Use of Semiquantitative Food Frequency Questionnaires to Estimate the Distribution of Usual Intake

The authors consider whether semiquantitative food frequency questionnaires can be used to survey a population to estimate the distribution of usual intake. They take as an assumption that, if they were possible to obtain, the mean of many food records or recalls would be an accurate representation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of epidemiology 1996-02, Vol.143 (4), p.392-404
Hauptverfasser: Carroll, R. J., Freedman, L. S., Hartman, A. M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 404
container_issue 4
container_start_page 392
container_title American journal of epidemiology
container_volume 143
creator Carroll, R. J.
Freedman, L. S.
Hartman, A. M.
description The authors consider whether semiquantitative food frequency questionnaires can be used to survey a population to estimate the distribution of usual intake. They take as an assumption that, if they were possible to obtain, the mean of many food records or recalls would be an accurate representation of an individual's usual diet. They then assume that nutrient intake as measured by a questionnaire follows a linear regression model when regressed against the usual intake of that nutrient. If the coefficients in this regression relation were known, then the distribution of usual intake could be constructed from the responses to the questionnaire. Since one generally does not know the values of the coefficients, they need to be estimated from a calibration study in which respondents complete the questionnaire together with multiple food records or recalls. This can be done either through an internal subset of the data or through an independent external study. With an internal substudy, the authors find that food frequency questionnaires typically provide little information about the distribution of usual intake in addition to that obtained from the multiple records or recalls in the substudy. When the substudy is external, if it is small then having very large numbers of subjects completing food frequency questionnaires in the survey is no more efficient than having a few subjects completing food records or recalls. However, if the external substudy is large and accurately characterizes the relation between the questionnaire response and usual intake, food frequency questionnaires can provide a cost-efficient way of estimating the distribution of usual intake. These results do not apply to the different problem of correcting relative risks for the effects of measurement error.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008753
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78050734</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78050734</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-f182d882cfb0bdf5ad0554ce5f6c24827a52481361355c5bf23a69284c7835a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkFtrGzEQhUVpSF2nP6EgSunbOrqsLtu3ksR1QqBtEkPpi9BqJSpnvYolbUn-fWS8GPo0DOfMzJkPgE8YLTBq6Hl4diF2mzDGQfdpoTd2oRGSgtE3YIZrwStOGH8LZgghUjWEk3fgfUobhDBuGDoFp5JTygmdgXadLAwO3tut3416yD7r7P9ZuAyhg8tod6MdzAv8NdqUfRgG7aNNMAd4VfqtzhbmvxZe-pSjb8e9Zb9unUbdw-sh60d7Bk5ciWk_THUO1surh4tVdfvj-_XFt9vK1JTmymFJOimJcS1qO8d0hxirjWWOG1JLIjQrBVOOKWOGtY5QzRsiayMkZRrTOfhy2PsUw24fV219Mrbv9WDDmJSQiCFB62L8ejCaGFKK1qmnWF6JLwojtQes_gesCmA1AS7DH6crY7u13XF0Ilr0z5Ouk9G9i3owPh1tpJFClBRzUB1sBZx9Pso6PiouqGBq9fuP4jd3d_fN6qci9BVwwZp3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78050734</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of Semiquantitative Food Frequency Questionnaires to Estimate the Distribution of Usual Intake</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Carroll, R. J. ; Freedman, L. S. ; Hartman, A. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Carroll, R. J. ; Freedman, L. S. ; Hartman, A. M.</creatorcontrib><description>The authors consider whether semiquantitative food frequency questionnaires can be used to survey a population to estimate the distribution of usual intake. They take as an assumption that, if they were possible to obtain, the mean of many food records or recalls would be an accurate representation of an individual's usual diet. They then assume that nutrient intake as measured by a questionnaire follows a linear regression model when regressed against the usual intake of that nutrient. If the coefficients in this regression relation were known, then the distribution of usual intake could be constructed from the responses to the questionnaire. Since one generally does not know the values of the coefficients, they need to be estimated from a calibration study in which respondents complete the questionnaire together with multiple food records or recalls. This can be done either through an internal subset of the data or through an independent external study. With an internal substudy, the authors find that food frequency questionnaires typically provide little information about the distribution of usual intake in addition to that obtained from the multiple records or recalls in the substudy. When the substudy is external, if it is small then having very large numbers of subjects completing food frequency questionnaires in the survey is no more efficient than having a few subjects completing food records or recalls. However, if the external substudy is large and accurately characterizes the relation between the questionnaire response and usual intake, food frequency questionnaires can provide a cost-efficient way of estimating the distribution of usual intake. These results do not apply to the different problem of correcting relative risks for the effects of measurement error.