Sampling Error in Small-bore Sheathless Capillary Electrophoresis/Electrospray-ionization Mass Spectrometry
Two previously unreported sources of systematic error in electrokinetic injection caused by induced (hydrodynamic) flow in sheathless capillary electrophoresis/electrospray have been characterized for an interface constructed from 5 μm i.d. capillary column(s) with a 2–5 μm i.d. electrospray tip(s)....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Rapid communications in mass spectrometry 1996, Vol.10 (7), p.825-828 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 828 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 825 |
container_title | Rapid communications in mass spectrometry |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Valaskovic, Gary A. McLafferty, Fred W. |
description | Two previously unreported sources of systematic error in electrokinetic injection caused by induced (hydrodynamic) flow in sheathless capillary electrophoresis/electrospray have been characterized for an interface constructed from 5 μm i.d. capillary column(s) with a 2–5 μm i.d. electrospray tip(s). The tip of a sheathless interface is usually exposed to the atmosphere, resulting in evaporation of buffer solvent and inducing flow inside the column; such flow can cause a significant underestimation of injection size for quantitative electrokinetic sampling by as much as 50%. This bias can be eliminated during the injection process by temporarily immersing the tip in buffer solvent. The second source of hydrodynamic flow results from the electrostatic pull exerted by the electrospray process on the buffer, reducing migration times. Reduction in migration time causes an overestimation of sampling volume if there are no electrospray processes during the sampling event. The magnitude of this effect is a complex function of electrophoretic and electrospray parameters and has been measured to be as high as 15% for 5 μm i.d. capillaries. The possible deterioration of electrophoretic resolution caused by these processes is not yet clarified. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(199605)10:7<825::AID-RCM569>3.0.CO;2-Q |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78066802</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78066802</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4709-c88edcab142ae3301c45f43ebed9b56d222c4c90c61ed043a3ef2583a0848c453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUV1v0zAUtRBolMJPQMoTGg_u_JEvl2nSlHVb0Uo1Mgbi5cp1XGqWNMFONcqvxyFRX0Di6cr33HvO9TkInVEyoYSwk-N8ns3fUiISTBinx1SImES-MU1OUxZNp-fzC_wxW0SxOOMTMsmW7xi-fYJGh5WnaERERHFIRfocvXDuOyGURowcoSNBqGA8GqGHXFZNabbfgpm1tQ3MNsgrWZZ4VVsd5Bst202pnQsy2ZiylHYfzEqtWls3Gz_hjDsZ3q6xco9NvTW_ZOtLsJB-LW_-gJVu7f4leraWpdOvhjpGny5nd9k1vllezbPzG6zChAis0lQXSq5oyKTmnFAVRuuQ65UuxCqKC8aYCpUgKqa6ICGXXK9ZlHJJ0jD1s3yM3vS8ja1_7LRroTJOaX_9Vtc7B0lK4jj1Fo3RfT-o_PnO6jU01lT-j0AJdCkAdClAZyl0lkKfQgcn4FMA8ClAnwJwIJAtgcGtJ349XLBbVbo40A62e_xLjz-aUu__Uv2P6D81h46nxj21ca3-eaCW9gHihCcRfP5wBRfX79nXu3sOC_4bTFG0dQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78066802</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sampling Error in Small-bore Sheathless Capillary Electrophoresis/Electrospray-ionization Mass Spectrometry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Valaskovic, Gary A. ; McLafferty, Fred W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Valaskovic, Gary A. ; McLafferty, Fred W.</creatorcontrib><description>Two previously unreported sources of systematic error in electrokinetic injection caused by induced (hydrodynamic) flow in sheathless capillary electrophoresis/electrospray have been characterized for an interface constructed from 5 μm i.d. capillary column(s) with a 2–5 μm i.d. electrospray tip(s). The tip of a sheathless interface is usually exposed to the atmosphere, resulting in evaporation of buffer solvent and inducing flow inside the column; such flow can cause a significant underestimation of injection size for quantitative electrokinetic sampling by as much as 50%. This bias can be eliminated during the injection process by temporarily immersing the tip in buffer solvent. The second source of hydrodynamic flow results from the electrostatic pull exerted by the electrospray