The Practice Environment Project: A Process for Outcome Evaluation

Objective: Evaluating the practice environment is essential to determine if the practice environment is conducive to the delivery of quality patient care. The Practice Environment Project (PEP) was created to provide a framework for current and ongoing evaluation of the practice environment. Backgro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of nursing administration 1996-05, Vol.26 (5), p.43-51
Hauptverfasser: Grindel, Cecelia Gatson, Peterson, Karen, Kinneman, Mary, Turner, Tracy L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 51
container_issue 5
container_start_page 43
container_title The Journal of nursing administration
container_volume 26
creator Grindel, Cecelia Gatson
Peterson, Karen
Kinneman, Mary
Turner, Tracy L.
description Objective: Evaluating the practice environment is essential to determine if the practice environment is conducive to the delivery of quality patient care. The Practice Environment Project (PEP) was created to provide a framework for current and ongoing evaluation of the practice environment. Background: Major changes in the delivery of patient care services have focused attention on the evaluation of the effectiveness of these changes. The extent and type of change may vary throughout an institution. The identification of core variables to assess the effectiveness of these changes sets the framework for ongoing evaluation of new unit-based models for delivery of services. Methods: In part 1, quantitative data were collected from nursing staff members (job satisfaction, collaboration with physicians, autonomy), physicians (quality of nursing care, collaboration with nurses), and patients (satisfaction with nursing care). In part 2, focus groups were held with nursing personnel to discuss factors that affected the provision of services. Unit-based action plans were developed to manage barriers to the delivery of services. Results: Patients and physicians reported a high degree of satisfaction with patient care. Physicians reported a higher level of collaboration with nurses than that reported by nurses. Nurses reported a high degree of autonomy in practice; however, in other areas of job satisfaction (development and recognition), they suggested areas for improvement. Conclusions: The PEP created a mechanism to evaluate the current state-of-the-practice environment by identifying core elements for evaluation of work redesign. It also provided a framework for managing barriers that disrupted the delivery of patient care services.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00005110-199605000-00009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78046111</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26815721</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26815721</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3309-f82913922a6e9960244d4783b4e385125fffe340e68ed7f8da88334a6c66d323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UctOwzAQtBColMcnIOUCt4BfcWxupSoPCQkOvVuus1FTkhhspxV_j0sL4sJevDs7413NIpQRfE2wKm9wioIQnBOlBC5SlW8hdYDGpGAqxyUlh2icIJpjztkxOglhlUpOlRyhkRS0ZIqO0d18CdmrNzY2FrJZv2686zvoYwLdCmy8zSbb1EIIWe189jJE67pEXZt2MLFx_Rk6qk0b4Hz_nqL5_Ww-fcyfXx6eppPn3DKGVV5LqkiaSY2A7dKU84qXki04MFkQWtR1DYxjEBKqspaVkZIxboQVomKUnaKr3bfv3n0MEKLummChbU0Pbgi6lJgLQkgiyh3ReheCh1q_-6Yz_lMTrLfu6R_39K9735BK0ov9jGHRQfUr3NuV-nzX37g2gg9v7bABr5dg2rjU_x0lyS53slWIzv9dhzJcaiokKdLB2BdaiINu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78046111</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Practice Environment Project: A Process for Outcome Evaluation</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Grindel, Cecelia Gatson ; Peterson, Karen ; Kinneman, Mary ; Turner, Tracy L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Grindel, Cecelia Gatson ; Peterson, Karen ; Kinneman, Mary ; Turner, Tracy L.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: Evaluating the practice environment is essential to determine if the practice environment is conducive to the delivery of quality patient care. The Practice Environment Project (PEP) was created to provide a framework for current and ongoing evaluation of the practice environment. Background: Major changes in the delivery of patient care services have focused attention on the evaluation of the effectiveness of these changes. The extent and type of change may vary throughout an institution. The identification of core variables to assess the effectiveness of these changes sets the framework for ongoing evaluation of new unit-based models for delivery of services. Methods: In part 1, quantitative data were collected from nursing staff members (job satisfaction, collaboration with physicians, autonomy), physicians (quality of nursing care, collaboration with nurses), and patients (satisfaction with nursing care). In part 2, focus groups were held with nursing personnel to discuss factors that affected the provision of services. Unit-based action plans were developed to manage barriers to the delivery of services. Results: Patients and physicians reported a high degree of satisfaction with patient care. Physicians reported a higher level of collaboration with nurses than that reported by nurses. Nurses reported a high degree of autonomy in practice; however, in other areas of job satisfaction (development and recognition), they suggested areas for improvement. Conclusions: The PEP created a mechanism to evaluate the current state-of-the-practice environment by identifying core elements for evaluation of work redesign. It also provided a framework for managing barriers that disrupted the delivery of patient care services.