Evaluation of factors potentially associated with inadequate follow‐up of mammographic abnormalities

BACKGROUND To increase the proportion of women who receive the recommended follow‐up for mammographic abnormalities, factors which inhibit follow‐up must be identified. Patient and health care delivery related factors were evaluated, stratified by type of follow‐up recommendation, to determine reaso...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 1996-05, Vol.77 (10), p.2070-2076
Hauptverfasser: McCarthy, Bruce D., Yood, Marianne Ulcickas, Janz, Nancy K., Boohaker, Emily A., Ward, Richard E., Johnson, Christine Cole
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2076
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2070
container_title Cancer
container_volume 77
creator McCarthy, Bruce D.
Yood, Marianne Ulcickas
Janz, Nancy K.
Boohaker, Emily A.
Ward, Richard E.
Johnson, Christine Cole
description BACKGROUND To increase the proportion of women who receive the recommended follow‐up for mammographic abnormalities, factors which inhibit follow‐up must be identified. Patient and health care delivery related factors were evaluated, stratified by type of follow‐up recommendation, to determine reasons for inadequate follow‐up. METHODS All Caucasian and African American women at the Henry Ford Medical Group, in southeastern Michigan, with an abnormal screening mammogram result between January 1, 1992 and July 31, 1992 were identified. All women with inadequate follow‐up, and a random sample of women with adequate follow‐up, were invited to participate in a telephone interview that assessed three major dimensions of the Health Belief Model (susceptibility, benefits, and barriers), general health and health behaviors, and related characteristics. The relationship between these factors and inadequate follow‐up was evaluated separately for women with immediate and 6‐month follow‐up recommendations, using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS A total of 555 women were invited to participate in the study (219 with inadequate follow‐up and 336 with adequate follow‐up). Interviews were completed for 418 women (75.3%). Women who were not notified of their mammographic abnormality were excluded from this study, leaving 399 women available for analysis. Among the women who had the recommended immediate follow‐up, those who reported difficulty in obtaining medical appointments were 4 times more likely to have inadequate follow‐up (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5, 11.3), after adjusting for other variables. Among the women with six‐month follow‐up recommended, those who received fewer mammograms in the past 5 years were more likely to have inadequate follow‐up (odds ratio [OR] = 4.0; 95% CI 1.6, 10.4). In this group, sociodemographic characteristics were not associated with inadequate follow‐up, although women with transportation problems were at a higher risk (crude OR = 5.2; 95% CI 1.6, 16.7; adjusted OR = 3.1; 95% CI 0.5, 18.3). Among women with 6‐month follow‐up recommended, those who perceived their health as poor or fair (crude OR = 2.4; 95% CI 1.2, 5.1; adjusted OR = 2.3; 95% CI 0.8, 6.8) and those who did not examine their own breasts frequently (crude OR = 2.3; 95% CI 1.0, 5.4; adjusted OR = 2.7; 95% CI 0.5, 18.3) were also more likely to have inadequate follow‐up. CONCLUSIONS Results from this study demonstrate that the relative importance of factors
doi_str_mv 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960515)77:10<2070::AID-CNCR16>3.0.CO;2-S
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78026762</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>78026762</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4856-8bf23f52204aab4d34f61835924a6a63375040054f069e6caf68d2e7b8375ec03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUd2K1DAYLaKs4-ojCL0Q2b3o-DVpk3QUYa2rDiwOOAoiQvjaJm6WtOk2rcPc-Qg-o09iy9S50Quvwpfzw-GcIHgVwzIGIM_Otut8fR5DxiOIE3IWZxmDNE7POV_F8IIAh9XqYv06yt_nH2L2ki5hmW-ek2h7J1gcZXeDBQCIKE3o5_vBA-9vxpOTlJ4EJ4IlwDhZBPryO9oBe-Oa0OlQY9m7zoet61XTG7R2H6L3rjTYqyrcmf46NA1W6nbUqFA7a93u14-fQzupa6xr963D9tqUIRaN62q0pjfKPwzuabRePZrf0-DTm8uP-bvoavN2nV9cRWUiUhaJQhOqU0IgQSySiiaaxYKmGUmQIaOUp5AApIkGlilWomaiIooXYkRUCfQ0eHrwbTt3Oyjfy9r4UlmLjXKDl1wAYZyRkfjlQCw7532ntGw7U2O3lzHIaQQppxHk1Kac2pR_RpCcT5xpBCnHEeRhBEklyHwjidyO5o_nFENRq-poPbc-4k9mHH2JVnfYlMYfaRS4EJCNtK8H2s5Ytf8r4H_k-2e8-Yf-BrKysr8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>78026762</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of factors potentially associated with inadequate follow‐up of mammographic abnormalities</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>McCarthy, Bruce D. ; Yood, Marianne Ulcickas ; Janz, Nancy K. ; Boohaker, Emily A. ; Ward, Richard E. ; Johnson, Christine Cole</creator><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Bruce D. ; Yood, Marianne Ulcickas ; Janz, Nancy K. ; Boohaker, Emily A. ; Ward, Richard E. ; Johnson, Christine Cole</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND To increase the proportion of women who receive the recommended follow‐up for mammographic