied ergonomics 1987-09, Vol.18 (3), p.239-243 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 243 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 239 |
container_title | Applied ergonomics |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Yates, J.W. Karwowski, W. |
description | The psychophysical method was used to determine the maximal acceptable load that eight males (age 22–30 years) would lift in each of four different positions: (1) seated, two-handed, symmetrical lift from a table, to a position 38 cm forward of the edge, (2) a seated lift from a position at the subject's side, on to a table in front of the subject involving a 90 degree twist of the torso, (3) standing, two-handed, symmetrical lift from the table, to a position 38 cm forward of the edge, and (4) standing, vertical lift from 86 above the floor. Subsequent to a training period, subjects lifted a tray with slotted handles at the rate of 1 or 4 lifts/min. Each subject chose the weight of the tray which was acceptable to him by adding or removing flat pieces of lead over a 45 min period. The weight of the tray, heart rate, and the perceived exertion were measured at 15, 30 and 45 min. Oxygen consumption was measured during the last 5 min of the 45 min experiment. Statistical analysis revealed a significant frequency and position effect. An increase in frequency from 1 to 4 lifts/min resulted in a decrease of 1·6 to 2·1 kg in the maximum acceptable weight for the various tasks. On average, the maximum acceptable weight of lift for standing positions was 16% greater than for sitting positions. Oxygen consumption and heart rate were significantly higher for 4 lifts/min than for 1 lift/min; however, the rating of perceived exertion did not differ for any factor. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0003-6870(87)90012-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78080612</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0003687087900123</els_id><sourcerecordid>78080612</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-379efe99d7201849bc977fedd46cd4f305656f75cdd7cadcf6498daaab052dc13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMlKBDEQhoMoOo6-gUgfRPTQmvSS5SLI4MqIFz2HdFKRaG8m3S5vb7fTjDcvVVTx_UXxIXRA8BnBhJ5jjNOYcoZPODsVGJMkTjfQjHCWxIIkdBPN1sgO2g3hdRh5RvJttENyyihNxAzdP6gvV_VVpLSGtlNFCVHpbOfql6hslAmR6f04BFAdmEjVJgrdUMfdZ-PforYJrnNNHfbQllVlgP2pz9Hz9dXT4jZePt7cLS6XsU656OKUCbAghGEJJjwThRaMWTAmo9pkNsU5zalluTaGaWW0pZngRilV4DwxmqRzdLy62_rmvYfQycoFDWWpamj6IBnHHFOSDGC2ArVvQvBgZetdpfy3JFiODuUoSI6CJGfy16FMh9jhdL8vKjB_oUnaABxNgApaldarWruw5ljOBcN0wC5WGAwyPhx4GbSDWoNxHnQnTeP-f-QHr9GOPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78080612</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Maximum acceptable lifting loads during seated and standing work positions</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Yates, J.W. ; Karwowski, W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yates, J.W. ; Karwowski, W.</creatorcontrib><description>The psychophysical method was used to determine the maximal acceptable load that eight males (age 22–30 years) would lift in each of four different positions: (1) seated, two-handed, symmetrical lift from a table, to a position 38 cm forward of the edge, (2) a seated lift from a position at the subject's side, on to a table in front of the subject involving a 90 degree twist of the torso, (3) standing, two-handed, symmetrical lift from the table, to a position 38 cm forward of the edge, and (4) standing, vertical lift from 86 above the floor. Subsequent to a training period, subjects lifted a tray with slotted handles at the rate of 1 or 4 lifts/min. Each subject chose the weight of the tray which was acceptable to him by adding or removing flat pieces of lead over a 45 min period. The weight of the tray, heart rate, and the perceived exertion were measured at 15, 30 and 45 min. Oxygen consumption was measured during the last 5 min of the 45 min experiment. Statistical analysis revealed a significant frequency and position effect. An increase in frequency from 1 to 4 lifts/min resulted in a decrease of 1·6 to 2·1 kg in the maximum acceptable weight for the various tasks. On average, the maximum acceptable weight of lift for standing positions was 16% greater than for sitting positions. Oxygen consumption and heart rate were significantly higher for 4 lifts/min than for 1 lift/min; however, the rating of perceived exertion did not differ for any factor.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-6870</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9126</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0003-6870(87)90012-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15676629</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AERGBW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Ergonomics. Human factors ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; lifting ; Occupational psychology ; physical exertion ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Working environment</subject><ispartof>Applied ergonomics, 1987-09, Vol.18 (3), p.239-243</ispartof><rights>1987</rights><rights>1988 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-379efe99d7201849bc977fedd46cd4f305656f75cdd7cadcf6498daaab052dc13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-379efe99d7201849bc977fedd46cd4f305656f75cdd7cadcf6498daaab052dc13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(87)90012-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=7589706$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15676629$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yates, J.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karwowski, W.