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-0443</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-0721</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00005110-199605000-00009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8627392</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott–Raven Publishers</publisher><subject>Focus Groups ; Hospital Bed Capacity, 500 and over ; Humans ; Interprofessional Relations ; Job Satisfaction ; Medical Staff, Hospital - psychology ; Models, Nursing ; Nursing ; Nursing Administration Research - methods ; Nursing Staff, Hospital - psychology ; Organizational Innovation ; Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) ; Patient Satisfaction ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United States ; Workplace</subject><ispartof>The Journal of nursing administration, 1996-05, Vol.26 (5), p.43-51</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 Lippincott–Raven Publishers</rights><rights>Lippincott-Raven Publishers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3309-f82913922a6e9960244d4783b4e385125fffe340e68ed7f8da88334a6c66d323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26815721$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26815721$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8627392$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grindel, Cecelia Gatson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinneman, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Tracy L.</creatorcontrib><title>The Practice Environment Project: A Process for Outcome Evaluation</title><title>The Journal of nursing administration</title><addtitle>J Nurs Adm</addtitle><description>Objective: Evaluating the practice environment is essential to determine if the practice environment is conducive to the delivery of quality patient care. The Practice Environment Project (PEP) was created to provide a framework for current and ongoing evaluation of the practice environment. Background: Major changes in the delivery of patient care services have focused attention on the evaluation of the effectiveness of these changes. The extent and type of change may vary throughout an institution. The identification of core variables to assess the effectiveness of these changes sets the framework for ongoing evaluation of new unit-based models for delivery of services. Methods: In part 1, quantitative data were collected from nursing staff members (job satisfaction, collaboration with physicians, autonomy), physicians (quality of nursing care, collaboration with nurses), and patients (satisfaction with nursing care). In part 2, focus groups were held with nursing personnel to discuss factors that affected the provision of services. Unit-based action plans were developed to manage barriers to the delivery of services. Results: Patients and physicians reported a high degree of satisfaction with patient care. Physicians reported a higher level of collaboration with nurses than that reported by nurses. Nurses reported a high degree of autonomy in practice; however, in other areas of job satisfaction (development and recognition), they suggested areas for improvement. Conclusions: The PEP created a mechanism to evaluate the current state-of-the-practice environment by identifying core elements for evaluation of work redesign. It also provided a framework for managing barriers that disrupted the delivery of patient care services.</description><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Hospital Bed Capacity, 500 and over</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interprofessional Relations</subject><subject>Job Satisfaction</subject><subject>Medical Staff, Hospital - psychology</subject><subject>Models, Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Administration Research - methods</subject><subject>Nursing Staff, Hospital - psychology</subject><subject>Organizational Innovation</subject><subject>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Workplace</subject><issn>0002-0443</issn><issn>1539-0721</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UctOwzAQtBColMcnIOUCt4BfcWxupSoPCQkOvVuus1FTkhhspxV_j0sL4sJevDs7413NIpQRfE2wKm9wioIQnBOlBC5SlW8hdYDGpGAqxyUlh2icIJpjztkxOglhlUpOlRyhkRS0ZIqO0d18CdmrNzY2FrJZv2686zvoYwLdCmy8zSbb1EIIWe189jJE67pEXZt2MLFx_Rk6qk0b4Hz_nqL5_Ww-fcyfXx6eppPn3DKGVV5LqkiaSY2A7dKU84qXki04MFkQWtR1DYxjEBKqspaVkZIxboQVomKUnaKr3bfv3n0MEKLummChbU0Pbgi6lJgLQkgiyh3ReheCh1q_-6Yz_lMTrLfu6R_39K9735BK0ov9jGHRQfUr3NuV-nzX37g2gg9v7bABr5dg2rjU_x0lyS53slWIzv9dhzJcaiokKdLB2BdaiINu</recordid><startdate>19960501</startdate><enddate>19960501</enddate><creator>Grindel, Cecelia Gatson</creator><creator>Peterson, Karen</creator><creator>Kinneman, Mary</creator><creator>Turner, Tracy L.