abnormalities, factors which inhibit follow‐up must be identified. Patient and health care delivery related factors were evaluated, stratified by type of follow‐up recommendation, to determine reasons for inadequate follow‐up. METHODS All Caucasian and African American women at the Henry Ford Medical Group, in southeastern Michigan, with an abnormal screening mammogram result between January 1, 1992 and July 31, 1992 were identified. All women with inadequate follow‐up, and a random sample of women with adequate follow‐up, were invited to participate in a telephone interview that assessed three major dimensions of the Health Belief Model (susceptibility, benefits, and barriers), general health and health behaviors, and related characteristics. The relationship between these factors and inadequate follow‐up was evaluated separately for women with immediate and 6‐month follow‐up recommendations, using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS A total of 555 women were invited to participate in the study (219 with inadequate follow‐up and 336 with adequate follow‐up). Interviews were completed for 418 women (75.3%). Women who were not notified of their mammographic abnormality were excluded from this study, leaving 399 women available for analysis. Among the women who had the recommended immediate follow‐up, those who reported difficulty in obtaining medical appointments were 4 times more likely to have inadequate follow‐up (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5, 11.3), after adjusting for other variables. Among the women with six‐month follow‐up recommended, those who received fewer mammograms in the past 5 years were more likely to have inadequate follow‐up (odds ratio [OR] = 4.0; 95% CI 1.6, 10.4). In this group, sociodemographic characteristics were not associated with inadequate follow‐up, although women with transportation problems were at a higher risk (crude OR = 5.2; 95% CI 1.6, 16.7; adjusted OR = 3.1; 95% CI 0.5, 18.3). Among women with 6‐month follow‐up recommended, those who perceived their health as poor or fair (crude OR = 2.4; 95% CI 1.2, 5.1; adjusted OR = 2.3; 95% CI 0.8, 6.8) and those who did not examine their own breasts frequently (crude OR = 2.3; 95% CI 1.0, 5.4; adjusted OR = 2.7; 95% CI 0.5, 18.3) were also more likely to have inadequate follow‐up. CONCLUSIONS Results from this study demonstrate that the relative importance of factors associated with inadequate follow‐up of abnormal mammograms differs according to the type of follow‐up recommended. For both types of recommendations, the factors identified are noteworthy because they are amenable to intervention. Efforts should be made to facilitate appointment scheduling for follow‐up of abnormal mammograms, and information about previous mammography screening should be obtained to identify women who are at a high risk for inadequate follow‐up. Cancer 1996;77:2070‐6.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960515)77:10&lt;2070::AID-CNCR16&gt;3.0.CO;2-S</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8640672</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CANCAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Attitude to Health ; Biological and medical sciences ; breast cancer screening ; Case-Control Studies ; Data Collection ; Delivery of Health Care ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; follow‐up ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Health Behavior ; health care delivery ; Humans ; Mammary gland diseases ; Mammography ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Patient Compliance ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 1996-05, Vol.77 (10), p.2070-2076</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1996 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4856-8bf23f52204aab4d34f61835924a6a63375040054f069e6caf68d2e7b8375ec03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291097-0142%2819960515%2977%3A10%3C2070%3A%3AAID-CNCR16%3E3.0.CO%3B2-S$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291097-0142%2819960515%2977%3A10%3C2070%3A%3AAID-CNCR16%3E3.0.CO%3B2-S$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3078809$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8640672$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Bruce D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yood, Marianne Ulcickas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janz, Nancy K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boohaker, Emily A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Christine Cole</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of factors potentially associated with inadequate follow‐up of mammographic abnormalities</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND To increase the proportion of women who receive the recommended follow‐up for mammographic abnormalities, factors which inhibit follow‐up must be identified. Patient and health care delivery related factors were evaluated, stratified by type of follow‐up recommendation, to determine reasons for inadequate follow‐up. METHODS All Caucasian and African