Sampling Error in Small-bore Sheathless Capillary Electrophoresis/Electrospray-ionization Mass Spectrometry

Two previously unreported sources of systematic error in electrokinetic injection caused by induced (hydrodynamic) flow in sheathless capillary electrophoresis/electrospray have been characterized for an interface constructed from 5 μm i.d. capillary column(s) with a 2–5 μm i.d. electrospray tip(s)....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Rapid communications in mass spectrometry 1996, Vol.10 (7), p.825-828
Hauptverfasser: Valaskovic, Gary A., McLafferty, Fred W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 828
container_issue 7
container_start_page 825
container_title Rapid communications in mass spectrometry
container_volume 10
creator Valaskovic, Gary A.
McLafferty, Fred W.
description Two previously unreported sources of systematic error in electrokinetic injection caused by induced (hydrodynamic) flow in sheathless capillary electrophoresis/electrospray have been characterized for an interface constructed from 5 μm i.d. capillary column(s) with a 2–5 μm i.d. electrospray tip(s). The tip of a sheathless interface is usually exposed to the atmosphere, resulting in evaporation of buffer solvent and inducing flow inside the column; such flow can cause a significant underestimation of injection size for quantitative electrokinetic sampling by as much as 50%. This bias can be eliminated during the injection process by temporarily immersing the tip in buffer solvent. The second source of hydrodynamic flow results from the electrostatic pull exerted by the electrospray process on the buffer, reducing migration times. Reduction in migration time causes an overestimation of sampling volume if there are no electrospray processes during the sampling event. The magnitude of this effect is a complex function of electrophoretic and electrospray parameters and has been measured to be as high as 15% for 5 μm i.d. capillaries. The possible deterioration of electrophoretic resolution caused by these processes is not yet clarified.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(199605)10:7<825::AID-RCM569>3.0.CO;2-Q
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78066802</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78066802</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4709-c88edcab142ae3301c45f43ebed9b56d222c4c90c61ed043a3ef2583a0848c453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUV1v0zAUtRBolMJPQMoTGg_u_JEvl2nSlHVb0Uo1Mgbi5cp1XGqWNMFONcqvxyFRX0Di6cr33HvO9TkInVEyoYSwk-N8ns3fUiISTBinx1SImES-MU1OUxZNp-fzC_wxW0SxOOMTMsmW7xi-fYJGh5WnaERERHFIRfocvXDuOyGURowcoSNBqGA8GqGHXFZNabbfgpm1tQ3MNsgrWZZ4VVsd5Bst202pnQsy2ZiylHYfzEqtWls3Gz_hjDsZ3q6xco9NvTW_ZOtLsJB-LW_-gJVu7f4leraWpdOvhjpGny5nd9k1vllezbPzG6zChAis0lQXSq5oyKTmnFAVRuuQ65UuxCqKC8aYCpUgKqa6ICGXXK9ZlHJJ0jD1s3yM3vS8ja1_7LRroTJOaX_9Vtc7B0lK4jj1Fo3RfT-o_PnO6jU01lT-j0AJdCkAdClAZyl0lkKfQgcn4FMA8ClAnwJwIJAtgcGtJ349XLBbVbo40A62e_xLjz-aUu__Uv2P6D81h46nxj21ca3-eaCW9gHihCcRfP5wBRfX79nXu3sOC_4bTFG0dQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78066802</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sampling Error in Small-bore Sheathless Capillary Electrophoresis/Electrospray-ionization Mass Spectrometry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Valaskovic, Gary A. ; McLafferty, Fred W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Valaskovic, Gary A. ; McLafferty, Fred W.</creatorcontrib><description>Two previously unreported sources of systematic error in electrokinetic injection caused by induced (hydrodynamic) flow in sheathless capillary electrophoresis/electrospray have been characterized for an interface constructed from 5 μm i.d. capillary column(s) with a 2–5 μm i.d. electrospray tip(s). The tip of a sheathless interface is usually exposed to the atmosphere, resulting in evaporation of buffer solvent and inducing flow inside the column; such flow can cause a significant underestimation of injection size for quantitative electrokinetic sampling by as much as 50%. This bias can be eliminated during the injection process by temporarily immersing the tip in buffer solvent. The second source of hydrodynamic flow results from the electrostatic pull exerted by the electrospray process on the