process on the buffer, reducing migration times. Reduction in migration time causes an overestimation of sampling volume if there are no electrospray processes during the sampling event. The magnitude of this effect is a complex function of electrophoretic and electrospray parameters and has been measured to be as high as 15% for 5 μm i.d. capillaries. The possible deterioration of electrophoretic resolution caused by these processes is not yet clarified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-4198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(199605)10:7<825::AID-RCM569>3.0.CO;2-Q</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9019235</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Heyden & Son Limited</publisher><subject>Animals ; Buffers ; Cattle ; Electrophoresis, Capillary - instrumentation ; Electrophoresis, Capillary - standards ; Mass Spectrometry - instrumentation ; Mass Spectrometry - standards ; Ubiquitins - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry, 1996, Vol.10 (7), p.825-828</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291097-0231%28199605%2910%3A7%3C825%3A%3AAID-RCM569%3E3.0.CO%3B2-Q$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291097-0231%28199605%2910%3A7%3C825%3A%3AAID-RCM569%3E3.0.CO%3B2-Q$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,4010,27900,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9019235$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Valaskovic, Gary A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLafferty, Fred W.</creatorcontrib><title>Sampling Error in Small-bore Sheathless Capillary Electrophoresis/Electrospray-ionization Mass Spectrometry</title><title>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry</title><addtitle>Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom</addtitle><description>Two previously unreported sources of systematic error in electrokinetic injection caused by induced (hydrodynamic) flow in sheathless capillary electrophoresis/electrospray have been characterized for an interface constructed from 5 μm i.d. capillary column(s) with a 2–5 μm i.d. electrospray tip(s). The tip of a sheathless interface is usually exposed to the atmosphere, resulting in evaporation of buffer solvent and inducing flow inside the column; such flow can cause a significant underestimation of injection size for quantitative electrokinetic sampling by as much as 50%. This bias can be eliminated during the injection process by temporarily immersing the tip in buffer solvent. The second source of hydrodynamic flow results from the electrostatic pull exerted by the electrospray process on the buffer, reducing migration times. Reduction in migration time causes an overestimation of sampling volume if there are no electrospray processes during the sampling event. The magnitude of this effect is a complex function of electrophoretic and electrospray parameters and has been measured to be as high as 15% for 5 μm i.d. capillaries. The possible deterioration of electrophoretic resolution caused by these processes is not yet clarified.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Buffers</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Electrophoresis, Capillary - instrumentation</subject><subject>Electrophoresis, Capillary - standards</subject><subject>Mass Spectrometry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Mass Spectrometry - standards</subject><subject>Ubiquitins - chemistry</subject><issn>0951-4198</issn><issn>1097-0231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUV1v0zAUtRBolMJPQMoTGg_u_JEvl2nSlHVb0Uo1Mgbi5cp1XGqWNMFONcqvxyFRX0Di6cr33HvO9TkInVEyoYSwk-N8ns3fUiISTBinx1SImES-MU1OUxZNp-fzC_wxW0SxOOMTMsmW7xi-fYJGh5WnaERERHFIRfocvXDuOyGURowcoSNBqGA8GqGHXFZNabbfgpm1tQ3MNsgrWZZ4VVsd5Bst202pnQsy2ZiylHYfzEqtWls3Gz_hjDsZ3q6xco9NvTW_ZOtLsJB-LW_-gJVu7f4leraWpdOvhjpGny5nd9k1vllezbPzG6zChAis0lQXSq5oyKTmnFAVRuuQ65UuxCqKC8aYCpUgKqa6ICGXXK9ZlHJJ0jD1s3yM3vS8ja1_7LRroTJOaX_9Vtc7B0lK4jj1Fo3RfT-o_PnO6jU01lT-j0AJdCkAdClAZyl0lkKfQgcn4FMA8ClAnwJwIJAtgcGtJ349XLBbVbo40A62e_xLjz-aUu__Uv2P6D81h46nxj21ca3-eaCW9gHihCcRfP5wBRfX79nXu3sOC_4bTFG0dQ</recordid><startdate>1996</startdate><enddate>1996</enddate><creator>Valaskovic, Gary A.</creator><creator>McLafferty, Fred W.