American women at the Henry Ford Medical Group, in southeastern Michigan, with an abnormal screening mammogram result between January 1, 1992 and July 31, 1992 were identified. All women with inadequate follow‐up, and a random sample of women with adequate follow‐up, were invited to participate in a telephone interview that assessed three major dimensions of the Health Belief Model (susceptibility, benefits, and barriers), general health and health behaviors, and related characteristics. The relationship between these factors and inadequate follow‐up was evaluated separately for women with immediate and 6‐month follow‐up recommendations, using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS A total of 555 women were invited to participate in the study (219 with inadequate follow‐up and 336 with adequate follow‐up). Interviews were completed for 418 women (75.3%). Women who were not notified of their mammographic abnormality were excluded from this study, leaving 399 women available for analysis. Among the women who had the recommended immediate follow‐up, those who reported difficulty in obtaining medical appointments were 4 times more likely to have inadequate follow‐up (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5, 11.3), after adjusting for other variables. Among the women with six‐month follow‐up recommended, those who received fewer mammograms in the past 5 years were more likely to have inadequate follow‐up (odds ratio [OR] = 4.0; 95% CI 1.6, 10.4). In this group, sociodemographic characteristics were not associated with inadequate follow‐up, although women with transportation problems were at a higher risk (crude OR = 5.2; 95% CI 1.6, 16.7; adjusted OR = 3.1; 95% CI 0.5, 18.3). Among women with 6‐month follow‐up recommended, those who perceived their health as poor or fair (crude OR = 2.4; 95% CI 1.2, 5.1; adjusted OR = 2.3; 95% CI 0.8, 6.8) and those who did not examine their own breasts frequently (crude OR = 2.3; 95% CI 1.0, 5.4; adjusted OR = 2.7; 95% CI 0.5, 18.3) were also more likely to have inadequate follow‐up. CONCLUSIONS Results from this study demonstrate that the relative importance of factors associated with inadequate follow‐up of abnormal mammograms differs according to the type of follow‐up recommended. For both types of recommendations, the factors identified are noteworthy because they are amenable to intervention. Efforts should be made to facilitate appointment scheduling for follow‐up of abnormal mammograms, and information about previous mammography screening should be obtained to identify women who are at a high risk for inadequate follow‐up. Cancer 1996;77:2070‐6.</description><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>breast cancer screening</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>follow‐up</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>health care delivery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Compliance</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUd2K1DAYLaKs4-ojCL0Q2b3o-DVpk3QUYa2rDiwOOAoiQvjaJm6WtOk2rcPc-Qg-o09iy9S50Quvwpfzw-GcIHgVwzIGIM_Otut8fR5DxiOIE3IWZxmDNE7POV_F8IIAh9XqYv06yt_nH2L2ki5hmW-ek2h7J1gcZXeDBQCIKE3o5_vBA-9vxpOTlJ4EJ4IlwDhZBPryO9oBe-Oa0OlQY9m7zoet61XTG7R2H6L3rjTYqyrcmf46NA1W6nbUqFA7a93u14-fQzupa6xr963D9tqUIRaN62q0pjfKPwzuabRePZrf0-DTm8uP-bvoavN2nV9cRWUiUhaJQhOqU0IgQSySiiaaxYKmGUmQIaOUp5AApIkGlilWomaiIooXYkRUCfQ0eHrwbTt3Oyjfy9r4UlmLjXKDl1wAYZyRkfjlQCw7532ntGw7U2O3lzHIaQQppxHk1Kac2pR_RpCcT5xpBCnHEeRhBEklyHwjidyO5o_nFENRq-poPbc-4k9mHH2JVnfYlMYfaRS4EJCNtK8H2s5Ytf8r4H_k-2e8-Yf-BrKysr8</recordid><startdate>19960515</startdate><enddate>19960515</enddate><creator>McCarthy, Bruce D.</creator><creator>Yood, Marianne Ulcickas</creator><creator>Janz, Nancy K.</creator><creator>Boohaker, Emily A.</creator><creator>Ward, Richard E.</creator><creator>Johnson, Christine Cole</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Liss</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960515</creationdate><title>Evaluation of factors potentially associated with inadequate follow‐up of mammographic abnormalities</title><author>McCarthy, Bruce D. ; Yood, Marianne Ulcickas ; Janz, Nancy K. ; Boohaker, Emily A. ; Ward, Richard E. ; Johnson, Christine Cole</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4856-8bf23f52204aab4d34f61835924a6a63375040054f069e6caf68d2e7b8375ec03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>breast cancer screening</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>follow‐up</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>health care delivery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Compliance</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Bruce D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yood, Marianne Ulcickas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janz, Nancy K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boohaker, Emily A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Christine Cole</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCarthy, Bruce D.</au><au>Yood, Marianne Ulcickas</au><au>Janz, Nancy K.</au><au>Boohaker, Emily A.</au><au>Ward, Richard E.