</creator><general>Lippincott–Raven Publishers</general><general>Lippincott-Raven Publishers</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960501</creationdate><title>The Practice Environment Project: A Process for Outcome Evaluation</title><author>Grindel, Cecelia Gatson ; Peterson, Karen ; Kinneman, Mary ; Turner, Tracy L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3309-f82913922a6e9960244d4783b4e385125fffe340e68ed7f8da88334a6c66d323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Hospital Bed Capacity, 500 and over</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interprofessional Relations</topic><topic>Job Satisfaction</topic><topic>Medical Staff, Hospital - psychology</topic><topic>Models, Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Administration Research - methods</topic><topic>Nursing Staff, Hospital - psychology</topic><topic>Organizational Innovation</topic><topic>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Workplace</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grindel, Cecelia Gatson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinneman, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Tracy L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of nursing administration</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grindel, Cecelia Gatson</au><au>Peterson, Karen</au><au>Kinneman, Mary</au><au>Turner, Tracy L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Practice Environment Project: A Process for Outcome Evaluation</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of nursing administration</jtitle><addtitle>J Nurs Adm</addtitle><date>1996-05-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>43</spage><epage>51</epage><pages>43-51</pages><issn>0002-0443</issn><eissn>1539-0721</eissn><abstract>Objective: Evaluating the practice environment is essential to determine if the practice environment is conducive to the delivery of quality patient care. The Practice Environment Project (PEP) was created to provide a framework for current and ongoing evaluation of the practice environment. Background: Major changes in the delivery of patient care services have focused attention on the evaluation of the effectiveness of these changes. The extent and type of change may vary throughout an institution. The identification of core variables to assess the effectiveness of these changes sets the framework for ongoing evaluation of new unit-based models for delivery of services. Methods: In part 1, quantitative data were collected from nursing staff members (job satisfaction, collaboration with physicians, autonomy), physicians (quality of nursing care, collaboration with nurses), and patients (satisfaction with nursing care). In part 2, focus groups were held with nursing personnel to discuss factors that affected the provision of services. Unit-based action plans were developed to manage barriers to the delivery of services. Results: Patients and physicians reported a high degree of satisfaction with patient care. Physicians reported a higher level of collaboration with nurses than that reported by nurses. Nurses reported a high degree of autonomy in practice; however, in other areas of job satisfaction (development and recognition), they suggested areas for improvement. Conclusions: The PEP created a mechanism to evaluate the current state-of-the-practice environment by identifying core elements for evaluation of work redesign. It also provided a framework for managing barriers that disrupted the delivery of patient care services.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott–Raven Publishers</pub><pmid>8627392</pmid><doi>10.1097/00005110-199605000-00009</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-0443
ispartof The Journal of nursing administration, 1996-05, Vol.26 (5), p.43-51
issn 0002-0443
1539-0721
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78046111
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload; MEDLINE
subjects Focus Groups
Hospital Bed Capacity, 500 and over
Humans
Interprofessional Relations
Job Satisfaction
Medical Staff, Hospital - psychology
Models, Nursing
Nursing
Nursing Administration Research - methods
Nursing Staff, Hospital - psychology
Organizational Innovation
Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)
Patient Satisfaction
Surveys and Questionnaires
United States
Workplace
title The Practice Environment Project: A Process for Outcome Evaluation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T20%3A46%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Practice%20Environment%20Project:%20A%20Process%20for%20Outcome%20Evaluation&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20nursing%20administration&rft.au=Grindel,%20Cecelia%20Gatson&rft.date=1996-05-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=43&rft.epage=51&rft.pages=43-51&rft.issn=0002-0443&rft.eissn=1539-0721&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00005110-199605000-00009&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26815721%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78046111&rft_id=info:pmid/8627392&rft_jstor_id=26815721&rfr_iscdi=true