Comparison of steady-state diffusion and transit time ultrasonic measurements of umbilical blood flow in the chronic fetal sheep preparation

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to measure umbilical blood flow continuously by use of a transit time ultrasonic flow transducer and to compare the blood flow measurements with the steady-state diffusion method in the chronic fetal sheep preparation. STUDY DESIGN: We compared umbilical blood flow measure...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 1996-05, Vol.174 (5), p.1456-1460
Hauptverfasser: Sokol, Gregory M., Liechty, Edward A., Boyle, David W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1460
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1456
container_title American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 174
creator Sokol, Gregory M.
Liechty, Edward A.
Boyle, David W.
description OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to measure umbilical blood flow continuously by use of a transit time ultrasonic flow transducer and to compare the blood flow measurements with the steady-state diffusion method in the chronic fetal sheep preparation. STUDY DESIGN: We compared umbilical blood flow measurements calculated by the steady-state diffusion method with ethanol as the diffusing substance and with the transit time ultrasonic flow transducer placed on the common umbilical artery in five chronically prepared fetal sheep. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference between measurements of umbilical blood flow measured by the flow transducer versus the steady-state diffusion method, 600 ± 22 versus 664 ± 56 ml per minute (mean ± SEM) ( p = 0.23). The mean coefficient of variation within each study was 13.6% for the steady-state diffusion method versus 4.1% for the transit time flow transducer. Umbilical blood flow variance was significantly lower as measured by the flow transducer compared with the diffusion method ( p < 0.0001). There were no differences in umbilical blood flow per kilogram or fetal oxygen uptake between the two methods. CONCLUSION: We conclude that umbilical blood flow can be measured continuously under steady-state conditions by use of a transit time flow transducer. Because of the lower variability in the flow transducer–obtained measurements, we speculate that the flow transducer may differentiate alterations in umbilical blood flow with greater precision in chronic preparations. This may be advantageous for measuring absolute changes in fetal substrate uptake, especially under non-steady-state conditions. (A M J O BSTET G YNECOL 1996;174:1456-60.)
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70588-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78079044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937896705884</els_id><sourcerecordid>78079044</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-137dc881b26b424b42a70831560d34357c0956594a2b0aefdcad7463df5ca68b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2KFDEUhYMoY8_oIwxkIeIsSpNKVX5WMjT-wYALdR1SyQ0dqaqUSUqZd_ChTXU3vXURwuV8597LuQjdUvKWEsrffSOEtI1iQr5R_E6QXsqme4J2lCjRcMnlU7S7IM_Rdc4_t7JV7RW6UoT3lNId-ruP02JSyHHG0eNcwLjHJhdTALvg_ZpDVczscElmzqHgEibA61jL6gkWT2DymmCCueStxToNYQzWjHgYY3TYj_EPDjMuB8D2kI4eD6Xq-QCw4CVBXcCUOucFeubNmOHl-b9BPz5--L7_3Dx8_fRlf__QWCZVaSgTzkpJh5YPXdvVZwSRjPacONaxXliiet6rzrQDMeCdNU50nDnfW8PlwG7Q61PfJcVfK-Sip5AtjKOZIa5ZC0mEIl1Xwf4E2hRzTuD1ksJk0qOmRG9X0Mcr6C1irbg-XkFvvtvzgHWYwF1c59ir_uqsm1yT8jVaG_IFY5R2komKvT9hUMP4HSDpbAPMFlxIYIt2MfxnkX_B-6as</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78079044</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of steady-state diffusion and transit time ultrasonic measurements of umbilical blood flow in the chronic fetal sheep preparation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Sokol, Gregory M. ; Liechty, Edward A. ; Boyle, David W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sokol, Gregory M. ; Liechty, Edward A. ; Boyle, David W.</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to measure umbilical blood flow continuously by use of a transit time ultrasonic flow transducer and to compare the blood flow measurements with the steady-state diffusion method in the chronic fetal sheep preparation. STUDY DESIGN: We compared umbilical blood flow measurements calculated by the steady-state diffusion method with ethanol as the diffusing substance and with the transit time ultrasonic flow transducer placed on the common umbilical artery in five chronically prepared fetal sheep. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference between measurements of umbilical blood flow measured by the flow transducer versus the steady-state diffusion method, 600 ± 22 versus 664 ± 56 ml per minute (mean ± SEM) ( p = 0.23). The mean coefficient of variation within each study was 13.6% for the steady-state diffusion method versus 4.1% for the transit time flow transducer. Umbilical blood flow variance was significantly lower as measured by the flow transducer compared with the diffusion method ( p &lt; 0.0001). There were no differences in umbilical blood flow per kilogram or fetal oxygen uptake between the two methods. CONCLUSION: We conclude that umbilical blood flow can be measured continuously under steady-state conditions by use of a transit time flow transducer. Because of the lower variability in the flow transducer–obtained measurements, we speculate that the flow transducer may differentiate alterations in umbilical blood flow with greater precision in chronic preparations. This may be advantageous for measuring absolute changes in fetal substrate uptake, especially under non-steady-state conditions. (A M J O BSTET G YNECOL 1996;174:1456-60.