</creator><general>Heyden & Son Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1996</creationdate><title>Sampling Error in Small-bore Sheathless Capillary Electrophoresis/Electrospray-ionization Mass Spectrometry</title><author>Valaskovic, Gary A. ; McLafferty, Fred W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4709-c88edcab142ae3301c45f43ebed9b56d222c4c90c61ed043a3ef2583a0848c453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Buffers</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Electrophoresis, Capillary - instrumentation</topic><topic>Electrophoresis, Capillary - standards</topic><topic>Mass Spectrometry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Mass Spectrometry - standards</topic><topic>Ubiquitins - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Valaskovic, Gary A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLafferty, Fred W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Valaskovic, Gary A.</au><au>McLafferty, Fred W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sampling Error in Small-bore Sheathless Capillary Electrophoresis/Electrospray-ionization Mass Spectrometry</atitle><jtitle>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry</jtitle><addtitle>Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom</addtitle><date>1996</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>825</spage><epage>828</epage><pages>825-828</pages><issn>0951-4198</issn><eissn>1097-0231</eissn><abstract>Two previously unreported sources of systematic error in electrokinetic injection caused by induced (hydrodynamic) flow in sheathless capillary electrophoresis/electrospray have been characterized for an interface constructed from 5 μm i.d. capillary column(s) with a 2–5 μm i.d. electrospray tip(s). The tip of a sheathless interface is usually exposed to the atmosphere, resulting in evaporation of buffer solvent and inducing flow inside the column; such flow can cause a significant underestimation of injection size for quantitative electrokinetic sampling by as much as 50%. This bias can be eliminated during the injection process by temporarily immersing the tip in buffer solvent. The second source of hydrodynamic flow results from the electrostatic pull exerted by the electrospray process on the buffer, reducing migration times. Reduction in migration time causes an overestimation of sampling volume if there are no electrospray processes during the sampling event. The magnitude of this effect is a complex function of electrophoretic and electrospray parameters and has been measured to be as high as 15% for 5 μm i.d. capillaries. The possible deterioration of electrophoretic resolution caused by these processes is not yet clarified.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Heyden & Son Limited</pub><pmid>9019235</pmid><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(199605)10:7<825::AID-RCM569>3.0.CO;2-Q</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0951-4198 |
ispartof | Rapid communications in mass spectrometry, 1996, Vol.10 (7), p.825-828 |
issn | 0951-4198 1097-0231 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78066802 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Animals Buffers Cattle Electrophoresis, Capillary - instrumentation Electrophoresis, Capillary - standards Mass Spectrometry - instrumentation Mass Spectrometry - standards Ubiquitins - chemistry |
title | Sampling Error in Small-bore Sheathless Capillary Electrophoresis/Electrospray-ionization Mass Spectrometry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T02%3A46%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sampling%20Error%20in%20Small-bore%20Sheathless%20Capillary%20Electrophoresis/Electrospray-ionization%20Mass%20Spectrometry&rft.jtitle=Rapid%20communications%20in%20mass%20spectrometry&rft.au=Valaskovic,%20Gary%20A.&rft.date=1996&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=825&rft.epage=828&rft.pages=825-828&rft.issn=0951-4198&rft.eissn=1097-0231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(199605)10:7%3C825::AID-RCM569%3E3.0.CO;2-Q&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78066802%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78066802&rft_id=info:pmid/9019235&rfr_iscdi=true |