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-6256</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008753</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8633623</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJEPAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cary, NC: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Bias ; Biological and medical sciences ; Calibration ; cohort studies ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Diet Records ; Diet Surveys ; Dietary Fats - administration &amp; dosage ; Energy Intake ; epidemiologic methods ; Female ; Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology ; Humans ; Linear Models ; Medical sciences ; nutrition ; Nutritional survey. Food supply and nutritional requirement ; questionnaires ; Reproducibility of Results ; statistics ; study design ; Surveys and Questionnaires - economics ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards ; Women's Health</subject><ispartof>American journal of epidemiology, 1996-02, Vol.143 (4), p.392-404</ispartof><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-f182d882cfb0bdf5ad0554ce5f6c24827a52481361355c5bf23a69284c7835a13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2987707$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8633623$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carroll, R. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freedman, L. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartman, A. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Use of Semiquantitative Food Frequency Questionnaires to Estimate the Distribution of Usual Intake</title><title>American journal of epidemiology</title><addtitle>Am J Epidemiol</addtitle><description>The authors consider whether semiquantitative food frequency questionnaires can be used to survey a population to estimate the distribution of usual intake. They take as an assumption that, if they were possible to obtain, the mean of many food records or recalls would be an accurate representation of an individual's usual diet. They then assume that nutrient intake as measured by a questionnaire follows a linear regression model when regressed against the usual intake of that nutrient. If the coefficients in this regression relation were known, then the distribution of usual intake could be constructed from the responses to the questionnaire. Since one generally does not know the values of the coefficients, they need to be estimated from a calibration study in which respondents complete the questionnaire together with multiple food records or recalls. This can be done either through an internal subset of the data or through an independent external study. With an internal substudy, the authors find that food frequency questionnaires typically provide little information about the distribution of usual intake in addition to that obtained from the multiple records or recalls in the substudy. When the substudy is external, if it is small then having very large numbers of subjects completing food frequency questionnaires in the survey is no more efficient than having a few subjects completing food records or recalls. However, if the external substudy is large and accurately characterizes the relation between the questionnaire response and usual intake, food frequency questionnaires can provide a cost-efficient way of estimating the distribution of usual intake. These results do not apply to the different problem of correcting relative risks for the effects of measurement error.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>cohort studies</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Diet Records</subject><subject>Diet Surveys</subject><subject>Dietary Fats - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Energy Intake</subject><subject>epidemiologic methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>nutrition</subject><subject>Nutritional survey. Food supply and nutritional requirement</subject><subject>questionnaires</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>statistics</subject><subject>study design</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - economics</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><subject>Women's Health</subject><issn>0002-9262</issn><issn>1476-6256</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkFtrGzEQhUVpSF2nP6EgSunbOrqsLtu3ksR1QqBtEkPpi9BqJSpnvYolbUn-fWS8GPo0DOfMzJkPgE8YLTBq6Hl4diF2mzDGQfdpoTd2oRGSgtE3YIZrwStOGH8LZgghUjWEk3fgfUobhDBuGDoFp5JTygmdgXadLAwO3tut3416yD7r7P9ZuAyhg8tod6MdzAv8NdqUfRgG7aNNMAd4VfqtzhbmvxZe-pSjb8e9Zb9unUbdw-sh60d7Bk5ciWk_THUO1surh4tVdfvj-_XFt9vK1JTmymFJOimJcS1qO8d0hxirjWWOG1JLIjQrBVOOKWOGtY5QzRsiayMkZRrTOfhy2PsUw24fV219Mrbv9WDDmJSQiCFB62L8ejCaGFKK1qmnWF6JLwojtQes_gesCmA1AS7DH6crY7u13XF0Ilr0z5Ouk9G9i3owPh1tpJFClBRzUB1sBZx9Pso6PiouqGBq9fuP4jd3d_fN6qci9BVwwZp3</recordid><startdate>19960215</startdate><enddate>19960215</enddate><creator>Carroll, R. J.</creator><creator>Freedman, L. S.</creator><creator>Hartman, A. M.