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70588-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9065111</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJOGAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Diffusion ; Female ; Fetal Blood - diagnostic imaging ; Fetal Blood - physiology ; fetal sheep ; Fetus - metabolism ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Homeostasis ; Management. Prenatal diagnosis ; Medical sciences ; Oxygen Consumption ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta ; Regional Blood Flow ; Rheology - methods ; Sheep - embryology ; steady-state diffusion ; Time Factors ; transit time ultrasonic flow transducer ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal ; Umbilical blood flow</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1996-05, Vol.174 (5), p.1456-1460</ispartof><rights>1996 Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-137dc881b26b424b42a70831560d34357c0956594a2b0aefdcad7463df5ca68b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-137dc881b26b424b42a70831560d34357c0956594a2b0aefdcad7463df5ca68b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002937896705884$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3114837$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9065111$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sokol, Gregory M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liechty, Edward A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, David W.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of steady-state diffusion and transit time ultrasonic measurements of umbilical blood flow in the chronic fetal sheep preparation</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to measure umbilical blood flow continuously by use of a transit time ultrasonic flow transducer and to compare the blood flow measurements with the steady-state diffusion method in the chronic fetal sheep preparation. STUDY DESIGN: We compared umbilical blood flow measurements calculated by the steady-state diffusion method with ethanol as the diffusing substance and with the transit time ultrasonic flow transducer placed on the common umbilical artery in five chronically prepared fetal sheep. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference between measurements of umbilical blood flow measured by the flow transducer versus the steady-state diffusion method, 600 ± 22 versus 664 ± 56 ml per minute (mean ± SEM) ( p = 0.23). The mean coefficient of variation within each study was 13.6% for the steady-state diffusion method versus 4.1% for the transit time flow transducer. Umbilical blood flow variance was significantly lower as measured by the flow transducer compared with the diffusion method ( p &lt; 0.0001). There were no differences in umbilical blood flow per kilogram or fetal oxygen uptake between the two methods. CONCLUSION: We conclude that umbilical blood flow can be measured continuously under steady-state conditions by use of a transit time flow transducer. Because of the lower variability in the flow transducer–obtained measurements, we speculate that the flow transducer may differentiate alterations in umbilical blood flow with greater precision in chronic preparations. This may be advantageous for measuring absolute changes in fetal substrate uptake, especially under non-steady-state conditions. (A M J O BSTET G YNECOL 1996;174:1456-60.)</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diffusion</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal Blood - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Fetal Blood - physiology</subject><subject>fetal sheep</subject><subject>Fetus - metabolism</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Homeostasis</subject><subject>Management. Prenatal diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Oxygen Consumption</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</subject><subject>Regional Blood Flow</subject><subject>Rheology - methods</subject><subject>Sheep - embryology</subject><subject>steady-state diffusion</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>transit time ultrasonic flow transducer</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</subject><subject>Umbilical blood flow</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc2KFDEUhYMoY8_oIwxkIeIsSpNKVX5WMjT-wYALdR1SyQ0dqaqUSUqZd_ChTXU3vXURwuV8597LuQjdUvKWEsrffSOEtI1iQr5R_E6QXsqme4J2lCjRcMnlU7S7IM_Rdc4_t7JV7RW6UoT3lNId-ruP02JSyHHG0eNcwLjHJhdTALvg_ZpDVczscElmzqHgEibA61jL6gkWT2DymmCCueStxToNYQzWjHgYY3TYj_EPDjMuB8D2kI4eD6Xq-QCw4CVBXcCUOucFeubNmOHl-b9BPz5--L7_3Dx8_fRlf__QWCZVaSgTzkpJh5YPXdvVZwSRjPacONaxXliiet6rzrQDMeCdNU50nDnfW8PlwG7Q61PfJcVfK-Sip5AtjKOZIa5ZC0mEIl1Xwf4E2hRzTuD1ksJk0qOmRG9X0Mcr6C1irbg-XkFvvtvzgHWYwF1c59ir_uqsm1yT8jVaG_IFY5R2komKvT9hUMP4HSDpbAPMFlxIYIt2MfxnkX_B-6as</recordid><startdate>19960501</startdate><enddate>19960501</enddate><creator>Sokol, Gregory M.</creator><creator>Liechty, Edward A.</creator><creator>Boyle, David W.