buffer, reducing migration times. Reduction in migration time causes an overestimation of sampling volume if there are no electrospray processes during the sampling event. The magnitude of this effect is a complex function of electrophoretic and electrospray parameters and has been measured to be as high as 15% for 5 μm i.d. capillaries. The possible deterioration of electrophoretic resolution caused by these processes is not yet clarified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-4198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(199605)10:7&lt;825::AID-RCM569&gt;3.0.CO;2-Q</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9019235</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Heyden &amp; Son Limited</publisher><subject>Animals ; Buffers ; Cattle ; Electrophoresis, Capillary - instrumentation ; Electrophoresis, Capillary - standards ; Mass Spectrometry - instrumentation ; Mass Spectrometry - standards ; Ubiquitins - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry, 1996, Vol.10 (7), p.825-828</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1996 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291097-0231%28199605%2910%3A7%3C825%3A%3AAID-RCM569%3E3.0.CO%3B2-Q$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291097-0231%28199605%2910%3A7%3C825%3A%3AAID-RCM569%3E3.0.CO%3B2-Q$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,4010,27900,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9019235$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Valaskovic, Gary A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLafferty, Fred W.</creatorcontrib><title>Sampling Error in Small-bore Sheathless Capillary Electrophoresis/Electrospray-ionization Mass Spectrometry</title><title>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry</title><addtitle>Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom</addtitle><description>Two previously unreported sources of systematic error in electrokinetic injection caused by induced (hydrodynamic) flow in sheathless capillary electrophoresis/electrospray have been characterized for an interface constructed from 5 μm i.d. capillary column(s) with a 2–5 μm i.d. electrospray tip(s). The tip of a sheathless interface is usually exposed to the atmosphere, resulting in evaporation of buffer solvent and inducing flow inside the column; such flow can cause a significant underestimation of injection size for quantitative electrokinetic sampling by as much as 50%. This bias can be eliminated during the injection process by temporarily immersing the tip in buffer solvent. The second source of hydrodynamic flow results from the electrostatic pull exerted by the electrospray process on the buffer, reducing migration times. Reduction in migration time causes an overestimation of sampling volume if there are no electrospray processes during the sampling event. The magnitude of this effect is a complex function of electrophoretic and electrospray parameters and has been measured to be as high as 15% for 5 μm i.d. capillaries. The possible deterioration of electrophoretic resolution caused by these processes is not yet clarified.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Buffers</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Electrophoresis, Capillary - instrumentation</subject><subject>Electrophoresis, Capillary - standards</subject><subject>Mass Spectrometry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Mass Spectrometry - standards</subject><subject>Ubiquitins - chemistry</subject><issn>0951-4198</issn><issn>1097-0231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUV1v0zAUtRBolMJPQMoTGg_u_JEvl2nSlHVb0Uo1Mgbi5cp1XGqWNMFONcqvxyFRX0Di6cr33HvO9TkInVEyoYSwk-N8ns3fUiISTBinx1SImES-MU1OUxZNp-fzC_wxW0SxOOMTMsmW7xi-fYJGh5WnaERERHFIRfocvXDuOyGURowcoSNBqGA8GqGHXFZNabbfgpm1tQ3MNsgrWZZ4VVsd5Bst202pnQsy2ZiylHYfzEqtWls3Gz_hjDsZ3q6xco9NvTW_ZOtLsJB-LW_-gJVu7f4leraWpdOvhjpGny5nd9k1vllezbPzG6zChAis0lQXSq5oyKTmnFAVRuuQ65UuxCqKC8aYCpUgKqa6ICGXXK9ZlHJJ0jD1s3yM3vS8ja1_7LRroTJOaX_9Vtc7B0lK4jj1Fo3RfT-o_PnO6jU01lT-j0AJdCkAdClAZyl0lkKfQgcn4FMA8ClAnwJwIJAtgcGtJ349XLBbVbo40A62e_xLjz-aUu__Uv2P6D81h46nxj21ca3-eaCW9gHihCcRfP5wBRfX79nXu3sOC_4bTFG0dQ</recordid><startdate>1996</startdate><enddate>1996</enddate><creator>Valaskovic, Gary A.