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960215</creationdate><title>Use of Semiquantitative Food Frequency Questionnaires to Estimate the Distribution of Usual Intake</title><author>Carroll, R. J. ; Freedman, L. S. ; Hartman, A. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-f182d882cfb0bdf5ad0554ce5f6c24827a52481361355c5bf23a69284c7835a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>cohort studies</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Diet Records</topic><topic>Diet Surveys</topic><topic>Dietary Fats - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Energy Intake</topic><topic>epidemiologic methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>nutrition</topic><topic>Nutritional survey. Food supply and nutritional requirement</topic><topic>questionnaires</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>statistics</topic><topic>study design</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - economics</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><topic>Women's Health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carroll, R. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freedman, L. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartman, A. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carroll, R. J.</au><au>Freedman, L. S.</au><au>Hartman, A. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of Semiquantitative Food Frequency Questionnaires to Estimate the Distribution of Usual Intake</atitle><jtitle>American journal of epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Epidemiol</addtitle><date>1996-02-15</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>392</spage><epage>404</epage><pages>392-404</pages><issn>0002-9262</issn><eissn>1476-6256</eissn><coden>AJEPAS</coden><abstract>The authors consider whether semiquantitative food frequency questionnaires can be used to survey a population to estimate the distribution of usual intake. They take as an assumption that, if they were possible to obtain, the mean of many food records or recalls would be an accurate representation of an individual's usual diet. They then assume that nutrient intake as measured by a questionnaire follows a linear regression model when regressed against the usual intake of that nutrient. If the coefficients in this regression relation were known, then the distribution of usual intake could be constructed from the responses to the questionnaire. Since one generally does not know the values of the coefficients, they need to be estimated from a calibration study in which respondents complete the questionnaire together with multiple food records or recalls. This can be done either through an internal subset of the data or through an independent external study. With an internal substudy, the authors find that food frequency questionnaires typically provide little information about the distribution of usual intake in addition to that obtained from the multiple records or recalls in the substudy. When the substudy is external, if it is small then having very large numbers of subjects completing food frequency questionnaires in the survey is no more efficient than having a few subjects completing food records or recalls. However, if the external substudy is large and accurately characterizes the relation between the questionnaire response and usual intake, food frequency questionnaires can provide a cost-efficient way of estimating the distribution of usual intake. These results do not apply to the different problem of correcting relative risks for the effects of measurement error.</abstract><cop>Cary, NC</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>8633623</pmid><doi>10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008753</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9262
ispartof American journal of epidemiology, 1996-02, Vol.143 (4), p.392-404
issn 0002-9262
1476-6256
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78050734
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Bias
Biological and medical sciences
Calibration
cohort studies
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Diet Records
Diet Surveys
Dietary Fats - administration & dosage
Energy Intake
epidemiologic methods
Female
Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology
Humans
Linear Models
Medical sciences
nutrition
Nutritional survey. Food supply and nutritional requirement
questionnaires
Reproducibility of Results
statistics
study design
Surveys and Questionnaires - economics
Surveys and Questionnaires - standards
Women's Health
title Use of Semiquantitative Food Frequency Questionnaires to Estimate the Distribution of Usual Intake
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T06%3A32%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20Semiquantitative%20Food%20Frequency%20Questionnaires%20to%20Estimate%20the%20Distribution%20of%20Usual%20Intake&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20epidemiology&rft.au=Carroll,%20R.%20J.&rft.date=1996-02-15&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=392&rft.epage=404&rft.pages=392-404&rft.issn=0002-9262&rft.eissn=1476-6256&rft.coden=AJEPAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008753&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78050734%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78050734&rft_id=info:pmid/8633623&rfr_iscdi=true