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960501</creationdate><title>Comparison of steady-state diffusion and transit time ultrasonic measurements of umbilical blood flow in the chronic fetal sheep preparation</title><author>Sokol, Gregory M. ; Liechty, Edward A. ; Boyle, David W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-137dc881b26b424b42a70831560d34357c0956594a2b0aefdcad7463df5ca68b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diffusion</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal Blood - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Fetal Blood - physiology</topic><topic>fetal sheep</topic><topic>Fetus - metabolism</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Homeostasis</topic><topic>Management. Prenatal diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Oxygen Consumption</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</topic><topic>Regional Blood Flow</topic><topic>Rheology - methods</topic><topic>Sheep - embryology</topic><topic>steady-state diffusion</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>transit time ultrasonic flow transducer</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</topic><topic>Umbilical blood flow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sokol, Gregory M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liechty, Edward A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, David W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sokol, Gregory M.</au><au>Liechty, Edward A.</au><au>Boyle, David W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of steady-state diffusion and transit time ultrasonic measurements of umbilical blood flow in the chronic fetal sheep preparation</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>1996-05-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>174</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1456</spage><epage>1460</epage><pages>1456-1460</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><coden>AJOGAH</coden><abstract>OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to measure umbilical blood flow continuously by use of a transit time ultrasonic flow transducer and to compare the blood flow measurements with the steady-state diffusion method in the chronic fetal sheep preparation. STUDY DESIGN: We compared umbilical blood flow measurements calculated by the steady-state diffusion method with ethanol as the diffusing substance and with the transit time ultrasonic flow transducer placed on the common umbilical artery in five chronically prepared fetal sheep. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference between measurements of umbilical blood flow measured by the flow transducer versus the steady-state diffusion method, 600 ± 22 versus 664 ± 56 ml per minute (mean ± SEM) ( p = 0.23). The mean coefficient of variation within each study was 13.6% for the steady-state diffusion method versus 4.1% for the transit time flow transducer. Umbilical blood flow variance was significantly lower as measured by the flow transducer compared with the diffusion method ( p &lt; 0.0001). There were no differences in umbilical blood flow per kilogram or fetal oxygen uptake between the two methods. CONCLUSION: We conclude that umbilical blood flow can be measured continuously under steady-state conditions by use of a transit time flow transducer. Because of the lower variability in the flow transducer–obtained measurements, we speculate that the flow transducer may differentiate alterations in umbilical blood flow with greater precision in chronic preparations. This may be advantageous for measuring absolute changes in fetal substrate uptake, especially under non-steady-state conditions. (A M J O BSTET G YNECOL 1996;174:1456-60.)</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>9065111</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70588-4</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9378
ispartof American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1996-05, Vol.174 (5), p.1456-1460
issn 0002-9378
1097-6868
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78079044
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Diffusion
Female
Fetal Blood - diagnostic imaging
Fetal Blood - physiology
fetal sheep
Fetus - metabolism
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Homeostasis
Management. Prenatal diagnosis
Medical sciences
Oxygen Consumption
Pregnancy
Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta
Regional Blood Flow
Rheology - methods
Sheep - embryology
steady-state diffusion
Time Factors
transit time ultrasonic flow transducer
Ultrasonography, Prenatal
Umbilical blood flow
title Comparison of steady-state diffusion and transit time ultrasonic measurements of umbilical blood flow in the chronic fetal sheep preparation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T10%3A24%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20steady-state%20diffusion%20and%20transit%20time%20ultrasonic%20measurements%20of%20umbilical%20blood%20flow%20in%20the%20chronic%20fetal%20sheep%20preparation&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Sokol,%20Gregory%20M.&rft.date=1996-05-01&rft.volume=174&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1456&rft.epage=1460&rft.pages=1456-1460&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft.coden=AJOGAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70588-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78079044%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78079044&rft_id=info:pmid/9065111&rft_els_id=S0002937896705884&rfr_iscdi=true