</au><au>Johnson, Christine Cole</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of factors potentially associated with inadequate follow‐up of mammographic abnormalities</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>1996-05-15</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2070</spage><epage>2076</epage><pages>2070-2076</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><coden>CANCAR</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND To increase the proportion of women who receive the recommended follow‐up for mammographic abnormalities, factors which inhibit follow‐up must be identified. Patient and health care delivery related factors were evaluated, stratified by type of follow‐up recommendation, to determine reasons for inadequate follow‐up. METHODS All Caucasian and African American women at the Henry Ford Medical Group, in southeastern Michigan, with an abnormal screening mammogram result between January 1, 1992 and July 31, 1992 were identified. All women with inadequate follow‐up, and a random sample of women with adequate follow‐up, were invited to participate in a telephone interview that assessed three major dimensions of the Health Belief Model (susceptibility, benefits, and barriers), general health and health behaviors, and related characteristics. The relationship between these factors and inadequate follow‐up was evaluated separately for women with immediate and 6‐month follow‐up recommendations, using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS A total of 555 women were invited to participate in the study (219 with inadequate follow‐up and 336 with adequate follow‐up). Interviews were completed for 418 women (75.3%). Women who were not notified of their mammographic abnormality were excluded from this study, leaving 399 women available for analysis. Among the women who had the recommended immediate follow‐up, those who reported difficulty in obtaining medical appointments were 4 times more likely to have inadequate follow‐up (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5, 11.3), after adjusting for other variables. Among the women with six‐month follow‐up recommended, those who received fewer mammograms in the past 5 years were more likely to have inadequate follow‐up (odds ratio [OR] = 4.0; 95% CI 1.6, 10.4). In this group, sociodemographic characteristics were not associated with inadequate follow‐up, although women with transportation problems were at a higher risk (crude OR = 5.2; 95% CI 1.6, 16.7; adjusted OR = 3.1; 95% CI 0.5, 18.3). Among women with 6‐month follow‐up recommended, those who perceived their health as poor or fair (crude OR = 2.4; 95% CI 1.2, 5.1; adjusted OR = 2.3; 95% CI 0.8, 6.8) and those who did not examine their own breasts frequently (crude OR = 2.3; 95% CI 1.0, 5.4; adjusted OR = 2.7; 95% CI 0.5, 18.3) were also more likely to have inadequate follow‐up. CONCLUSIONS Results from this study demonstrate that the relative importance of factors associated with inadequate follow‐up of abnormal mammograms differs according to the type of follow‐up recommended. For both types of recommendations, the factors identified are noteworthy because they are amenable to intervention. Efforts should be made to facilitate appointment scheduling for follow‐up of abnormal mammograms, and information about previous mammography screening should be obtained to identify women who are at a high risk for inadequate follow‐up. Cancer 1996;77:2070‐6.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>8640672</pmid><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960515)77:10&lt;2070::AID-CNCR16&gt;3.0.CO;2-S</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 1996-05, Vol.77 (10), p.2070-2076
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_78026762
source Wiley Free Content; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Attitude to Health
Biological and medical sciences
breast cancer screening
Case-Control Studies
Data Collection
Delivery of Health Care
Female
Follow-Up Studies
follow‐up
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Health Behavior
health care delivery
Humans
Mammary gland diseases
Mammography
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Patient Compliance
Socioeconomic Factors
Tumors
title Evaluation of factors potentially associated with inadequate follow‐up of mammographic abnormalities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T23%3A29%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20factors%20potentially%20associated%20with%20inadequate%20follow%E2%80%90up%20of%20mammographic%20abnormalities&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=McCarthy,%20Bruce%20D.&rft.date=1996-05-15&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2070&rft.epage=2076&rft.pages=2070-2076&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft.coden=CANCAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960515)77:10%3C2070::AID-CNCR16%3E3.0.CO;2-S&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E78026762%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=78026762&rft_id=info:pmid/8640672&rfr_iscdi=true