</creator><creator>McLafferty, Fred W.</creator><general>Heyden &amp; Son Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1996</creationdate><title>Sampling Error in Small-bore Sheathless Capillary Electrophoresis/Electrospray-ionization Mass Spectrometry</title><author>Valaskovic, Gary A. ; McLafferty, Fred W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4709-c88edcab142ae3301c45f43ebed9b56d222c4c90c61ed043a3ef2583a0848c453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Buffers</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Electrophoresis, Capillary - instrumentation</topic><topic>Electrophoresis, Capillary - standards</topic><topic>Mass Spectrometry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Mass Spectrometry - standards</topic><topic>Ubiquitins - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Valaskovic, Gary A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLafferty, Fred W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Valaskovic, Gary A.</au><au>McLafferty, Fred W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sampling Error in Small-bore Sheathless Capillary Electrophoresis/Electrospray-ionization Mass Spectrometry</atitle><jtitle>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry</jtitle><addtitle>Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom</addtitle><date>1996</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>825</spage><epage>828</epage><pages>825-828</pages><issn>0951-4198</issn><eissn>1097-0231</eissn><abstract>Two previously unreported sources of systematic error in electrokinetic injection caused by induced (hydrodynamic) flow in sheathless capillary electrophoresis/electrospray have been characterized for an interface constructed from 5 μm i.d. capillary column(s) with a 2–5 μm i.d. electrospray tip(s). The tip of a sheathless interface is usually exposed to the atmosphere, resulting in evaporation of buffer solvent and inducing flow inside the column; such flow can cause a significant underestimation of injection size for quantitative electrokinetic sampling by as much as 50%. This bias can be eliminated during the injection process by temporarily immersing the tip in buffer solvent. The second source of hydrodynamic flow results from the electrostatic pull exerted by the electrospray process on the buffer, reducing migration times. Reduction in migration time causes an overestimation of sampling volume if there are no electrospray processes during the sampling event. The magnitude of this effect is a complex function of electrophoretic and electrospray parameters and has been measured to be as high as 15% for 5 μm i.d. capillaries. The possible deterioration of electrophoretic resolution caused by these processes is not yet clarified.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Heyden &amp; Son Limited</pub><pmid>9019235</pmid><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(199605)10:7&lt;825::AID-RCM569&gt;3.0.CO;2-Q</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0951-4198
ispartof Rapid communications in mass spectrometry, 1996, Vol.10 (7), p.825-828
issn 0951-4198
1097-0231
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78066802
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animals
Buffers
Cattle
Electrophoresis, Capillary - instrumentation
Electrophoresis, Capillary - standards
Mass Spectrometry - instrumentation
Mass Spectrometry - standards
Ubiquitins - chemistry
title Sampling Error in Small-bore Sheathless Capillary Electrophoresis/Electrospray-ionization Mass Spectrometry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T02%3A46%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sampling%20Error%20in%20Small-bore%20Sheathless%20Capillary%20Electrophoresis/Electrospray-ionization%20Mass%20Spectrometry&rft.jtitle=Rapid%20communications%20in%20mass%20spectrometry&rft.au=Valaskovic,%20Gary%20A.&rft.date=1996&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=825&rft.epage=828&rft.pages=825-828&rft.issn=0951-4198&rft.eissn=1097-0231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(199605)10:7%3C825::AID-RCM569%3E3.0.CO;2-Q&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78066802%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78066802&rft_id=info:pmid/9019235&rfr_iscdi=true