</creatorcontrib><title>Maximum acceptable lifting loads during seated and standing work positions</title><title>Applied ergonomics</title><addtitle>Appl Ergon</addtitle><description>The psychophysical method was used to determine the maximal acceptable load that eight males (age 22–30 years) would lift in each of four different positions: (1) seated, two-handed, symmetrical lift from a table, to a position 38 cm forward of the edge, (2) a seated lift from a position at the subject's side, on to a table in front of the subject involving a 90 degree twist of the torso, (3) standing, two-handed, symmetrical lift from the table, to a position 38 cm forward of the edge, and (4) standing, vertical lift from 86 above the floor. Subsequent to a training period, subjects lifted a tray with slotted handles at the rate of 1 or 4 lifts/min. Each subject chose the weight of the tray which was acceptable to him by adding or removing flat pieces of lead over a 45 min period. The weight of the tray, heart rate, and the perceived exertion were measured at 15, 30 and 45 min. Oxygen consumption was measured during the last 5 min of the 45 min experiment. Statistical analysis revealed a significant frequency and position effect. An increase in frequency from 1 to 4 lifts/min resulted in a decrease of 1·6 to 2·1 kg in the maximum acceptable weight for the various tasks. On average, the maximum acceptable weight of lift for standing positions was 16% greater than for sitting positions. Oxygen consumption and heart rate were significantly higher for 4 lifts/min than for 1 lift/min; however, the rating of perceived exertion did not differ for any factor.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Ergonomics. Human factors</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>lifting</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>physical exertion</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Working environment</subject><issn>0003-6870</issn><issn>1872-9126</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMlKBDEQhoMoOo6-gUgfRPTQmvSS5SLI4MqIFz2HdFKRaG8m3S5vb7fTjDcvVVTx_UXxIXRA8BnBhJ5jjNOYcoZPODsVGJMkTjfQjHCWxIIkdBPN1sgO2g3hdRh5RvJttENyyihNxAzdP6gvV_VVpLSGtlNFCVHpbOfql6hslAmR6f04BFAdmEjVJgrdUMfdZ-PforYJrnNNHfbQllVlgP2pz9Hz9dXT4jZePt7cLS6XsU656OKUCbAghGEJJjwThRaMWTAmo9pkNsU5zalluTaGaWW0pZngRilV4DwxmqRzdLy62_rmvYfQycoFDWWpamj6IBnHHFOSDGC2ArVvQvBgZetdpfy3JFiODuUoSI6CJGfy16FMh9jhdL8vKjB_oUnaABxNgApaldarWruw5ljOBcN0wC5WGAwyPhx4GbSDWoNxHnQnTeP-f-QHr9GOPg</recordid><startdate>19870901</startdate><enddate>19870901</enddate><creator>Yates, J.W.</creator><creator>Karwowski, W.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19870901</creationdate><title>Maximum acceptable lifting loads during seated and standing work positions</title><author>Yates, J.W. ; Karwowski, W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-379efe99d7201849bc977fedd46cd4f305656f75cdd7cadcf6498daaab052dc13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Ergonomics. Human factors</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>lifting</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>physical exertion</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Working environment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yates, J.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karwowski, W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Applied ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yates, J.W.</au><au>Karwowski, W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Maximum acceptable lifting loads during seated and standing work positions</atitle><jtitle>Applied ergonomics</jtitle><addtitle>Appl Ergon</addtitle><date>1987-09-01</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>239</spage><epage>243</epage><pages>239-243</pages><issn>0003-6870</issn><eissn>1872-9126</eissn><coden>AERGBW</coden><abstract>The psychophysical method was used to determine the maximal acceptable load that eight males (age 22–30 years) would lift in each of four different positions: (1) seated, two-handed, symmetrical lift from a table, to a position 38 cm forward of the edge, (2) a seated lift from a position at the subject's side, on to a table in front of the subject involving a 90 degree twist of the torso, (3) standing, two-handed, symmetrical lift from the table, to a position 38 cm forward of the edge, and (4) standing, vertical lift from 86 above the floor. Subsequent to a training period, subjects lifted a tray with slotted handles at the rate of 1 or 4 lifts/min. Each subject chose the weight of the tray which was acceptable to him by adding or removing flat pieces of lead over a 45 min period. The weight of the tray, heart rate, and the perceived exertion were measured at 15, 30 and 45 min. Oxygen consumption was measured during the last 5 min of the 45 min experiment. Statistical analysis revealed a significant frequency and position effect. An increase in frequency from 1 to 4 lifts/min resulted in a decrease of 1·6 to 2·1 kg in the maximum acceptable weight for the various tasks. On average, the maximum acceptable weight of lift for standing positions was 16% greater than for sitting positions. Oxygen consumption and heart rate were significantly higher for 4 lifts/min than for 1 lift/min; however, the rating of perceived exertion did not differ for any factor.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>15676629</pmid><doi>10.1016/0003-6870(87)90012-3</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-6870 |
ispartof | Applied ergonomics, 1987-09, Vol.18 (3), p.239-243 |
issn | 0003-6870 1872-9126 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78080612 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Ergonomics. Human factors Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology lifting Occupational psychology physical exertion Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Working environment |
title | Maximum acceptable lifting loads during seated and standing work positions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A03%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Maximum%20acceptable%20lifting%20loads%20during%20seated%20and%20standing%20work%20positions&rft.jtitle=Applied%20ergonomics&rft.au=Yates,%20J.W.&rft.date=1987-09-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=239&rft.epage=243&rft.pages=239-243&rft.issn=0003-6870&rft.eissn=1872-9126&rft.coden=AERGBW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0003-6870(87)90012-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78080612%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78080612&rft_id=info:pmid/15676629&rft_els_id=0003687087900123&rfr_iscdi=true |